The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

Destacado
crunchy bits are the best dijo:
Couldn't agree more, there's a reason why there's a term in Japan called "karoshi" which means more or less "death from overworking."

Reiterating that Japan is a male and work-dominated society wherein employment and corporate culture are the top priorities in life. Seems that the government's efforts to increase their native population isn't working at all when your entire culture to "work work work until you die" has been ingrained in their minds for so long. Being replaced by foreigners to replace the natives is a bad look for Japan especially when that population is slowly filled with migrant leeches like Jeets.
Presiona para expandir...
Ok we Americans like your Japanese culture so we’re going to force you all to fuck at gun point.
 
To the people who worry about the racism tide against jeets being "fake". Just know I openly told my mother "I fucking hate them" verbatim in regards to jeets and she just nodded along. I'm sure to this day if I said the same about niggers (though I've ranted about them before just not overtly said I think they should all be written off) she'd act flabbergasted and shocked. She's pretty normie "just be nice to other" people type of person. So things are changing and even those who aren't "plugged in" to certain ideas are noticing and receptive to the truth and the light.
 
1784575144775.png
 
Chaotic Good Barbarian dijo:
That cunt is so funny. Her fake ass Jamaican patois and her fake ass dreads should literally be called out for appropriating non-poo culture. Has her head totally up her ass about her talent because aside from a handful of rock bands (Primus, Mudvayne) nobody makes that much being a pretentious overplaying bassist.

Apparently “there’s no money above the 12th fret” still applies, since her and her Guido McShortass photocopy boyfriend are stuck shilling AI that replaces both of them. If not for Danny Sapko I doubt I’d have ever heard of this cunt.
Presiona para expandir...
I find people whose sole skill on bass is slapping and tapping so mind boggling boring to listen to or watch. BITCH, YOU GOT NO LICKS.
 
Sicko Hunter dijo:
Can someone tell where the "umm actually the Sikhs are the based good Indians!!" lie started? This was so common even my gf who reads KF parroted it.
Presiona para expandir...
Rudy Coleman dijo:
thats an ancient Internet myth that people believed before the great indian awakening.
people believed it because they they never had any interactions with indians and no content or stories about them existed, so it was easy to just read that statement and move on with your life without questioning it because it really didn't matter at the end of the day.
Presiona para expandir...
teriyakiburns dijo:
Combo of the fact that sikhs were loyal to the British during the Raj, and made decent enough soldiers during that time, and an absolutely massive propaganda push in the aftermath of 9/11, which sought to differentiate sikhs from muslims.
Presiona para expandir...
I'm not a scholar or a historian but I did a bit of a deep dive on this, cause in my view Sikhs are the absolute lowest and most insidious form of Jeet and I am continually baffled by the praise they receive.

@teriyakiburns is correct, praise of Sikhs in the Anglosphere does seem to originate with Sikhs being loyal to the British Raj during the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny but there's a bit more context that can be given.

Although primary sources of the Sepoy Mutiny like Charles Ball's "The History of the Indian Mutiny" (published 1858) are actually quite critical of the Sikhs quality as soldiers (at least that's my interpretation from reading it) the fact is, they did assist with putting down the revolt. Publications from later decades such as Frederick Roberts' memoir "Forty-One Years in India" and in particular the works of Lepel Griffin such as "The Punjab Chiefs" "The Rajas of the Punjab" and "Ranjit Singh" were very favorable towards Sikhs. I don't know whether books like this were the origin of the "Loyal Sikh" stereotype or if they just popularized an already existing stereotype but these works are evidence that the stereotype existed in the late 19th century. This idea appears to have spread to North America at least (and presumably the rest of the British Empire) as evidenced by this quote I found originating from the October 11, 1906 issue of the Canadian newspaper "The Province":

"These Hindus are all old soldiers. They know little outside of their regular drill... I would have White labourers of course if I can get them... But I would rather give employment to these old soldiers who have helped to fight for the British Empire than to entire aliens."

(Please note while this quote refers to Hindus the paper I found it in "Making and Unmaking of Strangers - the Komagata Maru Episode and the Alienation of Sikhs as Undesirable Persons" by Anjali Gera Roy explains that this quote was said in the context of Punjabi migration to Canada so the original speaker presumably did not know the difference between a Hindu and a Sikh but would have been understood to be referring to Sikhs)

In any case I believe this stereotype is almost certainly the origin of modern idea of the "Based Sikh" Loyalty is a positive quality and I could very easily see how it could morph into a generally positive conception of Sikhs by Europeans/White Americans when comparing them to other forms of Jeet.

The claim that there was an huge propaganda push post 9/11 to differentiate Sikhs from Muslims is harder to verify with citations if you particularly care about academic rigor (which you shouldn't this is an Internet gossip forum), but I can personally attest to there being tons of propaganda post 9/11 about how "Sikhs are totally different from Muslims guys!!!1! We love America!!!!1!"

TLDR: I argue that the "Based Sikh" stereotype stems from the late 19th century writings of the British in India which established a stereotype that Sikhs were particularly loyal to the Empire in ways that other Jeets were not. Over time and especially post 9/11 this metastasized into the modern "Based Sikh" stereotype.

All the books and the paper I referred to are free to access on archive.org or researchgate if you just search the titles, I'm not going to bother archiving them here cause no one is going to read them anyways.
 
Última edición:
the worst part of being racist in 2026 has to be dealing with everyone who isn’t.

Theres this automatic assumption that if you’re pro white and brown dubious, that you’re somehow an uneducated inbred MAGA conservative when in reality, maybe we’re just noticing that a disproportionate group of people are causing a lot of issues for the rest of us and that we’d like a change.
 
Organized Derailment dijo:
Theres this automatic assumption that if you’re pro white and brown dubious, that you’re somehow an uneducated inbred MAGA conservative
Presiona para expandir...
A deliberately engineered one, at that. The partisan political fighting thats taken over the west has ended up with a bizarre focus on 'conceding' traits that would otherwise be consider common sense, centrist opinions, to increase the overall polarization pressure. Its not merely some naive assumption, its dictated dogma that conservatives are dumb, that liberals will ignore reality when faced with it, etc. The interesting part is that reconciliation of mismatches to this only go one way - if you're a right wing smart guy with a bunch of chud beliefs and one lefty belief, the left will refuse to even acknowledge you as part of their side on the one belief - they'd rather you fuck off and never be involved because of the one stain. If you're a dyed in the wool liberal who ends up in a life situation that forces them to acknowledge a bit of race realism, the right will be willing to talk to you about that race realism stuff, and go "He might be a retarded liberal, but he's not wrong about [group]".

The Dude dijo:
I'm not talking about a typical pendulum swing within a single political cycle of 4 years. I'm talking about a massive cultural shift of the entire Western World the likes of what we saw over generations beginning in the late 1800s and early 1900s, only this time it will be to the Right
Presiona para expandir...
And what I just wrote is exactly why this is happening. Outside of who's "correct", the right is generally willing to accept allies who have some positions that are fundamentally disagreeable to the group - They'll merely oppose them on that, and support them on others. The left is unwilling to accept anything other than total adoption of their dogma, and as a result they've become an inflexible cult, unable to address the actual present day needs of the people, and so they're losing them. The right isn't perfect, and accepting the 'outlier' positions weakens them, but people prefer imperfection over the fucking nothing they get from the left now.

Luckily it'll drive Total Jeet Death, which I'm all for.
 
Uzumaki dijo:
Good, because it’s a standard you fall short of.


Name one thing.
Presiona para expandir...
You could say a lot about India itself, Britain has a share of the blame because let's be frank it was their colony and like every colony the main concern is wealth extraction at the expense of everything else. Including building functional civilization. So if your grandmother was scammed by an indian national let it be known these methods were pioneered by european traders who exchanged valuables for fucking mirrors and rugs.
 
Maurice Maine dijo:
You could say a lot about India itself, Britain has a share of the blame because let's be frank it was their colony and like every colony the main concern is wealth extraction at the expense of everything else. Including building functional civilization. So if your grandmother was scammed by an indian national let it be known these methods were pioneered by european traders who exchanged valuables for fucking mirrors and rugs.
Presiona para expandir...
1780s British pioneered scamming grandma with Target gift cards and wire transfers. You heard it here first, folks.
 
Maurice Maine dijo:
You could say a lot about India itself, Britain has a share of the blame because let's be frank it was their colony and like every colony the main concern is wealth extraction at the expense of everything else. Including building functional civilization. So if your grandmother was scammed by an indian national let it be known these methods were pioneered by european traders who exchanged valuables for fucking mirrors and rugs.
Presiona para expandir...
Britain doesn't get any of the blame. They made one of two assumptions. They either correctly assumed the jeets would be too retarded to be civilized and didn't bother putting extra effort into it, or they assumed the jeets would be like pretty much every other conquered people in history, and learn from their conquerors to implement some of what made them able to so decisively win. History is full of conquered peoples being extracted from and ultimately becoming better in the long term, the brits ain't unique, just one of the last to play the game.

The jeets had about as peaceful a handoff as possible (from the british, the shit they immediately kicked off was their choice) with a functional state and infrastructure alongside brotherhood with one of the great world powers of its era, and proceeded to do jack and shit with it beyond fleece their own people to sell off or squander their generational inheritence.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo