Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

"Orchia Minn" is really weird *even for a troon* and clearly enjoys saying the worst possible thing. If not actually troll, he must be borderline retarded. + autistic but that almost goes without saying on here.
He's legit. Remember, there is no "reasonable trans" because the underlying logic of trans is not reasonable. Even the nicest, prettiest, most employed, most socially adroit, most medicalized, and most stealth passing trans folx are still attempting to lie to everyone they meet. There isn't "radical trans" and "reasonable trans", the insane demands and denial of reality are always there. Remember the schism between "truscum" and "tucutes", and how both sides were fucking delusional?
To anyone who says "they don't actually believe that" - yes, they do actually believe what they say, and it's actually a problem. We can't tell if they're trolling because the ludicrous shit they do and say is entirely consistent with their ideology.
 
This would have been an acceptable joke if he didn't feel the need to throw the jab about trannies AND "trans" KIDS specifically. You can defend trannies and I'll think you're a mongoloid retard, but if you defend trans kids I instantly assume you're a pedophile.
To be fair. Technically nobody actually defends trans kids. They either groom them or admit they don't exist. Because trans kids don't exist and attempting to make them a thing is child grooming.
 
To be fair. Technically nobody actually defends trans kids. They either groom them or admit they don't exist. Because trans kids don't exist and attempting to make them a thing is child grooming.
The timestamp at the video literally has doug whinging about "muh trans keedz".
 
The timestamp at the video literally has doug whinging about "muh trans keedz".
No I'm saying you can't defend trans kids. Because they don't exist. You either defend child groomers which is what Doug did. Or you admit they don't exist like 99% of the population. Doug decided to join chomoland a while ago anyway. He was butt buddies with jew wario.
 
He's legit. Remember, there is no "reasonable trans" because the underlying logic of trans is not reasonable. Even the nicest, prettiest, most employed, most socially adroit, most medicalized, and most stealth passing trans folx are still attempting to lie to everyone they meet. There isn't "radical trans" and "reasonable trans", the insane demands and denial of reality are always there. Remember the schism between "truscum" and "tucutes", and how both sides were fucking delusional?
To anyone who says "they don't actually believe that" - yes, they do actually believe what they say, and it's actually a problem. We can't tell if they're trolling because the ludicrous shit they do and say is entirely consistent with their ideology.
There's no such thing as reasonable trans. However I think what most people actually mean is agps and communists vs rape victims. People are more willing to try to accommodate trans people who are victims of abuse than they are psycho gooners. Hell Rowling has friends she considers 'reasonable trans'. The problem with the approach is you're still affirming delusions out of pity rather than actually helping. However a lot more people are going to be empathetic towards rape victims than rapists and this empathy is why people play along with it because it's easier than actually helping them. A lot of these people need real genuine therapy that I doubt any of us get paid enough to give. The agps and commies however should be executed with a rusted potato peeler. Let them contemplate the suffering they will receive in hell as they slowly are peeled layer by layer.
 
However a lot more people are going to be empathetic towards rape victims than rapists and this empathy is why people play along with it because it's easier than actually helping them.
I actually think that one of the most insidious things about the trans movement is how it callously takes advantage of people's empathy. Most people are empathetic. Most people, if they see someone in distress, want to help out. It's pretty obvious why the majority of humans would have evolved to be this way. So many of the crimes of Grindelwald the trans movement have gotten through using "this man is very sad" as a Trojan horse. We see that the man is very sad, and we want to help him. The recent U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled that states have the right to keep women's sports teams female-only had a side that relied entirely on "boy is sad, so sad" as their argument (they lost).
 
Some redditors woke up today and chose RDS
Jk Rowling's husband cheated with a trans woman...right? | archive
To reddit's credit sorting by controversial does give you the sane answer, but that's likely only because this isn't a main thoroughfare sub and is probably not so heavily moderated despite showing up in r/all
image0002.png
The only reason you would not want men in women's spaces is just economic anxiety
image0003 .png
and a bite size seethe:
Stonewall Inn Owners Accuse J.K. Rowling of Inflicting ‘Global Damage’ on LGBTQ+ Community | archive
stereotypical female response:
image0001 .png
 
There was a time in my life that I could not have believed anyone would seriously say something like this, and especially not in public on the internet. Then I came to Kiwi Farms.
This person is being blunter than the rest, but make no mistake – trannies absolutely fetishize the idea of being catcalled, harassed, groped, and raped because they think it makes them real women, and that makes them hard. There are countless examples (many archived here in one thread or another), one of the most egregious being a jealous redditor whining that their pedo uncle diddled his sister and not him.

The savvier ones cloak it in "obviously it's so terrible how women are treated...but..." or just post obvious maturbation fantasies about how many people sexually assault them and how sexy and victimized they are. You can't spend much time in Stinkditch without noticing the pattern.
 
Amnesty UK released a report in which they list 'anti-rights' groups in the UK that are a danger to the rights of women and alphabet people. It includes a whole bunch of gender critical orgs and even JKR's women's shelter Beira's Place.
Screenshot 2026-07-10 at 20-32-32 The Herald on X JK Rowling’s support centre for female sexua...png
article

Grok summary of the story:

Amnesty UK Report Labels Gender-Critical Groups as Rights Threats
Last updated 18 hours ago
The 46-page report, released on July 8, 2026, tracks 117 UK groups including 51 gender-critical ones like For Women Scotland, LGB Alliance, and Sex Matters, claiming they form an ecosystem opposing trans rights and women's protections. It notes these groups emerged mostly since 2017, represent half the listed entities but only 2.5% of £144 million in spending from 2019-2024, and have succeeded through litigation aligned with UK law like the April 2025 Supreme Court ruling on biological sex. Critics including Maya Forstater and Bev Jackson called the report authoritarian and libelous, defending their work as truth-telling in line with public support and legal protections for women and same-sex attracted people.

I can't find the actual report. There's a link on Amnesty's website, but it doesn't lead to anything. Did they delete it already?
[edit] The page was archived, but the download doesn't work.

Julie Bindel posted some screenshots of the list
Screenshot 2026-07-10 at 20-28-11 Julie Bindel on X Pleased and proud that those w⚓️s at Amnes...png x
list1.jpg list2.jpg

Rowling's response:
Screenshot 2026-07-10 at 20-54-45 Amnesty UK Report Labels Gender-Critical Groups as Rights Th...png x
 
Última edición:
The 46-page report, released on July 8, 2026, tracks 117 UK groups including 51 gender-critical ones like For Women Scotland, LGB Alliance, and Sex Matters, claiming they form an ecosystem opposing trans rights and women's protections.
Amnesty have been known cunts in my eyes for a while now but I do hope this enlightens a few that still believe.
 
Didn't JKR work for Amnesty once upon a time? Another organization lost to ideological capture...
Yes she did.

Amnesty appear to have taken down the report after belatedly realising the seriousness of slandering people and orgs like this.

Here it is - courtesy of Wings Over Scotland who had archived it.
 

Archivos adjuntos

Amnesty appear to have taken down the report after belatedly realising the seriousness of slandering people and orgs like this.
I find it funny that these left orgs are starting to backtrack on publishing shit now that they've realized that they won't automatically win in court, especially in speech-strict places like the UK.
 
Amnesty has charitable status in the UK.
As such, they must operate for the public benefit rather than for political or ideological interests.

How does lying about people "taking" trans rights, that were never theirs in the first place, make them a legitimate charitable organisation rather than an ideological one?
 
I find it funny that these left orgs are starting to backtrack on publishing shit now that they've realized that they won't automatically win in court, especially in speech-strict places like the UK.
Flashback to the Stonewall officer forced to testify by video about why he advised Stonewall's clients to bully GC women and who asked to have his mother and his dog for emotional support (true story).

There is a whole class of people who studied Something Studies at uni and then go to work for NGOs and who basically have absolutely no idea how anything works and no one is looking over them until it's too late.
 
Amnesty has charitable status in the UK.
As such, they must operate for the public benefit rather than for political or ideological interests.
The majority of UK charities have tossed that the same way the BBC ignores its requirements to be neutral.

The first thing any decent government would do would be to strip charitable status from a couple of hundred.
Flashback to the Stonewall officer forced to testify by video about why he advised Stonewall's clients to bully GC women and who asked to have his mother and his dog for emotional support (true story).
For anyone who doubts the above here's some archives.



 
Fredo Wallace having one of his regular Leeroy Jenkins moments:

1783792596984.png
1783792620243.png

(Absolutely delighted that AM Scanlon whoever she is is also calling him Fredo like I've been doing on here for a while.)

1783792695104.png

He reminds me of the kids in Tom Sawyer, endlessly tracing lines in the sand and threatening each other. Mind you he might also be drunk-posting as he was once visibly drunk at an in-person debate.

1783792840908.png

OK what follows is nothing to do with anything or TDS but I find it really funny so why not share? She always gets people who pay no attention to the discussion going on and just want to ask her book questions.

1783792923485.png
1783792937458.png
1783792953718.png
 
Atrás
Top Abajo