💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
But I do get your point, sometimes looking into a lolcow makes you see things you don't like in yourself. And sometimes that's horrifying or scary.
Rick has this magic mirror-like quality. When I look at him, I see a terrifying vision of what I might have been. I'm not perfect, I've messed up, but I will never let myself hit the lows he wallows fatly in. Ask yourself "What would Rick do?" and then do the opposite, and you will always come out better for it.
 
Since he's (technically) an adult and can't be diagnosed with ODD, the part highlited in blue is forcing me to do a deep dive on the "other specified disorders". I really want to know what the hell is wrong with this rotund herpes homunculus!
Generally when you become an adult you stop doing childish shit like arguing with your parents over dishes and start doing big boy shit like stealing cars and smoking crack. Patrick is basically a 50 year old still arguing with his parents over the dishes, except it's his own toilet on twitter.
 
Amazing. He didn't even wait on the payout of the settlement to start another legal feud with the city.
I told you that the win in court will end in more milk in the future than a loss.

Patrick just taking the money and retiring as a lolcow was never in the cards, children.
He just has more resources for new and stupid projects now.
 
The problem is he's asking for something that is literally impossible, AND he's asking for the wrong thing.

A VARIANCE is what you ask for if you are violating city by-laws or code. Say, your city requires that all houses be set back six feet from the curb. And your house is set back 5.5 feet from the curb. That's a situation to ask for a variance. In some cities, certain energy-conservation requirements can be exempted, usually for properties that have heritage value. Say, Mrs. Smith has beautiful stained glass windows, but they're not energy-efficient.

A variance cannot issue to evade a safety concern. There's even a recent, on topic case about what is required for a variance: Murphy v. LLC (Minn. Ct. App. 2025). This one affirmed the granting of a variance, but gave three steps that the court of appeal held are required to grant a variance. The third is that "If granted, the proposed variance will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or of those utilizing the property or nearby properties."

If the city mistakenly approves an unsafe, non-code improvement, and someone gets hurt, the city can be liable for it (Snyder v. City of Minneapolis).

An AFTER-THE-FACT PERMIT is what you look for if you (or the last guy who owned your house) have an improvement that required a permit but you (or the last guy) didn't get one. This requires you to file everything you needed for the original permit, AND pass an in-person, physical inspection. Remember (per Snyder), if the city doesn't inspect when it should have, the city can be liable for some dumbass getting hurt when it falls down.

He also has multiple problems with that guardrail: The gap between the railing and the wall looks more than 4", and I do not think they could support the required weight.
 
The problem is he's asking for something that is literally impossible, AND he's asking for the wrong thing.

A VARIANCE is what you ask for if you are violating city by-laws or code. Say, your city requires that all houses be set back six feet from the curb. And your house is set back 5.5 feet from the curb. That's a situation to ask for a variance. In some cities, certain energy-conservation requirements can be exempted, usually for properties that have heritage value. Say, Mrs. Smith has beautiful stained glass windows, but they're not energy-efficient.

A variance cannot issue to evade a safety concern. There's even a recent, on topic case about what is required for a variance: Murphy v. LLC (Minn. Ct. App. 2025). This one affirmed the granting of a variance, but gave three steps that the court of appeal held are required to grant a variance. The third is that "If granted, the proposed variance will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public or of those utilizing the property or nearby properties."

If the city mistakenly approves an unsafe, non-code improvement, and someone gets hurt, the city can be liable for it (Snyder v. City of Minneapolis).

An AFTER-THE-FACT PERMIT is what you look for if you (or the last guy who owned your house) have an improvement that required a permit but you (or the last guy) didn't get one. This requires you to file everything you needed for the original permit, AND pass an in-person, physical inspection. Remember (per Snyder), if the city doesn't inspect when it should have, the city can be liable for some dumbass getting hurt when it falls down.

He also has multiple problems with that guardrail: The gap between the railing and the wall looks more than 4", and I do not think they could support the required weight.
I hope one of the niggers gangbanging Nicole falls off the balcony and gets killed. This would have many benefits: The $100k or whatever he got from the lolsuit instantly gone in litigation, one less nigger on the earth, and Fatso enjoying prison.
 
Anger, irritation, argumentativeness and defiance: this is what your "Fat Fucks of Milwaukee 101" professor teaches you in the first day of college.

Since he's (technically) an adult and can't be diagnosed with ODD, the part highlited in blue is forcing me to do a deep dive on the "other specified disorders". I really want to know what the hell is wrong with this rotund herpes homunculus!
Ver archivo adjunto 9191333
What’s wrong with him is that he’s a fat faggot with bitch tits (I believe that was the diagnosis of intrepid investigative journalist Thomas Apostle).

I often forget, but isn’t he the one who was allergic to his mothers breast milk, it’s like at birth nature recognized the terrible, fat mistake that was made and tried to end it.

Seriously though, if you find anything I’d be interested to see.
 
Amazing. He didn't even wait on the payout of the settlement to start another legal feud with the city.
I told you that the win in court will end in more milk in the future than a loss.

Patrick just taking the money and retiring as a lolcow was never in the cards, children.
He just has more resources for new and stupid projects now.
Everyone thinks access to wealth cures stupidity. As I said earlier today in the NFL thread, you can take the hoodrat out of the hood but you can't take the hood out of the hoodrat.

You can never remove Fatrick from his self-destructive behavior because that would require creating a whole separate human being. Fatrick does the things he does because he is Fatrick. He is never going to change because he is just wired to be who he is.
 
Fatrick is precisely the kind of fat asshole who'll hurt himself with his own collapsed constructions and try to sue the city for not adequately "supervising" the construction via permit requirements.
If he hurts himself they can say they told him not to now and have clean hands.
Right, but what if it kills someone else? Wouldn't that be a bad thing? He isn't just doing an astoundingly stupid thing that only affects himself. He is creating a risk that threatens everyone near him.
Don't treaspass under Fatrick's deck and you'll be okay, though I would pity the furniture delivery driver.
 
To paraphrase the closing argument, he's only guilty of being Patrick S Tomlinson.

That is his crime.
There should be actually a statute making it a felony just to be Patrick S. Tomlinson and the sentence should be to be fucked to death by you personally.

That said, though, it is very unfair to compare Rimmer to Rick. He may have been an insufferable asshole in many respects, but he had sympathetic points. Example: the gazpacho soup scene.
Both hilarious and sympathetic. A lot of what Rick does is hilarious, but none of it is remotely sympathetic.
 
The genuinely funniest outcome would be if the guardrail doesn’t actually meet the 36-inch requirement. Because then none of this magnificent correspondence matters at all.

And Pat does have a real issue with this requirement: the deck surface has a 4.8 degree slope. The code requires 36 inches measured from the “hard structural surface” to the top of the guard, and on a sloped surface that measurement varies depending on where you take it.
I think it probably does. @Throwing Romans got a few more pictures that were missed and it looks like it's between 39 and 40 inches. The deck slope might play in but it's a comically thin "deck" so I don't think it'd be enough.

There's a few (fat hand) pictures also on the second page of uploads on the violation and one more letter that was missed
 
As previously discussed by some people here, in theory ODD is a diagnostic exclusive to children. Which bugs me like a motherfucker because to me Pat sounds like the most ODD person in the universe.
It might just be a pragmatic thing. If ODD is a disorder that means you could get on the dole for it. Meaning I could get to tell my boss he's a faggot at a couple jobs then claim disability. Which would end up being pretty disastrous for society at large...
 
Can someone explain why he'd go through the trouble of checking with the city just to lie to them? How much money was he hoping to save by not getting a permit and lying by omission instead?

Was it worth the trouble you're in now, Pat?

Stupid. Fat.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo