🐱 Sex Work Is Work—And Its Laborers Are Officially Unionizing

CatParty

731219


Understandably, it’s pretty difficult to start a union when parts of your industry have been criminalized by the state. But that hasn’t stopped British sex workers from unionizing in order to fight for their labor rights—even with the web of contradictory laws around sex work in the UK.

In England, it’s legal to exchange sex for money, but street-based workers are often criminalized through loitering and soliciting laws. Brothels are illegal, but an overly generous legal definition of a ‘brothel’ means that sex workers can be raided and persecuted for sharing premises—even if they’re doing so for their own protection. Campaign groups and collectives like Decrim Now and SWARM are calling for full decriminalization, but in the meantime strippers—whose work is entirely legal—are unionizing in the hopes of sparking industry-wide change.


The idea for a strippers’ union came at last year’s Women’s Strike, in which sex workers played an instrumental role. “It literally just started with a conversation,” Shiri Shalmy, a representative of trade unionUnited Voices of the World (UVW), recalls. “We soon found that strippers are often misclassified as self-employed, but in reality they’re expected to be on time, to follow a shift pattern and to be told what they can earn—or, in some cases, lose.” She’s referring to the house fees that are commonplace in strip clubs. Dancers can also be fined for not showing up to shifts, and Shalmy says anecdotally that she knows of dancers who have been fired for trying to unionize.

Shalmy herself is not a dancer; she supports the strippers union’ as part of her role at UVW. “Most sex workers are truly independent, but from a trade union perspective it makes sense to start with workers who can organise inside an actual workplace,” she explains. “We’re entirely led by members; we don’t tell them what to do and we don’t assume we know the industry better than they do. What we do is provide the legal support and the organizing experience.”

Louise, a dancer and member of the union, tells Broadly: “I think pretty much every dancer has experienced discrimination at some point. It’s the same as being a woman in any workplace!” She lists a number of examples: clubs turning away dancers of color because they “already have enough,” a lack of support for dancers dealing with personal issues, and casual repeated body-shaming from both managers and clients. (Louise asked to use her stripper name as she is not out to her friends and family.)

It’s worth noting that these problems aren’t unique to strip clubs—the English Collective of Prostitutes has authored an extensive research report proving that jobs commonly thought of as women’s work tends to be highly exploitative—but that doesn’t mean that it’s not worth trying to fix them.

That’s where unions come in. “What’s beautiful about organizing is that we want better conditions for all of our fellow dancers,” Louise explains. She describes an “informal sisterhood” fighting collectively for their rights, a battle which has already yielded some victories. Better still, a handful of strip clubs seem to be actively listening: They’re consulting with workers and hiring staff to manage their concerns.


In Scotland, a recent vote to develop a version of the so-called Nordic model—a widely-criticized framework that criminalizes clients but not sex workers—has led to sex workers unionizing with the support of trade union GMB Scotland. Organizer Rhea Wolfson explains that the new legislation was the main catalyst: “Sex workers joined to organize fellow workers to fight against laws which put their safety at risk. Our aim is to show that sex work is work, and to fight for a legislative framework which gives those workers access to the same rights we all rely on.”

Sex worker Megara Furie also played a key role in fighting for unionization. “If you criminalize clients, it’s not going to end demand,” she outlined in an interview with the Evening Times . “All it does is remove any safeguards we’ve got.” She shares the sentiment that decriminalization is the best way to protect workers—it’s been proven to be highly effective in New Zealand—and as a result the union welcomes self-employed sex workers in its fight for legislative change. It’s an unconventional but pragmatic approach to fighting laws that isolate sex workers.

A grievance shared by both unions is that sex workers of all varieties are often told they’re self-employed when they legally aren’t considered as such. “It’s a workforce that doesn’t consider itself a workforce,” explains Shalmy, who cites Uber and Deliveroo drivers as similar examples. “That’s no coincidence. It’s a deliberate political move to deprive workers of their rights. It’s part of a wider neoliberal move to destroy our communities.”

Similar sex worker unions are cropping up across the world. OTRAS is a particularly high-profile example. The Spanish union initially had its registration approved by the government, but swift political backlash led to the decision being revoked on the basis that prostitution doesn’t legally qualify as work (OTRAS is appealing the decision). Dutch sex workers’ union PROUD is currently organizing to protest a recent ban of Red Light District tours. Outside of Europe, countries like Argentina haveextensive histories of sex worker unionization. The same can’t be said of North America; the most up-to-date research suggests that numerous attempts to achieve trade union recognition for sex workers have largely failed, although vital NGOs like SWOP (Sex Workers’ Outreach Project) continue to fight for justice and the wider safety of workers.

But trade unions in the UK have a specific history. They’ve struggled to thrive since being ravaged by union-hating Conservative prime minister Margaret Thatcher in the 80s, and smaller bodies have been swallowed up by larger, more powerful entities. “They were deliberately destroyed,” laments Shalmy, “so as bigger unions essentially became service unions, the political rhetoric became ‘sit down with bosses and talk to them.’”

The general consensus among unions is that this approach no longer works. A gradual shift towards zero-hour contracts have made workplace rights the exception as opposed to the rule; as a result, unions are becoming more vocal and more demanding. “The new trade unions are successful, and they’re growing rapidly,” Shalmy continues, telling me that UVW gained 124 members in the last month alone. “We’ve injected a new kind of politics into trade unions. It’s not about asking for small reforms and tiny improvements. It’s about saying: ‘We have been robbed and cheated, not just out of our wages, but our of our collective bargaining power.’ So we don’t ask. We demand.”
 
Personally, I agree woth you that prostitution should be legalized, thus could shrinken the black market and the abuse of hookers from the pimps.
However, the problem a lot of people here have with this union, as I could concluded from skimming through the comments, seems to be that this union isn't practical on solving any problem that related to the real "prostitution problem".
Sure maybe this union could push though to have prostitution to be legalized in US. But could it really help the real prostitutes aka no thot larping as whore, who have mortal danger coming from their pimps, even after the legalization.
From what I have read, I don't feel like they would really provide any in need help for those poor souls. All they want, as it seems, is just being a whore aristocrat.

I get that, that's the reason I said that people have negative connotation about unions.

Union is basically an association, an insurance policy, legal help. They can pitch in money, and in ideal world where the funds are not squandered, those funds could be used in lobby efforts, legal aid to hookers caught in drag nets, help managing asshole pimps, free testing, medical help may be. There are many issues that whores need help with and would be better off if they team up together to help each other. As usual, the high end hookers won't need this as much as those on lower pay scale.

Government victimizes whores directly or by proxy more than Johns or slave traders.
 
I like how none of the people in the OP's photo are even remotely fuckable, let alone look like someone who'd ever get paid for it.

If you were representing those poor ladies then, well, talk to the pimp and see what they will get you(hint: bullet.) If you are not, then why the fuck are you talking about sex worker right when you have as much right as other worker on earth?

Same reason these kinds of folks bitch about muh soggy knee in first-world countries but clam the fuck up the moment you point to third-world shitholes that could actually use an injection of feminism. They're doing it for the Woke Points™.
 
Not in their country of origin. There's a large and unspeakably evil network bringing these women to market, even if that Market is in a "fair" country.

Countries of origin has less to do with this, as women are recruited or baited to come to countries where they are victimized.

The "fair countries" keep those networks in the shade thanks to criminalization of prostitution and kneecapping any immigration/work enforcement. Sanctuary policies is what in fact promotes this victimization.
 
Shiri Shalmy, a representative of trade unionUnited Voices of the World (UVW), recalls.
"Voices of the world unite!"

"Fuck the system, man."
"I'm Jim fucking Sterling, son."
"Sacre bleu, elle est en flambé!"
"Allahu Ackbar!"
"In Series 4, episode 3 Thomas meets a 3-4-3 Emerson Steamer named..."
"Oh those sexist, homophobe bigot cishet white male Nazi transphobe...."
"tweeet tweet tweet tweeeeet tweet"
"Red Tyrannosaurus!"
"Y'all got any grits?"
"ugga booga ugga booga"
"Dokdo is Korean!!!!"
incessant drumming noises
 
In theory this is a fine idea, but I get the impression that these are people whose idea of sex work is camming in a bikini. In reality, this won’t work for the simple reason that sex work at the sharp end is a shallow, exploitative industry with a strong transient, underground element. You won’t convince the immigrants coming over for a few months to make a quick buck to join your union, and the junkies and trafficked women won’t be able to. If your union makes it more difficult or more expensive to hire a hooker, demand will swing in favour of the more dangerous, less legal side of the industry, which historically has always been more than happy to help.

IMO, reform of the sex work laws in Britain is needed. The situation at the moment is a dumb half-and-half situation where some aspects are legal but not others, and anyone attempting to blow the whistle on exploitative or dangerous aspects of the trade risks arrest themselves.
 
  1. Legalize it, no dumbass “Nordic model” needed
  2. Tax it
  3. Require regular STD testing
  4. Use taxes derived from step 2 to fund crackdowns on pimping, trafficking, etc.

This shit isn’t a hard problem to fix.
 
  1. Legalize it, no dumbass “Nordic model” needed
  2. Tax it
  3. Require regular STD testing
  4. Use taxes derived from step 2 to fund crackdowns on pimping, trafficking, etc.
This shit isn’t a hard problem to fix.

In addition to that, put heavy penalties on going to anyone not under the sanctioned umbrella, like trafficked women, illicit apartment brothels, street walkers, just fuck everyone up that does that until the criminal elements are starved to death. Prostitution is something that no government will ever be able to get rid of(just look at Iran) so the only feasible option is to regulate it and try to control it through that, a situation similar to weed these days.

Also, make procuring illegal, so no pimping.

The common counter argument is that Australia did that and they still have trafficked women forced into prostitution and I agree, illegal immigration is a big problem for native laws and regulations in any society.

In theory this is a fine idea, but I get the impression that these are people whose idea of sex work is camming in a bikini.

They should get together with the streamers trying to unionize so that Twitch has to pay them maternity leave or whatever harebrained idea it was.
 
Sex Work is worse than Work. With work you are selling your labor to someone else in exchange for money which you then use to purchase something that was made with someone else's labor, with sex work you are literally selling your body.
 
In addition to that, put heavy penalties on going to anyone not under the sanctioned umbrella, like trafficked women, illicit apartment brothels, street walkers, just fuck everyone up that does that until the criminal elements are starved to death. Prostitution is something that no government will ever be able to get rid of(just look at Iran) so the only feasible option is to regulate it and try to control it through that, a situation similar to weed these days.

Also, make procuring illegal, so no pimping.

The common counter argument is that Australia did that and they still have trafficked women forced into prostitution and I agree, illegal immigration is a big problem for native laws and regulations in any society.
The legal position in the UK more-or-less is this. You go to Soho in London and you see open doors advertising prostitutes perfectly legally. The problem is that the police have very limited resources, thanks to years of cutbacks, so they can’t effectively pursue the illegal aspects.
 
When I'm at the shops and see some people that have kids. I really do wonder. How fucking thirsty was the guy that banged that? Like... seriously, why.

No shit. Same thing when I go to the commissary (military grocery store) or exchange (military version of Walmart, just more upscale). I call them "dependopotamuses" - fat, tattooed, sometimes with all manner of hair colors. I ask myself the same question.

On another subject, prostitution is the world's oldest profession. Happens everywhere, never going to get rid of it. See no reason why sex workers, of all types (except pimps, which need to go) cannot and should not organize. Why not ensure sex workers can work in a reasonably clean and safe environment, for example? Benefits both the worker and the customer. Why not provide the workers with benefits through the union, where applicable? Keeping the workers and families healthy benefits the worker, the family, and the customer. Why not have a certain standard for hours and pay? Why not get these workers into the tax and Social Security systems? Let them pay tax on their earnings, if they are employees. If independent contractors affiliated with the union, they'd pay tax and Social Security on those earnings.

Just copping to reality. Treat workers properly, Provide good working conditions. Get the pimps out of it. Win-win for workers and customers.
 
Unionizing sex workers doesn't make any sense, they're all private contractors or representing their own business. Who exactly is the union going to represent, and to whom? Will the johns also have to start a union, to collectively bargain with the sex worker union on fair rates? How are they going to organize a strike, and who would they be striking against? Are they gonna put up "Closed corner" signs where only union girls can stand?

These people do not understand what a union even is, outside of government mandated bullshit unions that actually have no reason to exist except to pay the union officials.
 
It'll take another 8 years for people to realize that selling their used panties, premium snapchat, softcore porn cosplay, and being a general camwhore is considered sex work, albeit non-physical and long-distance. The faster the actual sex workers start to describe aforementioned as such, the faster we'll purge degeneracy from being accepted in mainstream media (See: Twitch).
 
Sex Work is worse than Work. With work you are selling your labor to someone else in exchange for money which you then use to purchase something that was made with someone else's labor, with sex work you are literally selling your body.
What?

With work, you're selling your entire self, body included, for some amount of time, for some amount of money. If you don't bring your body to work, you won't get paid. You are selling your presence, first and foremost, and then whatever energy you expend.

With sex work, it's the same thing, except typically the contracts aren't as long term.

You're just trying to moralize this but frame it as an objective judgement.
 
Broadly is supposed to be Vice's channel for women's issues.

If you ever needed hard evidence of just how far off the rails that publication is, just read between the lines as the editors try to jam the concept of girldick down their reader's collective throats. Who they validate, what they don't.
Broadly's articles surreptitiously include troons into the feminist agenda. It's just... there. It's a forgone conclusion that transwomen are women and I don't recall them even broaching the issue. If you asked, they'd probably say something like, "We redefined womanhood to be dick inclusive last year and have proceeded to write as such ever since. Shit's past tense, gurl, get with the times."
or 'Women should think for themselves, so long as we do that thinking.'

Between that and their ever present need to acknowledge/normalize the 'inherent nobility' of sex work, I see Broadly as a wolf in sheep's clothing.
 
I agree with you but in practice, unfuckable weird men stay weird after they pay someone to fuck them. I tangentially (friend of a friend) knew a guy who got to 30 as a virgin, and decided to pay a hooker to fuck him as a 30th present to himself so he could finally lose his virginity and, if anything, he was weirder after. It was like now he'd had a sniff of pussy he knew what he was missing, but it didn't fix any of the underlying reasons that he was complete vagina-kryptonite before.
I think I know the person to whom you refer:
736284
 
Atrás
Top Abajo