🐱 Anime deserves a spot in public education

CatParty


Some college students have heard of the legendary “Kamehameha” often followed by cupped hands, a thrust forward and a beam of powerful energy. If not, students have been exposed to the world of anime in some form or another, whether it is a brief passing on Netflix, a classmate’s shirt or through pop culture.

Anime is a Japanese animation style that has made its way into American culture for entertainment, but its purpose can extend far beyond. It has the power to educate young people and should be implemented in schools around the world.

Anime has several characteristics that could expose students to unconventional teaching methods that can yield better results in the long run. Over the past decade, teaching has made a drastic turn. In more traditional methodology, which can accurately be described as a “teacher-dominated interaction,” teachers were the source of knowledge, while “learners serve[d] as passive receivers.”

In theory, this can be seen as a good thing since teachers have all the information. However, learning should not solely be the responsibility of the teacher.

A more modern take for the teaching experience is often described as “student-centered.” In this setting, teachers yield material to fit students’ needs. Students are more active in consuming the material and encouraged to remain engaged. That combined with technological advances, such as the internet, Zoom and Canvas, the limit to how and what to teach seems infinite.

Anime could be a part of the infinite ways to connect students with certain subjects in school. Using fiction to teach is similar to people who often tell folktales to connect and teach children lessons. For instance, instead of explaining a certain concept or theme, the folktales were used to entertain children while also providing them with valuable lessons.

Analyzing and studying different storytelling forms is essential to learning diverse ways to connect to different audiences and compare them to other literary forms. Anime can absolutely be a part of that process, significantly because learning from other cultures, like Japanese, can help build a diverse way of thinking.

The introduction of bringing other cultures into the classroom can make students more creative and innovative. According to European Affairs, “art and culture have the ability to stimulate people’s imagination and creativity in schools, in colleges and universities and in lifelong learning.”

Anime is the integration of Japanese art and culture. It can encourage creative thinking that can be used for other core curricula. The stimulation of creativity is what promotes critical thinking that could help students even when they leave school.

More aligned with the core curriculum, some amine shows are specifically for learning and obtaining knowledge of certain subjects. For instance, an anime entitled “Cells at Work” is focused around the human body and the different anthropomorphic cells that keep the body healthy and safe against germs and bacteria. Each function and cell is personified in an entertaining way to learn about the immune system.

This idea has made its way to a seventh-gradeclassroom where a teacher used anime to weave together history, language arts, ecological sustainability and visual arts. It not only provided knowledge of Japanese culture but also served as a way to connect back to English themes and ideas used to enhance learning. This type of learning is rare and should be used more often in middle school and undergraduate programs.

Students who prefer the traditional way of teaching may disagree. However, the way of teaching must be adjusted to adapt to new generations with different interests and mindsets. Anime is a great way to connect with students in the classroom.
 
Sometimes stuff like this "How do you do, fellow weebs?" article makes me glad I'm no longer in school. The only time anime was brought up in class was in Japanese I and II, but we watched the movies in Japanese (subtitles were turned off in II), and had ourselves the packet to follow along and answer the questions, including writing down vocabulary we could recognize and sometimes had to put down the kanji. In college, it was brought up even when talking to our instructors, but it was always during downtime, and only the students would use it as an example in classroom projects. Only one instructor (whom I never had) had it mentioned on his teacher bio that he did work on Dragon Ball Z as an animator for Goku, key animation or in-between or clean-up artist, doesn't matter, he helped work on it at some point.

So while I don't care if a teacher wants to use an example from an appropriate TV show or a comic book to help make it easier for the kid(s) to understand while still making sure it's accurate to the lesson, there's no place in the regular curriculum for lessons strictly about Chinese cartoons. Even in an animation class, it doesn't matter what the source material looks like just as long as it's being used to teach the proper subject such as key animation or designing your character as a visual shorthand, but typically old Warner Bros. or MGM cartoons are used to show off such examples. Teachers aren't to be friends with their students or even get on their good side, that's not their job, and I bet you this is actually why they want to push bringing in anime into the classroom.

Also quickly took a look at the linked NCTE page (from 2010 btw) about the seventh grade class:

"An English teacher, visual arts teacher, and social studies teacher collaborate on a project using Hayao Miyazaki’s anime film Spirited Away to inspire students to create short videos on an environmental theme."

objectives.png

Okay, fair enough. Sounds like this was a separate project that's not interfering with other studies, unless this is what they actually did all year. If it was more like this, where it's like an after school volunteer thing to encourage kids to explore their creativity especially those interested in film, then whatever, bring in some anime to get the kids more invested if they're into it. The school's an independent, non-profit school anyway, they can do this. But this was ten years ago, they must not be doing it anymore, and who knows if it was even a success to keep bringing it back.

Also Spirited Away is not as much of an environmental message like Princess Mononoke, which is brought up in the article, too, but I understand if they didn't want to show that to seventh-graders without that parental permission slip. Ponyo was name-dropped, too. Pom Poko was shamefully never considered.
 
Flat out no. The only justification for studying such would only be if you're interested in animation which is too specialized a subject for the public education system.
I was saying this as a joke but since you took my post very seriously, I'm going to say a few words about this. I don't disagree with you as it could be used for animation and such but I think anime should be out of the public eye. The majority of people that anime attracts are autists and weirdos and it's generally an internet subculture thing and it should stay that way. Joe Sixpack is not interested in anime, he's interested in watching the latest sportsball game with his favorite team on display and would rather watch CNN tell him Orange Man bad for the 6,000,000th time.
 
Anime Clubs are enough of a blight on the individual schools' already flimsy reputations as it is, there's no need in making said blight any bigger
I remember back in high school when the anime club was around.

All it was full of were fat weirdos wearing naruto headbands crying every 10 seconds, art hoes, and gay theater kids that broke out singing Disney songs right after trying to make you read their Eren X Levi fanfiction.
 
>anime comes to be a form of animation and sequential art in Japan
>years upon years of cultural investment happens in Japan, leading to anime becoming relevant to the national tapestry
>1990s happen, America decides to enjoy a turn in interest in alternative media because the popular music industry collapses as much as the 1970s did with disco and Japan becomes a major economic powerhouse by the Bubble Boom of the 1980s
>America isn't even the first nation anime has been introduced to mainsteam, in fact, it's one of the last first world nations to do so
>Toonami begins as does Sailor Moon and Dragonball Z on basic providers like UPN, and Pokemon and Digimon on WB Kids and Fox Kids
>America doesn't even bother to create their own stuff, while fans majorly spread around the idea that "Only Japan can create anime" because of a long history of censorship in animation and comics, which is a way to kill creative development
>20 odd some years later down the line, the most anyone has done is Avatar The Last Airbender and RWBY
>no interest in actually studying foundations of anime or what makes anime
>weeaboos come to be, from annoying spergs to smartass elitist hipsters
>this shit happens

I'm voting no for this shit.
 
Lol no. Most anime is just an even crappier version of Saturday morning cartoons designed to sell toys with the smallest possible investment.

If a piece of anime is a good enough piece of work to be worth studying, it doesn't need a special allowance for anime.

Akira could be worth including in a senior elective art class or what have you. Or Steamboy, if you're doing a class on boring letdowns...
 
If the subject is pop culture history, then perhaps it should. Art culture studies from Japan? Certainly. As a serious study for a degree or graduation? Absolutely not. This would only pass as an elective, not something to base off real life studies.
 
I remember back in high school when the anime club was around.

All it was full of were fat weirdos wearing naruto headbands crying every 10 seconds, art hoes, and gay theater kids that broke out singing Disney songs right after trying to make you read their Eren X Levi fanfiction.
Yeah, no thanks. I did some extracurricular work at my high school so I'd occasionally go into the classroom hosting the anime club to borrow stuff. It was a cesspool of spergs and proto-troons, I even overheard the sponsor reminding members that MLP is not an anime.
Wow anime clubs degenerated after my time. We had ROTC kids, anime art drawers (legitimately art majors with talent that aced advanced courses), techies/computer guys, goths and scene kids, smart kids, and even a small pool of genuinely interested casual watchers. The club even got to be a part of school spirit week because most were not spergs and made their own school website, but I'm not even sure it's still around anymore. I was even into Naruto before the tards came to be wearing ninja headbands and wanting to be Naruto land ninjas and made it their only series to watch. Shit sucks, man.
 
Oh my god, I knew it.

Everyone else was like "if you let Cuties go, if you let pedos become normalized next is bestiality!"

But I knew that if we had pedo acceptance, next would be the fucking weebs!
 
Unfortunate how they say they don’t want students to study manga, since our illiteracy rate should be going down.

Also if they ever studied anime in public school, they better show Welcome To The NHK

C1C938F6-9452-4697-A975-76E215BE10FC.png
 
I watched some anime in class. It was Japanese language class and one of many short videos we ended each class to be exposed to many forms of culture and just hear the language. Afterwards the teacher explained some quirks in whatever we just watched to let us know what was normal and want wasn't. I can't really think much more than that where anime would be that appropriate to use. Maybe in animation, design or film class but most subjects video isn't a common tool anyway. At least where I have studied teaching time was active interaction with teacher and other students or doing something while teacher is there to help. Passive forms like reading or watching video were most likely to be home work.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo