Law Judge jails father for blaming her for son's death - Mother killed son after being given custody

https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/ma...dly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county (https://archive.vn/7psYP)
(WXYZ) — He lost a custody battle, then his son lost his life. He blames the court system. He voiced his strong opinions on social media and the next thing he knew he was locked in jail.

“He was so full of life,” said Deborah Vanderhagen of her grandson. “I am trying not to cry.”

On September 22 it will be the two-year anniversary of the day Deborah Vanderhagen’s grandson Killian lost his life. She believes her son Jonathan Vanderhagen is justified in feeling the court cost her grandson his life. He died in the custody of his mom after her son asked for sole custody.

“His lawyer said something is going to happen to this child. You need to get him away from the mother. There are too many red flags. And the judge said, oh that is in the past,” said Deborah Vanderhagen.

The police report filed after two-year-old Killian died shows he had a previous medical condition and investigators did not believe there was evidence Killian’s mother was responsible. His dad felt otherwise and repeatedly posted criticism of the judge and friend of the court on his Facebook Page.

Judge Rachel Rancilio saw the posts, many of which are publicly targeted at her. She apparently felt uncomfortable and possibly threatened.

The Macomb County Sheriff’s office responded and found he criticized what Judge Rachel Rancilio pinned on Pinterest as in his opinion inappropriate, posted videos saying he feels she and others responsible for Killian’s death, and blamed the court system for his loss.

The investigative report also says at no time did he threaten harm or violence.
Still he was charged with malicious use of telecommunications services and released on bond. Then he made more posts, such as one that reads, “Dada back to digging and you best believe I’m gonna dig up all the skeletons in this court’s closet.”

A judge ruled he violated his bond conditions. He now is in jail on half a million dollars bond.

His mom says she feels he simply was exercising his right to free speech.
“He just wants justice. He don’t want to kill anybody. He don’t want anybody physically hurt. He wants them to acknowledge what they’ve done and get justice,” said Deborah Vanderhagen.

A jury trial is scheduled for September 13.
 
free speech sperging back-and-forth

Of course it should be legal to criticize judges and all people involved with law enforcement. Does that mean it makes sense to call a traffic officer "a fucking pig" and demand he squeal for your amusement when you show up to court to have a burnt-out headlight ticket dismissed? Probably not.

The reality is you have to be extra fucking polite to judges and officers to get rulings and treatment in your favor, especially if you aren't a skin color/race match for the authority figure in question. The correct play by Mr. Vandertard here would have been to take his rant to reddit, or anonymize himself on Medium as sympathetic fan of the case. Eron Gjoni of Gamergate fame got slammed with a gag order after the woman he called out in his blogpost cried to the judge that she felt threatened & that shit stuck to him for over 2 years in a legal battle that took crowdfunding to escape. In Eron's case, he kept his mouth shut under penalty of heavy fines and jail time until a famous 1st Amendment precedent lawyer took his case pro bono, and even then he's been reticent on her drama since.

That female judge is a baby killer by proxy & neither her nor the mom should have felt threatened by the husband's shitposts online. Still, attaching those shitposts to your name is a surefire way to tank your custody case's future prospects. Dad should've exercised his free speech in a smarter way and recruited some helpers before strike 2 and landing in jail.

Pretty obscure story link btw, are you a Detroit local @CrunkLord420 or did you bump into it via the reddit sperging? I want Post Malone's autograph(for ebay)
 
Of course it should be legal to criticize judges and all people involved with law enforcement. Does that mean it makes sense to call a traffic officer "a fucking pig" and demand he squeal for your amusement when you show up to court to have a burnt-out headlight ticket dismissed? Probably not.

The reality is you have to be extra fucking polite to judges and officers to get rulings and treatment in your favor, especially if you aren't a skin color/race match for the authority figure in question. The correct play by Mr. Vandertard here would have been to take his rant to reddit, or anonymize himself on Medium as sympathetic fan of the case. Eron Gjoni of Gamergate fame got slammed with a gag order after the woman he called out in his blogpost cried to the judge that she felt threatened & that shit stuck to him for over 2 years in a legal battle that took crowdfunding to escape. In Eron's case, he kept his mouth shut under penalty of heavy fines and jail time until a famous 1st Amendment precedent lawyer took his case pro bono, and even then he's been reticent on her drama since.

That female judge is a baby killer by proxy & neither her nor the mom should have felt threatened by the husband's shitposts online. Still, attaching those shitposts to your name is a surefire way to tank your custody case's future prospects. Dad should've exercised his free speech in a smarter way and recruited some helpers before strike 2 and landing in jail.

Pretty obscure story link btw, are you a Detroit local @CrunkLord420 or did you bump into it via the reddit sperging? I want Post Malone's autograph(for ebay)
I mean... his son is dead; I understand that logically speaking badly to a judge is a bad idea, but his kid is dead.
In a less enlightened country, this would be the sort of a scenario that starts a blood feud.
 
I mean... his son is dead; I understand that logically speaking badly to a judge is a bad idea, but his kid is dead.
In a less enlightened country, this would be the sort of a scenario that starts a blood feud.
Yeah. Not like he has to be worried about custody agreements going against him anymore.
 
I mean... his son is dead; I understand that logically speaking badly to a judge is a bad idea, but his kid is dead.
In a less enlightened country, this would be the sort of a scenario that starts a blood feud.
Define "less enlightened" in context. Because I'm not actually seeing how that's an inferior solution to someone simply because crushed by an unaccountable bureaucracy.
 
Excellent- Mr. Vanderhagen's lawyer is reporting he was found not guilty (fairly rapidly).
https://www.facebook.com/nicholas.paul.790/posts/10157328031365803

Jury was "three old males and four young to middle aged women" according to the local reporter. Sounds like Mr. Vanderhagen's lawyer, while a fairly dogmatic libertarian (won't hold it against him in this case) had things covered pretty well from both the 'muh constitution' and 'muh grieving father' side of things.

One pretty funny aspect- according to Judge Rancilio, she "viewed a video that scared her. The video was not available for the trial." Sounds like some pig fucked up the evidence collection. And a wicked racist like Rancilio is not necessarily particularly credible when testifying to what she supposedly saw.

At this point I mainly want to know now just how much of the context of Mr. Vanderhagen's 'stalking' posts was disclosed.. like the fact that the 'personal stuff' he was reposting from her social media while questioning whether she took child protection seriously included jokes about being a serial killer and shanking people.
https://www.facebook.com/JusticeforKillianV/posts/107432397318409
1568927212355.png

1568927235784.png


EDIT:
Vanderhagen's attorney and mother said his next steps are a hot shower, a good meal, a cigarette, spending time with family and reflecting on the last two months in jail.

"I think that Jonathan should continue speaking the truth, I think he should continue researching our elected public officials and telling people what happened to him and warning other people about the court system," Somberg said.
 
Última edición:
It really feels like we won't have those principles in place much longer here, either.

Having too much of those principles got us all in this mess to begin with. To hell with principles, if there's no respect for the law by those who wield it then they should be dealt with harshly, swiftly, and permanently.
 
Having too much of those principles got us all in this mess to begin with. To hell with principles, if there's no respect for the law by those who wield it then they should be dealt with harshly, swiftly, and permanently.
Didn't justice semi prevail without bloodshed? I mean over the threats, obviously the original ruling was fucked.
 
Didn't justice semi prevail without bloodshed? I mean over the threats, obviously the original ruling was fucked.
Did it? Did I miss something in the coverage? I thought he was still on trial and stuck in jail on a half million dollar bond. That's not justice at all.

ETA: Oh, I guess he was found not guilty. At least his peers aren't total fucking idiots. I still hope this guy sues that city/county/whatever for every penny it's got for this bullshit.
 
Última edición:
Didn't justice semi prevail without bloodshed? I mean over the threats, obviously the original ruling was fucked.
His son is still dead and the airhead and the mafia judge have imprisoned him unjustly for the past three months. The best one can say about this outcome is that it's given him more of a platform for total thermonuclear war against Macomb County.
 
Doesn't even matter. He has every right to burn down- figuratively- anyone connected in any way to the family court system over this.

I imagine men awarded sole custody are less likely to get child support from the mother than the reverse, but they're very rare birds and this sounds a bit like a MRA talking point rather than a major factor in driving the dynamics of family law.


Women are vastly more likely to be assigned primary physical custody of child, be granted child support, receive state benefits, too.

Wow. According to the 'Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium', Mr. Vanderhagen is now a terrorist. For asking why a judge let his son be murdered.

This obviously isn't a credible group, but it would be interesting to know why these guys posted this. Do they just pick random stories from the news and call them 'white supremacist terrorism'? Or did the baby-killing judge or the mafia judge make a phone call to these guys?

Can't wait to see this dude's case listed in the SPLC and ADL list of "white supremacist terrorists in 2019", and being linked constantly to bolster the left's claims that the right is a bigger danger because one fat chick got run down, but please ignore the multiple cases of blunt force trauma to the cranial region of numerous random people.
 
His son is still dead and the airhead and the mafia judge have imprisoned him unjustly for the past three months. The best one can say about this outcome is that it's given him more of a platform for total thermonuclear war against Macomb County.
Best case scenario, the dude meets a criminal sympathetic to him who can give him some directions for a not so legal gun seller
And the rest isnt hard to figure out
 
Wow. According to the 'Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium', Mr. Vanderhagen is now a terrorist. For asking why a judge let his son be murdered.

This obviously isn't a credible group, but it would be interesting to know why these guys posted this. Do they just pick random stories from the news and call them 'white supremacist terrorism'? Or did the baby-killing judge or the mafia judge make a phone call to these guys?
Hey, neat. Libel! He can (and should) sue them for that. Discovery would be quite interesting in figuring out who tipped them off, too.
 
Well, meaning violence is not needed or a good idea. He's out of jail.
Yeah justice isn't possible for him now, but I hope he sues everyone and everything involved.

If it happens to him, it'll happen to anyone. As long as judges like this are allowed to continue wielding the law as a blunt instrument of pain and humiliation then i'd say violence is exactly what is needed.

Until she's truly held accountable for her abuse of the law then there is no room for justice in the courts. A lawsuit ain't gonna fix jack shit.
 
Didn't justice semi prevail without bloodshed? I mean over the threats, obviously the original ruling was fucked.
how has justice prevailed? the kid is dead, who knows where the mom is and the judge that let all this happen and jailed the grieving father is still a judge with no repercussions. where's the justice?
 
how has justice prevailed? the kid is dead, who knows where the mom is and the judge that let all this happen and jailed the grieving father is still a judge with no repercussions. where's the justice?

I guess it will have to be mob justice.
There's a change.org (I know!) petition to impeach, useless of course but it raises awareness of the case.
I see that Rancilio was elected in Macomb County in 2016 and this is her first appointment as a judge. Her term of office is 6yrs.
I suspect that the poor bastards best hope of at least some consequences for the cunt is to plaster her 2022 campaign posters with pictures of his dead kid and with a bit of luck her re-election chances will sink without a trace.
 
I guess it will have to be mob justice.
There's a change.org (I know!) petition to impeach, useless of course but it raises awareness of the case.
I see that Rancilio was elected in Macomb County in 2016 and this is her first appointment as a judge. Her term of office is 6yrs.
I suspect that the poor bastards best hope of at least some consequences for the cunt is to plaster her 2022 campaign posters with pictures of his dead kid and with a bit of luck her re-election chances will sink without a trace.
The only problem with that plan is that she could be running uncontested; if that's the case she could just tell the guy to eat shit since she has no competition.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo