The minor that Angelmaws defended drawing NSFW (formerly
@bunnisspit, now
@bunnissnot and
ghoulpiss on Toyhou.se) is back on Twitter inserting themselves into the drama with Maws alongside their sibling
Citykings. Citykings is another popular artist that Angelmaws is friends with, and their adopts typically sell for $500+ and are commonly on Toyhou.se user wishlists or "dreamie" lists.
The bunnisspit @ was suspended, and it seems like the kid (they're 16) and Citykings are now name-searching Angelmaws on Twitter to reply to posts:
Ver archivo adjunto 2221225 Ver archivo adjunto 2221226
https://twitter.com/bunnissnot/status/1399396122498641927 /
https://archive.md/QHK0y
Tweets from Citykings, including one where they threaten to "put people on blast." The user with the Kuromi icon in the first tweet is bunni:
Ver archivo adjunto 2221234 Ver archivo adjunto 2221242 Ver archivo adjunto 2221243
tweet 1 /
tweet 2 /
tweet 3 +
archive 1 /
archive 2 /
archive 3
As a reminder, this is bunni's art that they're claiming is totally SFW and saying it's everyone else's fault for "sexualizing":
And here's some art of their sona by others. If it's their sona, isn't the character also technically 16?:
Here are also some more screenshots from the original situation with Angelmaws defending bunni. A lot of these tweets are unavailable now partially since the bunnisspit @ was suspended. Bunni and Angelmaws's followers were accusing the artist who expressed concern over bunni's safety of being a pedophile and misogynist:
Ver archivo adjunto 2221308 Ver archivo adjunto 2221311 Ver archivo adjunto 2221313
Ver archivo adjunto 2221316 Ver archivo adjunto 2221317
Bunni has also accused people expressing concern towards them on
Toyhou.se of being pedophiles, and no one has reprimanded them for this. Their followers and Citykings's followers just join in on attacking everyone:
Ver archivo adjunto 2221332 Ver archivo adjunto 2221330
Bunni also co-owns a Discord server with Citykings, which has 300+ members and allows users as young as 15. Bunni posts their art and adopts there, so they're encouraging kids as young as 15 to see no issue with this:
Ver archivo adjunto 2221344 Ver archivo adjunto 2221351 Ver archivo adjunto 2221354
https://twitter.com/OakeWitch/status/1399107621861343232 /
https://archive.md/DIuZi
Seems like they're set on dying on the hill that everyone who expresses concern over the minor's safety here is just a pedo or creep, and they're somehow unable to see the difference between art like this compared to something like a nude study, which is entirely different and serves a different purpose altogether. God knows why they're so set on wanting to allow and let a 16-year-old lead the free the nipple crusade so vehemently.