US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
"Look I know we have millions of thirdworld bots, the democrats believe anything MSM tells them, and there's a contingency in the right who can be manipulated by low IQ groypers... But we need to save our most sophisticated arguments for Kiwi Farms. Someone call up Herzliya, we need Catch the Rainbow on the case!"

This is actually his backstory, he told me in the new whisper feature in chat, coincidentally where no one can see or verify that I'm lying ever.
 
I heard some grumbling about this on lib places, will it actually be named Moon Base Trump?

Ver archivo adjunto 8751927
x9aa40sow0RQhNxx.mp4
I'M SICK OF THE FAGGOT LIBERAL MEDIA NOT LETTING US HAVE A MOON BASE.
we should offer a program to illegals where if they sign a consent form to be survival testers at the moonbase they can gain citizenship. it's like what russia did with the dogs except the dogs have more value to society.
NO WE ALREADY LET THEM TAKE OVER MINNESOTA I DON'T WANT A BUNCH OF SOMALIANS ON MY FUCKING MOON BASE.
My unwavering response as always is that you are gay as fuck.
 
I heard some grumbling about this on lib places, will it actually be named Moon Base Trump?

Ver archivo adjunto 8751927
x9aa40sow0RQhNxx.mp4
This would seem to mean that either the Lockheed Orion or the SpaceX Starship is being scrubbed from the moon mission. One of the primary uses of Gateway is for an Orion crew to transfer to a Starship for the actual lunar landing. No Gateway means no crew transfer. Since SpaceX still hasn't figured out how to refuel Starship, I'm thinking it's SpaceX that's getting cut. (Starship delays, Orion @ NASA).
 
A first-of-its-kind mission called "SR-1 Freedom" will launch before 2028 using nuclear fission power to travel to Mars.
Uhh, I would be very interested to see how they plan to accomplish this because current nuclear rocket tech involves blasting radiation out in a manner which would irradiate all debris and craft behind it within low Earth orbit. They would have to make a rocket which reaches interplanetary space first and then uses nuclear, which at that point makes nuclear useful for deceleration to achieve an orbit around Mars. At that point it would technically be the first successful nuclear rocket, however cost/benefit wise it doesn't make too much sense. The research for a reliable rocket was finished back in 1972 with the US nuclear engine program ending in 73.

TLDR: Nuclear rockets were fully developed over 50 years ago, they're very radioactive, practical applications near Earth extremely limited, and it is of this poster's opinion that a nuclear rocket to Mars will be more about research than practical future application.

Edit: I'm a retard, they mean nuclear electric propulsion. Ramping that up to a larger scale will be cool. Good shit
 
I heard some grumbling about this on lib places, will it actually be named Moon Base Trump?
I have no interest in space colonization and would prefer that the hundreds of billions which would spent on such a project (for no gain!) would instead go towards building up our passenger rail systems among other infrastructure projects.
 
Uhh, I would be very interested to see how they plan to accomplish this because current nuclear rocket tech involves blasting radiation out in a manner which would irradiate all debris and craft behind it within low Earth orbit. They would have to make a rocket which reaches interplanetary space first and then uses nuclear, which at that point makes nuclear useful for deceleration to achieve an orbit around Mars. At that point it would technically be the first successful nuclear rocket, however cost/benefit wise it doesn't make too much sense. The research for a reliable rocket was finished back in 1972 with the US nuclear engine program ending in 73.

TLDR: Nuclear rockets were fully developed over 50 years ago, they're very radioactive, practical applications near Earth extremely limited, and it is of this poster's opinion that a nuclear rocket to Mars will be more about research than practical future application.

Edit: I'm a retard, they mean nuclear electric propulsion. Ramping that up to a larger scale will be cool. Good shit
You're thinking of open-cycle nuclear thermal rockets
 
Atrás
Top Abajo