📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Destacado
1595087651517.png

:thinking:
 
pr3nt177 dijo:
Where's the child's mother whilst this shit stain was getting its jollies? Absolutely disgusting, that poor kid.

Whilst I can laugh at most of the monstrosities in this thread, this one just sickens. Yeah I know, rate me autistic.
Presiona para expandir...

This is what fucks with me the most. The trans ‘community’ harbours some absolute reprobates, but the people who let children in their care anywhere near them for woke points are just as bad.

Guardians who should be protecting children that allow shit like this photoshoot to happen while screeching YAAAS KWEEN are just as complicit.
 
Carlton dijo:
This is what fucks with me the most. The trans ‘community’ harbours some absolute reprobates, but the people who let children in their care anywhere near them for woke points are just as bad.

Guardians who should be protecting children that allow shit like this photoshoot to happen while screeching YAAAS KWEEN are just as complicit.
Presiona para expandir...

This stuff is honestly so blatantly fetishistic and pedophilic. The fact that other mtf troons aren’t trying to put this guy against the wall definitively proves that none of them are actually women and makes it harder to argue that any of them aren’t complicit in sexual predation. Mermaids, Jazz Jennings, Desmond is Amazing, Lactatia and trannies using helpless babies as sexual props... laughing at freaks is all fun and games until it turns into a black pill.
 
poor_snow_leopard18 dijo:
Are you sure that the women who told you that they have a lingerie fetish are being genuine and not just having a joke at your expense?
Presiona para expandir...

A lot of people in this thread really, rrally don't understand women much better than the troons do.

Women frequently seek a lot of social validation and approval; if you're in a social circle where being "sex positive" or kinky is considered mature, progressive, smart, and exciting, a woman will absolutely claim a mild kink/fetish to signal her membership in the group. (Men also signal group inclusion, just usually in different ways, since men and women tend to communicate differently.)

When a woman says she "feels sexy", what she is saying is NOT that she feels aroused by herself, nor even that she feels aroused at all. She is saying "I recognize that I am sexually attractive to men, and therefore feel confident, desirable, and have worth." If she ia aroused, she's aroused by the idea of men wanting her. Aka not self-aroused, nor aroused by het underwear itself, nor the "meaning" of the underwear. She's aroused by the idea that a man she finds attractive would also be attracted back. You know, like a normal healthy sexual human connection.

When a woman even literally says "I turn myself on", she is not being literal, you absolute acoustics. She is using a turn of phrase, a jovial metaphor, which gets social approval for being a fun confident person. Just like saying "I'm too sexy for my shirt" doesn't mean you are literally planning to strip in public.

AGPs feel aroused by the concept of fulfilling their idea of what a woman is, which is typically over-simplistic and stereotyped. This is why they're aroused by shit like breastfeeding, knitting, or wearing tampons. (It's also why their clothes are fucking tacky.) Sometimes women report a lot of confidence and satisfaction when fulfilling feminine gender roles... Wise troons will claim that's how they feel too, not aexual arousal, but spend 5 minutes on troon reddit and you can see they're lying.

(Personally I'd be okay with AGP TVs, as long as they admit their motivation and stop this "real woman" bullshit.)

By the way, it eas probably already mentioned, but "autoandrophilia" (aka women turned on by the idea of being men) was only ever theorized and never researched, because the researchers never discovered any. We obviously are now seeing a correlate of course (the fujoshis-gone-wrong). However it's worth mentioning that at least one (I think it was Blanchard) noticed the exact same thing we've pointed out repeatedly on this thread -- female troons are NOT aroused by being manly, and often don't even try to be, they avtually want to be "a gay man" specifically. Their longing and/or arousal is specifically at the idea of being a gay man. (Blanchard suggested some new term for it.) So it's interesting and worth noting there still doesn't seem to be an actual autoandrophile - females don't turn themselves on.

Also note, even lesbians don't turn themselves on, and will often be like "ew" at themselves even while buried in pussy.
 
Stay on topic you faggots.
poor_snow_leopard18 dijo:
Are you sure that the women who told you that they have a lingerie fetish are being genuine and not just having a joke at your expense?
Presiona para expandir...
Yeah.
DumbDude42 dijo:
how does this work?
do they legit get off on putting on a corset and stockings, then have a wank while staring at a mirror? or is it more about being dressed up to feel hot and desirable while being with their man?
Presiona para expandir...
If a woman wears lingerie as her primary turn on, that in fact makes it a fetish.

Corn Flakes dijo:
That whole argument between @TaimuRadiu and @horsegirl666 could be summed up with: women can be extreme narcissists. And those women are as mentally ill as narcissistic men.
Presiona para expandir...
 
Kirkorov dijo:
Baby, not even 4 months old, used as prop to suck a Troon's fake nipples to validate his gender feels.

It's not a fetish though!


Ver archivo adjunto 1456236
Presiona para expandir...

Holy shit, that is just straight up sexual assault on a child. That thing should be thrown in jail for the rest of its life. Better yet, hanged off a nearby bridge or overpass.

When was that photo created? I tried accessing his Instagram page at https://www.instagram.com/kennylemes/ but it seems to have been taken down.
 
KingQueen dijo:
A lot of people in this thread really, rrally don't understand women much better than the troons do.

Women frequently seek a lot of social validation and approval; if you're in a social circle where being "sex positive" or kinky is considered mature, progressive, smart, and exciting, a woman will absolutely claim a mild kink/fetish to signal her membership in the group. (Men also signal group inclusion, just usually in different ways, since men and women tend to communicate differently.)

When a woman says she "feels sexy", what she is saying is NOT that she feels aroused by herself, nor even that she feels aroused at all. She is saying "I recognize that I am sexually attractive to men, and therefore feel confident, desirable, and have worth." If she ia aroused, she's aroused by the idea of men wanting her. Aka not self-aroused, nor aroused by het underwear itself, nor the "meaning" of the underwear. She's aroused by the idea that a man she finds attractive would also be attracted back. You know, like a normal healthy sexual human connection.

When a woman even literally says "I turn myself on", she is not being literal, you absolute acoustics. She is using a turn of phrase, a jovial metaphor, which gets social approval for being a fun confident person. Just like saying "I'm too sexy for my shirt" doesn't mean you are literally planning to strip in public.

AGPs feel aroused by the concept of fulfilling their idea of what a woman is, which is typically over-simplistic and stereotyped. This is why they're aroused by shit like breastfeeding, knitting, or wearing tampons. (It's also why their clothes are fucking tacky.) Sometimes women report a lot of confidence and satisfaction when fulfilling feminine gender roles... Wise troons will claim that's how they feel too, not aexual arousal, but spend 5 minutes on troon reddit and you can see they're lying.

(Personally I'd be okay with AGP TVs, as long as they admit their motivation and stop this "real woman" bullshit.)

By the way, it eas probably already mentioned, but "autoandrophilia" (aka women turned on by the idea of being men) was only ever theorized and never researched, because the researchers never discovered any. We obviously are now seeing a correlate of course (the fujoshis-gone-wrong). However it's worth mentioning that at least one (I think it was Blanchard) noticed the exact same thing we've pointed out repeatedly on this thread -- female troons are NOT aroused by being manly, and often don't even try to be, they avtually want to be "a gay man" specifically. Their longing and/or arousal is specifically at the idea of being a gay man. (Blanchard suggested some new term for it.) So it's interesting and worth noting there still doesn't seem to be an actual autoandrophile - females don't turn themselves on.

Also note, even lesbians don't turn themselves on, and will often be like "ew" at themselves even while buried in pussy.
Presiona para expandir...

Small (autistic?) theory: same-sex attracted women having fantasies "of themselves" are mostly fantasizing about the generic idea of a woman (like how a man imagines a generic "cheerleader" or "nurse" fantasy) and are using themselves as the avatar for their fantasy as a sort of default.
 
Chromeo dijo:
Small (autistic?) theory: same-sex attracted women having fantasies "of themselves" are mostly fantasizing about the generic idea of a woman (like how a man imagines a generic "cheerleader" or "nurse" fantasy) and are using themselves as the avatar for their fantasy as a sort of default.
Presiona para expandir...
I would agree with you about being aroused by "the generic idea of a woman", expect that I have never ever heard of a same-sex-attracted woman being aroused at themselves, or claiming to be, or doing a fantasy like you describe. I'd presume people new to homosexuality or uncomfortable with their own sexuality, or folks with social difficulty, would have a tendency to fantasize about generic stereotypes because they struggle to connect to actual specific individuals.

Some lesbians say they often imagined themselves as men having sex with women, but tend to explain this as because they had no idea homosexuality existed so had a hard time even mentally imagining how it would work physically without PIV. Or, if they could, they felt guilty, so escaped into an easier delusion of "if I was a man it would be olay".

But anyway, prob derailing now. Back to troons.

I've suspected a long time, after talking to transmen, that at least some of them absorbed a very pornified idea of female sexuality, and that they fantasize about being gay men so they feel "equal" to their partner instead of a sex object. Like if they're a man then being bottom is an okay and safe normal sexuality, whereas if you're a girl you're always inferior or submissive. Basically they feel guilty for wanting to fuck men, but since gay men are peoud of fucking men, I'll be one of those instead. If that makes sense.

(I think that's a related reason for why some women have rape fantasies -- sexual reprrssion. They feel guilty and slutty for wanting sex, but if they're "raped" then it's not their fault and they don't feel guilty any more.)
 
Have you ever been to /LGBT/? Troons want to convince every vulnerable person they have contact with into taking HRT. I am now convinced that they know how fucked up they are, and that they want to drag with them as many people as possible. This is what libs don't understand: they say that trans people are only trying to have the same rights as anyone else: to be left alone and coexist in society. Sure, a lot of them do, but this wave of troons that emerged from the dark corners of the internet are a bunch of AGP freaks with only their pleasure and narcissism in mind. These transgender cliques are death cults. They want to harm as many people as possible, so that their horrible lives become the norm; so that they never experience shame ever again.

That photo with the baby... What is that poor child going to feel about it's identity once it hits puberty and sees the degeneracy it has been made part of? rationalization will ensue, and the degradation cycle will continue. It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of trans lolcows turn out to have a lot of shit under the rug regarding pedophilia that has been hidden by their enablers. Just wait: all those SJW echo chambers are going to become the next catholic church.
 
Última edición:
Obreon dijo:
Just wait: all those SJW echo chambers are going to become the next catholic church.
Presiona para expandir...
We're not going to have to wait very long. There's a reason the "0 days since a male feminist has been revealed as a sex offender" meme exists. Once the avalanche of accusations against SJW truly begins, it will be visible from space.
 
Carlton dijo:
This is what fucks with me the most. The trans ‘community’ harbours some absolute reprobates, but the people who let children in their care anywhere near them for woke points are just as bad.

Guardians who should be protecting children that allow shit like this photoshoot to happen while screeching YAAAS KWEEN are just as complicit.
Presiona para expandir...
Keep in mind that the current dogma is that pwecious transwomen never sexually assault anyone, least of all children, and insinuating otherwise earns even the most woke liberal a one-way trip to the bigot gulag. Even suggesting that he shouldn't stick his gross troon man-nips in that baby's mouth would be unthinkable.

Of course, the baby could also be born to some kind of genderspecial(s) who were more than happy to offer their kid up for the photoshoot. Validating transwomen matters more than life itself to pronoun clowns.
 
Última edición:
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo