Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀
- Iniciador del tema ditto
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 6 de Jun, 2020
The dems are going to come off even more monstrous this time around. Since their going after a mother and her children.
- Registrado
- 12 de Jun, 2020
Given that she has adopted a Black Haitian daughter, probably never going to happen. It would have to be something in college or high school.
But the Black daughter can always rebuff those claims and the progressive making them is fucked. They might try to have the original parents (if they are alive) claim that Barrett engineered the adoption to rob the parents of their kids but that is dangerous as well.
All I can say is that the Democrats are probably cooking something up and they deserve to be marched in front of a firing squad for whatever shenanigans they pull.
- Registrado
- 25 de Abr, 2015
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
Honestly, all the indicators have been for Barrett from the beginning so I don't know why everyone here got a massive hard on for Lagoa. I did agree she'd be the best for the idpol bullshit, but seemed a stretch to think Trump would pick her just on that.
While I'm not a fan of Barrett's entire record, there are no indicators she is a RINO. That's just doomering. At worst, she leans more towards the economic end of conservativism neutral on issues like gun rights, and is somewhat iffier on social conservatism. But she is a conservative one, which means she'll likely end up siding with the other conservative justices.
While I'm not a fan of Barrett's entire record, there are no indicators she is a RINO. That's just doomering. At worst, she leans more towards the economic end of conservativism neutral on issues like gun rights, and is somewhat iffier on social conservatism. But she is a conservative one, which means she'll likely end up siding with the other conservative justices.
RumblyTumbly
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Abr, 2018
In his whole speech, replace Catholic with Muslim or Jew and it becomes a national story.
But I'll give Maher credit: He'll call all religions stupid.
- Registrado
- 9 de Sep, 2019
Yeah. RELIGION. Am I right?
RumblyTumbly
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Abr, 2018
He's like the original fedora neckbeard.
ditto
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2019
Except progressivism.
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 29 de Ago, 2019
I remember in 2016 when he admitted "Yes we Called McCain and Romney Crazy bigot sexist Nazis...but this time with trump WE REALLY MEAN IT."
- Registrado
- 10 de Jul, 2017
It would cost them New York and Massachusetts. I don't think they are that stupid? At least not the ones in the Senate... Well excepting Feinstein, who already did just that last go round with Amy Barret Comey and got curbstomped by the Judge for it. Harris and Warren who hate Catholics and Christian's, and Schumer, who's just a fucking moron.
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 29 de Ago, 2019
Impeachment.
- Registrado
- 21 de Mar, 2019
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
Its... stupid.
Personally, I think Barnes is just salty that Trump didn't pick his favoured candidate. Mind, Trump still could because he is playing coy with actually confirming it. Still, its stupidity.
While it would help in Florida to pick Lagoa... Lagoa also has less time on the bench, less of a track record, and thats SAYING something since I honestly hold that BARRETT has too little time on the bench.
- Registrado
- 25 de Abr, 2020
While I don't necessarily think this is 100% the case, you should always remember that pundits need to say something, and that negative predictions always get more traction and attention than positive ones. Go back far enough and every positive decision as sitting president has made since Clinton, no matter how innocuous or positive, was criticized by at least one talking head supposedly "on their side".
In this case, I think they're paying too much attention to Barrett's alleged legal improprieties and not really thinking about the fact that according to most sources Barrett had already been considered and vetted by Trump for the position of SCOTUS judge back before Kavanaugh got in. Trump knows who she is and he knows what she's done. This wouldn't be a pick done on a whim no matter what the media narrative is, and if she's picked for the position there's a very good chance Trump has had a long and productive conversation with her before making his decision.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 11 de Ago, 2020
Anyone who watches late night "comedy" is already going to oppose Trump's pick.
I have no fucking idea why Barnes is cucking so hard. He said it himself:
Which is it Barnes?
I have no fucking idea why Barnes is cucking so hard. He said it himself:
Which is it Barnes?
ditto
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2019
Also Lagoa would be easier to push through a potentially more hostile senate.
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
Salt that HIS favored candidate didn't get in.