🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon, alleged rapist and revenge pornographer. Exiled in Mexico carlesss on a diet of slop. Has triple titties. Wanted to fuck Keffals' moobs.

[Secret Asshole]

Its more than likely YouTube did it because they instantly took down Killstream channels.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Consider the following scenario.

#wsjkillskids and/or #cancergate becomes a GamerGate like rabble uprising against journos.

Shitrat and Kraut are found to be the flaggers. Sargon is implicated.

So Sargon gets his GamerGate 2.0 but he's on the Anita Sarkeesian side.

LMAO.

 

[Cinderblock]

That's all true, but is missing the broader point. A charity should be able to say "Hey we don't like them and think they're gross, but jokes on them because we are gonna use their money for good." without getting any backlash.

So, they had to deny contributions based on political motivations, basically alienating 50% of their possible donors, for some SJW virtue signalling points?

That YouTube refunded a stream's worth of Super Chats that they got no part of and you think that these things, along with the unpersoning, is all about keeping up appearances?

Don't be exceptional guys. Not one week has passed from the synagoge shootings. Having 14.88 chats and "peacfully sunset all the jews" is not "having divergent political opinions". At least not in terms of optics. But as we know, the optics have been screwed in favour of going in.

 

[IamnottheNSA]

http://wsjkillskids.com/

 

[Crippled_Retard]

Didn't some of the Septics say they were talking to journalists, like Kraut did or whatever?

 

[UnKillFill]

I thought dehumanizing people was a bad thing. I guess it's ok when *they* do it.

 

[PantsFreeZone]

Don't be exceptional guys. Not one week has passed from the synagoge shootings. Having 14.88 chats and "peacfully sunset all the jews" is not "having divergent political opinions". At least not in terms of optics. But as we know, the optics have been screwed in favour of going in.

Dude. Kill All Jews was trending on Twitter. Where is the deplatforming of Jack and Company?

This is a straight up mass assassination play like the end of The Godfather. Alex Jones 2.0 with The WSJ and Google working in lockstep.

 

[Fougaro]

Ralph supposedly appearing here in 15 minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=secj-F194H8

"Ryan Dawson, who has also been targeted by the techno globo-homo elite." Never change, Joachim!

 

[Secret Asshole]

I thought dehumanizing people was a bad thing. I guess it's ok when *they* do it.

Of course it is. If it doesn't fit the narrative, they try to change it because it makes them uncomfortable.

 

[Yellow Yam Scam]

This probably wouldn't have happened if dweebs could contain themselves and not send superchats with Nazi memes. The reason we can't have nice things is because there will always be some loser who doesn't get it can't figure out that they are making themselves and the content creators they like look bad.

 

[DunrikNurd]

Probably because the US is #1 in the world for successful cancer treatment

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2007/09/14/stronach_travels_to_us_for_cancer_treatment.html

Maybe so, but US cancer survival rate are actually lower than Canada, Brasil, Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Germany, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland und so weiter.

Why that is?

Well... Maybe because only rich US and foreign citizens can afford their #1 successful cancer treatment. Luckely for the rest of us poor bastards who live in countries with good developed public health, this only frees up the line, the rich still have to pay. US poor bastards are left to the mercy of politically correct donations.

 

[Sonork]

More galaxy brain logic. If you refuse money you get more money.

 

[Mapo Tofu]

This probably wouldn't have happened if dweebs could contain themselves and not send superchats with Nazi memes. The reason we can't have nice things is because there will always be some loser who doesn't get it can't figure out that they are making themselves and the content creators they like look bad.

You expect Youtube commenters to have any sort of decency.

 

[mindlessobserver]

There is really only one solution to this, and it hurts my soul to say it. Government needs to introduce legislation to regulate the internet, and create a whole new layer of beaurocracy to manage it. essentially, internet police, with the mission statement of preventing monopolistic control and collusion in the same way the SEC prevents market manipulation by the banks. Will it be perfect? No. The SEC sucks balls but it's still better then nothing.

 

[Fougaro]

More galaxy brain logic. If you refuse money you get more money.

Ver archivo adjunto 582873

Jim's stream must have really broken him.

 

[Absolutego]

There is really only one solution to this, and it hurts my soul to say it. Government needs to introduce legislation to regulate the internet, and create a whole new layer of beaurocracy to manage it. essentially, internet police, with the mission statement of preventing monopolistic control and collusion in the same way the SEC prevents market manipulation by the banks. Will it be perfect? No. The SEC sucks balls but it's still better then nothing.

Or we could finally nut up and utilize existing trade regulations against ostensibly competing outlets colluding against individuals for non-legal reasons, and maybe break up a few media empires and Alphabet for violating anti-trust laws for good measure.

I'd take enforcing existing regulation the feds have been content to ignore for over 100 years than adding more useless paper to the legal code.

 

[TazMetric]

There is really only one solution to this, and it hurts my soul to say it. Government needs to introduce legislation to regulate the internet, and create a whole new layer of beaurocracy to manage it. essentially, internet police, with the mission statement of preventing monopolistic control and collusion in the same way the SEC prevents market manipulation by the banks. Will it be perfect? No. The SEC sucks balls but it's still better then nothing.

There is something going to supreme court on this. No idea when they'll vote on it or whatever: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/sup...cide-fb-twitter-power-to-regulate-speech.html

 

[Secret Asshole]

This probably wouldn't have happened if dweebs could contain themselves and not send superchats with Nazi memes. The reason we can't have nice things is because there will always be some loser who doesn't get it can't figure out that they are making themselves and the content creators they like look bad.

Wrong. This would have happened anyway because of the nature of the show, it was right leaning. They've labeled fucking Mundane Matt as alt-right. The reason this happened is because a right wing show with the power to raise 27k in one stream. They're terrified of that influence. They don't want them to have that influence at all. YouTube was eventually going to do something with Superchats anyway because Youtube are dumb cunts. Taking out Ralph was purely the Wallstreet journal. Its because he was the #1 late night show on Youtube. They don't want the right to have any sort of influence because they literally believe hearing something will make you a nazi.

Thing is the opposite is happening. This is blowing up really big actually.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

There is really only one solution to this, and it hurts my soul to say it. Government needs to introduce legislation to regulate the internet, and create a whole new layer of beaurocracy to manage it. essentially, internet police, with the mission statement of preventing monopolistic control and collusion in the same way the SEC prevents market manipulation by the banks. Will it be perfect? No. The SEC sucks balls but it's still better then nothing.

Not necessarily, there's an argument that we might have free speech in a public forum like social media, the supreme court has recognized it as a public forum, though there's no definitive ruling, the current controlling ruling would treat them like malls (which is retarded), and say they can do whatever, but the case would have to get to the sup court

 

[Mapo Tofu]

There is something going to supreme court on this. No idea when they'll vote on it or whatever: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/16/sup...cide-fb-twitter-power-to-regulate-speech.html

I said decency not censorship.
It's the difference between "Buy me candy" and "Break someone's neck"
Decency: Don't say dumb shit that can fuck others.
Censorship: Don't say shit