US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
LOL no they aren't. The politicians are schooled in neoliberalism and Marxism, both of which hate the very concept of the nation-state and the clash of civilizations. They all believe the future is stateless and cultureless, and hate the people they govern for resisting inevitability.
For all the (deserved) hate our boomer politicians get, the politicians from Europe show that gen X is just as, if not more, pozzed.
 
For all the (deserved) hate our boomer politicians get, the politicians from Europe show that gen X is just as, if not more, pozzed.
That is down to Europe being so intensely secular. It is the same as Canada, aside from the prairies. Liberalism replaces faith in God with faith in the State, so in places where there is less religious faith, you get unopposed liberal rot.
 
That is down to Europe being so intensely secular. It is the same as Canada, aside from the prairies. Liberalism replaces faith in God with faith in the State, so in places where there is less religious faith, you get unopposed liberal rot.
Man really does need religion, or else you get the gayest fucking shit/literal Satan
 
It's ok for browns to want to preserve their culture and bloodline but not you shabbos goy.
Modern leftists are unable to compromise their positive bias towards black and brown people and so they have to use mental gymnastics to justify why it's ok for them to discriminate against white people. This kind of thinking is usually justified in their minds as racism towards white people tends to not have as much of a material impact on their lives compared to their black and brown counterparts. You can argue about if that itself is true or not but what can't be denied is that this is retarded logic and dehumanizes people who are privileged or merely look like they are. An additional result is that the respect towards cultures is shifted unevenly; an example I can provide is with closed practices in Native American communities being respected but practices which were meant to be closed in some European communities being forcibly opened with people arguing that it's racist to have closed practices.
Gen X is mega pozzed and started the gay sex mega craze with AIDS/GRIDS in the 80s
You aren't familiar with the gay community, that isn't a gen X thing, it's just a gay thing. Fags still get AIDS and consume drugs nobody in this thread even knows the name of all the time.
 
Modern leftists are unable to compromise their positive bias towards black and brown people and so they have to use mental gymnastics to justify why it's ok for them to discriminate against white people. This kind of thinking is usually justified in their minds as racism towards white people tends to not have as much of a material impact on their lives compared to their black and brown counterparts. You can argue about if that itself is true or not but what can't be denied is that this is retarded logic and dehumanizes people who are privileged or merely look like they are. An additional result is that the respect towards cultures is shifted unevenly; an example I can provide is with closed practices in Native American communities being respected but practices which were meant to be closed in some European communities being forcibly opened with people arguing that it's racist to do such a thing.

You aren't familiar with the gay community, that isn't a gen X thing, it's just a gay thing. Fags still get AIDS and consume drugs nobody in this thread even knows the name of all the time.
Just call them out directly, they aren't used to be on the defensive. They are used to the right winger that gives them the frame, not the one who takes it.
 
Man really does need religion, or else you get the gayest fucking shit/literal Satan
Trusting governments to legislate morality without religious backing is like expecting a former crack addict to be a good babysitter, it's only a matter of when, not if, they relapse and start selling your kids for drugs.
 
Im glad trump isent the type to hold grudges
1774214259182.png 1774214302049.png
Source
Source

this guy is wacko mode today
1774214406796.png

he retweeted (retruthed) like 3 posts in a row from this one account called womenfortrump on truth,

real talk real fast, how hard would it be for our adversarys to make flattering accounts on his social media and just get him to ostracize himself more using way over the top flattery? Keep it a bean I think thats what we are looking at right here.

I think Id want trump in a 3rd term more than most but still and smart enough to realize doing that would fundamentally break our democracy

here are the other 2 from same account being retweeted by our president early this morning
1774214600478.png 1774214620681.png 1774214671766.png
im not cherrypicking these, all 3 were in a row and this morning

look how low the engagement is with these posts, buddy is the PRESIDENT of the united states but no one is into his scamware app.

you know much much trump on USPG2 would pop the fuck off?
 
I believe you mean he should post a video of returning a shopping cart since THAT is the ultimate expression of whiteness
You know, I’ve always done that, but a few months ago a black guy was like “why are you don’t that? They pay people to return the shopping carts.” That was the moment I realized it was a white thing
 
Paul Graham, billionaire partner in venture capital group Y Combinator, seethes about Trump's Mueller Truke. He wishes that a "classy actor" could be the president instead.

graham1.JPG graham2.JPG

(Graham lives in the UK btw.)

L / A / GA
 
"Iraq style" putting in a lot of work.
What is Iraq style in this context? If the US doesn't stay for a decade, is it less than Iraq style and therefore based? 1,000 troops is OK but 10,000 is not?

If there's boots on the ground to "take over" Kharg island, do you expect Iran to give it up without throwing its entire military to the only fight that it can actually respond effectively in, i.e. shit-flinging ground combat? How do you keep it safe from drones etc? Do you go further in to neutralize them? How long does it need to be occupied? Is it to safeguard oil forever? etc
 
What is Iraq style in this context? If the US doesn't stay for a decade, is it less than Iraq style and therefore based? 1,000 troops is OK but 10,000 is not?

If there's boots on the ground to "take over" Kharg island, do you expect Iran to give it up without throwing its entire military to the only fight that it can actually respond effectively in, i.e. shit-flinging ground combat? How do you keep it safe from drones etc? Do you go further in to neutralize them? How long does it need to be occupied? Is it to safeguard oil forever? etc
If they want to blow up their own oil terminal let them. America has their own.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo