Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

If Vic is considered a private citizen, then the standard is negligence, and saying "Vic assaulted four women" or "criminal charges are coming" without good proof is negligent as fuck.

Arguably, talking to his friends is enough for a good faith belief that "Vic assaulted four women". But "criminal charges are coming" implies some of them talked to police, who indicated charges would be filed. Considering their failure to report anything is the 20 year problem they keep whining about, that's pretty unlikely.

And it's still not relevant to the TCPA.

whatever the lawyers equivalent of feet pics are.

That would be citations in a brief. Lawyers are sick, sick people.
 
One thing I noticed right now:

In their motion MoRon's counsel asked the Court to extend the deadlines for both their Cross-Appellant Brief and their Appellee's Response Brief to March, 19th.

Ver archivo adjunto 1159978

The Court granted the motion but to me it sounds like they did so only for their overdue Cross-Appellant Brief:

Ver archivo adjunto 1159977

The deadline for the apellee's response briefs is March 10:
Ver archivo adjunto 1159982

I know it will most likely be a nothingburger. But I'm going full LMAO, if WP will miss just another brief's deadline.
It says the "appellees' briefs are due" March 19, though, which is plural. I would read that to say the deadlines for both briefs were extended, as requested.
 
I thinks that is what happens except Popehat doesn't have to direct anything. His orbiters are so pathetic and sycophantic that they do it all on their own in the hopes of getting whatever the lawyers equivalent of feet pics are.

It's true, and it's disgusting. I was following twitter links yesterday and ended up on that retard Popehat's twitter, and he's so up his ass with Trump Derangement that he crows every time something bad happens to anybody even remotely connected to Trump, yet here comes the document evidence proving that the prosecution has been absolutely and irrefutably telling lies to the court and concealing exculpatory evidence in many of these cases, and this motherfucker is quieter than a fart from a church mouse.

You would think that a "reputable" lawyer would want crooked prosecutors held accountable for literally perpetrating fraud on the court, but lawtwitter is morally corrupt and angry. They don't care about standards in the rule of law or equal justice, they just want to be seen as on the winning side. And since Shithat is the defacto leader of the cunts of lawtwitter, if he is an emotional wreck who will sell out his trade then the rest will follow suit.

They make me sick.
 
It says the "appellees' briefs are due" March 19, though, which is plural. I would read that to say the deadlines for both briefs were extended, as requested.

I think you misread it. It says the appellee's briefs (from all appellees, including Funi and Marchi) in response to Vic's appellant brief are due March 10.
The Order only grants the extension of MoRons' cross-appellant brief, which is now due March 19.
 
I hope they misread it too and fucking miss the filing date, I would die laughting
On one hand that would be a Top Kek, on the other..it would give Law Twitter a way to "excuse" how they lost "REEE VIC WON BECAUSE OF A TECHNICALITY!!! REEEE" and I don't want that, I want the actual laws to be what decide how this falls.
 
On one hand that would be a Top Kek, on the other..it would give Law Twitter a way to "excuse" how they lost "REEE VIC WON BECAUSE OF A TECHNICALITY!!! REEEE" and I don't want that, I want the actual laws to be what decide how this falls.
The reeing of them over Ty being incompetent and then that happening to lemonhead would be the toppest of keks.
 
Honestly, just making it to Discovery will be the kek to end all keks.

If we get an e-mail like Chris Sabat going:
"Mmm, baby. You get Vic and you can put a gerbil in my asshole and Ron can watch."

Would make it forever.

I'm -very- interested in seeing what kind of threats Sabat had going toward them or others, tbh. If any.
 
Última edición:
I'm -very- interested in seeing what kind of threats Sabat had going toward them or others, tbh. If any.
I particularly want to see the communications between the defendants and the KamehaCon breachers, Sarah Wiedenheft, Josh Grelle, Daman Mills, and Josh Martin.

If there's anything to the effect of "KamehaCon invited Vic again. We don't want you to attend anymore," oh my fuck, that'll be devastating,
 
I particularly want to see the communications between the defendants and the KamehaCon breachers, Sarah Wiedenheft, Josh Grelle, Daman Mills, and Josh Martin.

If there's anything to the effect of "KamehaCon invited Vic again. We don't want you to attend anymore," oh my fuck, that'll be devastating,
Lol if you don’t think they’ll be destroying records like nazis and former Soviet states.
 
Lol if you don’t think they’ll be destroying records like nazis and former Soviet states.
If they did it over email or text messages then they can't really erase that, there are always some records that the companies keep, Discovery would theoretically allow for subpoena of those records. Also remember Nick's comments about there being some people on the side of Vic insider the company, they probably have copies of such communications but are saving them up for the trial proper, not a good idea to show an ace under your sleeve until it's the right moment.
 
Lol if you don’t think they’ll be destroying records like nazis and former Soviet states.
I imagine they'll want to do that, and quite possibly they will. Being spoliation, though, it is a risk. If Vic can prove that they destroyed some evidence, then that might cause a real problem for their case, depending on various factors. How likely that is to happen, I don't know, since proving it probably isn't trivial. But it'd be pretty funny if they got caught at it.

Also, I don't know how good a source this is, but this document, outlining spoliation law in all 50 states, might be informative.

If they did it over email or text messages then they can't really erase that, there are always some records that the companies keep, Discovery would theoretically allow for subpoena of those records. Also remember Nick's comments about there being some people on the side of Vic insider the company, they probably have copies of such communications but are saving them up for the trial proper, not a good idea to show an ace under your sleeve until it's the right moment.
There's that, too. I can't wait to see what might come out at trial.
 
Let’s not get to far ahead of ourselves. It’s still gotta get past the CoA.

And even then, settlement is most likely as none of them will want that stuff public.
Vic doesn’t have to accept settlement, and I doubt the defendants would under what his terms would be for settlement.
 
Vic doesn’t have to accept settlement, and I doubt the defendants would under what his terms would be for settlement.

i know one party that will want to settle if they get past CoA.

I don’t care about the case after that, I just want to see Marchi having to work $5 handies to pay Sam Johnson.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo