💰 Grifter Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

[I'd abeeb bear]

Shit looks like the story is really blowing up. Dick just jumped off a burning bridge onto a train that was about to crash.
Ver archivo adjunto 1534753Ver archivo adjunto 1534756
Ver archivo adjunto 1534764
Everybody hates this movie. It's gonna be a fun month daxie.

But did it violate the NAP?

 

[instythot]

Shit looks like the story is really blowing up. Dick just jumped off a burning bridge onto a train that was about to crash.
Ver archivo adjunto 1534753Ver archivo adjunto 1534756
Ver archivo adjunto 1534764
Everybody hates this movie. It's gonna be a fun month daxie.

Coming off of backing Ethan Ralph's poo sniffing too.

I suddenly feel like gambling on horses. Can someone get me Dax's picks so I can go with the exact opposite of what he'd do?

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

But did it violate the NAP?

Yeah. Kids can't consent like that. But Dax (one of the most uselessly aggressive people alive) would say no aggression occurred therefore this is good somehow.

The only thing that matters to him is lolis=good, naked girls=good, women's rights=bad.

 

[b0o0pinsn0o0tz]

I think there's a huge problem with this argument Dick keeps bringing up about Cuties really being a "cautionary tale"... No part of the trailer or the advertising indicates it's a cautionary tale. The trailer is way too upbeat, the scenes with the twerking are creepily happy, the clip portrays the stern religious mother as the stuffy villainess.

A cautionary tale would be advertised in a much darker way and would sure as hell have much less blatant sexualization. I think this 'cautionary tale' argument is bullshit.

It's Dick, all he knows is bad faith non arguments at this point. Nigga could try to explain the sky is blue and still fuck it up. If it's a good idea for Ralph to get clean, it's a good idea for Dick too. The booze and drugs simply seem to exaggerate their flaws.

 

[I'd abeeb bear]

Yeah. Kids can't consent like that. But Dax (one of the most uselessly aggressive people alive) would say no aggression occurred.

Oh no, we can't open up that can of worms, there's a reason "but what if the child consents" became a meme.

"But when can someone consent really"
"What if they're mature for their age, do you get to determine when someone is mentally mature?"
"I want to fuck children, and here's why that's okay"

The list goes on, as they say.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

Oh no, we can't open up that can of worms, there's a reason "but what if the child consents" became a meme.

"But when can someone consent really"
"What if they're mature for their age, do you get to determine when someone is mentally mature?"
"I want to fuck children, and here's why that's okay"

The list goes on, as they say.

I can't wait until Dax is so far down the rabbit hole that he actually starts making those arguments.

 

[Wodanaz]

Looking back on the last four days of Herrera content, I am reminded of an old joke:

Q: what's better than winning the special Olympics?
A: not being a retard in the first place

Even if Dax somehow manages to btfo all of Twitter into submission on this issue, his position is still that nothing wrong is with depictions of children getting fucked

It's fucking strange to me. It seems like he legitimately cannot tell the difference between something being legal and something being socially/morally acceptable.

 

[instythot]

It's fucking strange to me. It seems like he legitimately cannot tell the difference between something being legal and something being socially/morally acceptable.

Oh, he's deliberately conflating the two to "own the betas"

A good way to make him stammer like the moron he is would be to point out that by his logic, his crack shack being seized by the government under eminent domain would be a greater good and to be celebrated by all

 

[I'd abeeb bear]

I can't wait until Dax is so far down the rabbit hole that he actually starts making those arguments.

He already kind of did in the episode where he talks about Desmond is Amazing.

I'll try to find that episode, but his site is garbage and my net is crap.

Also, this is going to be pretty funny when we have confirmation of his gay exploits;

 

[Table Country]

Am I too late to make a suggestion for the thread's official theme song?

 

[WyanWunt]

Does anyone else get bad vibes from a guy who presents himself as someone who manipulates women and as a chauvinist as arguing the specifics of what does and does not count as grooming.
almost like those guys who become feminists but literally just manipulate women.

 

[Robert James]

I can't wait until Dax is so far down the rabbit hole that he actually starts making those arguments.

At this rate he'll be there by tonight.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Does anyone else get bad vibes from a guy who presents himself as someone who manipulates women and as a chauvinist as arguing the specifics of what does and does not count as grooming.
almost like those guys who become feminists but literally just manipulate women.

A self-described misogynist, promoting child porn as a form of women's rights. It's not even creepy, it's downright horrifying.

"But when can someone consent really"
"What if they're mature for their age, do you get to determine when someone is mentally mature?"
"I want to fuck children, and here's why that's okay"

I genuinely hate people who make arguments like this, too.

Usually they're singularly obsessed with the subject of kids and sex... like dude no one needs you to make these speculations, just stop, it's creepy.

 

[Bafta]

What I can gather from the last 50 pages is you can get this dude to take any awful stance you want if you do it right, I don't think he's even sentient half the time at this point.

 

[I'd abeeb bear]

What I can gather from the last 50 pages is you can get this dude to take any awful stance you want if you do it right, I don't think he's even sentient half the time at this point.

He's no doubt drowning in liquor right now. He acts above it all but this online stuff really is most of his life at this point.

 

[Eris!]

But did it violate the NAP?

Yes, Exploiting and abusing children to create softcore pornography for public commercial dissemination violates the NAP.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Dax Herrera on Twitter these days.

 

[Table Country]

It's fucking strange to me. It seems like he legitimately cannot tell the difference between something being legal and something being socially/morally acceptable.

Come to think of it doesn't Onionson defend himself the same way?

 

[2021Murder]

LOL the kikes in Hollywood and everywhere else had very little problem with Reagan; a lot of love actually.

harvein weinstein, alan alda, gwnethy paltrow's dad, and a few others were really anti-reagan and were big during the 80s. i'm sure most were also anti-gop but those 3 made it explicitly known at the time, which was quite rare back then, so for them to be open about not working with them and banning them from sets was a big deal at the time. up until the 2000s political comedy wasn't really a thing, even the politcal shows of the 90s like Dennis Miller and politically correct were more about social issues than outright shitting on most politicians.

 

[I'd abeeb bear]

Yes, Exploiting and abusing children to create softcore pornography for public commercial dissemination violates the NAP.

Take that stance at the Libertarian National Convention, you fake libertarian!