US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[GunCar Gary]

Happy that Cubans are finally getting some justice today:

watching a pretty young woman interview an older man that understands the value of stoicism but can't help but be emotional feels good for my soul

 

[AstaSilva]

So, we got like 3 seats from VRA, which is good, but we must not get overdosed by hopium (especially if dems can use their 10-1 Virginia map). Our biggest obstacle now is 2028, if dems win it -which they probably will- then it's unironically so joever. They'll either outright rig the census to give themselves favorable numbers in electoral college or fill their states with illegal aliens to give themselves favorable numbers. Then they give them citizenship to get their votes. You'll see America go to 50% white in just four years.

We need mass remigrations now. Randy Fine is pushing for denaturalizing Mamdani -which is good- and some gay "Assimilation act" (which would repeal Hart-Celler) but I was thinking a bit about why they didn't encourage remigration much. I think they're gonna do it after midterms. You'll see Texas being white again.

While it is true that someone like Gavin Newsom would 100% rig the census if he somehow beat Vance in 2028.
The rest of what you're saying [remigration] is not going to happen in 2026-2030 timespan.

If GOP Wins 2028, we run a clean census. California and other blue states lose seats. Speaker Mike Johnson has breathing room.
Then we cut off all illegals from any form of government benefits.
Then we pass laws denaturalizing for terrorism or other clear charges.
And so on.

 

[Betonhaus]

So whut should a good Democrat do?

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politic...imary-jungle-election-california-22255381.php

Well change the rules back of course! So today a few Commiefornia cucks put in a resolution that the primary system should go back to being a standard, vote your own party" type, like all the other states.

I'm a little confused as the article doesn't summarize the preceding drama well, but it sounds like the rule changes won't happen until 2028 so they will still only have Republican choices for the 2026 midterms or something?

 

[Unredacted TND]

While it is true that someone like Gavin Newsom would 100% rig the census if he somehow beat Vance in 2028.
The rest of what you're saying [remigration] is not going to happen in 2026-2030 timespan.

If GOP Wins 2028, we run a clean census. California and other blue states lose seats. Speaker Mike Johnson has breathing room.
Then we cut off all illegals from any form of government benefits.
Then we pass laws denaturalizing for terrorism or other clear charges.
And so on.

We need to be quick, otherwise democrats will bus entire South America to Texas once they win.

 

[Sammich]

Speaking of, this is the entire commentary Mark Mitchell (aka tuck jr.) posted on x following Massie’s being cast down:

Ver archivo adjunto 9033637

What an absolute bitch

wish i was capable of phonebooking that whore, she's crazy as fuck and has been sucking candace's cunt and smearing ericka for 6 months.

 

[The Nothingness]

Also, to get away from Cuba and give you fuckers a potential W for today, Trump's bill to restrict Blackrock from buying up single-family homes has passed the House and is now heading to Senate. Please Thune, do not mess this up.

He will sit on it, just like with the SAVE Act.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I'm a little confused as the article doesn't summarize the preceding drama well, but it sounds like the rule changes won't happen until 2028 so they will still only have Republican choices for the 2026 midterms or something?

yah it's hard to get good info out of any Commiefornia news outlets as they are mostly used for pushing narrative and propaganda for the DNC.

But yes your correct in your assumption. By the rules set out in the original proposition, the new resolution would have to go before the people in 2028 so it theoretically won't help them in 2026.

But I don't think that will happen, we know the DNC won't allow 2 GoP candidates to enter the election uncontested. The Democrats would have to rely on a write in campaign to have any hope of winning and we already know that rules and laws mean shit so my guess would be they call some sort of "special election" and get this rammed though ASAP so they can knock out the GoP'ers and run that cunt/whore Katie Porter, you know the one caught on camera screaming at her staff like a karen and walking out of a interview when she was asked an off script question in a rage.

The Democrats control Commiefornia lock, stock and barrel, so they can really do what ever they want as the very liberal Commiefornia courts will just rubber stamped whatever the state house passes. I would not bet any money on a GoP Govenor anytime soon.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Ver archivo adjunto 9029280

almost 100, nearly triple digits but 88 is pretty cool, idk what that little graph means

 

[Snikch]

Spoiler: 2026 Senate predictions

Only primary that could change a rating is MIS where if Muslim guy doesn't win that state goes to Lean D.
Both MT dem candidates have confirmed that they won't drop, so GOP just wins MT.
Overall rating Tilt D. Pretty sure DEMS win AK/MI if they eek out a victory in NE/IA/OH/TX.

 

[Imperial Citizen]

Again...how do you live side by side with someone who wants you dead, someone who views you as the very epitome of the evil in this world, will do whatever it takes to make that happen and have zero ethical constraints stopping them?

I mean, that’s always been the case in the United States, going back to the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Such strife and yet we’ve had only one civil war. We just get along with each other.

 

[Alphasnail]

It's a reaction to 2 years of the opposition going all in on sand NIGGERS. And no I'm not memeing or joking. Several years of the universities, Democrats, liberals and jewspergs going hard into third world Islamic support, because brown=good Jew/white=bad, was going to lead to an inverse reaction. This is what that looks like. If I am forced to pick a flavor of camel jockey to side with in the short run, I'm picking Jews over the Islam worshipping, sister fucking, dog hating niggers.

I didnt notice right wingers starting to love mudslimes until the Iran war. It wasn't obvious that was gonna happen to me. Once trump killed the ayatollah, a bunch of people's programming kicked on and they started hooting about pro Iran shit that id never heard before. I think id heard a couple off hand comments here and there about Iran, but (and dont make fun of me for this now that I read it out) I didn't realize that guys who made their whole online career around digging up dirt on the jews would be Mohammed suckers.

 

[Sammich]

I mean, that’s always been the case in the United States, going back to the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Such strife and yet we’ve had only one civil war. We just get along with each other.

I think it's that most people are lazy, and the people capable of understanding what a civil war would actually look like want no part of it.

I tell myself i'm part of the latter, when I know damn well i'm part of the former.

 

[Mister Fister]

I think miller wants TND.

 

[whoishomermynameis]

 

[Betonhaus]

yah it's hard to get good info out of any Commiefornia news outlets as they are mostly used for pushing narrative and propaganda for the DNC.

But yes your correct in your assumption. By the rules set out in the original proposition, the new resolution would have to go before the people in 2028 so it theoretically won't help them in 2026.

But I don't think that will happen, we know the DNC won't allow 2 GoP candidates to enter the election uncontested. The Democrats would have to rely on a write in campaign to have any hope of winning and we already know that rules and laws mean shit so my guess would be they call some sort of "special election" and get this rammed though ASAP so they can knock out the GoP'ers and run that cunt/whore Katie Porter, you know the one caught on camera screaming at her staff like a karen and walking out of a interview when she was asked an off script question in a rage.

The Democrats control Commiefornia lock, stock and barrel, so they can really do what ever they want as the very liberal Commiefornia courts will just rubber stamped whatever the state house passes. I would not bet any money on a GoP Govenor anytime soon.

Ah, I could tell they were trying to handwave away "the Democrats previously tried to pass a law that would lock all Republicans out if the election but since our candidates are so unpopular that law will instead lock out the Democrats" by phrasing things as if it was just discussed five seconds ago and nobody should need it repeated.

But I'm not sure if they could change it in time for the midterms, especially if the Republicans challenge it for shits and giggles (and to get the SCOTUS to rule that such laws are unconstitutional). Or does this only affect the governor race which doesn't happen until 2028? It would be hilarious if this rule made them lose house and Senate seats in the midterms though.

 

[Imperial Citizen]

I think it's that most people are lazy, and the people capable of understanding what a civil war would actually look like want no part of it.

I tell myself i'm part of the latter, when I know damn well i'm part of the former.

A Second American Civil War wouldn’t be large scale conflict of great patriots purifying the land of degenerates, lunatics, and criminal scum.

It’ll be you getting shot by a sniper as you walk across the street because they misidentified you as a combatant. Power just stops working and doesn’t come back. Fertilizer and gas doesn’t arrive to your town. You live in poverty and fear that some fanatical warlord comes to your home, rapes your children, and shoots you in the head. It’ll be like the Syrian Civil War; a long, slow, and bloody affair.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

But I'm not sure if they could change it in time for the midterms, especially if the Republicans challenge it for shits and giggles (and to get the SCOTUS to rule that such laws are unconstitutional).

I actually don't think the SCOTUS would take the case. They tend to not over ride a states supreme court when it comes to internal state issues. A'la Virgina redistricting. Commiefornia courts can do pretty much whatever they want and the SCOTUS will stay hands off. I mean..looking at all the crazy anti-gun laws they've passed over the last decade and SCOTUS ain't taken up any of the suits against it.

 

[Betonhaus]

It generally would not look like a civil war in any way we recognize. Just look at the available assets and land. In a traditional civil war it had several States working together with all the citizens of the state united by choice or by force, and they put together armies to march across state lines and fight an opposing state.

This war would not be like that. The Republicans basically control the federal government and it's resources, and it has the support of almost all of the countryside. The Democrats only control cities that can be blockaded, and whoever in the army they can subvert without their underlings or superiors shooting them for treason. Maybe the port cities could hire troops from overseas and have them shipped in, but their money may not be trusted and the troops they employ might take over them instead

I'm not home right now, but you can basically take the 2024 US election results and assume that only districts that have a +20 for the Democrats will be under their control. Anything less then that and most centrist would not support a civil war, and anything deeply red would fight back. Take a look at that map and see how many districts the Democrats will actually control, and if they are self sufficient. Pay attention to gerrymandering where 90% of a districts land had it's votes overwhelmed by the municipal part.

 

[Basic Blond Boy]

I think it's that most people are lazy, and the people capable of understanding what a civil war would actually look like want no part of it.

I tell myself i'm part of the latter, when I know damn well i'm part of the former.

More realistically, the smarter Dems who could pull it off are all old as shit and would be far better off enjoying their last years then trying to start a revolution.

Meanwhile the young Dems are the most bottom of the barrel after decades of the elders purging the smart ones. They are also impulsive and quick to turn on each other to power level their superiority. Even if they wanted to, I don’t think AOC or her followers are smart enough to achieve anything other than attacking the low class, city dwellers they are fighting for.

 

[Unredacted TND]

"Perhaps I misjudged you."