- Registrado
- 28 de Abr, 2019
It's fucking Uncle Fester.
Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS
- Iniciador del tema damian
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Estado
It's fucking Uncle Fester.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mar, 2019
lmao @ "i got a friend in her"
in soye's case, "you got a friend in me" works with his """wife""" too
in soye's case, "you got a friend in me" works with his """wife""" too
Pedro Sanchez
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Ene, 2019
Null got some splainin to do
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2018
This just fucking screams vordrak
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2019
- Registrado
- 18 de Abr, 2019
This is some believe bulma shit.
- Registrado
- 10 de Jul, 2017
Null! How dare you offer to bribe Buzzfeed in Nick's Name! ROFL!
(and why so cheap?)
(and why so cheap?)
- Registrado
- 17 de Mayo, 2019
This is getting dumb now with the hyper gay-ops.
- Registrado
- 21 de Oct, 2018
- Registrado
- 25 de Mar, 2019
more like believenull
its totally him guys hes stabbing nick in the back!!!
Is This The End Of Rekieta Law ???
U
UA 674
Guest
kiwifarms.net
What the fuck am I missing?
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2018
So this journalist has a kiwifarms thread eh?
- Registrado
- 26 de Feb, 2019
Why did Buzzfeed claim that it was Null who was pretending to be Nick? I'm really curious how they made that leap of logic
- Registrado
- 10 de Jul, 2017
Nick just confirmed the Buzzfeed Writer is a documented Lolcow here on the farms. Hmmm? Who we got from Buzzfeed?
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2019
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Lol Nick forgot about the agreement between Meyer and Waid again.
"Defendant’s position is that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over him. For that reason, Defendant requests that the Court extend the deadline to file any motion to dismiss under the TCPA to 14 days after an order by the Court denying (in whole or in part) the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.
For clarity, the 14 day period would not begin to run on a magistrate’s report and recommendation, but only on the Court’s order on that report and recommendation."
So far, we just have the report and recommendation. Meyer could challenge the recommendation and then the judge would have to rule on it. Only then would the 14 days begin ticking.
"Defendant’s position is that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over him. For that reason, Defendant requests that the Court extend the deadline to file any motion to dismiss under the TCPA to 14 days after an order by the Court denying (in whole or in part) the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.
For clarity, the 14 day period would not begin to run on a magistrate’s report and recommendation, but only on the Court’s order on that report and recommendation."
So far, we just have the report and recommendation. Meyer could challenge the recommendation and then the judge would have to rule on it. Only then would the 14 days begin ticking.
- Registrado
- 9 de Mar, 2019
You assume this is an actual writer from BuzzFeed and not someone who SAYS they are a writer from BuzzFeed.
- Estado