- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2018
Lmfao. A whopping 1,000 people. Doesn't say anything about their political party or who they even voted for in the actual election.
God damn I hope they're legit trying to push for another Clinton run.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Iniciador del tema Randall Fragg
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Lmfao. A whopping 1,000 people. Doesn't say anything about their political party or who they even voted for in the actual election.
God damn I hope they're legit trying to push for another Clinton run.
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2016
Now that I think of it, Obama's got much more in common with gangsta rappers than with middle-class black America. Never does a lick of work, he just shows up and mouths a bunch of nonsense and people throw money at him. His dreams have all come true.
- Registrado
- 16 de Ago, 2016
- Registrado
- 28 de Feb, 2018
That's a refreshing comparison.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2017
They're wrong. This isn't Trump's end game -he's not finished because I'm not yet tired of winning.
- Registrado
- 26 de Dic, 2014
lol shut up Barry, or do you want people to troll you with your "you are never going to be president" video? that one must still sting
- Registrado
- 27 de Sep, 2015
Hm. Article says:
"Eight percent of respondents said they would not vote in such a hypothetical match-up, while 4 percent declined to state a preference. With those options excluded, the percentage of those who said they would vote for Trump increased to 41 percent, while the percentage of those who said the same for Clinton went up to 50 percent."
Better idea: Instead of excluding those numbers... just give them to Trump. I mean, it's pretty obvious that that's what happened before, right? People just kind of lied to pollsters? You don't even need to like Trump, just hate him with insufficient intensity and some people are going to want to have that fight. Do you have the energy to have that fight today? A lot of people would just like to interact with our TDS-afflicted friends and family, who otherwise VERY nice people.
"Eight percent of respondents said they would not vote in such a hypothetical match-up, while 4 percent declined to state a preference. With those options excluded, the percentage of those who said they would vote for Trump increased to 41 percent, while the percentage of those who said the same for Clinton went up to 50 percent."
Better idea: Instead of excluding those numbers... just give them to Trump. I mean, it's pretty obvious that that's what happened before, right? People just kind of lied to pollsters? You don't even need to like Trump, just hate him with insufficient intensity and some people are going to want to have that fight. Do you have the energy to have that fight today? A lot of people would just like to interact with our TDS-afflicted friends and family, who otherwise VERY nice people.
- Registrado
- 20 de Mayo, 2016
In other words...
You know they say that all candidates are created equal, but you look at me and you look at Hillary and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one on one with another candidate, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But I'm a genetic freak and I'm very very intelligent! So you got a 25%, AT BEST, at beat me. Then you add Bernie Sanders to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the 3 way at the prelims, you got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because Bernie Sanders KNOWS he can't beat me and he's not even gonna try!
So Hillary, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning the elections. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning the presidency. See Hilldawg, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you in the Supreme Court.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2017
Then you take the pubes, and I'll take the twenty dollars
- Registrado
- 28 de Feb, 2018
Good timing since Ford is probably not going to testify.
- Registrado
- 12 de Abr, 2016
I love how they always think people are gonna read their pages long "stunning and brave" screeds. They never learned how to make a point; you get in, make the point, then get out. No fluff, no beating around the bush, no bullshit. You'll note how leftist "memes" are the of the same overly verbose nature -- Donald and people who know how to meme know how to make their point with few words, usually of the politically incorrect nature.
also lol that bitch look fat
also lol that bitch look fat
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2016
1. If every woman in the world has been assaulted at some point, then most of us got over it damn fast and still manage to function, so it clearly isn't that big a deal. What I'm trying to say is, stop trivializing rape, you enabler. (Sorry to be Mad on the Internet, but fucking hell, these women are the ones who make it hard to take assault claims seriously.)
2. If you gave one single shit about what God wants, you wouldn't turn a blind eye when other women are raped and murdered by Muslim refugees. Don't invoke His name lightly.
(ETA: This is Lauren Jauregui of Fifth Harmony, noted bisexual musician who has bitched about "Nazi" Trump before, especially the "Muslim Ban".)
- Registrado
- 28 de Feb, 2018
- These days, SJWS makes us White Christians accountable for rape, not Blacks nor Muslims because that's bigoted!
- Keep in mind that Jauregui is 22, so I imagine she'll change her political opinions on Trump and other shit the older she gets.
- Registrado
- 12 de Ene, 2017
- Registrado
- 4 de Jun, 2018
They wish the legal system worked like their Title IX kangaroo courts.
- Registrado
- 12 de Sep, 2017
Brevity is the soul of wit and these people are witless.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2017
Oh that makes sense. If she's in the pop industry, there is a near 100% chance this girl has traded some disgusting sex act with some old guy for keeping her career and/or the money coming. And the reason she's freaking out about this is because she knows if she came out with all the weinstein-type sex shit she had to do, and to provide ANY context about what went down (I.E. sucked 37 dicks to make it through auditions), she'd be outed a literal whore. So of course we need to believe when she said she was raped, and not hear anything at all from the person she's accusing when he says "the door was open, she could have walked out, I didn't use any force and just told her what I like to see girls do, and she did it" (on the advice of her manager who told her if she didn't, any of the dozens of other hotter girls would)
Also possibly some frustrations with normies who don't believe her that her fame came at the cost of giving some industry exec a rusty trombone.
No this is logically consistent. God made her, just kinda wen t "ehhhhhh... you know what, maybe I don't need to have a plan for EVERYONE" and just signed the title back over to her. Sometimes its smart to know when to cut your losses.
- Registrado
- 20 de Mayo, 2016
She's agreed to testify
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/21/politics/kavanaugh-ford-senate-judiciary-hearing/index.html
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/21/politics/kavanaugh-ford-senate-judiciary-hearing/index.html
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2016
Taking bets now, pick your poison:
- Her backers offered her more money.
- Her backers reminded her of things she doesn't want other people suddenly "remembering".
- She's going to turn up mysteriously dead a couple days beforehand.
- Registrado
- 4 de Nov, 2017
Non-CNN source on that?
(What are "Things you have to say now you never thought you'd need to say 10 years ago", Alex?)