The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votos: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votos: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votos: 299 30.1%

  • Total de votantes
    992
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Nigger did you never go visit a farm in elementary school.

Seed goes in the ground and grows into corn on the cob and bread powder.

Feed goes into cows to make steak and milk.
But the feed goes into the animals which make manure, which goes back into the ecosystem to sustain plants. Would that not make it feed FOR seed?
 
Can anyone recommend an article/video that sums up the trial in a relatively factual way (preferably one that’s understandable by a non American)? Or is that a completely ridiculous premise in 2021?

It would be more sane to expect the Biden White House to run up the Nazi flag and decorate with Nazi banners and bunting.
 
The longer the jury deliberates the better for chauvin. The fact that they didnt finish yesterday means two things.

1. Theres at least one holdout for not guilty or just manslaughter.
2. The entire jury is not so pantsshittingly terrified and gave a murder convict after a minute.

Likely won’t see a verdict til tomorrow especially if its for innocence.
 
The longer the jury deliberates the better for chauvin. The fact that they didnt finish yesterday means two things.

1. Theres at least one holdout for not guilty or just manslaughter.
2. The entire jury is not so pantsshittingly terrified and gave a murder convict after a minute.

Likely won’t see a verdict til tomorrow especially if its for innocence.
Waiting for this verdict is like staring at a Christmas present. I wanna see what grandma got me.
It's Schrodinger's verdict.
 

unnamed.jpg

“As you know, madness is like gravity...all it takes is a little push.”​

 
Mistrial, guaranteed. No judge worth his salt would think this jury hasn't been influenced by the prosecution's fuckery and the riots. Also why is hung jury not an option?
A hung jury would result in a mistrial, which is one of the poll options.
The defence made a motion today and he denied it.
Nelson is just getting his motion on the record so the appeals judge doesn't ask "why didn't you ask the trial judge for a mistrial in the first place?". He knew it would be denied and the judge knew he would ask, which is why that whole thing seemed very mundane. You don't want to make it seem like the only reason you're appealing is because you lost, and in 99% of cases, you can only appeal what's in the original record.

Edit: In retrospect, I should have been more precise and said "you don't want to make it seem like the only reason you asked for a mistrial is because you lost". Of course the only reason you'd appeal is because you lost; that's self-evident.
 
Última edición:
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo