US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
"erm the amendment made by radical abolitionists designed to fold millions of freed slaves into the US after the largest conflict in us history doesn't actually apply to the group it was written about after the conflict fought over them, it was actually so you could have a cheap gardener and maid"

Mfw the antislavery amendments enable more slavery than ever
Though the 14th amendment doesn’t specify that it was for formerly enslaved while the 13th and 15th explicitly addresses slavery. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 explicitly mentioned it being unlawful to deprive citizenship based on “prior condition of slavery”.

The 14th amendment stands out by not using similar language.
 
The 2028 Presidency will be something to behold. Options to pack the Supreme Court with loyalists are there for both parties if they are willing to go that far and they have enough power in Congress and the White House.
Newsom/AOC will win. No reason to bother with elections anymore.

JUSTICE ALITO RETIRING! DON'T FUCK THIS UP TRUMP!

(Source)

Ver archivo adjunto 9212331
Trump is going to replace him with another ACB, calling it right fucking now.

Not going to read the thread, bad news is the shit the doomers like to feast on like the maggots they are. But I understand Patriots taking a day or two to grouse about the stupidity of the decision.

Birthright citizenship failing to be overturned is not the end, it just means our fight remains as difficult today and tomorrow as it was yesterday. Despite the difficulty we've faced, make no mistake: we are winning. Birthright citizenship even being challenged was unthinkable 4 years ago. There is no straight linear progression to victory, there's going to be dips on the way; but we will reach it, because we have to, no one is coming to save us.

I believe in America, I believe we're going to win, and I believe in YOU 🫵 random Kiwi, so long as you're not a doomer faggot.
You are in the minority. We don't have a country anymore. Even the most loyal plan trusters are throwing in the towel.
 
Well that happened. Nothing more to be done about it. It was a long shot, and now we know damn well why Roberts and Co took so long on it. Trump's not gonna be happy about this one, that's for goddamn sure.

Anyway that was strategy ONE to get rid of birthright citizenship and address certain problems within the nation.

What about two through ten?

We still have options. One of which is simple.

Deport the parents, put the baby in the foster system.

They want an anchor baby, then they can have the anchor baby, they just don't get to come along for the ride.

The chinese want to use their children to build up a voting bloc? Try them all for treason.

We HAVE other ways of dealing with this bullshit. This was just the most pain-free way for everyone involved.

Now we get to do it the fun way.

EDIT: Eat shit fatpacks, I take a trashcan from you as a badge of fucking honor.
 
"Citizenship, then and now," Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Roberts concludes, "was the right to have rights--to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to 'every free-born person in this land.' We keep that promise today."

Ver archivo adjunto 9212264
One could argue (and apparently lose) that, by nature of their parents being in the country illegally, anchor babies are not "free-born". It's insane to assert that the framers of the 14th ever intended it to extend beyond the newly freed slaves of African descent held in bondage PRIOR to it's ratification. The fact that this shit is even in question is maddening. If only the founders and framers had had the foresight to realize how specific their language needed to be to prevent this kind of idiocy 100+ years later.
 
Última edición:
The Birthright Citizenship was a long swing and you could argue does follow the Constitution, it's just abusive. The fucking ruling by Barrett was beyond evil and violates both the Constitution and laws made by Congress. That fucking cunt even goes as far as to essentially say "Yeah, this might cause Civil War 2 but suck my clit, my kid is a nigger and I want infinity niggers".
I thought you MAGAloids wanted the constitution to be followed? Oh, right, you just want an 80 year old fat ass with dementia to be able to do anything he wants
 
Well that happened. Nothing more to be done about it. It was a long shot, and now we know damn well why Roberts and Co took so long on it. Trump's not gonna be happy about this one, that's for goddamn sure.

Anyway that was strategy ONE to get rid of birthright citizenship and address certain problems within the nation.

What about two through ten?

We still have options. One of which is simple.

Deport the parents, put the baby in the foster system.

They want an anchor baby, then they can have the anchor baby, they just don't get to come along for the ride.

The chinese want to use their children to build up a voting bloc? Try them all for treason.

We HAVE other ways of dealing with this bullshit. This was just the most pain-free way for everyone involved.

Now we get to do it the fun way.
If we have to repeat the steps to the civil war and repeating the death of Weimer, then so be it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo