NoraReed / Nora Fleck / Nora Reed Heineman-Fleck and the Norasphere - The neverending fuck-ups of a sadistic thumb and tons of white knights

Destacado
It's not the first time they have connected. They have a friend at WaPo, it's pretty clear, so nobody is asking, "Why do we care about this random weirdo with the psychotic not even blue checkmarked twitter feed?" sort of questions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...into-losing-arguments/?utm_term=.00742d0e0219

The funniest thing about clicking on a WaPo Nora Reed link is that the WaPo paywall actually asks you for money for this content. Look, look, even if you like this...Nora Reed is giving it away for free every day!
 
laserbender dijo:
Damn, WaPo should have never let someone like Reed post an article. :/
Presiona para expandir...

It’s their online opinion page. It’s like when someone says they have an article on WSJ, but it’s just one of the blogs anyone can post.

Also lol
379528BF-CAAD-4387-859E-CC06321E2C25.jpeg
 
Cows all say the farms is a “stalking website” but in the end, people still believe what we post because it’s well documented the source material are cow’s own tweets.

Sarah Nyberg is a self admitted pedophile. Jake Alley is a creepy transtrender stalker and serial harasser. Nora Reed is an abusive serial harasser called out by her own side (thanks Randi!). Reeebecca Gerber is a mentally ill, lying scammer and harasser.

These are all truths based on their tweets and actions towards others. We didn’t invent anything, we just posted and archived their tweets to laugh at and comment on.
 
Chan the Wizard dijo:
I guess it’s ok for Nora Reed to be a rape-apologist and pedophile-apologist if she doesn’t like the source.
Presiona para expandir...

Well, yes. Because if you listened to Kiwi Farms, you might discover what a reprehensible failure of a human being Nora actually is, how much of her persona is a lie, and that she has absolutely no authority, moral or otherwise, to try and force people's behaviour the way she wants to. All taken from her own words and self-reported actions, mind you.

It's not at all surprising that the people who most aggressively claim everything here is tainted are the people who feel they have the most to lose if we were to be believed.

Chan the Wizard dijo:
Is this a sign of autism or just another sign she isn’t terribly bright?
Presiona para expandir...

When your entire identity is based around being offended all the time, something like 'humour' or a 'running joke' becomes anathema. Considering her sense of humour is based in either her weaksauce version of 'lolrandom' or in her attempts to own her enemies, you'd think she might be able to recognise when it's used on her. But then that would take an ability to laugh at herself, even a hint of self-awareness, and the removal of the hypocrisy at the heart of Nora - that she doesn't hold herself to anything close to the same standard she REEEEEEs about in others.
 
Someone a decade too old to be spending the entire day on Twitter should probably not be making remarks about ageism
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo