US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
"I don't like this."

"HOW IS THIS GOOD?" Nigger can you read? We're tired of repeating that you cannot literally win every single thing. Every politician will have shitty parts to them, but again, it's certainly a better alternative than Kamala Harris.
I don't come to the boomercon dick sucking thread on the regular like you do. So no, I don't think turning on a campaign promise, especially one that involves a foreign country buying OUR LAND, is a benefit in any way. So maybe then you, the professional dick sucker, can explain it, or find some justification for it.

>that you cannot literally win every single thing
Pretty sure Donald already won on this issue, and me, a three time voter for him, expected him to uphold a campaign promise. That's the "winning" part. Now, you uphold and follow through on that "win", not do a 180 on it and expect people not to notice.
 
Considering all that happened, perhaps Massie focusing so much of his campaign messaging on Epstein and Israel was a mistake considering when this was just over a congressional district in Kentucky. Not sure if it would've mattered in the end though if he was more selective on what he talked about considering the amount of money and the Trump endorsement weighed against him.
I think his voting record was enough to do him in.

The people who sent him to congress seeing that he voted against everything they wanted couldn’t have done him any good.

People get angry when they order a Coke and get a Pepsi.
 
I don't come to the boomercon dick sucking thread on the regular like you do. So no, I don't think turning on a campaign promise, especially one that involves a foreign country buying OUR LAND, is a benefit in any way. So maybe then you, the professional dick sucker, can explain it, or find some justification for it.

>that you cannot literally win every single thing
Pretty sure Donald already won on this issue, and me, a three time voter for him, expected him to uphold a campaign promise. That's the "winning" part. Now, you uphold and follow through on that "win", not do a 180 on it and expect people not to notice.
I have good news for you.

Congress has already begun to work on this, so as I agree with you on this, I promise to call my state rep, and you promise to call your state rep, and we both promise to annoy the fuck out of our senators until the end of their lives, about getting this and SAVE passed.
 
He was in China doing negotiations during the interview and he still went against Chinese owning farmland in the US.

Speaking to Fox News host Sean Hannity from Beijing during his visit to China, Trump framed Chinese land ownership as a market issue rather than an ideological one.

“Look, it’s not that I love it—you want to see farm prices drop, you want to see farmers lose a lot of money? Just take that out of the market,” said Trump.

He added that Chinese investors had acquired U.S. farmland for years without intervention from previous administrations. “But they’ve had a lot of land for a long time. [Barack] Obama did nothing about it. They bought a lot of it during the Obama administration. He did nothing about it.”

I don't see how saying "just take that out of the market" is defending it
 
I have good news for you.

Congress has already begun to work on this, so as I agree with you on this, I promise to call my state rep, and you promise to call your state rep, and we both promise to annoy the fuck out of our senators until the end of their lives, about getting this and SAVE passed.
While that's somewhat reassuring, that press releases is a week before Trump's visit Chairman Pooh and his public admission to letting the chinks buy up more land.

Seriously, that's an open admission of breaking a campaign promise. Why did he think this was a good idea?
 
This comment perfectly describes some users here (ignore the anime pic). I wonder what does "goverment out of marriage" mean, polygamy?
My guess is the person believes marriage should be a private contract between any two persons without government involvement. As utopian as that may sound, it's rife for abuse and exploitation and it likely creates as many problems as it would theoretically solve.
 
“But they’ve had a lot of land for a long time. [Barack] Obama did nothing about it. They bought a lot of it during the Obama administration. He did nothing about it.”


If Trump is saying Obama did something, it’s a pretty safe bet that he does not like it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo