Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Destacado
I think Booker's gesticulating over the past week is more about keeping his seat from getting primaried by a #resister in 2020 rather than presidential aspirations.

After 2016 I'm pretty sure the DNC will try to build a candidate with as many minority claims as possible, which is why until we get closer to the election I have Harris as a lock for the nomination.
 
TheGreatCitracett dijo:
Because this isn't insane at all...
Ver archivo adjunto 538333
http://www.tmz.com/2018/09/10/carole-cook-donald-trump-john-wilkes-booth-assassinate-president/
Presiona para expandir...
I'd imagine the modern day JWB is somewhere on the side that isn't filled with people that want to take guns away because they get PTSD just from shooting the spooky-dooky AR-15 on a shooting range, let alone ever having the fortitude to cap a world leader in the back of the head with a pistol in Ford's Theatre

In other words, not your's

P.S. let's not forget that Lincoln's death brought far more dire consequences to his former enemies than they'd ever face if he were alive to oversee reconstruction since there were plenty of Union statesmen that wanted to gut the South alive if they had their way. Be careful what you wish for
 
Vault Boy dijo:
You know, shit like this would make for a fine Trump campaign ad for 2020.

Really, if they want to show how insane the left has become, just make a collage of articles like this.
Presiona para expandir...

I'm sure they are going to considering they already made this ad:


They haven't just developed TDS, they've also developed a debilitating case of Shot-In-Own-Foot syndrome.
 
Somewhat tangental, but looks like the D's might be starting to learn.
The kiwi who was talking about the DNC leadership being completely divorced from reality is spot on, but it looks like the new leadership is trying to do some course corrections. It might be too little too late, especially after HRC broke the bank.

Democrats strip superdelegates of power and reform caucuses in 'historic' move
TFA dijo:
CHICAGO — The Democratic National Committee voted Saturday to significantly curtail the power of superdelegates and make presidential caucuses more accessible, overcoming objections from a vocal minority of its membership.

The reform package, pushed by DNC Chairman Tom Perez and allies of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, among others, passed overwhelmingly by voice vote at the DNC’s summer meeting here — two years after the process started.

Perez and others hailed the outcome as momentous, saying the reforms will help welcome new people into the party by reassuring them that their vote will never be overruled by the party leaders who can vote for whomever they want for the presidential nomination.

“Today is a historic day for our party,” Perez said. “We passed major reforms that will not only put our next presidential nominee in the strongest position possible, but will help us elect Democrats up and down the ballot, across the country.”

The change will prohibit superdelegates from voting for president at the party’s 2020 convention, unless the outcome is already assured or it deadlocks, which hasn’t happened in decades. The vast majority of superdelegates sided with Hillary Clinton over Sanders in their primary fight two years ago.

"Today's decision by the DNC is an important step forward," Sanders said in a statement. "This has been a long and arduous process, and I want to thank Tom Perez and all of those who made it happen.”


The new rules will also make caucuses more accessible by requiring state parties to accept absentee votes, addressing concerns that the caucuses are less democratic than primaries because they require people to physically attend the events in order to participate in the presidential nominating process in their state.

A number of state parties are already considering replacing their caucuses with primaries, with some state party chairs here predicting the 2020 nominating contest will feature many fewer caucuses than in 2016.

The DNC can’t force states to change their rules but the reform package includes measures to encourage states to open their primaries and caucuses to independent voters, as well as to expand same-day voter registration in order to bring new voters.

Saturday’s vote was the conclusion of a lengthy process that began just before the 2016 Democratic National Convention, coming out of the animosity of that year's presidential primary.


The party created the Unity Reform Commission to propose changes, which then led to 83 hours of discussion in the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee, which then led to a vote by the party’s Executive Committee and then, finally, approval by the full DNC in Chicago.

“We’ve debated this ad nauseam,” said union president Lee Saunders of AFSCME, reflecting the fatigue of many in the room. “Our job as the Democratic Party is to get Democrats elected, so let’s start that right now.”


Nearly every DNC member is a superdelegate, so some were not eager to give up their power.

Defenders of the status quo headed into the meeting knowing they were outnumbered, but determined to fight. However, after a procedural vote that went overwhelmingly in Perez’ favor, they saw the writing on the wall.


In a dramatic moment, Don Fowler, a former DNC chair who has been leading the resistance to the superdelegate change, stood to essentially concede and call for a swift approval of the changes by acclimation, rather than a full vote by paper ballots.

That was met with a standing ovation from delegates, many of whom were eyeing the clock as they hoped to catch flights later in the afternoon.

“I was skeptical of this proposal, but I’m a team player, and the most important thing we can do is elect Democrats this fall and in 2020,” said William Owen, a DNC member from Tennessee, who got emotional as he noted it was the 50th anniversary of the tumultuous 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. “I’m trying to say this without crying.”

“Are you telling me that I’m going to go to a convention, after my 30 years of blood, sweat, and tears for this party, that you’re going to take away my right to appease a group of people?”

The debate was passionate and personal on both sides, provoking a hunger strike, invocations of the Bible and JFK, and some hurt feelings.


But in an interview with NBC News, Perez said he'd much rather have passion than apathy.

He compared the fight to a healthy "family" discussion, and said he was pleased the party ultimately decided to take a "leap of faith" to show that it trusts its grassroots and its voters.

In particular, he hoped young people, many of whom have been registering as independents instead of Democrats, will "look at what we did today and say, wow, the party is listening to me."

Some of the strongest opposition to the change came from black delegates, especially in the older generation, who said it would “disenfranchise” African-American and Latino party leaders and make their convention less diverse.

“Are you telling me that I’m going to go to a convention, after my 30 years of blood, sweat, and tears for this party, that you’re going to take away my right to appease a group of people?” said DNC Vice Chair Karen Carter Peterson, a black Louisiana State Senator, presumably referring to white Sanders supporters.


Proponents of the change dispute that charge, noting state parties will still include diversity requirements in their delegate selection rules, and that superdelegates can still endorse and advocate for candidates.

The changes are the most consequential reforms to the party’s nominating process since the 1980s, when it created superdelegates. Republican have no equivalent to superdelegates in their party.
Presiona para expandir...

The tl;dr here the DNC has 'super-delegates', delegates who have proven party loyalty by years of sucking D, so they were the ones who actually got to determine party direction. Everyone else was just there for window dressing, like a proper socialist/communist leadership group. They just voted to strip super delegates of most of their powers, meaning - and brace yourself for this fucking shocking concept - that the voters of the party will actually get to have bigger say in the DNC candidate choices, especially who it puts forward for president.


Of course the best part of the article is buried at the end
“Are you telling me that I’m going to go to a convention, after my 30 years of blood, sweat, and tears for this party, that you’re going to take away my rights to appease a group of people?” said DNC Vice Chair Karen Carter Peterson, a black Louisiana State Senator, presumably referring to white Sanders supporters.
Presiona para expandir...

The amount of salt in that quote is matched only by the levels of irony.


Capsaicin Addict dijo:
There were at least two cases (in different states) where Dem operatives were telling HQ 'We can't make any headway here, let us move to this other state where maybe we can nudge it over to our side.' And HQ was telling them, based on polling data and their own analysis programs, 'Oh no, stay there, you can keep the Republicans busy and waste Trump's resources'.
Presiona para expandir...

Trump spent very little time California. He knew the state was a write off.

I posted about this before, but the DNC's (This is the DNC mind you, not individual Dems or even State/Local Dem Orgs) ideas of victory are different than the Republicans. They just want money that they can funnel to themselves & allies (so that it can get funneled back to them). Who cares who win what race, as long as they are churning millions of dollars into their machine.
 
Derp Potato dijo:
Showdown between Booker and Harris.

Old white woman failed; need Obama 2.0 or Black Hillary.
Presiona para expandir...

Well if we start seeing Hillary getting spray tanning done with more frequency than Donald then we know what the plan will be.

Vorhtbame dijo:
She acts like he wouldn't catch the bullet, laugh, and then spit it back at the guy at high velocity. And when the bullet impacted the shooter, the blood spray would form the word "SAD!" in midair.
Presiona para expandir...

“Hillary, I'm not a Republic serial villain. Do you seriously think I'd explain my master-stroke if there remained the slightest chance of you affecting its outcome? I won re-election thirty-five months ago.”
 
Mad Maxine Waters escaped whatever cage the dems put her in, and it's great:

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/ma...-of-night-thinking-im-going-to-get-president/
(video of her speech available at link)

Some choice excerpts:
" I wake up in the middle of the night and all I can think about is I’m gonna get him."

“They say, ‘Maxine, please don’t say impeachment anymore.’
“And when they say that, I say impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment,” she said to applause.

“I had a conversation here today with someone asked, ‘Well, what about Pence? If you are able to impeach, Pence will be worse,'” she recollected.
“Well, I said, ‘Look, one at a time.’
“You knock one down, one at a time,” she said.
“You knock one down, and we’ll be ready for Pence. We’ll get him, too,” she vowed.
Presiona para expandir...

RENT FREE.
 
Ghostse dijo:
Somewhat tangental, but looks like the D's might be starting to learn.
The kiwi who was talking about the DNC leadership being completely divorced from reality is spot on, but it looks like the new leadership is trying to do some course corrections. It might be too little too late, especially after HRC broke the bank.

Democrats strip superdelegates of power and reform caucuses in 'historic' move


The tl;dr here the DNC has 'super-delegates', delegates who have proven party loyalty by years of sucking D, so they were the ones who actually got to determine party direction. Everyone else was just there for window dressing, like a proper socialist/communist leadership group. They just voted to strip super delegates of most of their powers, meaning - and brace yourself for this fucking shocking concept - that the voters of the party will actually get to have bigger say in the DNC candidate choices, especially who it puts forward for president.


Of course the best part of the article is buried at the end


The amount of salt in that quote is matched only by the levels of irony.




Trump spent very little time California. He knew the state was a write off.

I posted about this before, but the DNC's (This is the DNC mind you, not individual Dems or even State/Local Dem Orgs) ideas of victory are different than the Republicans. They just want money that they can funnel to themselves & allies (so that it can get funneled back to them). Who cares who win what race, as long as they are churning millions of dollars into their machine.
Presiona para expandir...
I guess this is going to be where push comes to shove, will the newly-neutered superdelegates stay in lockstep, or do they take their ball and go home? My inclination is the former, but it's hard to predict human behavior; heck, I didn't think Trump could get elected in 2016!

Still, the prospect of the Dems fracturing would give any GOP political wonk a serious case of priapism.
 
Ghostse dijo:
The tl;dr here the DNC has 'super-delegates', delegates who have proven party loyalty by years of sucking D
Presiona para expandir...
"D" as in "Democrat" or "Dick"? Or is it both; "Democrat Dick"?

blax dijo:
Mad Maxine Waters escaped whatever cage the dems put her in, and it's great:

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/ma...-of-night-thinking-im-going-to-get-president/
(video of her speech available at link)

Some choice excerpts:


RENT FREE.
Presiona para expandir...
If you a man enough rope, he will hang himself.

In the Democratic Party's case, they were given 10 miles of rope and they are lynching themselves with it.
 
Ghostse dijo:
Somewhat tangental, but looks like the D's might be starting to learn.
The kiwi who was talking about the DNC leadership being completely divorced from reality is spot on, but it looks like the new leadership is trying to do some course corrections. It might be too little too late, especially after HRC broke the bank.

Democrats strip superdelegates of power and reform caucuses in 'historic' move


The tl;dr here the DNC has 'super-delegates', delegates who have proven party loyalty by years of sucking D, so they were the ones who actually got to determine party direction. Everyone else was just there for window dressing, like a proper socialist/communist leadership group. They just voted to strip super delegates of most of their powers, meaning - and brace yourself for this fucking shocking concept - that the voters of the party will actually get to have bigger say in the DNC candidate choices, especially who it puts forward for president.


Of course the best part of the article is buried at the end


The amount of salt in that quote is matched only by the levels of irony.




Trump spent very little time California. He knew the state was a write off.

I posted about this before, but the DNC's (This is the DNC mind you, not individual Dems or even State/Local Dem Orgs) ideas of victory are different than the Republicans. They just want money that they can funnel to themselves & allies (so that it can get funneled back to them). Who cares who win what race, as long as they are churning millions of dollars into their machine.
Presiona para expandir...
All that is just a PR move nothing more.
Its all well and good to think that genuine reforms are happening but rest assured. Until the Clintons and Obamas and all their little sycophants and hanger ons are well and truly purged from the Democratic Party nothing will change.
The problem being that the Clintons are dug into the DNC like fucking ticks. Thats what almost 30 years of cronyism and identity politics and corporatism will do.
The only real solution is to burn the whole thing to the ground. The Dems will be eating the GOP's shit for quite awhile but no one ever said the process would easy or painless.
 
Última edición:
Presented without comment

IMG_20180910_192930.jpg

IMG_20180910_192952.jpg

IMG_20180910_193012.jpg
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo