2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Bartleby]

It's a defense that has a court on its side.

I haven't been listening to it, but if some of the posts here are to be believed, the defense is getting assblasted and shouting, which is weird if he doesn't have anything to worry about. Then again, he could be an idiot who honestly thinks the lower courts won't just dismiss it and that the odds are against him.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

I've been away for a bit. What's the quick rundown on what the defense was? If all they could muster was a 'retarded defense' as some here have put it, that's good news to me.

It doesn't matter. The defense could take a shit in the courtroom and throw it at the judge and the court will rule for them because the court is full of Democrat appointees. It's when it gets appealed in the SCOTUS that we'll see some serious shit.

I haven't been listening to it, but if some of the posts here are to be believed, the defense is getting assblasted and shouting, which is weird if he doesn't have anything to worry about. Then again, he could be an idiot who honestly thinks the lower courts won't just dismiss it and that the odds are against him.

If the facts are on your side, pound the facts into the table. If the law is on your side, pound the law into the table. If neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table.

 

[Reisen Storm]

What's the quick rundown on what the defense was?

Fraud is legal and in no way harmful.

 

[Gehenna]

Twitter is smugging out about the "massive Trump Loss" on this call.

But we already knew the PA Supremes were going to find the PA Supremes did nothing wrong. This is just a speed bump on the way to the SCOTUS.

And the defense's argument is literally "Fraud doesn't harm any one ergo you can't sue about it." Which as others have mentioned won't fly in front of the SCOTUS.

If they are stupid enough to bring this argument in front of SCOTUS then... well, I'd actually predict both Roberts AND Breyer peeling away from the liberal justices. Its THAT awful. Its almost TAILORED to make Breyer balk -hard-.

 

[737 MAX Stan Account]

Fraud is legal and in no way harmful.

In other words, not even Roberts can defend it. 5 cases to go.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

I've been away for a bit. What's the quick rundown on what the defense was? If all they could muster was a 'retarded defense' as some here have put it, that's good news to me.

"Fraud doesn't hurt anyone ergo since Trump wasn't harmed by it he doesn't have standing to sue about it."

And, IIRC, there was some stupidity about it being perfectly OK to force Poll Watchers to stand 30 feet away and even force them out of the building and do stuff without them being around, because fuckit why not?

 

[WeDon'tNeedToWhisper]

Goddamn the audio is so bad. This lawyer for the defense, I don't know how to spell his name, is in court virtually and he's borderline yelling. I can only make out half of what he's saying. And he's stuttering, ugh, calm down dude.

Haven't heard anything remarkable in 44 minutes, I'm out.

 

[DtoDab]

Ver archivo adjunto 1734516

fucking hell it keeps happening.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Fraud is legal and in no way harmful.

And even then, there was no fraud.

 

[draggs]

Theme of this guy never shutting up

When it's over, is it really over... and when you go, go, go, go... I know, it never ends... it never ends

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

If they are stupid enough to bring this argument in front of SCOTUS then... well, i'd actually predict both Roberts AND Breyer peeling away from the liberal justices. Its THAT awful. Its almost TAILORED to make Breyer balk -hard-.

7-2 would be mind-blowing.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Now Trump is tweeting how how Canada's election system is superior as they don't use Dominion and its full paper ballots that are hand counted.

How will leftists and the leafs defend this shit lol. Canada not having rigged elections means Canada must be destroyed if Trudeau is the true leader.

 

[CrippleThreat]

fucking hell it keeps happening.

It's so goddamn sloppy and rushed.

 

[draggs]

The judge finally broke in: "Some difficulty hearing you..."

 

[Gehenna]

If it turns out the blacks are kept in the DNC plantations because the DNC literally votes for them while they spend their days in debauchery and poverty I will start laughing and never stop. That's some serious Scifi Dystopia shit and we never even got our flying cars.

No, they do turn out for them in droves and the poll workers are mostly them.

Speaking as one from pozzed NY.


They could have just let him have it and then pull a "Sic semper tyrannis."

Here's the thing. Lets say that the bump up in Black Republican votes from cracking down on voter fraud is a conservative... 10-20%. So expected support is 30-40% for Republicans rather than 10-20%.

Holy SHIT the chaos that would cause. That means Blacks would be a -viable-ethnic group to go after. How long do you think the democrats could keep a hold on somewhere like Atlanta, surrounded in red as it is, if that were the case?


Now, I am nowhere near optimistic... or cynical? Enough to think the margins would be THAT wide. But its fun to consider.

 

[draggs]

Judge just told this sperg in effect "lol calm down"

 

[iRON-mAn]

"I'm not moving, you're moving"

Holy shit, this lawyer.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

The judge just told the marble-mouthed defense attorney to stop moving because they can't hear him.

"Do I need to go back over it"

"No! No! No!"

LOL

The judge doesn't need to hear his case to rule in his favor

 

[Ozzigy Osbourne]

They're explaining to him to stop moving around so much to stop having such terrible audio. Could he be doing the DSP rock?

 

[HTTP Error 404]

7-2 would be mind-blowing.

Remember, Trump has to win several states. I could see the SCOTUS giving him one win outright (read: 7-2 or even 9-... yeah no the two Obama idiots will NEVER do that) to "save face" assuming they can be more strict on later ones.