Science Government forces Anthropic to pull its latest AI model because it's too good.

https://archive.ph/SNAjZ


Supposedly the US government has forced Anthropic to freeze their latest AI model because it's so good that it can hack the US government.


Statement on the US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5​

Jun 12, 2026
The US government, citing national security authorities, has issued an export control directive to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, including foreign national Anthropic employees. The net effect of this order is that we must abruptly disable Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all our customers to ensure compliance. Access to all other Anthropic models will not be affected.

We received the directive from the government today at 5:21pm (ET). The letter did not provide specific details of its national security concern. Our understanding is that the government believes it has become aware of a method of bypassing, or “jailbreaking” Fable 5. We reviewed a demonstration of this specific technique being used to identify a small number of previously known, minor vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities all appear relatively simple, and we have found that other publicly-available models are able to discover them as well without requiring a bypass.

Anthropic’s posture with respect to Fable’s safeguards, as laid out in our launch blog post, is the following:

  • We have instituted strong safeguards that greatly reduce the likelihood that Fable is misused for tasks related to cybersecurity (among others). In fact, our safeguards are so strong that many users have complained that they are overly broad.
  • In the weeks leading up to the launch of Fable, Anthropic worked with the US government, the UK AISI, multiple private third-party organizations and internal teams to red-team Fable’s safeguards for thousands of hours in total.
  • These tests showed that Fable’s safeguards are substantially more effective than those of any previously deployed model.
  • No testers have yet been able to find a universal jailbreak—a jailbreak method that can very broadly bypass the model’s safeguards, unblocking a wide range of cyber capabilities.
  • We suspect that perfect jailbreak resistance is not currently possible for any model provider. Every safeguard used in the industry is vulnerable to non-universal jailbreaks (which can elicit some cyber information in specific circumstances), and it is likely that universal jailbreaks will eventually be found in the future. We stated this clearly when we released Fable 5.
  • Given that perfect jailbreak resistance does not appear to be possible today, Anthropic adopted a defense in depth strategy with Fable 5. We aimed to make jailbreaks either narrow (in the case of non-universal jailbreaks) or very expensive to produce (in the case of universal jailbreaks), and to combine this with thorough monitoring to quickly detect and shut down any successful attacks. This is also why Anthropic has required 30-day retention of customer data with Fable—a policy change that carries real costs for us with customers, but that allows us to research and mitigate jailbreaks.
  • We stand by this defense in depth strategy. It reduces the risks posed by Fable, making them comparable to the risks of existing models already deployed across the industry.
  • We have not even received a disclosure of a concerning non-universal potential jailbreak that led to a harmful result. The potential jailbreaks that have been disclosed to us are either entirely benign responses or are minor findings that provide no Mythos-specific uplift.
To date, the government has only given us verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak, which essentially consists of asking the model to read a specific codebase and fix any software flaws. Our understanding is that one potential jailbreak was shared with the government. We have reviewed a report that we believe is the basis of the government's directive and validated that the level of capability displayed there is widely available from other models (including OpenAI’s GPT-5.5), and is used every day by the defenders who keep systems safe. We will share more details over the next 24 hours.

We are complying with the government’s legal directive and are removing access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all users. However, we disagree that the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause for recalling a commercial model deployed to hundreds of millions of people. If this standard was applied across the industry, we believe it would essentially halt all new model deployments for all frontier model providers.

As we have stated publicly, we believe the government should have the ability to block unsafe deployments, as part of a statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts. This action does not adhere to those principles.

We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Step 1: Market your product by telling people again and again that its capabilities are so incredibly dangerous that it scares you and should scare them too.
Step 2: Someone in government takes you seriously and tells you to stop doing dangerous shit.
Step 3: ???
Step 4: IPO!
 
Anthropic spends so much of their time on self-fellating PR that it’s an amazement they have time to develop the technology at all.
 
Última edición:
Sucks, I was enjoying using it, but they brought it on themselves by constantly marketing Mythos and Fable as too good and needing to be reigned in. Fable is extremely capable, yes, but not enough to warrant the gov intervening over a jailbreak.

According to their press release they want it online again and hopefully it will be back later. At the bottom:
We apologize for this disruption to our customers. We believe this is a misunderstanding and are working to restore access as soon as possible.
 
We reviewed a demonstration of this specific technique being used to identify a small number of previously known, minor vulnerabilities. These vulnerabilities all appear relatively simple, and we have found that other publicly-available models are able to discover them as well without requiring a bypass.
If that part were true they'd be filing a lawsuit to stop it or get other models under the same order, I guess we shall see what happens.
 
Anthropic is one of the most insufferable tech companies around. Others are bigger assholes, but Anthropic really is a company full of retards high on their own supply.

They are a combination of an annoying stoner, vegan, and that friend that always lied about about an out of state girlfriend.
 
>OOOH NOOOES OUR MODEL IS SUPER DANGEROUS WE CAN'T LET YOU HAVE IT
>releases it anyways a few months later
>Government bought into your fear based marketing and demands you pull it

Wow, maybe don't cry wolf
 
Última edición:
Marketing wank, plain and simple.

It's always the same thing, too. "OMG our AI is so ADVANCED and CAPABLE and SMART that the GOVERNMENT has to put a leash on it! Watch out, we never know when our NEW AI might go Skynet! Buy our stock!"
 
i was adding windivert support to a mitm proxy that i was writing and was really surprised when i didn't see guard rails during the whole session. the biology guard rails were annoyingly prevalent, but it was very easy to talk this model into implementing shady shit security wise.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo