Yeah, and if a little boy hears ‘some boys like other boys’ and says he’s going to marry his male friend because girls have cooties and he’s imagining a marriage just hanging out and playing with Nerf guns, no harm done. His parents can embarrass him with this at his wedding or whatever. But in today’s climate a little boy who says he wants to be a girl because he likes pink will be on an awful lifelong path.
Wait what? How is it preferable to have a trooned out child than a gay one? The attitude is much different here in Amreica.
Apparently they insert rods that you can artificially pump up to make them stand up. That is all I have gleaned from the SRS/GRS thread, I'm too squeamish to look at most of the pics. But not everyone gets that surgery, a lot of them *are* just sausages and they have to use some kind of condom or ring to make them stiff.
In chemistry it is yes. In non-scientific nonsense fields like gender studies or queer studies it probably is but thats like saying Harry Potter is real. It definitely isn't any sort of biological term and probably some idiot on the internet made it up anyway.
In modern sociological discourse it is. It was actually coined by Julia Serrano, who ... has probably been mentioned in this thread.
its not lol, its a meme strawman narrative feminists and faggots push in an attempt to blame trannyism on the dang dirty homophobe conservatives instead of acknowledging that it is the offspring of their very own lgbtq ideology
Some religious people view homosexuality as a personal sin that the "sinner" (and more importantly the sinner's family) at least partially responsible for, while seeing being trans as a mental condition or physical defect and thus not the fault of anyone person.
Volkmar Sigusch coined it, acksually
I hear people online say that one all the time. "Christians would rather chop their son's cock off and raise him as a girl than accept a gay son."
There might be a small minority of Christians who do this, but the vast majority of people transing their sons are liberal weirdos.
I think they are conflicting the Iranian policy of forcing gay men and women to transition due to them subsiding the chop but will hang you if you are gay
Considering that a baseball cap is the ultimate signifier of manhood for both cartoons and ftms, it's a reasonable guess. But also if you sit through the video, the song specifically says the beaver family is full of trans people. I like how the only signifiers of breasts are the beaver masectomy scars and the dragtranny singer's bust. I don't quite know what it will imply to a child, but it seems something particularly fucked up in a subtle way.
You'd be surprised. In the tavistock case, allegedly, a lot of those particular families were immigrants (there's a weird Islamic idea about troons being better than gays, see Iran and Pakistan), but even in America it's an idea that pervades conservatives, rightoids, and christcucks. Caitlayanbrucieboy Jenner originally dismissed gay marriage after his transition (but walked it back, with "You can call it marriage if you want. I support gay marriage.") Pat Robertson has had a soft spot for troons for a while now. (Gays are still an abomination though.) And I've interacted with some homophobic HSTSs (to be fair, they have a common disdain for the antics of the gay men, which many gay men want to distance themselves from. Mix a little homegrown homophobia with that, and troonouts seem logical.) That's not even mentioning the smorgasbord of virulently homophobic FtMs listed in this thread. The weird thing about troonery, is how it's really about adherence to gender norms, which most plain gay people's existences are in opposition to. This can work nicely into someone's deep cope that they don't want a gay kid. You'll find a number of somewhat "traditionally" minded families in the insane parents of transgender kids thread, along with all the lefty wokie kooks.
This is perverse. Anything (in their minds) even remotely related to trans issues simply must be about the troon holocaust. It's always a reflection on them. They can't fucking dissociate from legitimate concerns that normal people might have about puberty blockers, or troons in womens sports.
cis being used in sociology, or by trans people or allies, doesn't mean anything about whether anyone should adopt it.
Use non-trans if you want? Nobody's stopping you. Language changes over time.
It's a case of trannies being upset because everyone refers to them as a transwomen (or men) and actual real women as just women. If they both have a preffix in their addled coomer minds it makes them equivalent 'types' of women not realising that the reason they're called transwomen to begin with is because they're not real women.
Of course not. But as an amusing anecdote, I was chatting with my white hippie TERFy friend about trannies and about our close mutual friend who is a pro-trans liberal white woman, and I jokingly pulled the "tranny onslaught is the fault of liberal white woman" line and she kinda sighed and said something like "yeah maybe... they sure aint helping the situation."
Here's an archive for that post.
yeah, obviously i don't have a gun to my head. "language changes" (passive) when a society adopts a term of its own free will.