Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?

  • Total de votantes
    4,033
Destacado
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid dijo:
You were being sarcastic, but that's technically correct by the definition of "rational." It doesn't mean "empirical evidence."
Presiona para expandir...

Usually the definition I follow on "rational" is "based on or in accordance with reason or logic." and as TL;DR is ignoring the things that would be logical to bring up because of his own heavy bias, i can't safely say him being one of those critical thinkers/skeptics on youtube is a thing.

If anything, I was poking at him trying to look like a level-headed individual when discussing incels but then ignores anything that may cause the view to appear level or neutral, and twisting what he does acknowledge because it's pretty much the elephant in the room (Toronto attack). For example; him ignoring the shudderingly large amount of proof that a lot of incels will ignore that it is sometimes a "them problem" for whatever reason (usually their mannerisms) and flat out denying it and blaming women for not dating them.

Hell i see a lot of people going off about "wahh women's fault for only wanting to date the top 20% of the population", which as well as not being a very attractive (whiny) mindset to be putting out there on the reg, is shifting the blame onto anyone but them, because it totally isn't on them to make any positive changes in their lives at all.

You cannot help people who refuse to help themselves.
 
LtCucumber dijo:
Usually the definition I follow on "rational" is "based on or in accordance with reason or logic." and as TL;DR is ignoring the things that would be logical to bring up because of his own heavy bias, i can't safely say him being one of those critical thinkers/skeptics on youtube is a thing.

If anything, I was poking at him trying to look like a level-headed individual when discussing incels but then ignores anything that may cause the view to appear level or neutral, and twisting what he does acknowledge because it's pretty much the elephant in the room (Toronto attack). For example; him ignoring the shudderingly large amount of proof that a lot of incels will ignore that it is sometimes a "them problem" for whatever reason (usually their mannerisms) and flat out denying it and blaming women for not dating them.

Hell i see a lot of people going off about "wahh women's fault for only wanting to date the top 20% of the population", which as well as not being a very attractive (whiny) mindset to be putting out there on the reg, is shifting the blame onto anyone but them, because it totally isn't on them to make any positive changes in their lives at all.

You cannot help people who refuse to help themselves.
Presiona para expandir...
I'm inclined to agree. I think that incels are their own worst enemies. When someone suggests something even close to bettering themselves, that idea is shot down.
 
MormonofID dijo:
I'm inclined to agree. I think that incels are their own worst enemies. When someone suggests something even close to bettering themselves, that idea is shot down.
Presiona para expandir...
The idea that nothing is their own fault comes with the name itself. "Involuntary" celibate, as if it's just some uncontrollable force of nature that's stopping them.
 
well both incelocalypse.ru and incelsandmalesexualists.ru are taken down (if you go to those sites, you get redirected to an incels.me thread about them), but it might just mean we're a month away from when they appear again

apparently they were taken down due to hosting rather than due to reporting anything to the authorities
 
https://incels.me/threads/incelocal...oday-2018-06-25-due-to-an-abuse-report.55521/
Yep, incelocalypse and Marjan's forum are down. Rest in piss.
unacc.png
murdd.png
flaa.png
 
_01 dijo:
The idea that nothing is their own fault comes with the name itself. "Involuntary" celibate, as if it's just some uncontrollable force of nature that's stopping them.
Presiona para expandir...

Their choice to act like a complete and utter piece of shit 24/7 is entirely voluntary.
 
Y6o1neHoHqnNCQjz2GNzbTqVtiXdlS853XUZJvAOYOM.jpg

The entire joke of Johnny Bravo is that Johnny is a super attractive Chad, but he can't even get a date because he has no idea how to interact with women. It's been a long time since I've watched the show, but I'm pretty sure "personality > looks" is the main message of the series.

Also, Dexter is like 8 years old and therefore uninterested in dating/sex yet, but he totally slayed in the "omelette du fromage" episode.

 
Steve Mayers dijo:
I've seen incels claim that women are addicted to sex but refuse to help the poor oppressed incels by giving them sex and instead women will engage in bestiality than have sex with a "sub 8".
Presiona para expandir...
It's always a Catch-88 with those incels, a bit like Nice Guys.
If a girl doesn't give sex, she's a bitch.
If a girl gives sex, she's a slut.
There's no winning for those guys.

lechatnoir dijo:
Now if only he would realize that only speds care as much as he does about women shitting and farting...
Presiona para expandir...
Reminds me aboot a certain someone...
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo