2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Maamtis]

They couldn't cheat Kamala through the primaries and to their base at least they still had to pretend to be honest. She wasn't even a favorite back then, she only got in because Biden promised "A WOMAN OF COLOR AS MY VP" and the job landed on her lap.

I imagine it wasn't the first thing that landed on her lap.

Hiyo!

 

[ThatOneLurker]

Just occurred to me why didn't they just run with Kamala if they were gonna cheat? Hell they could have a cabbage all things considered. I mean they pretty much did.

No amount of cheating would have convincingly got her the election. My father is a raging lunatic who hates Donald Trump, dating a crazy Hispanic woman who believes Trump is stuffing dreamers in cages.

They both voted Trump partly because of the fact Harris was picked as Biden's VP.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

No amount of cheating would have convincingly got her the election. My father is a raging lunatic who hates Donald Trump, dating a crazy Hispanic woman who believes Trump is stuffing dreamers in cages.

They both voted Trump partly because of the fact Harris was picked as Biden's VP.

She also lost the primary badly. Biden, for all his flaws, won it comfortably.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1324742258088906752

The amount of salt if Trump pulls this out of the fire... please God, I don't ask for much...

 

[Puff]

They have 1/1/1800 and 1/1/1900? What?

I already talked on this thread about how 1/1/1900 is the "default" birth date on many databases (read, what the program outputs if there's no date or it encounters an error). Obviously this is for databases counting 20th century onward, 1/1/1900 is the earliest date they tollerate. 1/1/1800 obviously is the "default" for databases starting on the 19th century... But. A database can't have 2 defaults. I mean, of course it can't. So... How the fuck did this happen?!

1-We are having 2 different databases giving error here. For some fucking reason. I checked and some counties have both results so this isn't one of those cases where certain counties use a different program, so it must be due to mail in using another program or something like that... Either way I can't help but conclude this is a flagrant case of spaguetti code going down!

2-one or both of the results aren't an error at all and they are manually imputting 1/1/1900 and/or 1/1/1800 while cheating... Which. What?! Why?! How fucking stupid are these people?!

AND, some are entirely blank.

 

[Shield Breaker]

Are recounts even going to do anything? Won't they just recount the fraudulant votes?

Recounts are done differently.

 

[Coccxys]

This is so obvious even normie boomers are starting to wake up to it. If the establishment republicans aren't rolling over on this you know it's bad.

 

[SheerHeartAttack]

This is so obvious even normie boomers are starting to wake up to it. If the establishment republicans aren't rolling over on this you know it's bad.

They better support Trump, otherwise we're just going to get cucked forever by rigged elections.

 

[EmuWarsVeteran]

AND, some are entirely blank.

I did not see those because they are put at the top of the list. Now that I have, I have run out of explanations. They faked it so bad that I can't even explain how they fucked it so bad. I am gonna go take a break now because my head is on fire.

She also lost the primary badly. Biden, for all his flaws, won it comfortably.

He only did so after a ton of the candidates gave him their votes, so while technically true, it's not really aplicable. All dem candidates sucked dick votes wise.

 

[Tour of Italy]

Ver archivo adjunto 1711967
Smug cunt doing a softcore porn webcomic being a smug cunt.

Ver archivo adjunto 1711968

https://twitter.com/NationalistTV/status/1324740544900247552

5.5 MILLION votes went to Biden that didn't go to House Reps.

I’ve been looking at historical differences between full ballots and highest office votes that abstain from house voting, and this is actually pretty normal fluctuation.

It’s good to keep digging for inconsistencies, but I don’t know if there’s much to conclude here.

Ironically though, there’s something fucky about the GA election this year, but not in the way you’d expect.

GA historically has a highest office only deficit of 4 to 8 percentage points, going back to 2000, which is on the very high side. VA gets 1.5% to 1.0%, Delaware is 2% to 3%.

Georgia has about 6% more votes for president only than president plus downballot in 2016. This year they had a historic adjustment to less than 2%.

They’re trying to steal the GA senate seat too.

Either that, or I have to start agreeing with @It's HK-47 that they have been stealing elections for longer than anyone has realized.

 

[Grandpa Simpson]

I have yet to see the Trump campaign say anything about the abnormal spikes in turnout, the statistical improbabilities, the difference between the Congressional races and the top of the ticket, the failure to segregate ballots in PA, or any claims about specific batches of absentee ballots in MI or PA. Talking about "irregularities" and inability to observe is accurate but insufficient.

The Campaign team, made up of the analysts, researchers and campaign strategists, probably saw the numbers coming out on election night, then saw some polling places stopped counting, told him "This looks like shenanigans" and thats when Trump first came out and said, "We probably won, but they are screwing us". That's when probably made the call to the lawyers at that point to start drawing up the charges.

 

[jje100010001]

but a Nuclear tactic- declassifying things like Russiagate, Biden's China dealings, etc.? He has a month to convince the public that something is afoot with Biden and his victory.

 

[Meat Target]

I have yet to see the Trump campaign say anything about the abnormal spikes in turnout, the statistical improbabilities, the difference between the Congressional races and the top of the ticket, the failure to segregate ballots in PA, or any claims about specific batches of absentee ballots in MI or PA. Talking about "irregularities" and inability to observe is accurate but insufficient.

They need to be challenging the entire process in PA and MI, not just individual quirks. Trump needs to be setting the narrative stage for invalidating results wholesale out of Philadelphia, not just nitpicking some outrages already circulating on Twitter. Go from specific to general, not the other way around.

They need to get the case together and not tip their hand, lest the Lugenpresse poison the well ahead of time.

 

[Tour of Italy]

They have 1/1/1800 and 1/1/1900? What?

I already talked on this thread about how 1/1/1900 is the "default" birth date on many databases (read, what the program outputs if there's no date or it encounters an error). Obviously this is for databases counting 20th century onward, 1/1/1900 is the earliest date they tollerate. 1/1/1800 obviously is the "default" for databases starting on the 19th century... But. A database can't have 2 defaults. I mean, of course it can't. So... How the fuck did this happen?!

1-We are having 2 different databases giving error here. For some fucking reason. I checked and some counties have both results so this isn't one of those cases where certain counties use a different program, so it must be due to mail in using another program or something like that... Either way I can't help but conclude this is a flagrant case of spaguetti code going down!

2-one or both of the results aren't an error at all and they are manually imputting 1/1/1900 and/or 1/1/1800 while cheating... Which. What?! Why?! How fucking stupid are these people?!

And it doesn’t stop with just 1800/1900.

I saw legit records for 1850-somethings who voted, and was almost 1000 entrants in before I got to 1920.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Baris is talking about Arizona and Nevada.

 

[jje100010001]

They need to get the case together and not tip their hand, lest the Lugenpresse poison the well ahead of time.

Yup, you could already see it with the 'explanations' for the Biden charts, or the poll workers filling in votes.

"Oh they fixed it later on!" (No, they spread out the votes over a few hours instead)
"Oh it was just poll worker fixing invalid votes!" (They're not allowed to do that)

 

[Shield Breaker]

Hundreds, maybe thousands of dead voters on PA.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Effi...n-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm/data

Sort by birthday and see just how many 100+ year olds happened to send in their ballots. There are only 60k max people in the US over 100, maybe 1.5k in PA. Way more than that are voting.

Some of the birthdays look like they could be placeholders, but why are registrants without verifiable birthdays still in the system, and why the fuck are they voting?

Download the bulk data using “export”, just in case the site goes down.

The meme was true.

 

[iRON-mAn]

This site is just not mainstream enough for him to know or care. It's not even in the top 10,000 sites in America. It's irrelevant.

He might come after 4chan. That's it.

Whatever Biden does is likely to be so broad and undefined that even if it only aims for 4chan, it'll hit us too.

 

[Someone Awful]

I've heard Baris is going to lay out a plan going forward for what he sees as inevitable, the total breakdown of civility due to at least half of the population not trusting the electoral process and the MSM pushing the lie that Trump was illegitimate.

He also wants to show why exactly the polling made the worst errors they did since 1948.

 

[FAQnews Correspondent]

Recounts are done differently.

What do they do? Do they do more things to verify the vote and do they have different people doing it?