Science Koalas 'Functionally Extinct' in Australia with just 80,000 Estimated to Remain

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema AA 102
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio

The Australian Koala Foundation said it believes “there are no more than 80,000 koalas in Australia,” making the species "functionally extinct."
While this number is dramatically lower than the most recent academic estimates, there's no doubt koala numbers in many places are in steep decline.
It's hard to say exactly how many koalas are still remaining in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and the Australian Capital Territory, but they are highly vulnerable to such threats as deforestation, disease and the effects of climate change.
Once a koala population falls below a critical point, it can no longer produce the next generation, leading to extinction.
What Does ‘Functionally Extinct' Mean?
The term “functionally extinct” can describe a few perilous situations. In one case, it can refer to a species whose population has declined to the point where it can no longer play a significant role in the ecosystem. For example, it has been used to describe dingoes in places where they have become so reduced they have a negligible influence on the species they prey on.
Dingoes are top predators and therefore can play a significant role in some ecosystems. Our innocuous, leaf-eating koala cannot be considered a top predator.
For millions of years, koalas have been a key part of the health of our eucalyptus forests by eating upper leaves, and on the forest floor, their droppings contribute to important nutrient recycling. Their known fossil records date back approximately 30 million years, so they may have once been a food source for megafauna carnivores.
"Functionally extinct" can also describe a population that is no longer viable. For example, in Southport, Queensland, native oyster reef beds are functionally extinct because more than 99 percent of the habitat has been lost and there are no individuals left to reproduce.
Finally, "functionally extinct" can refer to a small population that, although still breeding, is suffering from inbreeding that can threaten its future viability. We know that at least some koala populations in urban areas are suffering in this way, and genetic studies on the Koala Coast, located 20 kilometers (12 miles) southeast of Brisbane, show that the population is suffering from reduced genetic variation. In South East Queensland, koalas in some areas have experienced catastrophic declines
We also know that koala populations in some inland regions of Queensland and New South Wales are affected by climate extremes, such as severe droughts and heat waves, and have declined by as much as 80 percent.
Exhaustive multidisciplinary koala research continues apace in an effort to find ways of protecting wild koala populations and ensuring that they remain viable now and in the future. Habitat loss, population dynamics, genetics, disease, diet and climate change are some key areas being studied.
How Many Koalas Are There?
Koala researchers are often asked, “How many koalas are in the wild?” It's a hard question to answer. Koalas are not stationary, are patchily distributed throughout an extremely wide range encompassing urban and rural areas in four states and one territory, and are usually difficult to see.
koala
File photo. Koala charity claims species is "functionally extinct."ISTOCK
To determine whether each population of koalas scattered across eastern Australia is functionally extinct would require a gargantuan effort.
In 2016, in an attempt to determine population trends for the koala within the four states, a panel of 15 koala experts used a structured, four-step question format to estimate bioregional population sizes of koalas, and changes in those sizes.
The estimated percentage of koala population loss in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia was 53 percent, 26 percent, 14 percent and 3 percent, respectively. The estimated total number of koalas for Australia was 329,000 (within a range of 144,000 to 605,000), with an estimated average decline of 24 percent over the past three generations and the next three generations.
Since May 2012, koalas have been listed as vulnerable in Queensland, New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory because populations in these regions have declined significantly or are at risk of doing so.
In the southern states of Victoria and South Australia, koala populations vary widely from abundant to low or locally extinct. Although not currently listed as vulnerable, these koalas are also experiencing a range of serious threats, including low genetic diversity.
To date, the present “vulnerable” listing has not achieved any known positive results for koala populations in Queensland and New South Wales. In fact, recent research invariably shows the opposite.
This is because the key threats to koalas remain and are mostly increasing. The primary threat is habitat loss. Koala habitat (primarily eucalyptus woodlands and forests) continues to rapidly diminish, and unless it is protected, restore, and expanded, we will indeed see wild koala populations become “functionally extinct." We know what comes after that.

Christine Adams-Hosking is an honorary research fellow at The University of Queensland, Australia.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Views expressed in this article are the author's own.
 
This is something that's always deeply confused me about the endangered species lists:

How exactly is it determined? Say for instance that there were never more than 120,000 koalas to begin with; at which point do they become critically endangered? I'm sure there are multiple species on the list that are listed as critically endangered that just never had large numbers to begin with. It just seems like they assume that all species had or have one million members (or something) at some point and start reasoning from there. It's certainly not the case that we've counted all of the animals, we haven't even counted all of the species.

Doesn't make a lick of sense to me.
 
This is a weird article. Apparently koalas are Pakistani and inbreeding is fucking them over? Which makes more sense than claiming they are going extinct, because let me tell you there is no shortage of koalas in my neighborhood, they sit in the trees and bark every morning from 4 til 6.
 
No, actually, they aren't. They are classified as vulnerable by an actual real body that isn't some stupid Aussie Koala Society trying to get pity money. The problem they are facing is habitat loss and local populations are dying off. They are not "functionally extinct" whatever the fuck that means. That's the article tl;dr
 
Aussies keep making that dropbear joke, and visiting Americans aren't taking any chances.
 
Functionally is such a cop out term, either finish the job or say you aren't ready yet.
 
This is a weird article. Apparently koalas are Pakistani and inbreeding is fucking them over? Which makes more sense than claiming they are going extinct, because let me tell you there is no shortage of koalas in my neighborhood, they sit in the trees and bark every morning from 4 til 6.
The phenomenon is called the extinction vortex. When a population of a species drops to low numbers for whatever reason, they begin inbreeding as they can't find more genetically diverse mates. As generations go by, the gene pool gets less diverse while also being filled with traits that impede survival. Eventually, the species would die off
 

Bad science reporting. Some local populations may be functionally extinct, but not the species as a whole. The species is still being impacted by climate change and habitat loss and facing a pretty steep decline, but still have a fairly wide distribution.
 
The pure Abbo Dingo is not wasteful like the white man's feral dog. He lives in tune with the environment in which he is a destructive invasive species, and uses every part of the toddler.
 
Much like how the great climate apocalypse has failed, and our coastal cities aren't up to the 9th floor in water as they told us would happen by 2020 at the latest... so are more and more of these articles being written that say the same thing about biological species "They aren't extinct like we said they would be, but, they're functionally extinct in some local areas due to lack of genetic diversity, good enough. We clearly were right all along!"

The "Scare em straight" approach failed to create the Green Generation of the 21st Century that all the lefties thought would happen, and now, since they've Cried "Wolf" and the dire predictions didn't happen, ironically, we're likely to see more damage done as the ACTUAL issues of habitat loss and whatnot are glossed over as "you ALWAYS say this will hurt them, and you were wrong the last 120 times "

So instead of some reasonable approach to ecological stewardship, we get the "doomed" conditions re-defined and the cries of "WOLF!" Start up again.... with clickbait leading the way.
 
Koalas are fucking horrible animals. They have one of the smallest brain to body ratios of any mammal, additionally - their brains are smooth. A brain is folded to increase the surface area for neurons. If you present a koala with leaves plucked from a branch, laid on a flat surface, the koala will not recognise it as food. They are too thick to adapt their feeding behaviour to cope with change. In a room full of potential food, they can literally starve to death. This is not the token of an animal that is winning at life. Speaking of stupidity and food, one of the likely reasons for their primitive brains is the fact that additionally to being poisonous, eucalyptus leaves (the only thing they eat) have almost no nutritional value. They can't afford the extra energy to think, they sleep more than 80% of their fucking lives. When they are awake all they do is eat, shit and occasionally scream like fucking satan. Because eucalyptus leaves hold such little nutritional value, koalas have to ferment the leaves in their guts for days on end. Unlike their brains, they have the largest hind gut to body ratio of any mammal. Many herbivorous mammals have adaptations to cope with harsh plant life taking its toll on their teeth, rodents for instance have teeth that never stop growing, some animals only have teeth on their lower jaw, grinding plant matter on bony plates in the tops of their mouths, others have enlarged molars that distribute the wear and break down plant matter more efficiently... Koalas are no exception, when their teeth erode down to nothing, they resolve the situation by starving to death, because they're fucking terrible animals. Being mammals, koalas raise their joeys on milk (admittedly, one of the lowest milk yields to body ratio... There's a trend here). When the young joey needs to transition from rich, nourishing substances like milk, to eucalyptus (a plant that seems to be making it abundantly clear that it doesn't want to be eaten), it finds it does not have the necessary gut flora to digest the leaves. To remedy this, the young joey begins nuzzling its mother's anus until she leaks a little diarrhoea (actually fecal pap, slightly less digested), which he then proceeds to slurp on. This partially digested plant matter gives him just what he needs to start developing his digestive system. Of course, he may not even have needed to bother nuzzling his mother. She may have been suffering from incontinence. Why? Because koalas are riddled with chlamydia. In some areas the infection rate is 80% or higher. This statistic isn't helped by the fact that one of the few other activities koalas will spend their precious energy on is rape. Despite being seasonal breeders, males seem to either not know or care, and will simply overpower a female regardless of whether she is ovulating. If she fights back, he may drag them both out of the tree, which brings us full circle back to the brain: Koalas have a higher than average quantity of cerebrospinal fluid in their brains. This is to protect their brains from injury... should they fall from a tree. An animal so thick it has its own little built in special ed helmet. I fucking hate them.
Tldr; Koalas are stupid, leaky, STI riddled sex offenders. But, hey. They look cute. If you ignore the terrifying snake eyes and terrifying feet.
 
I don't want them go extinct, but people talk about extinction like it's an event that only exists due to humanity as though we alone brought that up. Again, I wouldn't want them to disappear, but could it be that it's their time to go? Who knows what could have happened if humans never arrived. Maybe they would have died anyway and sooner due to more dangerous predators.
 
Aren't koalas like the panda bears of Australia except much more retarded? What purpose do they really have in the ecosystem, anyway?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo