Culture Lessons From the Graham Platner Disaster

1000004884.png

Hopefully, by the time you read this, Graham Platner will have dropped out of the Senate race in Maine. If he hasn’t, he needs to, immediately.

His campaign, which started with such excitement and inspired so many people in Maine, has become a shameful catastrophe. What’s left — besides finding a Democrat to run in his place — is figuring out what, if anything, can be learned from this debacle.

As you probably know by now, Politico published a story on Monday about a woman, Jenny Racicot, who says that Platner raped her. According to Racicot, they’d been romantically involved, on and off, for more than two years when he showed up at her house drunk and uninvited one night in 2021, let himself in and forced himself on her.

She confided her ordeal to a man she dated after Platner, as well as to her therapist, and showed Politico text messages she sent in 2023 warning an acquaintance away from him. Her account is completely believable and completely devastating.

Platner denies Racicot’s accusations but seems to realize that his campaign may no longer be viable. In a video posted on social media, he said, “Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting, but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we are taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.”

But that time needs to wrap up. According to Maine law, Platner has to drop out by next Monday for Democrats to replace him on the November ballot. The sooner this mess ends, the better.

The Platner campaign represented an electoral insurgency against the Democratic Party; now, there are going to be furious recriminations against those who launched it. There is plenty of blame to go around.

Most at fault, of course, is Platner himself. He allegedly victimized Racicot, and then his campaign victimized her again, putting her into a situation where she felt she had to go public. He betrayed his supporters by plunging into a campaign while knowing he had a closet full of skeletons and drawing people who believed in him into a doomed enterprise.

Maine Democrats were willing to overlook Platner’s Totenkopf tattoo, his terrible Reddit posts and his sexting with other women while he was married because they felt so invigorated by him and the movement he was creating. They went out on a limb for him, and he had every reason to know it was going to be sawed off.

Also liable for this disaster are the progressive operatives who recruited Platner and were so infatuated with his identity — a gruff, handsome oysterman with social democratic politics — that they failed to do their due diligence. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that Platner’s top strategist, Dan Moraff, didn’t want to spring for a thorough background check, which can take weeks and cost around $20,000. “Moraff asked for an expedited, cheaper review to be done within days,” The Journal said.

Moraff, who travels the country trying to recruit left-wing, working-class candidates, reportedly learned about some of Platner’s troubling Reddit posts but decided to charge forward anyway. “Part of our thesis here is that people do not want their candidates grown in vats,” he told The Journal.

He’s correct about the appetite for unconventional candidates, but that is no excuse for such willful sloppiness. Before blithely assuming that voters would forgive a candidate’s flaws, he had a responsibility to try to find out what those flaws were.

This fiasco might seem to vindicate the establishment that Platner railed against, but Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, who wanted to stop Platner, is also partly culpable here. Schumer badly misread the Democratic electorate and tried to clear the field for his preferred candidate, Maine’s 78-year-old governor, Janet Mills, leaving a vacuum that Platner filled.

As NOTUS reported last week, Dan Kleban, a co-founder of Maine Beer Company, had been preparing to launch a populist, anti-Wall Street Senate bid last summer, but the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee tried to dissuade him. “He and his campaign were left with the impression that if he ran, Democrats in Washington would make it difficult because they were holding their support for Maine Gov. Janet Mills,” NOTUS wrote. Kleban ended up delaying the start of his campaign, not getting in until Platner had already caught fire.

While I’m assigning blame, I shouldn’t leave out myself. Last October, when stories about Platner’s tattoo and Reddit posts first broke, I went to Maine to write about him. I tried to convey what I saw: a campaign that was electrifying angry Maine voters. But I deeply regret that, impressed by Platner’s political charisma, I wrote that he was “nothing like the edgelord caricature I encountered online.” If anything, he seems to be significantly worse.

One person who tried to alert Democrats was Platner’s former political director, Genevieve McDonald. She quit when the first Platner scandals emerged and has been increasingly outspoken against him. Progressive operatives made her seem like a vindictive person eager to curry favor with Maine’s political establishment. In retrospect, she looks much more like someone who took a profound professional risk to do the right thing. I can’t be the only one who regrets not taking her more seriously.

If there’s a lesson here, it might be about the importance of listening hard to the people telling you what you don’t want to hear. Many Democrats, disgusted by their party’s failure to contain Donald Trump, want representatives as furious as they are, and they no longer trust their leaders to tell them who is electable. That opens space up for outsider candidates who wouldn’t have had a chance a few years ago. It also makes it easier for unfit characters to escape proper vetting.

Platner offered many on the left something they’re desperate for: working-class aesthetics married to uncompromising lefty politics. Many progressives want to believe that with a sufficiently populist message and style, they can win over voters alienated from the Democratic Party, obviating the need for ideological concessions. Platner seemed to embody this possibility, and that made a lot of people look past a lot of red flags until it was almost too late.

Link / archive
 
What is the alternative?

Most rape cases are "he says, she says" and our justice system chooses to believe the woman.

Solid Evidence for consent or lackthere off don't exist.
Our system of justice is based on the concept of "innocent until proven guilty." Somehow rape cases are the exception to this, giving women wide latitude to lie for money or attention. Had this woman gone to the police, they would have conducted an investigation, collected physical evidence, done a forensic exam, all of which would have bolstered her claim. She did none of this. And this happened after the #MeToo movement, so this woman had no reason to think that her case wouldn't be taken seriously.
 
Our system of justice is based on the concept of "innocent until proven guilty." Somehow rape cases are the exception to this, giving women wide latitude to lie for money or attention. Had this woman gone to the police, they would have conducted an investigation, collected physical evidence, done a forensic exam, all of which would have bolstered her claim. She did none of this. And this happened after the #MeToo movement, so this woman had no reason to think that her case wouldn't be taken seriously.
I know

But the fundamental problem still persists: Did he rape her or have consensual sex with her?

You see what I'm saying?

You can prove sexual contact, but you can't prove consent.

We know they were in a relationship (or some sort of a relationship) so proving sex is kinda irrelevant.
 
I’m extremely skeptical on the sexual assault allegations given that they are the Democratic Party’s favorite mechanism to purge their political enemies these days.

That being said, I’ll always cheer for bitter democrat infighting though. Also, always hold your enemies to the standard they hold you to.

So: Fuck him. He’s guilty.
 
Última edición:
The new rumor is that they (meaning Bernie Sanders Cabal) are going to switch to a Platner clone/prototype named Troy Jackson. He is a pretend "logger" rather than a pretend "oyster farmer" but its basically the same general presentation of the working class guy who is angry about things and stuff. But he is kind of damaged goods. He tried to run for governor already and got nowhere.

And not conincidentally, he already called for the rapey guy to step aside.
 
I know

But the fundamental problem still persists: Did he rape her or have consensual sex with her?

You see what I'm saying?

You can prove sexual contact, but you can't prove consent.

We know they were in a relationship (or some sort of a relationship) so proving sex is kinda irrelevant.
What if instead of rape, she claimed that Platner had sex with her and then stole $10,000 she kept hidden under her mattress while she was in the shower? She never went to the police or made accusations of theft until years later when he was running for office. Would anyone believe her? Would anyone even care? Why should rape be the one crime you never have to report, never have to ask for an investigation, and still expect to be believed years after the fact?

If you want to be seen as a victim, you should act like one, starting with going to the police when you have been physically assaulted. Going to the doctor after you've been raped. If you've been raped, there will not only be physical signs, but you'd also be concerned with STDs and pregnancy after the fact. Did she get tested for either in the aftermath of the rape? Doing so would bolster her claim, and providing said evidence to journalists would be no more invasive than admitting publicly that you've been raped.

If she didn't care enough at the time to contact the police or her doctor after being raped, why should I or anyone else take her claims seriously now?
 
What if instead of rape, she claimed that Platner had sex with her and then stole $10,000 she kept hidden under her mattress while she was in the shower? She never went to the police or made accusations of theft until years later when he was running for office. Would anyone believe her? Would anyone even care? Why should rape be the one crime you never have to report, never have to ask for an investigation, and still expect to be believed years after the fact?
I agree with you.

But the common view is that victims are too intimidated to report anything.
If you want to be seen as a victim, you should act like one, starting with going to the police when you have been physically assaulted. Going to the doctor after you've been raped. If you've been raped, there will not only be physical signs, but you'd also be concerned with STDs and pregnancy after the fact. Did she get tested for either in the aftermath of the rape? Doing so would bolster her claim, and providing said evidence to journalists would be no more invasive than admitting publicly that you've been raped.
This has always been the main reason why i doubt most of these "he raped me 5 years ago" claims.

These "victims" seem to not care it all about pregnancy or STDs.

If she didn't care enough at the time to contact the police or her doctor after being raped, why should I or anyone else take her claims seriously now?
we shouldn't.
 
Democrats don't know what a man or masculinity is either. They've been agonizing over their disconnect with male voters the last two years. They thought they had to get more male candidates who fit their stereotype of male voters (sweaty chuds) and boy in Oysterfuhrer did they get one. He checked enough boxes (luv socialism, 'ate Isntreal, fake tough guy, simple as) they didn't care he is a disgusting pig, until they were forced to
 
No, it's the usual bullshit. She "recalled" something that she "tried for many years to forget". She "complied" with the alleged rape and then didn't call the police immediately despite ample opportunity. She even slept in the same bed as her "rapist".
Michael Tracey - The woman accusing Platner of rape says she was in a "situationship" ... [207...mp4

Accusations like this are laughable no matter who is the target.
She acts so non chalant. To me rape is cruel, malicious, violent. I don't think that is the case here. Instead of leaving and calling the police she gave him some pussy. Yeah. I do not think it is fair or responsible to treat an allegation as a proven fact. Graham Platner has categorically denied non-consensual conduct, and there has been no public criminal finding establishing that he committed the act alleged. It's just the left attacking white men which is on par with their policy of white female supremacy, and dick riding Israel. She has a right to accuse, he has a right to deny. It should be settled in court. Like you couldn't go to the cops but your fat ass can perform for CNN.
 
I know

But the fundamental problem still persists: Did he rape her or have consensual sex with her?

You see what I'm saying?

You can prove sexual contact, but you can't prove consent.

We know they were in a relationship (or some sort of a relationship) so proving sex is kinda irrelevant.
I am surprised you are not bringing up the recent case of the Hispanic guy in California raping his daughter, who went to the police, and yet somehow they could not convict and gave him a plea deal.
 
The issue here is that leftist populists are so TDSed that they retort with "Trump Bad!" when faced with the misdeeds of their own candidates.

This tactic goes nowhere was Trump devotees don't give a shit and people like me who isn't a fan of Trump can just reply with, "Yeah, Trump sucks. Now can we talk about the misdeeds of the candidates you support?"

Once there they have no where to go.
 
I read elsewhere then lolcow Stephen King supported Platner, is that lolcow still support him?

About three hours ago, after king took alot of heat and saw which way the winds were blowing, he changed his mind. He now says that he was "misunderstood" when he said ""Graham Platner may drop out. I hope he doesn't" and "Tell you what--if you knew the whole truth about everyone in the Senate and House of Reps, those chambers would be dead empty. Jesus said, 'Let him without sin cast the first stone,'"....he was making some brilliant point about that darn Trump.

He now says he wasn't defending him.

Et tu Stephen King?

But he was really done when Bernie put the knife in today. I suspect the only reason he has not made it official is that the higher ups (including Bernie) are deciding (or fighting about) who the replacement candidate should be.
 
When someone complains the "police won't do anything"?

What I find them to really be saying is "the police will do their due diligence and conduct an investigation that might take weeks, but I want this guy to be in jail TONIGHT! If they won't be the agents of my immediate revenge? Then they're useless!!!!!"
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo