Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

Soon to no longer be the case because X puts you on 3-month of no creator payouts if you post fake war videos etc. Tiktok does the same thing.
Now, someone more conspiratorial would say that's just going to be abused to silence dissent, but for now, less botting.
They should also add a feature where the phone or computer electrocutes the third-world retard.
 
spain.png
???
 
This mother fucker is absolutely one of the worst on the A&H boards. He spent the first several days in the USPG2 thread constantly derailing about goddamned earthquakes and shit and hasn't gotten one bit better since. It amazes me how one person can know so little and still be so confident about it.
I fear he is the future of the average human, the person who will argue on any topic regardless of familiarity because of the ability to use ChatGPT. Also he has some mental issues or drug-induced psychosis I dunno. I don’t mind it mostly except this is primarily a news thread and he doesn’t really provide news just /x/ tier posting.
 
I guess it's easy to not consider yourself a sociopath if you just say that the school wasn't bombed and anti-ICE protesters weren't shot. By that logic, I guess there's no war in Iran and the Middle East has never been more peaceful. They're just bombings of peace.

Edit: In fact, I have it on good authority from @draggs that not a single civilian has been harmed in the continued bombings of Iran. After all, the US has never harmed a single civilians in its entire engagement in the Middle East as they're all Muslims and thus enemy combatants in his view.

1772657018943.png

1772657041692.png

>put school in military base
>military base gets hit
>school blows up
>MUH CIVILIANS
 
I guess it's easy to not consider yourself a sociopath if you just say that the school wasn't bombed
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. If you believe the former - which you 100% apparently do - you're taking the word of the IRGC at face value. That's a really fucking stupid thing to do, lol. And, again, even if the schoolgirl story turns out to be true, you still have zero evidence for the origin of the bomb.
Questioning official narratives (which are all full of propaganda) isn't sociopathic. It's common sense.
Lastly, please fuck off with your hysterical retarded nonsense. Go clutch your pearls somewhere else.
 
Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. If you believe the former - which you 100% apparently do - you're taking the word of the IRGC at face value
You can very easily verify things before going off on bullshit by the way, like satellite imagery.
Or what the US officials say:
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said that the U.S. was looking into what happened at the school. ""All I know, all I can say, is that we're investigating that," Hegseth said. "We, of course, never target civilian targets."
Questioning official narratives (which are all full of propaganda) isn't sociopathic. It's common sense.
The official narratives are both Israel and Pentagon saying they didn't do it, I think he's questioning that official narrative exhibiting common sense.
 
No you retard, they win by not loosing. Think about the Civil War without a Union invasion. So what the Confederates just loose because reasons? No, they were in the same situation as Iran is now. All they have to do to win is not cry uncle.
They are losing, so by definition they cannot win by not losing
 
No you retard, they win by not loosing. Think about the Civil War without a Union invasion. So what the Confederates just loose because reasons? No, they were in the same situation as Iran is now. All they have to do to win is not cry uncle.
Now you dumb motherfuckers are also Civil War experts. Very cool.
 
No you retard, they win by not loosing. Think about the Civil War without a Union invasion. So what the Confederates just loose because reasons? No, they were in the same situation as Iran is now. All they have to do to win is not cry uncle.
arab tier thinking. hamas uses the same logic where they win because they only lost 70 percent of their assets
 
The official narratives are both Israel and Pentagon saying they didn't do it, I think he's questioning that official narrative exhibiting common sense.
It's only common sense scepticism if you agree with the bloodthirsty majority in this thread. The school wasn't hit and if it was, then it's retroactively labelled a military target and all the girls were enemy combatants. Bombing them was absolutely crucial to winning the war. Besides, it was Iranians that bombed them. The entire war has just been Iranians bombing themselves and neither Israel nor the US have harmed a single Iranian. You should stay up to date with the narrative.
 
He based it (like the articles did) on deliveries.
Thanks. So, the 3-year asspull remains an asspull since it ignores existing stockpiles plus doesn't take into account production schedules can and will be changed. Journo clickbait strikes again!
loosing. Think about the Civil War without a Union invasion. So what the Confederates just loose
Losing. Lose. Basic bitch spelling errors like these indicate (a) You're an ESL and/or (b) Your entire argument can be completely disregarded.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo