US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
So recently I watched this old video of a student asking Charlie Kirk if he supports legal weed. I'm personally torn on the issue of recreational weed, so I clicked the video, and in it Charlie said he opposes it because legal weed hasn't actually hurt the cartels like weed supporters said and that it can be a gateway drug. Now what do you expect from the comments—intellectual discussion and debate? Nope, it's literally all potheads saying, "But what about alcohol?" and making anecdotes about how they are successful and smoke weed; therefore, weed is good for everybody. I mean, why are weed supporters so annoying? Why can't they come up with an intellectual argument beyond "What about alcohol?"
 
So recently I watched this old video of a student asking Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk is dead. His legacy has been made into a joke while everyone on his side sat in the cuck chair and watched. Nothing he has ever said in his entire life matters anymore, especially as America is about to lose its status as a sovereign nation forever.
 
The people that like this country are being disillusioned by politicians and judges pandering to people that hate it and foreigners with greater loyalty to their homeland, neither of which will ever love America.

What's going to happen in 30-40 years when the last people who remember the good times when America actually worked are dead or in hospice?
It's going to be pretty sad if I'm dead in my 50s to 60s bud.
 
I mean, why are weed supporters so annoying?
because a lot of them (NOT ALL) are just drug addicts and they act like weed is this magical no addiction drug even though they have to do it multiple times a day every day. i saw someone refer to it as "goynip" once and it's a pretty good term for it imo. there is credence to the better than alcohol argument but there are different types of THC delivery that sort of tarnish that whole point, namely those zoomer cart pens that niggers hit every 15 minutes so they're high constantly. there has been more than one occasion where i was in a store and the worker was so obviously high that they couldn't get anything done. for example, i had to wait 2 minutes once for some high retard in a jersey mikes to figure out how to wrap my sandwich.
 
If birthright citizenship is upheld what's to stop the admin from using Ketanji's own arguments against her. That the verbiage of subject to the jurisdiction of constitutes someone who follows the law of the country, and file another executive order that states illegal immigrants are not following the law by being here illegally, so they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the united states and therefore their children are not.
But... but... You aren't allowed to hold them to their own standards!
 
So recently I watched this old video of a student asking Charlie Kirk if he supports legal weed. I'm personally torn on the issue of recreational weed, so I clicked the video, and in it Charlie said he opposes it because legal weed hasn't actually hurt the cartels like weed supporters said and that it can be a gateway drug. Now what do you expect from the comments—intellectual discussion and debate? Nope, it's literally all potheads saying, "But what about alcohol?" and making anecdotes about how they are successful and smoke weed; therefore, weed is good for everybody. I mean, why are weed supporters so annoying? Why can't they come up with an intellectual argument beyond "What about alcohol?"
I especially hate that argument because it’s designed to be a gotcha rather than an argument. They expect the person to either drink alcohol or be in favor or it, whereas I am extremely against alcohol and don’t think prohibition was the failure lobbyists frame it as. So to me “what about alcohol” is just an invitation to espouse my opposition for both.
The only argument they have for recreation weed(and alcohol) is “people deserve the freedom to consume whatever they want.”
 
Maybe i'm an outlier in this thread, but i don't care which way birthright citizenship goes at all. They still make a small percentage of illegal immigrants.
The issue is that the knowledge birthright citizenship is as it is factors as a huge motivation for getting here illegally. And it promotes chain migration. So if you want illegals taken care of this is just one prong of that.
 
The issue is that the knowledge birthright citizenship is as it is factors as a huge motivation for getting here illegally. And it promotes chain migration. So if you want illegals taken care of this is just one prong of that.
And SCOTUS is about to enshrine it into the Constitution, meaning America ceases to be a country forever. The right is already blackpilling and surrendering because they know what's coming next.

The walls have closed in.
 
And SCOTUS is about to enshrine it into the Constitution, meaning America ceases to be a country forever. The right is already blackpilling and surrendering because they know what's coming next.

The walls have closed in.
No, clearly the supreme court is ruling that birthright citizenship is the law of the land so that it can then turn around and enshrine the border militias shooting Mexican's dead in the Rio grande and deserts.

I'm getting my right wing death squads, finally.
 
Fagpacks is the literal kiwi equivalent to an inbred muzzie bulbhead, he takes everything and contributes nothing and makes a high trust forum of warm 2700k frens become one of sperging 5000k annoying bright white.
I don't care if he's trolling, gimmick posters get the rope.
At least I try to vary my doomerism a bit
The correct way to do it is to switch between manic hope, reasoned neutrality, and frothing doomsperg arguing. Quoth Heinlein; "Specialization is for insects."
there is credence to the better than alcohol argument but there are different types of THC delivery that sort of tarnish that whole point
Consider the following:
Pot- Stinks, makes you stupid and gay, favored drug of insufferable vegans and niggers.
Alcohol- Founding substance of civilization, increases bravery, appears in every human society.
 
Reminder that if it were truly as over as the local rape victims / doomers, whichever you prefer to call them, believe then their posting about how it's so "joever you should just kill yourselves" (approx) would be unnecessary.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo