Democrat hardliners really are just horrible people - Hypocrites who will do anything in their quest for power

Republican hardliners are idiots too, they just haven't been as frankly fucking evil lately.

Centrists don't post about how bad any party is. You either hate everything about your opposition, love it all, or don't post what you don't know about.

I'm not a mega conservative either. The OP sounds like a centrist or a right-leaning centrist. Instead of reading their milquetoast post about 'extremes are bad mm'kay' you're acting like a sped.

I did read the post and it just came off as projecting at Democrats to me.
 
republicans aren't much better, they're just a little more covert about it.
for example, dems are screeching at maximum volume about how they want to abolish ICE and turn up immigration to the max. reps are not screeching about it like that, but in pracice they are doing the exact same thing when in office: increase immigration substantially.
even with a 'populist' president who ran on a loud anti immigration platform, this has not changed. there is no wall, there is no significant amount of deportations, there is no serious effort to curb and reverse immigration in any meaningful way.
and it's similar with many other situations. dems screech loudly about wanting free trade and globalisation, reps don't screech loudly about it, but when in office they still do it. apart from trumps meme trade war with china, nothing about this has changed at all compared to the obama era, or the bush era, or the clinton era, or the bush sr. era.
more examples? dems screech super loud about abortion and LGBT pandering, while reps say they oppose it. but have they actually opposed it in practice? they have a solid majority in the supreme court, yet roe v wade still stands unchallenged. they had the house and the senate for two years straight, and did absolutely nothing to push back on those issues at all.

so far the only notable difference trump brought was a lot of loud mouthed shitposting, and a tax cut. other than that the direction of the country is virtually indistinguishable from what it was under obama.
 
Centrists don't post about how bad any party is. You either hate everything about your opposition, love it all, or don't post what you don't know about.



I did read the post and it just came off as projecting at Democrats to me.

Democrats spent the last four years shitting on centrists on social media. It's almost like we kind of resent it.
 
republicans aren't much better, they're just a little more covert about it.
for example, dems are screeching at maximum volume about how they want to abolish ICE and turn up immigration to the max. reps are not screeching about it like that, but in pracice they are doing the exact same thing when in office: increase immigration substantially.

Try telling this to any political sperg Kiwi. They will tell you all Democrats are bad, and that there are no good Democrats whatsoever. Demsocs are the bad Democrats, center Democrats are good, yet most people here won't have that shitty opinion.
 
As a partial followup to my final thoughts on dumb SJW shit, I think I should say something about a phenomena I have autistically named "The obsequious instinct" "Sycophant Syndrome".

I.e. the pathological obsession shown by certain people to loudly and performatively demonstrate their support for a cause in the most extreme and obnoxious yet relatively comfortable and cheap ways they can think of, motivated not by a desire to grift money/power/social capital nor even being a sped with mental issues but solely due to the fact that they see whomever they have deemed the "higher authority" as having advocated for said cause, and thus seek to show off how in tune they are with this higher authority even when the cause in question completely contradict how they live their lives and even when their ways of demonstrating this support completely contradict the very cause.

Basically think of every hyperbolic partisan or fundie or ultranationalist or celeb worshipper you have ever encountered who had no direct stake in the shit they were going apeshit over, and indeed were happy to ignore beforehand, yet the moment a political talking head or preacher or nationalist demagogue or some worthless celeb specimen declared something or someone to be good or evil, they went absolutely feral in publically shrieking how that person or thing was the bestestest/most evilest person or thing in human history and how all who did not agree were some variety of filthy heretic conspiring against decency.

Now I know this all sounds very similar to your garden variety fanatic, but the key difference here is the total lack of any serious conviction or belief that what they are doing is right and that it is something they will cling to in the face of all rebuke from those around and above them. These specimens will chimpout over dumb shit entirely due to their belief that this is what those with moral authority over them want, even when its shit they never cared about before and will happily forget when told to stop by said moral authority.

Traditionally, the two main bodies capable of inciting such blindly aggressive support for anything they wanted no matter how dumb or evil have been governments and religions. However in the past few centuries as both governments and religions have lost a fucktunne of their old respectibility, these specimens will now congregate around media or internet personalities, conspiracy theorists, and indeed pretty much anyone who presents themselves as a worthy moral leader who knows "the truth" about everything and anything, and will at the slightest signal unleash the full force of pent up sycophantic rage that was once reserved for crusades, jihads and state sponsored genocides onto the dumbest and most petty shit imaginable.

To TLDR it, the kind of people who when told to jump by whomever they see as being "in charge" will spend weeks jumping and screeching to everyone around how jumping is the only salvation, and then the moment they are told to stop jumping they will spend weeks furiously demanding the cops break everyones knees to prevent illicit jumping from occurring. And unlike grifters and wannabe grifters they will do it for free and with little expectation of reward.

So when you see democrat hardliners, just remember that they are simply one single example of a vast multitute of speds who have always existed in every single segment of society since the dawn of civilisation.

Shut up Harvey. Rot in hell. No one likes you and if they say they do, they're lying.
 
republicans aren't much better, they're just a little more covert about it.
for example, dems are screeching at maximum volume about how they want to abolish ICE and turn up immigration to the max. reps are not screeching about it like that, but in pracice they are doing the exact same thing when in office: increase immigration substantially.
even with a 'populist' president who ran on a loud anti immigration platform, this has not changed. there is no wall, there is no significant amount of deportations, there is no serious effort to curb and reverse immigration in any meaningful way.
and it's similar with many other situations. dems screech loudly about wanting free trade and globalisation, reps don't screech loudly about it, but when in office they still do it. apart from trumps meme trade war with china, nothing about this has changed at all compared to the obama era, or the bush era, or the clinton era, or the bush sr. era.
more examples? dems screech super loud about abortion and LGBT pandering, while reps say they oppose it. but have they actually opposed it in practice? they have a solid majority in the supreme court, yet roe v wade still stands unchallenged. they had the house and the senate for two years straight, and did absolutely nothing to push back on those issues at all.

so far the only notable difference trump brought was a lot of loud mouthed shitposting, and a tax cut. other than that the direction of the country is virtually indistinguishable from what it was under obama.
I'm not talking about policy stuff. Yeah on policy they're closer than they'd like to admit and they constantly change positions.

I'm talking about Schiff lying for years about having evidence that didn't exist, and defending the FISA court which we now know was just as bad as Nunes said. I'm talking about the people hiding exonerating evidence for flynn because it's bad for their party. I'm talking about the people cheering Roger Stone being arrested in a predawn raid with guns drawn with CNN tipped off. I'm talking about the people who understand that shit happened and still defending the ones who did it. I'm talking about the people who screeched at anyone who dared suggest Kavanaugh might not be guilty who now screech at anyone who dares suggest Biden be subject to the same treatment.

This is beyond regular partisan scumminess, this is deep dark corruption with innocent lives destroyed on purpose, for the naked pursuit of power.
 
"STOP BEING INDIFFERENT TO MY POLITICAL AUTISM REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
1588274184160.png

My political autism is explicitly anti-centrist though.
 
As a partial followup to my final thoughts on dumb SJW shit, I think I should say something about a phenomena I have autistically named "The obsequious instinct" "Sycophant Syndrome".

I.e. the pathological obsession shown by certain people to loudly and performatively demonstrate their support for a cause in the most extreme and obnoxious yet relatively comfortable and cheap ways they can think of, motivated not by a desire to grift money/power/social capital nor even being a sped with mental issues but solely due to the fact that they see whomever they have deemed the "higher authority" as having advocated for said cause, and thus seek to show off how in tune they are with this higher authority even when the cause in question completely contradict how they live their lives and even when their ways of demonstrating this support completely contradict the very cause.

Basically think of every hyperbolic partisan or fundie or ultranationalist or celeb worshipper you have ever encountered who had no direct stake in the shit they were going apeshit over, and indeed were happy to ignore beforehand, yet the moment a political talking head or preacher or nationalist demagogue or some worthless celeb specimen declared something or someone to be good or evil, they went absolutely feral in publically shrieking how that person or thing was the bestestest/most evilest person or thing in human history and how all who did not agree were some variety of filthy heretic conspiring against decency.

Now I know this all sounds very similar to your garden variety fanatic, but the key difference here is the total lack of any serious conviction or belief that what they are doing is right and that it is something they will cling to in the face of all rebuke from those around and above them. These specimens will chimpout over dumb shit entirely due to their belief that this is what those with moral authority over them want, even when its shit they never cared about before and will happily forget when told to stop by said moral authority.

Traditionally, the two main bodies capable of inciting such blindly aggressive support for anything they wanted no matter how dumb or evil have been governments and religions. However in the past few centuries as both governments and religions have lost a fucktunne of their old respectibility, these specimens will now congregate around media or internet personalities, conspiracy theorists, and indeed pretty much anyone who presents themselves as a worthy moral leader who knows "the truth" about everything and anything, and will at the slightest signal unleash the full force of pent up sycophantic rage that was once reserved for crusades, jihads and state sponsored genocides onto the dumbest and most petty shit imaginable.

To TLDR it, the kind of people who when told to jump by whomever they see as being "in charge" will spend weeks jumping and screeching to everyone around how jumping is the only salvation, and then the moment they are told to stop jumping they will spend weeks furiously demanding the cops break everyones knees to prevent illicit jumping from occurring. And unlike grifters and wannabe grifters they will do it for free and with little expectation of reward.

So when you see democrat hardliners, just remember that they are simply one single example of a vast multitute of speds who have always existed in every single segment of society since the dawn of civilisation.

Pardon the repost, but you sound like an English Harvey. But you're still a dick.

My bad for confusing you tho.
 
Doesn't that sort of put you right at the center of some sort of hyper-horseshoe though?
No, actually. Centrists represent the neutral position, anti-centrists represent all opposing extreme positions at once.

Here's a better explanation:
 
Atrás
Top Abajo