US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Transgender Maine Senate Democrat candidate Ashley Webb says that he “leaks mucus” during his “periods”.
hK03KT_mkNHYia0B.mp4
Both of these men have porn of themselves doing degen shit on their government/company owned laptops. In the next copule of years, something is going to come out about him being an absolute sex pest or creep.

1784581842216.png

It's a bog standard behavior of these mentally ill men and I'm tired of the world pretending it isn't.
 
As a moid I don't have the strongest grasp on female attraction but I'm baffled at the number of women gooning over these ugly bug eyed Arab Communists like Hasan and Madami.

What's the appeal?
Women find attractive whatever society tells them is attractive. This is also why women constantly complain about beauty standards in media. If Chris Chan had Bernays in his employ he could have had women schlicking themselves silly over sonichu if they were sold that it would make them more popular.

If the media says Jeetmayor or the Bobbleheaded roach is the second coming of Christ and also more handsome than Jake Gyllenhaal they'll believe it because they are slaves to consensus. Consensus is also conveniently very easy to manufacture.
 
Rand Paul says newly released internal federal documents show the FBI asked Customs and Border Protection not to stop, search, or question EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak when he returned from China through JFK Airport in 2021 during the WHO’s COVID-19 origins investigation.

According to the documents, CBP had identified Daszak as an “extremely high person of interest” and planned to search his electronic devices and question him about his ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but stood down after a request from the FBI.
IMG_5662.jpeg
IMG_5663.jpeg
 
Trump imposed an extra 50% tariff on Canadian dairy, alcohol, and cars because they are unfair trading partners and, unofficially, because they polluted our beautiful air with their foul smoke:

IMPOSING ADDITIONAL DUTIES TO OFFSET CANADIAN DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO DAIRY​

Proclamations
July 20, 2026

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

1. Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1338) (section 338) empowers the President to, among other things, impose duties on imports of a foreign country to offset the burden or disadvantage from a foreign country’s discrimination against or unequal imposition on the commerce of the United States.

2. Canada, through discrimination or an unreasonable and unequal imposition, treats the commerce of certain foreign countries more favorably than commerce of the United States with respect to dairy and in turn, places a burden and disadvantage on the commerce of the United States. Specifically, Canada denies the commerce of the United States benefits that Canada affords to materially similar dairy commerce from certain other foreign countries and thus unreasonably burdens and disadvantages U.S. commerce compared to the commerce of certain other foreign countries.

3. Canada maintains a tariff-rate quota (TRQ) on cheeses of all types under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) as well as a TRQ on cheese of all types under the Canada-European Union (EU) Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). The TRQs provide duty-free access for the covered dairy products up to specified annual quantities (in‑quota quantities) and apply a customs duty to imports that exceed the respective in-quota quantities.

4. To access the TRQs under the USMCA and the CETA, Canada’s dairy TRQ allocation measures establish eligibility criteria. But Canada does not have the same eligibility criteria for the USMCA and the CETA, disfavoring the commerce of the United States. While Canada’s eligibility criteria for the USMCA dairy TRQs — and specifically, the cheeses of all types TRQ — do not allow retailers to obtain and use TRQ quantities, the eligibility criteria for the CETA do grant retailers access to the TRQ quantity for cheese of all types.

5. By making retailers ineligible to use the USMCA TRQ for cheeses of all types, Canada discriminates against U.S. goods that are similar to EU goods that are entered pursuant to the CETA cheese of all types TRQ. Canada thus denies to the United States the favorable treatment that Canada provides to the EU and its member States. This discrimination impedes market access into Canada and results in lost sales or revenues for U.S. dairy producers and exporters, among other things. The United States, U.S. businesses and workers, and U.S. commerce are negatively affected by Canada’s discriminatory practices.

6. Accordingly, pursuant to section 338, I find as a fact that Canada is discriminating in fact against the commerce of the United States through Canada’s TRQ allocation measures imposed on U.S. cheeses of all types under the USMCA, as compared to Canada’s TRQ allocation measures imposed on EU cheese of all types under the CETA. I also find as a fact that this discrimination places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of the EU and its member States. And I find as fact that Canada’s imposition is unreasonable, is not equally enforced upon the like articles of every foreign country, and places a burden on the commerce of the United States.

7. Further, I find that imposing additional ad valorem duties on certain products of Canada to address the burden or disadvantage from this discrimination or unequal and unreasonable imposition is in the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States. When U.S. producers are unfairly denied export opportunities by Canada’s TRQ allocation measures, they lose sales or revenues that support production in the United States, among other things. This suppresses U.S. agricultural output as well as investment and thereby undermines employment and economic vitality in American communities. Imposing additional duties on certain products of Canada will, among other things, expand opportunities for U.S. producers to compete within the U.S. market, enhancing American production and bringing attendant economic and societal benefits, and may spur Canada to remove the discrimination against U.S. cheeses of all types.

8. Accordingly, I find that it is necessary and appropriate and in the public interest to impose an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent on certain products of Canada, as identified in Annex II to this proclamation, effective as of 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026. I determine that the additional ad valorem duties imposed in this proclamation, as described below, will offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discrimination or unreasonable and unequal imposition. In my judgment, the action in this proclamation is consistent with the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States.

9. Section 338 authorizes the President, if he determines it will serve the public interest, to offset any burden or disadvantage placed on the commerce of the United States by an unequal imposition or discrimination by a foreign country by specifying and declaring additional duties not to exceed 50 percent ad valorem (or its equivalent) and not to take effect earlier than 30 days after the President’s proclamation finding that a foreign country imposes an unreasonable charge, exaction, regulation, or limitation that is not equally enforced on the like articles of every foreign country, or discriminates in fact against U.S. commerce in a way that places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of any foreign country. Section 338 also authorizes the President to suspend, revoke, supplement, or amend any proclamation under section 338 whenever the President deems that the public interests require such action. Further, section 338 authorizes the President to exclude products of the foreign country if the foreign country maintains or increases the discrimination against the commerce of the United States and the President deems the exclusion to be consistent with the public interests and the interests of the United States.

10. Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483) (section 604), authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the substance of statutes affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 338; section 301 of title 3, United States Code; and section 604, do hereby proclaim as follows:

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation, certain products of Canada, as set forth in Annex II to this proclamation, imported into the United States shall be subject to an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent, effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation and in Annex I to this proclamation, the duties imposed in this proclamation are in addition to any other duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges applicable to such products. The duties imposed in this proclamation shall not apply to articles subject to duties pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862), or articles, excluding unmanned aircraft, subject to the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.

(3) The HTSUS is modified as provided in Annex II to this proclamation, effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026, and the modifications shall continue in effect, unless this action is expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.

(4) Any product subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation, except those eligible for admission under “domestic status” as described in 19 CFR 146.43, that is subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation and that is admitted into a United States foreign trade zone on or after the effective date of this proclamation must be admitted as “privileged foreign status” as described in 19 CFR 146.41, and will be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad valorem rate of duty related to the classification under the applicable HTSUS subheading.

(5) The head of each executive department and agency (agency) is authorized to and shall take all appropriate measures within the agency’s authority to implement this proclamation. The head of each agency may, consistent with applicable law, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, redelegate the authority to take such appropriate measures within the agency.

(6) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, is authorized to issue such rules, regulations, guidance, instructions, or determinations as may be necessary to implement this proclamation and is authorized to take any necessary measures to administer the duties imposed in this proclamation.

(7) The Commissioner of CBP, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Chairman of the United States International Trade Commission, and any other senior official he deems appropriate, shall determine whether any additional modifications to the HTSUS are necessary to effectuate this proclamation and shall make such modifications to the HTSUS through notice in the Federal Register, including any technical correction to the annexes to this proclamation.

(8) For any rule or regulation the Commissioner of CBP makes to implement this proclamation, the Commissioner of CBP shall, to the extent required by law, obtain the approval of the President or the United States Trade Representative. The United States Trade Representative is delegated the President’s approval authority in 19 U.S.C. 1338(h).

(9) Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency. If any provision of this proclamation or the application of any provision to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first.

ANNEX I

ANNEX II

DONALD J. TRUMP
Source

IMPOSING ADDITIONAL DUTIES TO OFFSET CANADIAN DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES​

Proclamations
July 20, 2026

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

1. Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1338) (section 338) empowers the President to, among other things, impose duties on imports of a foreign country to offset the burden or disadvantage from a foreign country’s discrimination against or unequal imposition on the commerce of the United States.

2. Canada, through discrimination or an unreasonable and unequal imposition, burdens U.S. commerce but not the commerce of other countries and disadvantages U.S. commerce compared to the commerce of other countries. Specifically, Canada unreasonably burdens and disadvantages U.S. alcoholic beverages but not alcoholic beverages of other countries.

3. The provinces and territories of Canada generally regulate the distribution and sale of distilled spirits, wine, beer, and other alcoholic beverages (collectively, alcoholic beverages) in their respective jurisdictions. All provinces and territories control the wholesale of alcoholic beverages, and most have a hybrid public/private system for the retail of alcoholic beverages.

4. Beginning in March 2025, all Canadian provinces and territories halted the purchase, distribution, or retailing of U.S. alcoholic beverages. For example, on March 4, 2025, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) ceased purchasing all U.S. products and canceled existing orders where contractually possible; removed all U.S. products from wholesale product catalogues and retail eCommerce sites; and removed all U.S. products from LCBO retail stores and outlets. Similarly, on March 4, 2025, the province of Quebec asked the Société des Alcools du Québec to remove all U.S. products from its shelves and to stop supplying U.S. alcoholic beverages to grocery stores, liquor stores, bars, and restaurants. Only the provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan subsequently lifted their bans on the purchase, distribution, or retailing of U.S. alcoholic beverages, in June 2025.

5. The United States, U.S. businesses and workers, and U.S. commerce suffer from the Canadian provinces’ and territories’ unreasonable and unequal impositions and discriminations with respect to U.S. alcoholic beverages. Following the implementation of the bans, U.S. exports of alcoholic beverages to Canada fell precipitously. Comparing the period from March 2025 through February 2026 to the same period in 2024-2025, Canadian imports of U.S. alcoholic beverages decreased by approximately 81 percent (from approximately $718 million to approximately $137 million).

6. The Canadian provinces and territories have not instituted or maintained similar bans or restrictions on any other country since March 2025, thereby benefitting other countries at the expense of the United States. Indeed, exports of alcoholic beverages from other countries to Canada have increased to meet the demand previously filled by U.S. exports. For example, comparing March 2025 through February 2026 to the same period in 2024-2025, Canadian imports of alcoholic beverages from Chile, Japan, Argentina, Ireland, New Zealand, and Australia significantly increased, with increases ranging from approximately 13 percent to approximately 26 percent. Despite a nearly 12 percent decline in total imports of alcoholic beverages into Canada, imports into Canada from countries other than the United States increased by over $170 million from March 2025 through February 2026 compared to the same period in 2024-2025, with imports into Canada from the European Union accounting for over $100 million of this increase.

7. Accordingly, pursuant to section 338, I find as a fact that through the regulation, restriction, or prohibition of U.S. alcoholic beverages, Canada has imposed an unreasonable regulation or limitation on articles wholly or in part the growth or products of the United States and is discriminating in fact against the commerce of the United States in such manner as to place it at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of other countries, by banning the purchase, distribution, or retailing of U.S. alcoholic beverages while not banning or similarly restricting such products from other countries. I also find as a fact that this unequal and unreasonable imposition or discrimination places a burden on the commerce of the United States and places a disadvantage on the commerce of the United States.

8. Further, I find that imposing additional ad valorem duties on certain products of Canada to address the burden or disadvantage from this discrimination or unequal and unreasonable imposition is in the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States. When U.S. producers are unfairly denied export opportunities, as they are in Canada due to Canadian provinces’ and territories’ bans on the purchase, distribution, or retailing of U.S. alcoholic beverages, they lose sales that support production in the United States, among other harms to the U.S. alcoholic beverage industry. The unreasonable, unequal, and discriminatory actions by Canada suppress U.S. manufacturing and agricultural output, as well as investment, undermining employment and economic vitality in American communities. Imposing additional duties on certain products of Canada will, among other things, expand opportunities for U.S. producers to compete within the U.S. market, revitalizing U.S. production and bringing attendant economic and societal benefits, and may spur Canada to remove the unreasonable and unequal imposition on and discrimination against commerce in U.S. alcoholic beverages.

9. Accordingly, I find that it is necessary and appropriate and in the public interest to impose an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent on certain products of Canada, as identified in Annex II to this proclamation, effective as of 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026. I determine that the additional ad valorem duties imposed in this proclamation, as described below, will offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discrimination or unequal and unreasonable imposition. In my judgment, the action in this proclamation is consistent with the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States.

10. Section 338 authorizes the President, if he determines it will serve the public interest, to offset any burden or disadvantage placed on the commerce of the United States by an unequal imposition or discrimination by a foreign country by specifying and declaring additional duties not to exceed 50 percent ad valorem (or its equivalent) and not to take effect earlier than 30 days after the President’s proclamation finding that a foreign country imposes an unreasonable charge, exaction, regulation, or limitation that is not equally enforced on the like articles of every foreign country, or discriminates in fact against U.S. commerce in a way that places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of any foreign country. Section 338 also authorizes the President to suspend, revoke, supplement, or amend any proclamation under section 338 whenever the President deems that the public interests require such action. Further, section 338 authorizes the President to exclude articles of the foreign country if the foreign country maintains or increases the discrimination against the commerce of the United States and the President deems the exclusion to be consistent with the public interests and the interests of the United States.

11. Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483) (section 604), authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the substance of statutes affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 338; section 301 of title 3, United States Code; and section 604, do hereby proclaim as follows:

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation, certain products of Canada, as set forth in Annex II to this proclamation, imported into the United States shall be subject to an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent, effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation and in Annex I to this proclamation, the duties imposed in this proclamation are in addition to any other duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges applicable to such products. The duties imposed in this proclamation shall not apply to articles subject to duties pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862), or articles, excluding unmanned aircraft, subject to the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.

(3) The HTSUS is modified as provided in Annex II to this proclamation, effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026, and the modifications shall continue in effect, unless this action is expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.

(4) Any product subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation, except those eligible for admission under “domestic status” as described in 19 CFR 146.43, that is subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation and that is admitted into a United States foreign trade zone on or after the effective date of this proclamation must be admitted as “privileged foreign status” as described in 19 CFR 146.41, and will be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad valorem rate of duty related to the classification under the applicable HTSUS subheading.

(5) The head of each executive department and agency (agency) is authorized to and shall take all appropriate measures within the agency’s authority to implement this proclamation. The head of each agency may, consistent with applicable law, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, redelegate the authority to take such appropriate measures within the agency.

(6) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, is authorized to issue such rules, regulations, guidance, instructions, or determinations as may be necessary to implement this proclamation and is authorized to take any necessary measures to administer the duties imposed in this proclamation.

(7) The Commissioner of CBP, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Chairman of the United States International Trade Commission, and any other senior official he deems appropriate, shall determine whether any additional modifications to the HTSUS are necessary to effectuate this proclamation and shall make such modifications to the HTSUS through notice in the Federal Register, including any technical correction to the annexes to this proclamation.

(8) For any rule or regulation the Commissioner of CBP makes to implement this proclamation, the Commissioner of CBP shall, to the extent required by law, obtain the approval of the President or the United States Trade Representative. The United States Trade Representative is delegated the President’s approval authority in 19 U.S.C. 1338(h).

(9) Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency. If any provision of this proclamation or the application of any provision to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first.

ANNEX I

ANNEX II

DONALD J. TRUMP
Source

IMPOSING ADDITIONAL DUTIES TO OFFSET CANADIAN DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO MOTOR VEHICLES​

Proclamations
July 20, 2026

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION

1. Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1338) (section 338) empowers the President to, among other things, impose duties on imports of a foreign country to offset the burden or disadvantage from a foreign country’s discrimination against or unequal imposition on the commerce of the United States.

2. Canada, through discrimination against or an unreasonable and unequal imposition on U.S. auto and auto parts exports, burdens U.S. commerce but not the commerce of other countries and disadvantages U.S. commerce compared to the commerce of other countries. Specifically, Canada imposed a tariff system on only U.S. motor vehicles and treats the commerce of foreign countries more favorably than commerce of the United States with respect to motor vehicles, as defined in Canada’s United States Surtax Order (Motor Vehicles 2025), SOR/2025-118. By denying to the commerce of the United States the benefits afforded to like commerce from other countries, Canada discriminates against U.S. commerce, disadvantaging the commerce of the United States compared to the commerce of other countries. And Canada’s imposition on U.S. motor vehicles is unreasonable, is not equally applied upon the like articles of every foreign country, and places a burden on the commerce of the United States but not on the commerce of other countries.

3. Since April 9, 2025, Canada has maintained a 25 percent tariff rate on imports of U.S. motor vehicles that do not qualify for preferential, duty-free treatment under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). For U.S. motor vehicles that do qualify for preferential, duty-free treatment under the USMCA, Canada applies a 25 percent tariff rate on the value of all goods that do not originate in Canada or Mexico used in the production of the vehicle, up to 85 percent of the total value of the vehicle. In addition, Canada maintains a tariff-rate quota (TRQ) on U.S. motor vehicles that qualify for preferential, duty-free treatment under the USMCA. The TRQ for each automaker limits duty-free access for the covered motor vehicles from that automaker up to certain annual quantities (in-quota quantities) and applies the tariffs described above on products that exceed the in-quota quantities. The TRQs are granted to induce companies to invest in production in Canada, and Canada has announced that it reduced the TRQs for U.S. companies that moved manufacturing from Canada to the United States. Canada does not publicly disclose the company-specific, in-quota quantities, but it has published these new tariff rates in Customs Notice 25-15: United States Surtax Order (Motor Vehicles 2025).

4. The United States, U.S. businesses and workers, and U.S. commerce suffer from Canada’s discriminatory, unequal, and unreasonable tariff scheme. Following the implementation of the tariff scheme, U.S. exports of motor vehicles to Canada fell precipitously. Comparing the period from April 2025 through March 2026 to the same period in 2024-2025, imports of U.S. motor vehicles to Canada decreased by approximately 22 percent (from approximately $25.9 billion to approximately $20.3 billion).

5. Canada only applies the tariff scheme to U.S.-origin motor vehicles. The tariff scheme does not apply to the motor vehicles of any other country. Indeed, exports of motor vehicles from other countries to Canada have increased to meet the demand previously filled by U.S. exports. For example, comparing the period from April 2025 through February 2026 to the same period in 2024-2025, Canadian imports of Mexican motor vehicles increased by approximately 23.6 percent, and imports from Japan, Korea, and Germany increased by rates ranging from approximately 10.1 percent to approximately 13.5 percent. In total, Canadian imports of motor vehicles from countries other than the United States increased by approximately $2.85 billion over the same period, with Mexico accounting for almost $2 billion of the increase.

6. Accordingly, pursuant to section 338, I find as a fact that Canada is discriminating against the commerce of the United States through Canada’s motor vehicle tariff scheme. I also find as a fact that this discrimination places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of other countries. And I find as fact that Canada’s imposition is unreasonable, is not equally enforced upon the like articles of every foreign country, and places a burden on the commerce of the United States.

7. Further, I find that imposing additional ad valorem duties on certain products of Canada to address the burden or disadvantage from this discrimination or unequal and unreasonable imposition is in the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States. When U.S. producers are unfairly denied export opportunities by Canada’s motor vehicle tariffs and TRQs, they lose revenues that support production in the United States, among other things. This suppresses U.S. industrial output, as well as investment, and thereby undermines employment and economic vitality in American communities. Imposing additional duties on certain products of Canada will, among other things, expand opportunities for U.S. producers to compete within the U.S. market, enhancing American production and bringing attendant economic and societal benefits, and may spur Canada to remove the discrimination against U.S. motor vehicles.

8. Accordingly, I find that it is necessary and appropriate and in the public interest to impose an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent on certain products of Canada, as identified in Annex II to this proclamation, effective as of 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026. I determine that the additional ad valorem duties imposed in this proclamation, as described below, will offset the burden or disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discrimination or unequal and unreasonable imposition. In my judgment, the action in this proclamation is consistent with the public interest, will serve the public interest, and is consistent with the interests of the United States.

9. Section 338 authorizes the President, if he determines it will serve the public interest, to offset any burden or disadvantage placed on the commerce of the United States by an unequal imposition or discrimination by a foreign country by specifying and declaring additional duties not to exceed 50 percent ad valorem (or its equivalent) and not to take effect earlier than 30 days after the President’s proclamation finding that a foreign country imposes an unreasonable charge, exaction, regulation, or limitation that is not equally enforced on the like articles of every foreign country, or discriminates in fact against U.S. commerce in a way that places the commerce of the United States at a disadvantage compared to the commerce of any foreign country. Section 338 also authorizes the President to suspend, revoke, supplement, or amend any proclamation under section 338 whenever the President deems that the public interests require such action. Further, section 338 authorizes the President to exclude articles of the foreign country if the foreign country maintains or increases the discrimination against the commerce of the United States and the President deems the exclusion to be consistent with the public interests and the interests of the United States.

10. Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483) (section 604), authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the substance of statutes affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 338; section 301 of title 3, United States Code; and section 604, do hereby proclaim as follows:

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation, certain products of Canada, as set forth in Annex II to this proclamation, imported into the United States shall be subject to an additional ad valorem duty of 50 percent, effective for goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation and in Annex I to this proclamation, the duties imposed in this proclamation are in addition to any other duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges applicable to such products. The duties imposed in this proclamation shall not apply to articles subject to duties pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862), or articles, excluding unmanned aircraft, subject to the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft.

(3) The HTSUS is modified as provided in Annex II to this proclamation, effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern time on August 19, 2026, and the modifications shall continue in effect, unless this action is expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.

(4) Any product subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation, except those eligible for admission under “domestic status” as described in 19 CFR 146.43, that is subject to the duties imposed in this proclamation and that is admitted into a United States foreign trade zone on or after the effective date of this proclamation must be admitted as “privileged foreign status” as described in 19 CFR 146.41, and will be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad valorem rate of duty related to the classification under the applicable HTSUS subheading.

(5) The head of each executive department and agency (agency) is authorized to and shall take all appropriate measures within the agency’s authority to implement this proclamation. The head of each agency may, consistent with applicable law, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, redelegate the authority to take such appropriate measures within the agency.

(6) The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, is authorized to issue such rules, regulations, guidance, instructions, or determinations as may be necessary to implement this proclamation and is authorized to take any necessary measures to administer the duties imposed in this proclamation.

(7) The Commissioner of CBP, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Chairman of the United States International Trade Commission, and any other senior official he deems appropriate, shall determine whether any additional modifications to the HTSUS are necessary to effectuate this proclamation and shall make such modifications to the HTSUS through notice in the Federal Register, including any technical correction to the annexes to this proclamation.

(8) For any rule or regulation the Commissioner of CBP makes to implement this proclamation, the Commissioner of CBP shall, to the extent required by law, obtain the approval of the President or the United States Trade Representative. The United States Trade Representative is delegated the President’s approval authority in 19 U.S.C. 1338(h).

(9) Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency. If any provision of this proclamation or the application of any provision to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this proclamation and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fifty-first.

ANNEX I

ANNEX II

DONALD J. TRUMP
Source

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Imposes Additional Tariffs on Canada​

The White House
July 20, 2026

DEFENDING AMERICAN WORKERS AND ENSURING FAIR TRADE: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed three Proclamations pursuant to Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to impose additional 50% tariffs on certain goods of Canada in response to Canada’s discriminatory treatment of American products. By doing so, President Trump is offsetting the burden and disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discriminatory treatment of U.S. commerce and is leveling the playing field for crucial American exports—cars, alcohol, and dairy.
  • Each Section 338 proclamation imposes a 50% tariff on a different set of Canadian imports, covering products ranging from wine to hockey sticks to cement.
  • These Section 338 tariffs apply to all covered goods regardless of whether a good originates under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
  • These Section 338 tariffs will not apply to energy, potash, products subject to tariffs under Section 232, and certain other goods, such as fish or critical minerals.
  • The tariffs will take effect 30 days after signing and are designed to offset the burden and disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discrimination.
SECURING FAIR TREATMENT FOR AMERICAN EXPORTS: President Trump is taking action to hold Canada accountable for its continued discrimination against and unreasonable and unequal treatment of U.S. commerce that has burdened and disadvantaged hardworking Americans.
  • Section 338 empowers the President to impose tariffs when a country disadvantages U.S. exporters relative to the exports of another country to offset the disadvantage or burden on U.S. commerce.
  • Canada imposes certain tariffs and quotas on cars imported to Canada from the U.S., but not on imports from other countries. Canada also administers these quotas in a way that compels U.S. auto companies to invest in production in Canada instead of the United States.
    • From April 2025 through March 2026, Canadian imports of U.S. motor vehicles decreased by approximately 22%, or $5.6 billion, compared to the same period in 2024-2025. Exports of motor vehicles from other countries to Canada have increased to meet the demand previously filled by U.S. exports.
  • All but two Canadian provinces and territories have halted the purchase, distribution, or retailing of U.S. alcoholic beverages, and have not imposed similar restrictions on other countries.
    • From March 2025 through February 2026, Canadian imports of U.S. alcoholic beverages decreased by about 81%, or $582 million, compared to the same period in 2024-2025.
  • As part of its complicated and protectionist dairy system, Canada established tariff-rate quotas on U.S. cheese that are much more restrictive than the tariff-rate quotas imposed on similar imports of cheese into Canada from the EU, despite Canada having trade agreements with both the U.S. and the EU.
  • Over the past year and a half, only two countries have chosen to retaliate against President Trump’s tariffs rather than negotiate a deal with the United States: the People’s Republic of China and Canada.
  • The Section 338 tariffs imposed today make America wealthier and stronger, offsetting the burden and disadvantage on U.S. commerce from Canada’s discriminatory treatment of U.S. commerce.
KEEPING AMERICA FIRST: President Trump is delivering on his promise to secure better outcomes for American workers, farmers, and businesses by using tariffs to restore reciprocity to trade and strengthen our national security.
  • President Trump’s America First Trade Policy was created to benefit American workers and families. It has dramatically expanded global market access for U.S. exports, strengthened workers’ incomes, reshored and supported American jobs, and reduced the trade deficit.
  • The United States, under President Trump’s leadership, did not agree to renew the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in its current form, because the deal is not sufficiently beneficial for the United States.
  • President Trump has taken actions under Section 232 to protect and strengthen U.S. manufacturing critical for our national and economic security, including imposing tariffs on key goods such as steel, aluminum, copper, trucks and automobiles, timber, lumber, and pharmaceuticals.
  • In May 2026, U.S. manufacturing grew at its fastest rate in four years—nearly tripling expectations, and in June 2026, U.S. manufacturing expanded for its sixth straight month.
  • Through negotiations with foreign trading partners and the strategic use of tariffs, President Trump has secured trillions in private and foreign investment to bring American jobs and manufacturing back to the United States while diversifying global supply chains and reducing dependence on adversarial nations.
  • President Trump’s tariffs have resulted in 18 deals opening new markets for U.S. exports and bringing reciprocity back to America’s trade relations. Yet Canada has elected to discriminate against the United States rather than address Canadian trade barriers.
Source
 
Rand Paul says newly released internal federal documents show the FBI asked Customs and Border Protection not to stop, search, or question EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak when he returned from China through JFK Airport in 2021 during the WHO’s COVID-19 origins investigation.

According to the documents, CBP had identified Daszak as an “extremely high person of interest” and planned to search his electronic devices and question him about his ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but stood down after a request from the FBI.
Ver archivo adjunto 9299724
Ver archivo adjunto 9299723
It just keeps getting worse, I'm waiting on the Qatar files as well.
 
As a moid I don't have the strongest grasp on female attraction but I'm baffled at the number of women gooning over these ugly bug eyed Arab Communists like Hasan and Madami.

What's the appeal?
They're very rich (establishment approved) and they threaten people (in the literal sense of angrily promising to hurt them). Closest thing to a real-life werewolf billionaire.
 
He's not going to do anything about Netanyahu. Not if he values his life. Netanyahu is a foreign dignitary and head of state. Who is Mamdani? Just a mayor of New York City. He does not even have the jurisdiction to do anything about Netanyahu

Either Mamdani is suicidal or he has massive unwarranted self-importance. Personally I bet on the latter
If Mamdani fucks with Bibi, he will either suddenly fall off the face of the earth, kill himself by a gunshot to the back of the head, or get a phone call that rings precisely three times at 3:00 am everywhere he goes for the rest of his life.
 
Última edición:
Vance's kid was born this morning, his name is Alec:

Ver archivo adjunto 9295027


Barron is achieving his final form, from the laughable World Cup final:

Ver archivo adjunto 9295034
1784502789895.png
Rand Paul says newly released internal federal documents show the FBI asked Customs and Border Protection not to stop, search, or question EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak when he returned from China through JFK Airport in 2021 during the WHO’s COVID-19 origins investigation.

According to the documents, CBP had identified Daszak as an “extremely high person of interest” and planned to search his electronic devices and question him about his ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but stood down after a request from the FBI.
Ver archivo adjunto 9299724
Ver archivo adjunto 9299723
This is the most sus thing i've seen in a while.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo