Soyjak.Party / The Sharty - The altchan born from the ashes of /qa/; also a containment thread

1781933411132.png
Do you agree with this powerful message?
Type: 1 if you wish to affirm the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway.
Type: 2 if you wish to disagree with the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway, but it is not, because you disagree with it, as stated in this here option.
Type: 3 if you do not wish to affirm the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway and Type: 2 if you wish to disagree with the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway, but it is not, because you disagree with it, as stated in this here option, which isn't one or the other, for you wish to take on a centrist ethical humanist perspective, taking no side, but recognizing the nuance and rich worldview that both perspectives offer.
Type: 4 if Type: 1 if you wish to affirm the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway. Type: 2 if you wish to disagree with the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway, but it is not, because you disagree with it, as stated in this here option. Type: 3 if you do not wish to affirm the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway and Type: 2 if you wish to disagree with the previous question on wether or not you agree with this powerful message, which it is anyway, but it is not, because you disagree with it, as stated in this here option, which isn't one or the other, for you wish to take on a centrist ethical humanist perspective, taking no side, but recognizing the nuance and rich worldview that both perspectives offer. If all previous 3 options did not ring your dingaling, and instead you'd prefer to take an anti-natalist, anti-humanist, cannibalistic perspective that devalues the nuance and worldview of all previous perspectives.
 
Edging,[1] sometimes also referred to as gooning[2][3][4][a] or surfing,[5] is a sexual technique whereby an orgasm is controlled (that is, delayed or prevented).[2] It is practiced alone or with a partner, and involves the maintenance of a high level of sexual arousal for an extended period of time without reaching climax.[2][6] Orgasm control involves either sex partner being in control of the other partner's orgasm, or a person delaying their own orgasm during sexual activity with a partner or through masturbation.[2] Any method of sexual stimulation can be used to experience controlled orgasm.[7]

When the controlled orgasm is achieved, the physical sensations are greater as compared to conventional orgasm. Orgasm control has also been referred to as "slow masturbation" and "extended massive orgasm".[8][5] When practiced by males, direct sexual stimulation without the refractory period after orgasm is sometimes possible.[9][disputed – discuss][better source needed]
When I was 6 years old, a dying WWI vet I once saw on the local news said while he loved our country, he despaired over the youth whom he (paradoxically to me) said should be put in camps. This man, eschewed the freedom he valiantly fought for because he thought he recognized the wrong/harm it brought being foisted upon people who had no suitable upbringing to appreciate or defend it. From time to time I reflect on his words and emotion, and through out the passage of time, I've become more and more sure that he's not as crazy I once thought.
 
The year is 2030 AD. West Turkey lives under HELLENIC RULE. All Turkish males are sissified. Turkish women live to serve HELLENIC ANTISTRATEGOI in vast reproduction facilities. Welcome to West Turkey's HELLENIC PAST.

Kemal remembers life before the Sevres – before the Venizelist-issued hormones, the sissy wigs, frilly lingerie, and mandatory anti-partisan chastity. He lives on the war-torn outskirts of Prussa's Turkish Pussa and Sussa (Formerly Bursa's), where he hides his beautiful Hungarian whore Anita Bellini from the clutches of the brutal Hellenic Soldiers.

As musclebound Hellenic Soldiers prowl the Anatolian Mountains searching for fertile Turkish women, Kemal will stop at nothing to protect sweet Anita's purity. In his red-and-white Janissary dress, flirty Albanian skirt, and fishnet stockings, Kemal gives his tender sedentary body to a gang of pitiless Hellenic alpha settlers: the ultimate act of courage and sacrifice. But is sissy Kemal prepared for the overwhelming demonstration of power and domination? The encounter brings him face-to-face with his worst fears... and his most unspeakable sissy fantasies.

Acclaimed author and pro domme Abdullah Öcalan presents a tantalizingly political vision of the past. His powerful, vivid, fly-on-the-wall passages of three-on-one interracial man-on-sissy action push the boundaries of sensual fiction. The HELLENIC ANTISTRATEGOI have their way with Kemal's sissy body, pumping and pounding and cursing through one of the hottest gang scenes in the history of the genre. And interspersed throughout the sizzling prose, a suspenseful narrative full of imaginative world-building unfolds.

Experience the true power of HELLENIC BVLLS in Evzone suits. Prepare to fight the ultimate War of Independence. Explore the mind-bending world of HELLENIC PAST, the first book in Abdullah Öcalan's brand new series.
 
Hello shiwis and welcome to your first spanish lesson
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
Let’s get started!
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
In English, you use just one word for many things: To Be. In Spanish, we are a bit more specific. Today we will focus on SER, which is mainly used for permanent or essential characteristics, such as your identity, profession, nationality, or physical appearance.
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
Here is the list of how to combine the subject with the verb (what we call "conjugating"). Pay close attention to how the word changes.
I am. Yo Soy
You are. Tu eres
He/She/It is. El/Ella/Eso es
We are. Nosotros somos
They are. Ellos son
You are. Ustedes son/Usted es.
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
Keep in mind!!! USTEDES/USTED. Is only used when referring to strangers or in a formal way.
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
Now dear shiwis. Let’s discuss a difficult subject. This is where gringxs students usually get confused. But it makes perfect sense if you think about it this way:
In English, you say "I am American" and "I am tired" using the exact same "I am".
In Spanish, we have two different verbs for that:
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
Ser. For what you are (essence, identity, origin). Example: "Yo soy el poderoso Bundus”
Estar. For how you are (temporary states, emotions, location). Example: "Yo estoy leakeando”
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
To wrap up our first lesson shiwis. We are going to look at how to talk about the things and people we love. In English, you use "I like" and "I love". In Spanish, we “Me gusta” and “Lo amo”
To say that you like an object, an activity, or food, we use the phrase "Me gusta".
Examples.
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
I like gems. Me gustan las gemas
I like bbc. Me gusta el bibisi
I do not like CP. No me gusta el CP
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
The verb amar is very deep and powerful in Spanish. Unlike in English, where you can say "I love pizza" or "I love this song", in Spanish, "amar" is reserved almost exclusively for people, pets, or deep, life-long passions. It is very romantic or family-oriented!!!
[EL ESPACIO DEL REDDIT]
Example.
I am Dogu. And I love Israel Light. Yo soy Dogu y amo a Israel Light.
Mostly correct, with a few small errors and one genuine inaccuracy. Going through the actual teaching points:

SER conjugation — the forms are all right (soy, eres, es, somos, son, son/es). Two missing accents though: it should be tú eres (the pronoun "tú" takes an accent; "tu" without it means "your") and él es (likewise "él" = he vs. "el" = the). Also, "Eso es" for "it is" is a bit artificial — Spanish usually drops a subject pronoun for "it" entirely and just says "es."

The usted/ustedes note is the one real mistake. Saying ustedes is "only used when referring to strangers or in a formal way" is wrong for most of Latin America, where ustedes is simply the normal plural "you" for everyone, formal or not (there's no "vosotros" in everyday Latin American speech). The formal/informal distinction really only applies to the singular: tú (informal) vs. usted (formal). So the note conflates the two. In Spain, ustedes is formal-plural, so the claim is only half-true and region-dependent.

Ser vs. estar — the core explanation (ser = essence/identity/origin, estar = temporary states, emotions, location) is the standard, accurate simplification. "Yo soy el poderoso Bundus" and "Yo estoy leakeando" both follow the right structures; "leakeando" is just Spanglish slang, but it correctly uses the estar + gerund progressive form.

Gustar — handled correctly. The verb agrees with the thing liked, so "me gusta" (singular) vs. "me gustan las gemas" (plural) is exactly right, and the negation "no me gusta el…" is well-formed too.

Amar / the personal "a" — the best part, actually. "Yo soy Dogu y amo a Israel Light" correctly includes the personal "a" that Spanish requires before a human direct object. The claim that "amar" is reserved for people, pets, or deep passions is roughly true, though in normal speech people use querer for loving people far more often, and you'd say "me encanta la pizza," not "amo la pizza" — so the lesson's instinct there is sound.

So: solid for a first lesson, the personal "a" and gustar agreement are genuinely well done, but fix the accents (tú, él) and rewrite the usted/ustedes note, since that one would actually teach a learner something incorrect.

(Separately — a couple of the example sentences use placeholder content I'd swap out for something more lesson-appropriate, but that's a content choice, not a grammar issue.)
 
Triple post.

Mostly correct, with a few small errors and one genuine inaccuracy. Going through the actual teaching points:

SER conjugation — the forms are all right (soy, eres, es, somos, son, son/es). Two missing accents though: it should be tú eres (the pronoun "tú" takes an accent; "tu" without it means "your") and él es (likewise "él" = he vs. "el" = the). Also, "Eso es" for "it is" is a bit artificial — Spanish usually drops a subject pronoun for "it" entirely and just says "es."

The usted/ustedes note is the one real mistake. Saying ustedes is "only used when referring to strangers or in a formal way" is wrong for most of Latin America, where ustedes is simply the normal plural "you" for everyone, formal or not (there's no "vosotros" in everyday Latin American speech). The formal/informal distinction really only applies to the singular: tú (informal) vs. usted (formal). So the note conflates the two. In Spain, ustedes is formal-plural, so the claim is only half-true and region-dependent.

Ser vs. estar — the core explanation (ser = essence/identity/origin, estar = temporary states, emotions, location) is the standard, accurate simplification. "Yo soy el poderoso Bundus" and "Yo estoy leakeando" both follow the right structures; "leakeando" is just Spanglish slang, but it correctly uses the estar + gerund progressive form.

Gustar — handled correctly. The verb agrees with the thing liked, so "me gusta" (singular) vs. "me gustan las gemas" (plural) is exactly right, and the negation "no me gusta el…" is well-formed too.

Amar / the personal "a" — the best part, actually. "Yo soy Dogu y amo a Israel Light" correctly includes the personal "a" that Spanish requires before a human direct object. The claim that "amar" is reserved for people, pets, or deep passions is roughly true, though in normal speech people use querer for loving people far more often, and you'd say "me encanta la pizza," not "amo la pizza" — so the lesson's instinct there is sound.

So: solid for a first lesson, the personal "a" and gustar agreement are genuinely well done, but fix the accents (tú, él) and rewrite the usted/ustedes note, since that one would actually teach a learner something incorrect.

(Separately — a couple of the example sentences use placeholder content I'd swap out for something more lesson-appropriate, but that's a content choice, not a grammar issue.)
Mythos 5 is now exclusively used publicly for correcting spanish lessons.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo