🪦 Deceased Chloe Sagal / John Paul Neumann - Self-Immolated to Protest The US Mental Health System. Currently Being Exploited by her "Allies".

[CatFace]

That's right, I forgot the meanings of "feminism" and "equality" have been hijacked to mean "pay for what your ancestors did CIS WHITE MALE SCUM".

The reminder is appreciated

 

[niggers]

Second, keep in mind that hug machine devices *simulate* human affection. This person is so socially alienated from human social convention that he interprets physical affection amongst peers as requiring a layer of artifice. That, even face to face, they are somehow *simulating* care for each other.

wait, what. yes, that is exactly right. you live in a bubble of people sending you *hugs* and useless platitudes (and money) over the internet. there's no physicality at all. and even being face-to-face doesn't mean people are genuine. if you worked with me, i'd probably call you "she" just to get on with my life and not get fired - but i'd still laugh and call you a delusional manchild during off hours. you're entire personality revolves around denying reality and shutting out all dissension.

like, you get the concept of a hugbox, understand that we're saying you feed off a simulacrum of actual social interaction, but still manage to fuck up somehow translating it into readable text.

edit holy shit i was i just skimming but he calls us pedophiles based on absolutely nothing. that's some top tier mad

 

[Surtur]

http://destroyedforcomfort.com/2015...cs-in-anti-sjw-conspiracy-theories-gamergate/

Rani has decided that a userbase that is something like 40% completely neutral on GamerGate is actually an entirely GamerGate devoted hatesite for social justice.

Silly tranny, the moment you become boring you will mean nothing to us.

 

[Positron]

You stupid fucking cunt. It's not a "slang" term. That' s the name its inventor, Temple Grandin, gave it.

And Temple Grandin is a talented scientist and a genuine woman, unlike the foul creature who wrote that shit.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

First of all, for those that aren’t aware of slang terminology of child-porn sharing neckbeards that get off mocking handicapped children

Interesting that Rani is trying to make us sound so unappealing that no one who read that blog post would want to come check out this thread out of curiosity. I wonder why they would do that...

If we were so bad, so evil, surely our own posts would stand for themselves with no need for Rani's embellishments.

You stupid fucking cunt. It's not a "slang" term. That' s the name its inventor, Temple Grandin, gave it.

Unless Temple Grandin also used the term to mean an insular community that tries to shield itself from any and all criticism, the way we're using the term is slang.

 

[Totenkopf]

Any chimpouts on the Chloe front? Private tweets? Facebook caps? Anything?

 

[Surtur]

Any chimpouts on the Chloe front? Private tweets? Facebook caps? Anything?

She is probably crying and pretending to cut herself with a plastic spork.

 

[CatParty]

Phil is so clueless he doesn't even realize he started all of this

 

[AnOminous]

Emu Ranch? That's the best thing she could come up with?

Or she could have, you know, used the actual name of the site.

That is, if she weren't afraid of people actually checking out her bullshit for themselves.

Phil is so clueless he doesn't even realize he started all of this.

He's turning into quite the Judas goat.

 

[Cosmos]

wait, what. yes, that is exactly right. you live in a bubble of people sending you *hugs* and useless platitudes (and money) over the internet. there's no physicality at all. and even being face-to-face doesn't mean people are genuine. if you worked with me, i'd probably call you "she" just to get on with my life and not get fired - but i'd still laugh and call you a delusional manchild during off hours. you're entire personality revolves around denying reality and shutting out all dissension.

like, you get the concept of a hugbox, understand that we're saying you feed off a simulacrum of actual social interaction, but still manage to fuck up somehow translating it into readable text.

edit holy shit i was i just skimming but he calls us pedophiles based on absolutely nothing. that's some top tier mad

Do you know what real love and care is, Rani? It means that, sometimes, you have to do the right thing for someone you love instead of the easy thing. If you really, truly love Chloe and want what's best for her, you would take her to a mental health professional. You would try and get her the help she obviously needs, no matter how much she refuses it. Instead, you opt for the easy way out by caving into her demands and allowing her to leech off of you while she spirals down and becomes more and more unstable.

You don't have the right to look down on us from your high horse when you enable Chloe like this.

 

[c-no]

http://destroyedforcomfort.com/2015...cs-in-anti-sjw-conspiracy-theories-gamergate/

Rani has decided that a userbase that is something like 40% completely neutral on GamerGate is actually an entirely GamerGate devoted hatesite for social justice.

Don't forget, we have members that are anti-GamerGate (as shown in the votes on Wu in another thread). If we were fully aligned with GamerGate, we would of made the GG thread the thread to be on front-page. This is like when Rani said we were all neo-cons.

Commissioner Null lights the signal. Not for the hero this website needs, but for the one it deserves. The one who strikes from the darkness of his poorly-lit room with his webcam of justice.

Spoiler: The Homer Signal

Ver archivo adjunto 26210

Wouldn't Homer's signal be more of his waifu? Either way, we need him and his dark, poorly lit room.

 

[pickledance]

Chloe should be thanking us, after all, since shes been crying bout the Kiwis her patreon has gone form under $200 a month to over $700. Look at all we did for her.

 

[Null]

I should be a tranny. I'd get a lot more money.

 

[pickledance]

I should be a tranny. I'd get a lot more money.

You could argue that all theses shit bags on twitter suffer from internalized transmisogyny and are oppressing you and you need donations so the pain goes away.

 

[Wood Glue]

I should be a tranny. I'd get a lot more money.

Patreon instructions: Swap your gender for legal tender.

 

[Jaimas]

http://destroyedforcomfort.com/2015...cs-in-anti-sjw-conspiracy-theories-gamergate/

See, now you just made my day, because your very attempt to shovel shit has ensured that my article will have a far greater level of exposure than it otherwise would, my dear. Your little SJW friends will wring their hands about how awful those Kiwi Farms people are, and how those mean ol' Gamergaters are ever-so-mean, ignoring that Gamers in general have been demonized by the mainstream media since the advent of video gaming as a hobby, and, as such, have long since been excused from giving a fuck about what you or the mainstream press thinks.

See, the fact that you, personally, don't understand that the heroes of your side are predominantly charlatans with long criminal records ranging from fraud (Anita), to rape (Laurelai), to pedophilia (Nyberg) is fine, though this certainly explains why you yourself are perfectly fine with your significant other defrauding people to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. Your defense has always been a laughable one, and it will never stop being hilarious: "THEY'RE BEING HARASSED SO IT DOESN'T MATTER." I've seen that particular defense used, since Gamergate began, to justify assault, harassment, offline threats, attempts to get people fired, and most recently, a bomb threat in Washington DC. Nevermind that there's a few hundred pages of documented evidence that your side not only has been openly false-flagging (Brianna being the most infamous example), but actually paying people to false-flag them (Quinn most notably) so they have "evidence" of "harassment."

And I choose to note that your side has never posted a case of verified "Harassment" by an actual harasser that isn't some random post on twitter from a troll account or in response to something openly inflammatory someone on your side has said or done. In fact, of the various posts that Anita Sarkeesian submitted as evidence of her own harassment, roughly half of them were done in response to things Feminist Frequency has said or done, with the preceding post cropped or deleted. One might think that were "harassment" front and center, you'd have better evidence of it than a few random, clearly outlier accounts on Twitter or trolls on Tumblr.

But see, we both know it isn't. You don't have such evidence. What we do have is evidence that you and yours are willingly and knowingly engaged in criminal acts, which really pretty much just says everything, doesn't it? You can prove some nameless bumblefuck called you rude names or threatened to punch you from an obvious troll account, but we can prove your lover is an infamous con-artist who has squirreled away tens of thousands of dollars she extracted from unsuspecting and well-meaning people and then used her connections to try to ruin the man who tried to alert people as to what she was trying to do.

Which is more objectionable a crime, I wonder?

I could link to a few thousand articles citing every point I've ever made on the subject (and probably have if you traipse through my backlogs), but the simple fact is that we both know why it's a waste of time to do so. You not only won't read them, and if you do, will not recognize any points made, irrespective of what they are (because in your universe, the primacy of your feels trumps facts and simple common sense), and, indeed, you will actually be treated as haram if you actually deign to admit your opposition has any points whatsoever, so either way there's virtually no reason to dignify you with a barrage of citations (which veteran Kiwis will confirm is now my way).

Toodles.

 

[c-no]

See, now you just made my day, because your very attempt to shovel shit has ensured that my article will have a far greater level of exposure than it otherwise would, my dear. Your little SJW friends will wring their hands about how awful those Kiwi Farms people are, and how those mean ol' Gamergaters are ever-so-mean, ignoring that Gamers in general have been demonized by the mainstream media since the advent of video gaming as a hobby, and, as such, have long since been excused from giving a fuck about what you or the mainstream press thinks.

See, the fact that you, personally, don't understand that the heroes of your side are predominantly charlatans with long criminal records ranging from fraud (Anita), to rape (Laurelai), to pedophilia (Nyberg) is fine, though this certainly explains why you yourself are perfectly fine with your significant other defrauding people to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. Your defense has always been a laughable one, and it will never stop being hilarious: "THEY'RE BEING HARASSED SO IT DOESN'T MATTER." I've seen that particular defense used, since Gamergate began, to justify assault, harassment, offline threats, attempts to get people fired, and most recently, a bomb threat in Washington DC. Nevermind that there's a few hundred pages of documented evidence that your side not only has been openly false-flagging (Brianna being the most infamous example), but actually paying people to false-flag them (Quinn most notably) so they have "evidence" of "harassment."

And I choose to note that your side has never posted a case of verified "Harassment" by an actual harasser that isn't some random post on twitter from a troll account or in response to something openly inflammatory someone on your side has said or done. In fact, of the various posts that Anita Sarkeesian submitted as evidence of her own harassment, roughly half of them were done in response to things Feminist Frequency has said or done, with the preceding post cropped or deleted. One might think that were "harassment" front and center, you'd have better evidence of it than a few random, clearly outlier accounts on Twitter or trolls on Tumblr.

But see, we both know it isn't. You don't have such evidence. What we do have is evidence that you and yours are willingly and knowingly engaged in criminal acts, which really pretty much just says everything, doesn't it? You can prove some nameless bumblefuck called you rude names or threatened to punch you from an obvious troll account, but we can prove your lover is an infamous con-artist who has squirreled away tens of thousands of dollars she extracted from unsuspecting and well-meaning people and then used her connections to try to ruin the man who tried to alert people as to what she was trying to do.

Which is more objectionable a crime, I wonder?

I could link to a few thousand articles citing every point I've ever made on the subject (and probably have if you traipse through my backlogs), but the simple fact is that we both know why it's a waste of time to do so. You not only won't read them, and if you do, will not recognize any points made, irrespective of what they are (because in your universe, the primacy of your feels trumps facts and simple common sense), and, indeed, you will actually be treated as haram if you actually deign to admit your opposition has any points whatsoever, so either way there's virtually no reason to dignify you with a barrage of citations (which veteran Kiwis will confirm is now my way).

Toodles.

inb4 Rani tries to put her own spin on what you posted and say you are just some neckbeard whose forum is all GamerGate. Really, I just like to see what Rani comes up with next only for it to end up being dissected, showing what is wrong in her attempt.

 

[Smutley]

Chloe should be thanking us, after all, since shes been crying bout the Kiwis her patreon has gone form under $200 a month to over $700. Look at all we did for her.

Unless I'm grossly mistaken Chloe's patreon hasn't shifted a cent in the past couple weeks. No ones given her extra money and her 77-ish backers haven't pulled out yet.

 

[Owlflaps]

Unless I'm grossly mistaken Chloe's patreon hasn't shifted a cent in the past couple weeks. No ones given her extra money and her 77-ish backers haven't pulled out yet.

I don't think I could ever become a Patreon supporter to Chloe.

Freeloading transtrenders trigger me. I get heavily triggered at the thought of giving money to people who believe they're entitled to get it.

 

[Dr. Boe Jangles Esq.]

I live with a roommate. Those could be anyone's freezer cadavers.
Also, c'mon Rani, that's what you've got to refute a post reinforcing every stereotype about SJW's? The old "Well he's probably a murderer, so who cares what he thinks" bit? I'm kinda disappointed, to be honest. I was expecting at least a "Lol these guys just mad cause they can't get laid", or maybe even a "cishet oppressive scum!", but fucking "Emu Ranch" was the best that could be done? Where's the bile? Where's the A-material? Where's the declaration of war?
Really not trying to be hard on you, sugartits, but we get a lot of spergfits here (it's kind of our thing) are yours is just not at the standard we expect. Try a "literally shaking" and a few threats of doxxing and we'll talk.

Edit: Also, if giving us exposure is your plan for getting us to stop, then I'm not sure you understand how publicity works. Feel free to send your SJW buddies our way though, we'd love to chat with them. I'm sure it'll go just as well as it always does.