Opinion Why the Working Class is Turning to Fascism - The Working Class is Choosing Regress Over Progress, Around the World

Why the Working Class is Turning to Fascism​

The Working Class is Choosing Regress Over Progress, Around the World​


umair haque

umair haque
May 16 · 9 min read




1*8X35dYP03XuztpFG5AMdzg.jpeg
Image Credit: Dave Leip
The world has a very big problem, and it goes like this: its working classes are increasingly turning to fascism, as a way out of the trap of modernity. Let me explain what I mean — for those of you that haven’t quite connected the dots yet, though I suspect many of you have.
Take a hard look around. What do you see? Britain. America. India. The Phillippines. From corner to corner of the globe, working classes are in the midst of an historic Great Reversal. They used to be a reliable power base — political, cultural, social — for the left, or at least the center. But increasingly, they vote right. Harder and harder right.
Let’s take the example of Britain and America. In Britain, the Labour Party — it’s centre left political side — relied on a “red wall” of working class voters. That “red wall” has been totally, utterly demolished. Working class Brits these days are far, far more likely to vote conservative than they are for Labour.
But not even just conservative, in any ordinary sense. Ultra conservative. Gone are the days of Thatcher’s methodical, pragmatic cost-cutting — which, disagree with it if you like, wasn’t completely malicious, ideological, corrupt, and fanatical, to the bone — which the working class largely opposed.
Modern-day Britain, though, couldn’t be more different. It’s seen a vicious cycle of conservative leaders, each astonishingly worse than the last. The cycle began with David Cameron’s slicked-back greed, a paean to the 80s, austerity redux. But that was followed by Theresa May’s robotic Brexitism, moored in xenophobia, bigotry, rage, resentment, disinformation, lies, and outright stupidity. And that, in turn, has given way to the breathtaking corruption, sleaze, incompetence, and venality of Boris Johnson’s government. Consider the fact that his health secretary gave a multi-million pound Covid supplies contract to…the guy that ran his pub.
You’d think the working class would be upset — even enraged — by all that. Nothing could be further from the truth. Britain’s seen this vicious cycle of increasingly malicious, incompetent, nation-wrecking leaders precisely because the working class can now be counted on to vote conservative, more and harder.
Britain’s working class now looks like this — and if this takes your breath away, it should. The fisherman who voted for Brexit, has no catch, is going broke, can’t support his family — and still doesn’t grasp that Brexit was a Big Lie, and he was the mark…so he just votes even more conservative. The farmer who voted for Brexit, doesn’t have a Europe to export to anymore — exports are down by 90% in many sectors — is literally losing the farm…and retorts by voting even more conservative. The low-level professional who aspires to become middle class, yet who now has to pay for education, retirement, healthcare, and so on — and keeps on voting ever more conservative.
What on earth happened to Britain? Before I answer that question, let’s also consider the example of America.
Biden’s victory is hailed as a triumph of the working class, but it was no such thing.America’s working class did not for Biden as a bloc, sending a message of unity as a social group. Biden was pushed over the top by minorities from across the social stratum, Asians here, Black people there, Latinos here. The working class in America is badly, badly fractured — and by and large, it votes increasingly conservative.
Again, not just any kind of mainstream, middling conservative. But a kind of breathtaking, reactionary, ugly, grotesque fanatical conservative. You know the type by now. America’s working class votes for people like Marjorie Taylor Greene — who seems to literally stalk and harass her fellow members of Congress. Like Matt Gaetz, who’s a creep of the highest order. All that, of course, is because the white working class has become Donald Trump’s personal plaything, his cult, his own movement of extremism, violence, greed, and ruin.
If you think I’m kidding, consider the following. The poorer Americans are, the more likely they are to vote Republican. The same is more or less true in Britain now. And that trend is now spreading around the world.
That’s an incredibly troubling phenomenon. Again, you only have to think of America and Britain to understand why. How did they become failing — or full-fledged failed — states? Because of the results of the toxic vicious spiral above. Working class voters chose conservatives. But of course conservatives then put in place austerity. They privatised everything in sight and then deregulated what was left.
As a result, in America, the average person’s life simply fell apart. Instead of having public healthcare, education, retirement, and so on, because everything was to be privately provided under conservative mantra, prices rose astronomically. Until finally Americans were paying what they’re now famous for — the cost of a home for healthcare or educating a child, their life savings for medicine, and so forth.
Hence, the average American began to live and die in perpetual debt. When I say that to Americans, they give me their famous blank stare — so what? But what they don’t understand is that there’s no more troubling social indicator that exists, period. Why? Just think of the Weimar Republic. How did it turn into Nazi Germany? Because Germany couldn’t repay its debts, a massive depression set in, the average person’s life fell apart — and they turned to fascism.
Why? The Nazis blamed the woes of the average German on long-hated minorities. Jews, famously, but also Poles, gays. Anyone more powerless than the “real” German of true and pure blood. This was a famous, age-old demagogue’s trick. You see, the woes of the average German were real. Their lives had fallen apart. They were unable to pay the bills and make ends meet. What the Nazis gave them was a scapegoat.
And for giving people in such dire positions a scapegoat — people who were breaking down, mentally, socially, culturally, economically, spiritually — they were rewarded with a fanatical, cult like devotion. It wasn’t their fault — the good Germans of the working class. They could breathe a sigh of relief. And then they could erupt in snarling rage. It was the fault of those hated minorities — the woes of the good German, the working class man and woman — and all they had to do was cleanse society of those hated, powerless others.
Does any of that sound familiar? It should.
It is exactly — and I mean exactly — what’s happening in Britain and America today.Trump came along, and gave the white working class a scapegoat for its woes — Mexicans, Latinos, Jews, Muslims. The white working class responded in an explosion of fanatical adoration, which allowed Trump to build a cult. He’s used that cult of personality and the working class’s undying devotion to him to purge the Republican Party of anyone that stands in the way of still repeating the Big Lie that the election was stolen — which is now being compounded the the next Big Lie, that there was never an attempted coup.
This is the story of Weimar Germany all over again, in eerie, haunting detail. The woes of America’s working class are very, very real. It’s more or less impossible to live a decent life as a working class American now — you’re not just on the edge financially, you’re sunk, and even for sinking, you’re exploited to the bone. They can’t pay off their debts, ever, period — the social indicator that usually marks the transition to a fascist society.
And yet whose fault is this? It’s the working class’s own fault, for voting conservative to begin with. But nobody likes to be wrong — especially not when you have a demagogue casting a spell of black magic before you, and giving you a scapegoat to demonise for your woes.
Now look at Britain. Exactly the same dynamic holds true. What was Brexit really about? It was about finding a scapegoat. By then, 2015 or so, British working class life was in ruins. Britain had experienced something much like America had — its industrial base had been eviscerated, all those stable jobs were gone, towns were basically left to rot, and the people in them more or less abandoned.
Working class life became an exercise in despair and rage and ruin — just as in America, suicide rates skyrocketed.
But who was to blame for this mess? The working class itself was. It had made the crucial different in electing David Cameron, whose conservatism had put in place austerity, which, by the mid 2010s, had finished the job of destroying the working class’s optimism, faith, solidarity, trust in itself, confidence, possibilities.
Enter the next stage of the cycle of collapse. That is why the working class responded with an explosion of fanatical glee when it was given a scapegoat: Europeans. It’s hard to imagine a more ridiculous scapegoat than gentle and friendly Europeans. Working class Brits, though, were taught to genuinely begin to hate Europeans, as malign and corrupt enemies, dirty and impure aliens, job-stealing immigrants. Britain’s working class erupted in xenophobia, bigotry, rage, ugliness.
Just as in America, the magic trick of producing a scapegoat to blame for the problems it had itself created caused conservatism to soar in popularity amongst the working class. And the end result for Britain has been catastrophic — under Johnson’s government, Britain is becoming a failed state like America, a place without a functioning social contract, where the NHS is being sold off and the BBC privatised. This is going to hit the working class hardest — and yet they are as attached to Boris as America’s white working class is to Trump, with exactly the same level — if not more of senseless, mindless, thoughtless rapture.
That is why Britain and America feel like they are societies which cannot be mended now. The working class has made its choice, and its choice is for xenophobia, rage, ugliness, stupidity, hate. Give them someone to hate, and it seems, they will reward you by turning a blind eye to everything else. Their own lives falling apart. Their own exploitation and ruin. Their own dehumanisation and commodification as mere disposable cogs in a machine of profit.
As long as you give today’s working classes someone to hate, you can get away with anything, and I mean anything. Trump let hundreds of thousands of Americans needlessly die of Covid. Does anyone care? In Boris’s Britain, Brexit has destroyed the economy in a way that’s never been seen in a modern country. Nobody cares, much. Certainly not many in the working class.
Take that trick, and repeat it. And you’ve got Putin. Modi. Duterte. The rising fascists of Europe, the Le Pens and so on.
A modern society cannot function when a working class’s only political and social and cultural priority is to have someone to hate. To blame for their woes. Scapegoats, after all, are easy enough to conjure up. There are many strata below the working class, too, even poorer and more powerless — from minorities to the marginalised to refugees and so on — just pick one. But a working class whose only care in the world anymore is slaking its thirst for hate cannot be the linchpin of a functioning society. Because it will not demand a working social contract, economies in which gains are fairly shared, cultures in which lives have inherent worth and dignity, and it’s not just money that matters.
Only a working class can make a society be modern. That is one of the greatest paradoxes of all. What do we think of as the apex of modernity? Europe, Canada. Places with expansive social contracts which care for all. Working classes made that happen.
So when working classes stop making modernity happen, then the result, too, is predictable. Regress sets in. Modernity rewinds. It goes backwards in time. What does it mean to go backwards in time? Well, you begin with the 20th century’s fascism, and end up flashing back centuries at light speed, until you’re right back at feudalism and serfdom — cheering on your exploitation and dehumanisation by those “nobler” — richer, more violent, greedier, more indifferent — than you, because they give you a small position in a social order which, at least, is above someone else. They tell you are good, that your life has meaning, value, purpose — and all of that amounts to hating someone else, usually violently, for the gain of elites, mostly, who are busy taking everything you have while you’re not looking.
If you doubt me, take a hard look at America and Britain today, and tell me they’re not on that journey now.
The question is whether the rest of us join them.
Umair
May 2021

Source: https://eand.co/why-the-working-class-is-turning-to-fascism-e4548784e7de
 
Meh. Not really. Their rocket stuff was good but the rest was just ok. The criticism of overdesigned is correct. Most of their advanced weapons were just huge resource sinks that were too complicated to work on the battlefield. Shit even the V2, as good as it was, was hampered in effectiveness because the British read their encrypted mail with supercomputers which they used to back a massive disinfo campaign.

The main reason there were so many "innovations" by the Germans were because they were desperate and needed a miracle and threw everything out there to try to stem the tide. Everybody else properly field tested and developed tactics and doctrine first. The US and UK still managed to put in service more good shit than them.
You're literally agreeing with me retard.
My post is pointing out how "Nazis hated technology" is retarded. Please fucking read posts before replying to them thanks.
 
You're literally agreeing with me retard.
My post is pointing out how "Nazis hated technology" is retarded. Please fucking read posts before replying to them thanks.
No, I'm not. It's pretty clear that you are a wehraboo who thinks they were some kind of special. They really weren't and played catch-up the whole war mostly by just making shit bigger using old industrial techniques. Like their dumb gigantic railguns that didn't do much of anything.
 
Nazis did not invest in a single aircraft carrier and probably a equivalent of the Marine Corps.

One aircraft carrier alone would have swung it in favor of the Nazis over the skies of London. And stage an invasion of the Cliffs of Dover while at it.
WW2 effectively kicked off for the Germans when they invaded Poland to re-secure the Danzig Corridor, where ethnic Germans were being murdered by the thousands.
Going to war against Britain and the Commonwealth was never the goal, and as such, the German military forces were not geared towards such an objective.
You must also remember that much of Germany's military capability had been built in a very short time and in secret, and much of it secretly in violation of the Treaty of Versailles.
There was very little opportunity to develop things like aircraft carriers or strategic bombers. Germany was making do.
 
That's the biggest lie i've ever heard since unsliced bread. You mean to tell me that hitler cared even the slightest about the various foreign soldiers who served in the SS? You mean to tell me that hitler cared about africans and would even go so far as to work with them? Yea right!
"Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate." - Adolf "i love africans" Hitler, Main Kampf Chapter 11.

Second paragraph
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • 20210521_012136.jpg
    20210521_012136.jpg
    346.9 KB · Vistas: 28
Bull. They thought heavy bombers were useless and thought ginormous battleships were the future.
They actually did make heavy bombers- the 'Condor' which was a limited success. However it had a nasty tendency to break in half behind the wing roots if landed too heavily and was regarded as a waste of resources compared to lighter bombers (which were themselves supremely ineffective).
And as far as battleships go, Germany's naval faith was largely placed in 'Pocket Cruisers' (apart from the Bismarck and Tirpitz) and submarines.
Germans were not much aware of the threat that could be posed by even the most humble aircraft. They ignored the outcome of the Taranto raid in 1940, which involved obsolete Fairey Swordfish biplanes dropping torpedoes that crippled much of the Italian Mediterranean fleet. They only learned their lesson once those same crappy biplanes crippled the Bismarck, leading to its destruction.
Their one attempt to develop an aircraft carrier, the Graf Zeppelin, started in 1938 and never was completed before the resources needed to complete it had to be earmarked for other projects. It was never active and ended up being sunk for target practice after the war.

One of Germany's greatest challenges was the lack of uniformity. Infantry and armored units came with a dazzling array of ammunition requirements. Tanks and aircraft were not standardised and lacked interchangeable parts. This meant that blowing up a single manufacturing or storage facility in a supply chain could lead to critical forward-area shortages in things like vision blocks, axle bearings, track links etc.

German equipment was often ahead of the curve, if only by a few years. What was retarded about the Nazis was a lack of standardization in their supply chains and a focus on tactical, rather than strategic, logistics. Germans were great at winning battles and shit at winning wars.
 
Every time I see these kinds of opinion pieces I am reminded how fascists and figures like Donald Trump are a fetish for the modern day left (loosely speaking status quo liberal Democrats) and those who fall in line as a voting base; since its all too easy to call this brand of right wing populists like Bolsonaro, Erdogan, Modi and leaders in Poland and Hungary fascists because people are already aware of who 20th century fascists are and fighting fascism is the moralizing position the left wants people to rally around.

But this is not fascism it’s something different in our globalized world and something that can work within a democracy. It’s also something that came as a response to the lefts failure to represent working class interests like they used to. I think the fact we are seeing this lean into moralizations from the left is an indicator of a steady wave of defeats. The truth is if refugee policy in Europe were up to a popular referendum people would want borders closed. True democracy would lead to popular decisions to wall off countries to migrants and this isn’t the fault of workers. Leftist parties participated directly in creating the refugee crisis along with the right and conservative parties by destabilizing the Middle East and North Africa so why should a worker want to take the brunt of a problem created by politicians. Especially politicians who won’t talk honestly about the problems that refugees bring and instead moralize that we should open our hearts. It’s a problem that the left is leaving ground for the right to use as ammunition against them when the left could actually propose the mobilization of a coordinated response to have an evacuation registering people and distributing evenly populations of refugees to safe countries so this way Italy and Spain aren’t hit with waves of people packed like sardines in smugglers boats. This shop around free for all wanting to go to your favourite welfare state is bullshit. But the thing is the right wing populist solution will probably be to slam the doors shut and fortify at home to keep out the problems of the world, it seems to be where things are going in today’s climate take what you can today and wall yourself in within an impenetrable fortress when shit hits the fan.
 
They actually did make heavy bombers- the 'Condor' which was a limited success. However it had a nasty tendency to break in half behind the wing roots if landed too heavily and was regarded as a waste of resources compared to lighter bombers (which were themselves supremely ineffective).
And as far as battleships go, Germany's naval faith was largely placed in 'Pocket Cruisers' (apart from the Bismarck and Tirpitz) and submarines.
Germans were not much aware of the threat that could be posed by even the most humble aircraft. They ignored the outcome of the Taranto raid in 1940, which involved obsolete Fairey Swordfish biplanes dropping torpedoes that crippled much of the Italian Mediterranean fleet. They only learned their lesson once those same crappy biplanes crippled the Bismarck, leading to its destruction.
Their one attempt to develop an aircraft carrier, the Graf Zeppelin, started in 1938 and never was completed before the resources needed to complete it had to be earmarked for other projects. It was never active and ended up being sunk for target practice after the war.

One of Germany's greatest challenges was the lack of uniformity. Infantry and armored units came with a dazzling array of ammunition requirements. Tanks and aircraft were not standardised and lacked interchangeable parts. This meant that blowing up a single manufacturing or storage facility in a supply chain could lead to critical forward-area shortages in things like vision blocks, axle bearings, track links etc.

German equipment was often ahead of the curve, if only by a few years. What was retarded about the Nazis was a lack of standardization in their supply chains and a focus on tactical, rather than strategic, logistics. Germans were great at winning battles and shit at winning wars.
Is Albert Speer responsible for part of this mess since he was the minister of arms iirc. I read his one book where he talked about how corruption and nepotism sometimes got in his way of keeping the war machine alive as a basic summary. And needing a special order from Hitler personally everytime he reached an obstacle somewhere.
 
Is Albert Speer responsible for part of this mess since he was the minister of arms iirc. I read his one book where he talked about how corruption and nepotism sometimes got in his way of keeping the war machine alive as a basic summary. And needing a special order from Hitler personally everytime he reached an obstacle somewhere.
I feel that responsibility lies with Hitler, more than anything else. His insistence on expending resources on overengineered 'wunderwaffen' while his artillery was still being dragged around by horses was puzzling. Hitler was in many ways his own worst enemy, insisting on taking charge or maintaining control of stuff that was probably better left to subordinates, and constantly ignoring the consequences of his terrible decisions.
 
They actually did make heavy bombers- the 'Condor' which was a limited success. However it had a nasty tendency to break in half behind the wing roots if landed too heavily and was regarded as a waste of resources compared to lighter bombers (which were themselves supremely ineffective).
And as far as battleships go, Germany's naval faith was largely placed in 'Pocket Cruisers' (apart from the Bismarck and Tirpitz) and submarines.
Germans were not much aware of the threat that could be posed by even the most humble aircraft. They ignored the outcome of the Taranto raid in 1940, which involved obsolete Fairey Swordfish biplanes dropping torpedoes that crippled much of the Italian Mediterranean fleet. They only learned their lesson once those same crappy biplanes crippled the Bismarck, leading to its destruction.
Their one attempt to develop an aircraft carrier, the Graf Zeppelin, started in 1938 and never was completed before the resources needed to complete it had to be earmarked for other projects. It was never active and ended up being sunk for target practice after the war.

One of Germany's greatest challenges was the lack of uniformity. Infantry and armored units came with a dazzling array of ammunition requirements. Tanks and aircraft were not standardised and lacked interchangeable parts. This meant that blowing up a single manufacturing or storage facility in a supply chain could lead to critical forward-area shortages in things like vision blocks, axle bearings, track links etc.

German equipment was often ahead of the curve, if only by a few years. What was retarded about the Nazis was a lack of standardization in their supply chains and a focus on tactical, rather than strategic, logistics. Germans were great at winning battles and shit at winning wars.

I think a lot of this historical debate about what Germany did right or wrong militarily, (respectfully), can obscure the bigger picture which was that they were fighting Russia, Britain, France, India and the USA and their opponents were massively financed and supplied by the USA as well. It's interesting and worthwhile to debate all this so this isn't a criticism. But against odds like this the remarkable thing about Germany is not that they didn't win, but what a fight they managed to put up.
 
I feel that responsibility lies with Hitler, more than anything else. His insistence on expending resources on overengineered 'wunderwaffen' while his artillery was still being dragged around by horses was puzzling. Hitler was in many ways his own worst enemy, insisting on taking charge or maintaining control of stuff that was probably better left to subordinates, and constantly ignoring the consequences of his terrible decisions.

TL:DR - Germany's failure to win WWII was 20% Hitler's command decisions and 80% lack of industrial base to support the good ones or make the bad ones less catastrophic.

When the US, for example, screwed up and did something tactically wasteful, like trying to repeatedly take Hurtgen Forest instead of flanking around it (Cuz' Courtney Hodges, like Hitler, thought flanking/retreating in the face of dug-in resistance was for pussies) the US material advantage meant the Army could eat the losses and try again.

It's an oft stated story, and it might be apocryphal, but the sentiment behind it is nonetheless true.

When the Battle of the Bulge kicked off, and US forward artillery units retreated, they took their guns, but left their ammo. A German Colonel or Major or somesuch, was touring the captured US ammo dump and to his shock, the area being used to supply just 105mm howitzer shells measured more than the acerage of the village he'd grown up in as a kid. And that was JUST for one kind of gun.... and the Americans had just left it all, because to lose 17 acres of shells..... wasn't a problem. They'd have a fresh stock in a week........

Germany did not have the industrial output to win WWII, period.

And whoever it was who said they'd have won the Battle of Britain if they'd had just one carrier? The UK had 8 already commissioned by 1940. That claim, that giving the Kreigsmarine a carrier "tips the balance" is so wrong, it's farcical. They didn't even have a marine corps or a landing doctrine. THe allies had LSTs and Higgins Boats that could run right up to the beach and drop troops/vehicles. The BEST the Germans had, as in acutally put them into the plan for Sealion, was towing barges behind warships..... and not proper seagoing barges, CANAL barges they'd looted from the Dutch..... yeah, that was NEVER going to work.
 
TL:biggrin:R - Germany's failure to win WWII was 20% Hitler's command decisions and 80% lack of industrial base to support the good ones or make the bad ones less catastrophic.

When the US, for example, screwed up and did something tactically wasteful, like trying to repeatedly take Hurtgen Forest instead of flanking around it (Cuz' Courtney Hodges, like Hitler, thought flanking/retreating in the face of dug-in resistance was for pussies) the US material advantage meant the Army could eat the losses and try again.

It's an oft stated story, and it might be apocryphal, but the sentiment behind it is nonetheless true.

When the Battle of the Bulge kicked off, and US forward artillery units retreated, they took their guns, but left their ammo. A German Colonel or Major or somesuch, was touring the captured US ammo dump and to his shock, the area being used to supply just 105mm howitzer shells measured more than the acerage of the village he'd grown up in as a kid. And that was JUST for one kind of gun.... and the Americans had just left it all, because to lose 17 acres of shells..... wasn't a problem. They'd have a fresh stock in a week........

Germany did not have the industrial output to win WWII, period.

And whoever it was who said they'd have won the Battle of Britain if they'd had just one carrier? The UK had 8 already commissioned by 1940. That claim, that giving the Kreigsmarine a carrier "tips the balance" is so wrong, it's farcical. They didn't even have a marine corps or a landing doctrine. THe allies had LSTs and Higgins Boats that could run right up to the beach and drop troops/vehicles. The BEST the Germans had, as in acutally put them into the plan for Sealion, was towing barges behind warships..... and not proper seagoing barges, CANAL barges they'd looted from the Dutch..... yeah, that was NEVER going to work.
To add to this, the US had literal millions of trucks built for our need, roughly 2.4 million trucks bought by the Army from 1940 until the end of the war. If you think 650,000 Jeeps is impressive, we made over 800,000 two-and-a-quarter-ton cargo trucks, most of which were 6x6. I fully believe we had literal acres of 105mm ammo storage.

Probably overran some of the 99th Infantry Division's artillery...
Ver archivo adjunto Battle of the Bulge OrBat.png
Can't imagine why we'd have acres upon acres of shells when the 106th had 3 artillery battalions for every 2 infantry battalions, no sir.
 
Última edición:
Regarding the guns and ammo, even the United States war machine have limits and losing the artillery pieces would've been slightly inconvenient. Nevermind the not so small detail of the Germans using them. Leaving the ammo behind doesn't do the Germans much good if they none or few guns that can use them.
 
Just don't touch kids or spread faggotry and you're fine. Modern NatSoc doesn't care who you stick your dick in, as long as it's not done in public.
Earlier in this thread someone pointed out that fascists attract losers like fly on shit and this is a great example of that.

Look pal I don't care how much you want to "be the girlfriend" but that shit has got to stop and if you think that John Everyman is going to keep putting up with your internet-based autism in public and industrial-strength faggotry in private holy shit you better buckle the fuck up because you're in for one hell of a ride. After the 24/7 troon-tube infecting everything he likes? After drag queen story hour for his kids? No. No, and this is proof that fascism is for faggots. Period. "Oh Daddy government will do this that and the other thing for you, just keep your quota up and everything will be fine!" Yeah why don't you go suck a dick? (not literally, we already talked about that) We had a system that worked just fine for hundreds of years, we don't need some late 19th century political fanfiction that failed literally every time it was implemented. (just like its arch nemesis, communism) No, we will not be giving NatSoc another shot.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo