Rugged Individualism, Libertarianism, and Social Darwinism

[Eris!]

Abandon cringe libertarianism. Embrace based anarcho-fascism. The wild west was the ideal human society. Every man held judgement in his hands, and what 'lawmen' there were were no different from anybody else. They got hanged too.

 

[Kulee Baba]

Abandon cringe libertarianism. Embrace based anarcho-fascism. The wild west was the ideal human society. Every man held judgement in his hands, and what 'lawmen' there were were no different from anybody else. They got hanged too.

Based and Judge Holden-pilled.

Anyway I see no use anymore for Libertarianism, and clearly neither does The Libertarian Party itself since it's allowed itself to become a mockery of its former kooky self. Being a Libertarian from the 1990s to 2012 simply meant that you were a Republican in essentially all the important political issues and didn't care whatsoever about the stupid social issues that Democrats rally their base around. Since the left won the culture war why do I need to willfully take my small voice away from the Republicans? Why wouldn't I just want to vote in more people like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul?

I'd be happy if there were a Libertarian Party that stressed the importance of Fiscal Conservatism and backed away from heavy wasteful military spending. Alas the modern Libertarians lack any firebrand who could get people interested in the party.

 

[Distant Stare]

Based and Judge Holden-pilled.

Anyway I see no use anymore for Libertarianism, and clearly neither does The Libertarian Party itself since it's allowed itself to become a mockery of its former kooky self. Being a Libertarian from the 1990s to 2012 simply meant that you were a Republican in essentially all the important political issues and didn't care whatsoever about the stupid social issues that Democrats rally their base around. Since the left won the culture war why do I need to willfully take my small voice away from the Republicans? Why wouldn't I just want to vote in more people like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul?

I'd be happy if there were a Libertarian Party that stressed the importance of Fiscal Conservatism and backed away from heavy wasteful military spending. Alas the modern Libertarians lack any firebrand who could get people interested in the party.

The Libertarian Party is obviously fiscally conservative but social liberal by deffinition. It is also obvious that the GOP has been drifting ever more socially liberal over its existence. They no longer challenge the gay agenda anymore, and are ever more interested in diversity. Thus, it is safe to say that the GOP is slowly evolving into the Libertarian platform, but with high military spending.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

I disagree with age of consent laws. Can you really put an arbitrary number on love?

 

[Francis York Morgan]

The reason why no one is afraid of the Libertarian party is because they are a party of losers. They will never win because their entire outlook is defensive and passive. They are degenerates who larp as revolutionaries.

And everyone they run at the higher levels is a colossal retard.

 

[Jason Wynn]

ITT: libertarians telling other libertarians they're not true libertarians.

Sounds about right, and that's coming from a libertarian.

 

[Kylie Raina]

I disagree with age of consent laws. Can you really put an arbitrary number on love?

I really hope this is sarcasm, children arent mature enough to consent to sex because they dont know how it will affect them later in life. They could end up with an STD or even worse, an unwanted pregnancy. Theres nothing that says you cant date or love someone before that age but the idea of those laws is that its tryna protect children from making a decision that could possibly ruin their lives

 

[A Cardboard Box]

I really hope this is sarcasm, children arent mature enough to consent to sex because they dont know how it will affect them later in life. They could end up with an STD or even worse, an unwanted pregnancy. Theres nothing that says you cant date or love someone before that age but the idea of those laws is that its tryna protect children from making a decision that could possibly ruin their lives

Why can I have sex with someone 6570 days old but not 6569?

 

[Vecr]

Why can I have sex with someone 6570 days old but not 6569?

Because you have to put a number somewhere, otherwise the legal situation would get very confusing, with long, drawn out court cases and complex balancing tests. It's almost certainly not worth it.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Because you have to put a number somewhere, otherwise the legal situation would get very confusing, with long, drawn out court cases and complex balancing tests. It's almost certainly not worth it.

I agree. Abolish the age of consent. There's no science to it anyway.

 

[Samson Pumpkin Jr.]

"Instead of the state controlling law enforcement, the courts and the national defence, the different law systems should be provided by voluntarily-founded private competitors. Money should be privately and competitively provided in an open market and personal and economic activities should be regulated by the natural laws of the market and through private law rather than through politics."

Libertarians disgruntled with their lack of economic freedom, and the pace of parliamentary reform, are forming new factions in global politics. The Libertarians are the revolutionary avantgarde of the liberal ideology, and they will not hesitate to use whatever means necessary to see their ideas of freedom and free trade instituted both in America and abroad.

Okay.

 

[Terrorist]

You missed the boat by about a decade bud, all the halfwit college freshmen are based trad groypers or rose emojis now. Your moment is over.

Hoppe is the only libertarian worth reading (a society with his preconditions that is strictly hierarchical, homogenous, and socially reactionary is the only one where libertarianism would work - of course the question then becomes who will make such a society and how it'll be kept that way with minimal government).

 

[Gapernaper Rifle]

Why can I have sex with someone 6570 days old but not 6569?

Why can you vote, get married, or buy a gun when you are 6570 days old, but not 6569? Because that's the age we have decided is appropriate to do these activities. So fuck off pedo.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

There's nothing libertarians hate more than other libertarians.

Ancap gang rise up

 

[Saint Alphonsus]

Maybe if you spent more time increasing in virtue and less time shit posting while high, you libertarians would actually amount to something.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Why can you vote, get married, or buy a gun when you are 6570 days old, but not 6569? Because that's the age we have decided is appropriate to do these activities. So fuck off pedo.

Not an argument.

 

[Zelmek]

Part of favoring small government is that there is an increased level of responsibility on the individual citizen to take care of themselves. You can have personal responsibility and freedom or you can have a promise of safety under a helicopter nanny-state. For liberalism to function, one must have a limit to how much responsibility the government has to take care of the people. A common line is if they're not going to put in personal effort, then government aid should be cut off from them. If they suffer for their laziness, it's not the government's responsibility. The government should only serve to enforce law and order, enforce contracts between its citizens, and protect its citizens from the tyrany of other countries wishing to force their ways upon them. Aid from the government such as welfare is a temporary luxury. When times become hard, govt aid will decrease and those reliant upon it will have to rely on charity and donations from sympathetic passerbys. It's not the role of the government to step in and try to stand in the way of people trying to get a Darwin award and perpetually feed parasites with taxes taken by force from its citizens. You cannot make sympathy into law.