💰 Grifter StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

Some dude inspect elemented one of his tweets into "please stop putting amogus in my comics", which they all ate up. This is also why every stonetoss tweet has a bunch of stupid antifas saying amogus, because that owns him. Or something.
So it's just yet another evolution in the "left can't meme" meme. Because this is some of the most retarded unfunny shit out of the whole RockHurl "parody" scene ever.
 
So it's just yet another evolution in the "left can't meme" meme. Because this is some of the most retarded unfunny shit out of the whole RockHurl "parody" scene ever.
Yep. Reminds me of when they were trying to make Gritty memes a thing. That lasted for all of a week before they got bored of it.

You'd think they'd have figured out how to make halfway decent memes by now.
 
The issue he's trying to address is that liberals will paint Christianity as homophobic in an attempt to get pro gay Christians to be anti Christian, while painting Christianity as pro gay to get Christian homophobes to be pro gay. The second panel doesn't really show this enough, it paints the character as a Christian apathetic to homophobia instead of actually homophobic. He would have done better to have had the guy in the srcond panel respond with a proud "yes" or "exactly", which would have made the backtracking of the liberal more realistic while being equally hypocritical.
He was probably going for realism in that, fundies aside, most present day Christians are just tired of being bothered about this rather than eager to "own the libs" like it's a YouTube video in 2016. Part of the issue for people with Stonetoss's politics is that most conservatives in America aren't very far right and mostly just want to grill.
 
Some dude inspect elemented one of his tweets into "please stop putting amogus in my comics", which they all ate up. This is also why every stonetoss tweet has a bunch of stupid antifas saying amogus, because that owns him. Or something.

Given that the "call him a nazi" strategy didn't work, you can already bet this'll go away in a month tops.
Its hilarious how the idiots did not only fell for a fake tweet that was trying to own him, when he actually fully supports this since the only lasting result is twitter being flooded with dozens of hundreds of edits of his comics which will lead to more people finding him while trying to find the source of all of this, specially from the massive young impressionable among us audience, they are literally exposing millions of children to his comic and rhetoric in a funny easy to get into way, these dumbasses are doing the exact opposite of what they are aiming for
 
Hilarious new Breadpanes comic.
Tweet

fjxid5wqd3h61.jpg


You gotta love that smooth, natural-looking art and that hard-hitting, subversive comedy.

Bonus panel is locked behind the paywall.

3u23508h32r508h.png
 
Hilarious new Breadpanes comic.
Tweet

Ver archivo adjunto 1916821

You gotta love that smooth, natural-looking art and that hard-hitting, subversive comedy.

Bonus panel is locked behind the paywall.

Ver archivo adjunto 1916825

these comics are interesting (not funny, interesting!) because they actually make their strawmen funny and correct

note that they didn't even include what statement could be wrong? there's too many, and breadpanes is too chickenshit to ever just make a joke that might be wrong someday, gotta promote smug shit

fuckin hell
 
The issue he's trying to address is that liberals will paint Christianity as homophobic in an attempt to get pro gay Christians to be anti Christian, while painting Christianity as pro gay to get Christian homophobes to be pro gay. The second panel doesn't really show this enough, it paints the character as a Christian apathetic to homophobia instead of actually homophobic. He would have done better to have had the guy in the srcond panel respond with a proud "yes" or "exactly", which would have made the backtracking of the liberal more realistic while being equally hypocritical.
There's another angle to this. This is poking fun at how conservatives concede ground immediately in debates with leftists, giving them the leverage and the conservative thus having to work from the left's view of the world. In this case homophobia being bad. Normally a conservative would try to argue with a leftist that Christianity isn't homophobic. By engaging in that direction they've already conceded to the leftist that homophobia is bad, which means that they are now on the run and the leftist can continue chipping at them. It's a losing strategy for an argument.

Another example could be used for a race. There was a crappy meme I remember seeing a few years ago that illustrated this perfectly. If you admitted that the position you're taking is a racist one, a leftist would be shocked at the fact that you aren't arguing with them over it not being racist. The fact that they haven't shamed you into accepting racism is evil rots their mind.

Once you refuse to concede racism being bad, suddenly the leftist's argument goes from "Why isn't X racist?" to "Why aren't you arguing with me over why you think it's not racist?"
11954809_1035250703174652_943525447413202860_n.png

Both Stonetoss's comic and the meme above are illustrating an important point for right-wingers: when you don't let the left shame you into accepting the foundation for the left's argument and their worldview as a whole, the left suddenly has no idea what to do. You shouldn't play by the rules that the left has set for the argument is a much simpler way to put it.
 
Última edición:
Yeah but its more accurate and has a deeper meaning. The left isn't just looking for a fight, the left is looking to destroy ideologies that oppose it, using any slimy argument it can.

Apparently antifa's newest anti-stonetoss campaign is to just edit "amogus" into his comics for whatever reason. I have no idea how they think this will hurt him. Its amusing none the less.
Ver archivo adjunto 1915011
It's funnier than most leftist Stonetoss edits.
 
There's another angle to this. This is poking fun at how conservatives concede ground immediately in debates with leftists, giving them the leverage and the conservative thus having to work from the left's view of the world. In this case homophobia being bad. Normally a conservative would try to argue with a leftist that Christianity isn't homophobic. By engaging in that direction they've already conceded to the leftist that homophobia is bad, which means that they are now on the run and the leftist can continue chipping at them. It's a losing strategy for an argument.

Another example could be used for a race. There was a crappy meme I remember seeing a few years ago that illustrated this perfectly. If you admitted that the position you're taking is a racist one, a leftist would be shocked at the fact that you aren't arguing with them over it not being racist. The fact that they haven't shamed you into accepting racism is evil rots their mind.

Once you refuse to concede racism being bad, suddenly the leftist's argument goes from "Why isn't X racist?" to "Why aren't you arguing with me over why you think it's not racist?"
Ver archivo adjunto 1916889
Both Stonetoss's comic and the meme above are illustrating an important point for right-wingers: when you don't let the left shame you into accepting the foundation for the left's argument and their worldview as a whole, the left suddenly has no idea what to do. You shouldn't play by the rules that the left has set for the argument is a much simpler way to put it.
That doesn't work. The left will say, "Racism is hate. Racism leads to the holocaust. Do you think X is racist?"
You cannot ignore racism, you must reframe it.
"Racism is nationalism. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. One man's racist is another man's nationalist. The reason you're calling me racist is to guilt trip me into supporting open borders and allowing non-whites to disproportionate hurt me. "
Then when they repeat, "you're a racist."
You say, "Again my preferred noun is nationalist. Please check your privilege and respect my self identification."
Keep repeating until they STFU and then get them to admit they're trying destroy all white people and white spaces.
You cannot ignore racism, you must reframe it and debonk it.
 
That doesn't work. The left will say, "Racism is hate. Racism leads to the holocaust. Do you think X is racist?"
You cannot ignore racism, you must reframe it.
"Racism is nationalism. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. One man's racist is another man's nationalist. The reason you're calling me racist is to guilt trip me into supporting open borders and allowing non-whites to disproportionate hurt me. "
Then when they repeat, "you're a racist."
You say, "Again my preferred noun is nationalist. Please check your privilege and respect my self identification."
Keep repeating until they STFU and then get them to admit they're trying destroy all white people and white spaces.
You cannot ignore racism, you must reframe it and debonk it.
Or better yet, let them say shit at you and take it on the chin. Like how everyone responds to your stickers. Wait... nevermind.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo