🐱 the birth of the gender-neutral ‘theyby’

CatParty
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/apr/26/steven-pooles-word-of-the-week


Babies are so passe, even royal ones. The hip new thing to have is a “theyby”, according to a trend spotted by New York magazine that sees parents bringing up their offspring in a gender-neutral fashion.

There was of course nothing gender-specific about the “ba-“ part of “baby”, which is already a diminutive form of the original English word “babe”. The Oxford English Dictionary says that its origin is probably onomatopoeic – two syllables of “ba”, which is a typical “early infantile vocalisation”. So while a baby can call itself a baba, even if by accident, it will take much longer to pronounce itself a “theyby”.

So “theyby” here points to the desired attitude of others, rather than removing any bias from the traditional description of the object in question.
It is often unimportant whether such bias really existed anyway: replacing “mankind” with “humankind” hurts no one.)

Meanwhile, the possibilities for today’s theybies seem endless. If they need looking after they can go to theycare. In time they will even eat gender-neutral smoked-pork slices (theycon) on a Saturday morning while reading a language column in a theyper.
 
If these kids don't end up rebelling then we're gonna have a shit ton of serial killers. You know that by "gender neutral" it'll just be the parents denying any clothing of the original gender the kid was.
 
In defense of Millennial's, most of them know its bullshit too. Its the Boomers and Gen X shrieking about this crap in the media and from the Professors chair, and then a few overly privileged cunts in those same college classes who happen to be Millennial. Then the boomer media shills amplify what their brainwashed psychophants are doing to make it seem as if its somehow representative of an entire generation. Its not. The vast majority of Millennial's are just trying to get by, start careers, and so on.
 
(one study calls them “intersex”),

Yet the link itself says this?

Sex differences in brain structure are indeed well documented. There are sex differences in the size of the brain and of specific brain regions, and in composition of neurons, neurotransmitter content, morphology of dendrites, number of receptors, etc. (for recent reviews see Cahill, 2006; Cosgrove et al., 2007; McCarthy, 2009; Rhodes et al., 2009; Sakuma, 2009; Lenroot and Giedd, 2010; I will use the term brain characteristics to refer to all the characteristics of the brain that may show a sex difference). Yet, the idea that sex differences in the brain lead to sex differences in behavior and cognition has been challenged by several authors on various grounds, including lack of consistency in the literature on sex differences in brain structure; the difficulty to find a simple relation between a sex difference in brain structure and a sex difference in function; demonstrations that some sex differences in brain structure serve to prevent, rather than cause, sex differences in behavior and cognition; and the possibility that sex differences in the adult brain may be the result of sex differences in life experience (e.g., Byne et al., 1988; Rogers, 2001; Fitch and Bimonte, 2002; De Vries, 2004; Hines, 2004; Vidal, 2005; Cahill, 2006; de Vries and Sodersten, 2009; Rhodes et al., 2009; Jordan-Young, 2010). However, most of these authors also adhere to the view that anatomically, human brains can take one of two forms, “male” or “female.”

How can something be "intersex" but also have "well documented" "sex differences?" :\
 
Yet the link itself says this?



How can something be "intersex" but also have "well documented" "sex differences?" :\


The study said:
"neuroanatomical data reveal that sex interacts with other factors in uteroand throughout life to determine the structure of the brain, and that because these interactions are complex, the result is a multi-morphic, rather than a dimorphic, brain. "

The multi-morphic brain would be the Intersexed brain in this study, with the Di-morphic being either male or female.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176412/

"Yet, the idea that sex differences in the brain lead to sex differences in behavior and cognition has been challenged by several authors on various grounds, including lack of consistency in the literature on sex differences in brain structure; the difficulty to find a simple relation between a sex difference in brain structure and a sex difference in function; demonstrations that some sex differences in brain structure serve to prevent, rather than cause, sex differences in behavior and cognition; and the possibility that sex differences in the adult brain may be the result of sex differences in life experience."

Basically, yeah your brain can be born male or female, but the way you are raised and your particular set of life experiences determines your gender.
 
Yet the link itself says this?



How can something be "intersex" but also have "well documented" "sex differences?" :\
Terms like intersex are supposed to be for definitively sexed parts like genitalia. It's supposed to signify that what is usually unambiguously defined is instead between points of reference. Brain differences between sexes are composed of averages, and are averages of brain anatomy or mental ability that everyone possesses to different extents. There is not a brain part that one sex has that the other lacks, there's no mental ability exclusive to either sex. Intersex is not an accurate way to describe a brain. You can guess the sex of a brain owner 60-80 percent of the time based on certain measures(better than chance, not perfect), but you can guess sex on genitalia more than 99 percent of the time.
 
Dr. John Money tried this with an infant who lost his penis in a circumcision accident. He was raised a girl from birth, but surprise surprise he always knew he was male instinctively. All this is going to do is make parents realize they cant make their babies trans or gay through conditioning so they can virtue signal.

This is going to result in a whole generation hating their parents. The amount of millenial parents being put into homes by their kids and ignored for the rest of their and, miserable lives is going to be astronomically high. Reality doesn't give a fuck about fake shit like intersectionality. We're going to see a rebellion unheard of. These kids are going to RIP apart their parents progressive ideals because of mistreatment like this.

You've got parents forcibly making their sons playing with barbies and taking away male toys, pushing their girls towards science when they hate it, admonishing girls because they want to be a princess and have a knight save them. Kids aren't allowed to be kids anymore. They're a virtue signaling accessory.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo