What civilization? No indoor plumbing, open defecation on public roads and in public water sources, rampant incest, molestation and sexual assaults, exceptional classism and culturally-empowered dishonesty at all levels, etc.
Nigga I'm talking about American Indians
lol those niggers never developed indoor plumbing either
Yeah they'd didn't, but like I said, if the starting line is anatomically modern humans (it should be) then it only took them 2.6% (195k/190k) to get to the dawn of civilization) than it took the Europeans. They barely had any time. It only looks like they were far behind because we usually start our comparison from Mesopotamia, which throws the whole contest right out of the gate, instead of from ooga booga caveman days.lol those niggers never developed indoor plumbing either
Call me a motivated thinker but I do not give a shit about the official timeline of human expansion and development. For some reason, every "real scientist" says that indigenous people happened to float to their homelands on a piece of driftwood or something, and never try that trick again. Makes no sense to me. That basically means that everyone after the founder is a midwit who never gambles their lives on a wild idea. Our species is probably a lot younger or more interconnected than the narrative would have us believe.
I'm gonna "um, ackchually" for a sec and say the consensus is almost literally the opposite. Early-modern humans acting like perpetually horny nomads is a big reason why "race" isn't the neat and tidy categorical system internet racists want it to be.
Why is Israel in the middle? Whatever happened to the touted average 115 IQ for Ashkenazis?
They invited a lot of brown jews and then kept inbreeding for various strains, until we have Hills have Snozez type Kromosome Kikes.
The same reason why European countries are lower than US whites: Arabs. Israel has the most Arabs, percentage wise, than European countries.
Selection bias. It's more typically the highest IQ yellows that left.
If we take these two posts together, would the IQ of Koreans and Hong Kongers be around 100? And 103-ish for Japanese?
That's probably about right. I have enormous skepticism for any group claiming meaningfully higher average IQ than 100. There's usually an absurd degree of selection bias in testing to obtain those results. Just looking at the cleanliness, orderliness, and competence of the typical member of the group is enough to get a baseline estimate. Culture appears to be downwind of intelligence and not predictive of it. The cargo cult mindlessly carrying out a ritual isn't smart and sometimes the violent raiders (e.g. norse) are quite clever.
I think the only two groups who are meaningfully over 100 are US Asians and Ashkenazi Jews. Singapore may be around 103-104 but they are a bit self selecting too.
This is my biggest question I have. Why are Jews considered different from white? Is it for cultural reasons as Jewish culture is different from the European / Western culture or is it something else?