🦊 Furry Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" / CD-Call - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

[Cyber Bowling]

It's worth mentioning that when people make this claim, they are 9 times out of 10 speaking strictly about parents abusing their children. Every other form is summarily ignored, which I feel is reductive but explains the attitude at play.
That having been said: Incest is always unhealthy. That is not the same thing as abusive. Framing it entirely in a Victim-Abuser dynamic is actually deeply unhelpful, because when you do that you take your biases with you. And because we live in a patriarchal, misogynistic society, that framework is superimposed onto any narrative of abuse.

...what? Saying a parent is abusive by forcing their child into incest is...patriarchal and misogynistic? Lily makes a lot of outlandish claims and I can usually at least understand what he's talking about even if I think he's way off the mark, but this might be one of the most confusing things Lily has tried to claim in awhile. Especially because, I'd argue most people who think child abuser in that instance would imagine a dad abusing their kid and if it were about being patriarchal or misogynistic, wouldn't they be blaming the kid?

It also just discounts the reality that the most common form of incest is teenagers messing around and doing something stupid, something that I don't feel warrants anyone getting tarred as an abuser for

I know Lily is bad at remembering what he wrote before, but usually at least a day has to pass for that to come up. If 9/10 times is a parent abusing a child, then that means 1/10 would be teenagers messing around. Now, I'm not a fancy mathematician, but I don't think 1/10 is more common than 9/10. But it's a moot point anyway because I don't think I've ever heard of this being a thing. Sure, kids might experiment but, it'd be with a friend, not a family member. While teenagers aren't exactly known for making intelligent and logical decisions, they aren't complete idiots, they know what incest is and that it's bad.

Actually, going back to what Lily just said about patriarchal, misogynistic society, it really sounds like he's advocating for a "boys will be boys" style defense right now by arguing they're just messing around. I mean, how would he feel if someone argued Courtney was just a teenager messing around being stupid and shouldn't be tarred as an abuser?

 

[AMHOLIO]

When has she said she identifies with Lev?

When an anon asked Lily why she keeps writing characters like Lev and Niva's sister, Lily said they're people she knows exist IRL, and gave herself as an example ( ).

'Human cruelty' actually sounds like torture porn, which we know she'll gladly write.

That is the first fucking thing I thought of but didn't know how to put it. Thank you.

Actually, going back to what Lily just said about patriarchal, misogynistic society, it really sounds like he's advocating for a "boys will be boys" style defense right now by arguing they're just messing around. I mean, how would he feel if someone argued Courtney was just a teenager messing around being stupid and shouldn't be tarred as an abuser?

It's almost as if Lily is covering up/dismissing actions for someone's actions in the past that she knew like herself.

 

[TheAmbiguousLurker]

Lily: "It's fine and healthy that a relationship is a one-sided mess where one person has no goals, ambitions or desires outside of pleasing their partner. They just like being a tool."

Also Lily: "J.K Terfling is so bad for writing House Elves as liking serving people."

The point is to keep talking about it.

Damn Patriarchy, always keeping those hard-working incest-loving families down.

 

[ÁchtunaRoll]

Breaking news Lily lied about being fluent in French.

I'm not surprised that Ocean Waves didn't get a dub. Considering it took over 20 years for it to be released outside of Japan and it didn't do so well in Japan. The only dub they did of it was in Spanish. Tomomi Mochizuki directed Ocean Waves, and he only had directed tv shows like Mami the Psychic and part 1 of Twilight Q film. You're not missing out much by skipping this one even if it had a english dub.

https://www.tumblr.com/lovethelastrebrithus
cd-call-official-blog answered:

The only dub they did of it was in Spanish.

why not watch it in french?

cd-call-official-blog

I would sooner take the time to learn Japanese than willingly engage with anything in French. I was taught French against my will, and I know it against my will.
I will one day seek vengeance against Queefbec for inflicting this on every Canadian.

I for one am shocked.

Shocked.

 

[A Watchful Ghost]

...what? Saying a parent is abusive by forcing their child into incest is...patriarchal and misogynistic? Lily makes a lot of outlandish claims and I can usually at least understand what he's talking about even if I think he's way off the mark, but this might be one of the most confusing things Lily has tried to claim in awhile. Especially because, I'd argue most people who think child abuser in that instance would imagine a dad abusing their kid and if it were about being patriarchal or misogynistic, wouldn't they be blaming the kid?

All of this reads as a fanfiction about Peet wanting to be the case. About that being the standard of abuse when, in fact, it isn't. And it will never be. It comes from the deep want that they have to be someone like them when there's none. There's only one Peet and there will not be another one. Their ego deluded them into believing it's all about the patriarchy, and try to sound like a more batshit insane version of Anita Sarkissian.

Add the French to the things Peet would gladly be racist about because they forced him to learn it as a kid even if knowing two languages does help you in your resume in the long run.

 

[AMHOLIO]

Also Lily: "J.K Terfling is so bad for writing House Elves as liking serving people."

Well, Rowling made the elves ugly, weaker, and not sexy lesbian babes. Lily can never forgive her.

 

[Prophetic Spirit]

Well, Rowling made the elves ugly, weaker, and not sexy lesbian babes. Lily can never forgive her.

Those elves are jews. Bankers and everything.

 

[AMHOLIO]

Those elves are jews. Bankers and everything.

Those are goblins you fucking uncultured swine! Get your transphobic hatepoints in order!

 

[TheAmbiguousLurker]

Add the French to the things Peet would gladly be racist about because they forced him to learn it as a kid even if knowing two languages does help you in your resume in the long run.

Hey, you can't be racist against the French. Or Canadians. And God help anyone who encounters a French-Canadian without a burning cross.

 

[starborn427614]

Has Lily posted their ratings for the whole Ghibli catalogue yet? Would be interesting to see if any patterns show up (i.e. films without female protagonists are rated lower).

 

[FanFicFreak]

It's almost as if Lily is covering up/dismissing actions for someone's actions in the past that she knew like herself.

Without being too dramatic, this part "It also just discounts the reality that the most common form of incest is teenagers messing around and doing something stupid, something that I don't feel warrants anyone getting tarred as an abuser for" actually gave me goosebumps. Maybe it is due to the already given facts/knowledge when it comes to Lily, but this example just feels a bit too exact to be general, Lils - do better next time.
And, maybe it is just my word-nazi side kicking in, but if the incest happening due to abuse by the children's parents/environment, I honestly don't think the term "messing around" is the right one here - could be wrong, but it just feels too light and fun for something like incest caused by neglect. "Stupid" too is a word I just think carry the weight Lily should give the situation - based on her own alleged past and the ever looming abuse this whole point started from. I just strangely takes away from the edge of the situation.

Add the French to the things Peet would gladly be racist about because they forced him to learn it as a kid even if knowing two languages does help you in your resume in the long run.

A rather off topic question I was thinking about the past few days, and it popped in my mind seeing the post mentioning French: Does she has anything to stand on irl? A profession she learned in/after school, a paper saying 'this person is qualified to do this thing'? I'm aware of her lackluster history with working at fast-food places, I'm mostly curious about schooling/other forms of education. So far, at least I thought that even if not fully, but she at least speaks some French -> so like, a bilingual call-center gig at least wouldn't be impossible (on paper) for Lily (if she wasn't lacking the patience what is needed for this type of jobs). Turns out, unsurprisingly, no.

 

[A Watchful Ghost]

A rather off topic question I was thinking about the past few days, and it popped in my mind seeing the post mentioning French: Does she has anything to stand on irl? A profession she learned in/after school, a paper saying 'this person is qualified to do this thing'? I'm aware of her lackluster history with working at fast-food places, I'm mostly curious about schooling/other forms of education. So far, at least I thought that even if not fully, but she at least speaks some French -> so like, a bilingual call-center gig at least wouldn't be impossible (on paper) for Lily (if she wasn't lacking the patience what is needed for this type of jobs). Turns out, unsurprisingly, no.

Actually they do. Video editing. Even if it's not on a professional level. It can still help them within a marketing stand point.

But that requires for them to shut the fuck up and do as they are told. Which they won't and they will toss a asshole comment before getting fired.

 

[Duine In Cudromach]

A rather off topic question I was thinking about the past few days, and it popped in my mind seeing the post mentioning French: Does she has anything to stand on irl? A profession she learned in/after school, a paper saying 'this person is qualified to do this thing'? I'm aware of her lackluster history with working at fast-food places, I'm mostly curious about schooling/other forms of education. So far, at least I thought that even if not fully, but she at least speaks some French -> so like, a bilingual call-center gig at least wouldn't be impossible (on paper) for Lily (if she wasn't lacking the patience what is needed for this type of jobs). Turns out, unsurprisingly, no.

Her education was being shoved through the school system. I believe she does know functional French because it's actually a requirement in Quebec to teach both, and for literally everything in Canada to be written or broadcast in both English and French.

Entirely off-topic but I remember having a conversation with a Canadian once where somebody brough tup another Canadian who was was very rude to them. The man nodded. "French Canadian," he said somberly.

It's worth mentioning that when people make this claim, they are 9 times out of 10 speaking strictly about parents abusing their children. Every other form is summarily ignored, which I feel is reductive but explains the attitude at play.
That having been said: Incest is always unhealthy. That is not the same thing as abusive. Framing it entirely in a Victim-Abuser dynamic is actually deeply unhelpful, because when you do that you take your biases with you. And because we live in a patriarchal, misogynistic society, that framework is superimposed onto any narrative of abuse.
It also just discounts the reality that the most common form of incest is teenagers messing around and doing something stupid, something that I don't feel warrants anyone getting tarred as an abuser for. Nor should people trying (badly) to cope with a dysfunctional environment.
These things happen. We don't like to talk about them, but they happen. And they aren't as cut and dry, they aren't as mentally safe, as the Victim-Abuser dynamic. When one person is clearly in the wrong, that's easy. That's safe. When nobody is, or everyone is, that's hard and brushes up against a lot of very uncomfortable things people don't like to think about.

ChatGPT, is this accurate?

Short answer: parts of that are understandable reactions to how people talk about incest — but several core claims are inaccurate or misleading, especially from a clinical and legal perspective.

[/QUOTE]

Wh-- no! Tell me more!

“People usually mean parents abusing children”
That’s partly true in everyday discourse.

When incest is discussed publicly, it’s often referring to:

• Parent–child abuse
• Stepparent abuse
• Older sibling abusing a younger sibling

And statistically, those are indeed the most commonly reported and documented forms, especially parent or parent-figure abuse.

However, that doesn’t mean “every other form is ignored.” Research literature absolutely distinguishes between:

• Adult–child incest
• Sibling incest (with age gaps)
• Peer sibling sexual contact
• Consensual adult incest (rare and illegal in many places)

So the claim reflects how casual conversation works — not how psychology or law treats the issue.

Now how psychologists treat the issue? But Lily has a psych degree! She wouldn't lie to me about this topic that is so important t o her she maybe-sorta wrote her doctoral thesis on it!

(She claiims her 'thesis' was on 'enmeshment', which for anybody who's been in academia knows that's not how a collegiate paper works, let alone a thesis, but she heavily implied she chose this topic because of her 'personal experience' re: Courtney)

“Incest is always unhealthy, but not always abusive”
This is where things get complicated.

From a clinical and ethical standpoint, incest is generally considered inherently harmful because:

• Family systems are built on asymmetry of power, role, and dependency
• Consent is heavily compromised by:
  • Age
  • Authority
  • Emotional dependency
  • Family pressure
• It disrupts attachment structures that are foundational to development

Even in cases where both parties believe it was consensual, long-term psychological outcomes frequently show harm.

So while it’s true that not every case fits a stereotypical “violent predator vs helpless victim” model, it is inaccurate to imply that incest can exist in a neutral, non-harmful space.

The absence of overt coercion ≠ absence of abuse.

What? You mean abuse doesn't have to be overt and can be done through subtle manipulative tactics that render the abused party incapable of seeing the damage being dealt while they're still inside a manipulative system?

“The most common form of incest is teenagers messing around”
This claim is not supported by research.

The most commonly reported and studied form is adult–child incest, particularly father–daughter abuse.

Sibling sexual contact does occur, but:

• Large age gaps are common.
• One sibling is often clearly more developmentally advanced.
• There is often coercion, manipulation, or pressure.
• It correlates strongly with broader family dysfunction.

True “two same-age teens mutually experimenting” cases between siblings are not the dominant form in documented abuse data.

Also important:
Even when two teens are close in age, family role boundaries still make the situation psychologically complex in ways that peer relationships are not.

Wait, it isn't normal for two similar-sex siblings to want to fondle and/or fuck each other?!

“Framing it as victim–abuser is reductive”

This is the strongest philosophical point in the statement.

Yes — the simplistic predator/victim framing can:

• Miss nuances in sibling dynamics
• Overlook mutual dysfunction in chaotic households
• Fail to capture situations where both minors were harmed by larger systemic abuse

However:

Nuance does not eliminate the need to recognize power imbalance and harm.

Modern trauma psychology already accounts for:

• Situations where both parties are minors
• Situations where both were previously abused
• Situations shaped by neglect and chaotic family environments

Acknowledging complexity doesn’t mean abandoning the concept of abuse.

Wow, so even though there may be extenuating factors that actually doesn't absolve the abuser of agency? That's crazy!

“Sometimes nobody is clearly in the wrong”
Legally and clinically, this is usually not how it’s assessed.

In cases involving minors:

• Responsibility is evaluated developmentally.
• The older or more powerful party is typically assigned greater responsibility.
• If both are very close in age and developmental stage, interventions often focus on therapy rather than punishment — but it is still treated as boundary violation.

In adult cases:

• Most jurisdictions criminalize incest regardless of claimed consent.

The key issue isn’t “moral evil.”
It’s structural harm and boundary collapse within the family system.

And also no two siblings do not independently come to the conclusion that they should play with each others' genitals, there is usually an instigator and it is usually the one who is more developmentally advanced.

What’s missing from the original statement
The argument downplays several realities:

• Many incest survivors initially describe the relationship as “not abusive.”
• Trauma bonding can obscure coercion.
• Power imbalance can exist without physical force.
• Long-term psychological effects are common even when there was no overt violence.

It also conflates:

• “Not fitting a dramatic abuse narrative”
  with
• “Not abusive.”

Those are not the same thing.

Thanks, ChatGPT! You sure clarified a lot of bullshit.

(And even it can't clarify what the fuck Lily meant by The Patriarchy.)

EDIT: After a little fiddling I think I translated it, although I can't be sure of the way Lily usually uses the phrase 'misogynistic'. But it may be that she's saying the assumption is always that the male is the agressor and the female is the victim, implying that this framing is incorrect, which is pertinent because, of course, we vultures assume that the male (Lily, nee Jerry) was the agressor while the female (Coutney) was the victim. Although the way she usually uses 'misogyny' would imply that the woman is never believed while the man is? But that doesn't make any sense in context. If that's not what she was trying to say, then the most likely solution is that she just spitting buzzwords that she doesn't understand.

To add my own commentary, I also want to point out that despite being an 'incest survivor' who was brutally abused by her younger sister, Lily treats it like it's no big deal. 'Just two siblings fiddling around'. Why wouldn't she discuss her actual trauma? Why wouldn't she acknolwedge how manipulative Courtney is? Why is she going to bat for the concept of 'consensual incest' when Lily of all people alleges to know exactly how horrific and soul-destroying the experience was?

I was going to further ask how Lily knows it's just 'two teenagers fooling around' but my thoughts dove down a rabbit hole of her crusade against parental rights and I can't help but wonder if the two factors aren't related.

 

[AMHOLIO]

Wow, so even though there may be extenuating factors that actually doesn't absolve the abuser of agency? That's crazy!

Hold on, let me write the comment before Lily does...

"Hey Lily, your haters are so desperate they're using ChatGPT to prove you wrong."
"Figures. They're unoriginal and intellectually devoid tech bros who can't think without using a clanker. As I've said the whole time."

There we go. Now Lily is fully prepared to write a snarky response dismissing every other point made by pissing on your character.

 

[Duine In Cudromach]

There we go. Now Lily is fully prepared to write a snarky response dismissing every other point made by pissing on your character.

Much obliged!

I couldn't help but think while I was doing this about that time Lily sent herself a string of insults obviously generated by ChatGPT to pretend her critics were so unoriginal they were using AI to call her a man.

 

[Ultraman Orb Dark]

Spoiler: Media literacy

One annoying thing about indie games is the tendency to try and be every genre under the sun.
"Shadows in Venus is an FPS 4X Strategy game with RPG and Roguelike elements!"
My dude, you need ADHD medicine.
"Something's in the Closet is a roguelike deckbuilding survival horror with RTS elements"
Bro games are supposed to be ON a system, not BE a system.

Anonymous asked:
Why are so many writers so enamored with making slavery grey?


Some people believe everything is morally grey, that nothing is black and white. So when they're told they can't portray something uniquely evil as grey, they view it as a challenge.

Anonymous asked:
Do you believe that Shrek was Disney’s Beauty and the Beast (1991) done right?


...WELL I CERTAINLY AM NOW!

Anonymous asked:
Recently, Vivziepop released Valentine's merch and one print had shit color value and someone made an edit. I have seen a lot of people get mad about the edit but I don't see anything wrong with it, especially since it was a comercial piece. Do I don't see something wrong?


Given Medrano's character designs are not picked to high hell and back, I can see why people are sick of your crap.

Anonymous asked:
Since studio Ghibli's been a topic around here do you have a favorite Ghibli villain? Mine is probably Col Muska from Castle In the Sky, especially when Mark Hammill voices him, he's such a devious creep.


I think my favourite Ghibli villain is Urbanism (Pom Poko, Only Yesterday, Princess Kaguya)

Watching Let's Game It Out play Arknights Endfield, and apparently someone thought what Satisfactory was missing was playing like Genshin Impact.

In Harry Potter, Hogwarts is shown to have extremely lax safety standards, where physical and mental trauma inflicted on the students is treated with at best disregard and at worst amusement.
This is a subtle nod to the fact that JK Rowling was friends with Epstein and enjoys harming children.

Watching When Marnie was There and this film was such a MASTERFUL rug pull. They're laying that shit on so thick.

Anonymous asked:
Why the heck are people so against the premise of Toy Story 5? Considering they agree with those moral panic videos, wouldn't this be something they would highly anticipate?


For the same reason everyone is obsessed with protecting minors, but freaks out when ID policies start coming in: They don't want anyone with power to talk about these problems because then they might solve them. They like complaining and using it as a cudgel way more.

Anonymous asked:
I'm curious, you and Mikaila went to see Infinity Castle, so what was the experience of watching that film without having seen everything before it?


If you're asking if it was difficult to follow, no it wasn't. Not only is it really easy to pick things up from context clues, but that film in particular really liked to over-explain absolutely everything.
The notion that not watching something in order will leave you utterly confused is ridiculously overblown by fandom. The reality is most shows and films are not that complicated and are not written in such a way that very important plot details are revealed in Act 2 of Episode A113 - The Clip Show of Destiny. If a show was written like that, people would complain because even if you did watch every episode doesn't mean you'll remember every episode.
Fandom says this stuff because it makes their favorite show sound smarter than it actually is.
You could start Lord of the Rings at The Two Towers Extended Edition and get the gist of most of it.

privatetowel asked:
Is it irrational for me to say that most of the allied races in WoW should have been cosmetic options instead of being their own race? I can understand void elves and nightborne, but the others just seem too shallow to be considered distinct from the regular options.


Yes they should have.
But I'm going to be honest, part of Blizzard's charm even today is how they utterly refuse to do anything in a sensible way, it's always gotta be in a ridiculously roundabout route.
"Yeah we could add brown skin tones to the Orcs that have been in the Horde since TBC, but instead let's wait 16 years and make you time travel to an alternate universe and recruit Thrall's time paradox clone sister."
That's shit only Blizzard would do because they are incapable of being normal.
At a certain point you have to accept the nonsense.

Anonymous asked:
The way my sapphic ass went in not pre-spoiled into watching When Marnie was there and got soccer punched in the face by the twist. I was like "Well this movie is slightly dull but at least it has this cute semi-sapphic thing going o-OOP NEVERMIND WHAT THE FU-"
I mean it's not like I ACTUALLY expected it to go the sapphic route but still


That shit was targeted. That was entirely done on purpose.
I went in pre-spoiled so I was like "I think the Internet was just being amatanormative aga- OH GOOD LORD!" This film is the fucking most.
I've written siblings spooning and even I thought that was a little much.

Anonymous asked:
Your "I got the gist of it" stance on fiction is correct, and more people need to come to terms with it.

There's a JRPG series called Trails, and hardcore fans will shit themselves if you admit to starting with one of the latter arcs, or even just skipping a game.

"But if you didn't play the previous ten games in order, you won't understand how much it MEANS when this character shows up!"

It's about anime warriors in a techno-fantasy setting where half the characters have cool epithets related to their powers.
I'm pretty sure I can suss out that This Swordsman Guy who was introduced in slow motion, with music that is clearly the theme song for some former game is A Big Deal.
I do not need to sit through almost 150 hours of him doing Anime Warrior School Bullshit while surrounded by fawning girls to grok that.

There is something very funny about shonen or JRPG fanboys acting like the story of their favorite slop is super complicated and deep.
They're power fantasies for little boys, dipshit. They're not that hard to follow.

mothmannns asked:
Question about When marine was there , can I ask what was too much? I haven't watched the movie but it is for pg audience so it can't be something that weird right?


I think you're fundamentally misunderstanding what I'm saying. It's not about it getting weird, it's about how they're laying it on so thick.

Anonymous asked:
Why is Beauty and The Beast is still being called a classic and people's favourite disney princess movie by grown ass people when Belle was forced to be a prisoner to save her father, and the beast have some serious anger issues. I thought people didn't like the narrative of needing a woman to "fix" the guy.

Anonymous asked:
out of curiosity are there any trans characters you've read/watched/insert medium here that you really enjoyed?


None that were so significant that they come to mind immediately.

Spoiler: Pretending her critics don't bother her

Anonymous asked:
I'm sorry this must be very annoying to deal with but "CD doesn't like every kind of asian dish in existence? Clearly she must be racist" is such dumb logic I can't help but laugh. I wonder if anon was being serious or doing a bit


It's weebs coping, I guess.

Anonymous asked:
I get the impression from your community post comments/video comments your YT community seems older and much more kind than tumblr or your other public socials. Do you also find this to be true, or is there more behind the scenes when it comes to your YouTube Community?


Youtube is much more heavily moderated, but you are right. I don't get vicious, angry messages over there very often.
The reason is because the hate anons come from like 3 people and they were all hidden on Youtube a while ago.

Anonymous asked:
Anons seem very confused by affection not being transactional today lol
I wonder what the statistics are, how many people in real life think that someone being nice to you puts you in debt.


I had an ex once complain I was "putting her on a pedestal" when I said she was being sweet. Some people are just miserable assholes.

Anonymous asked:
Hows your brother doing


Awful, as always

Anonymous asked:
Found out you support ice unsubscribing removing myself as a patreon member right now


I do? This is news to me. I've been saying variations of "ICE agents should be [REDACTED BECAUSE TUMBLR BANS TRANSFEMS AT THE DROP OF A HAT]" for the last 2 years.
I guess I'll have to rethink my praxis if "I literally see you as subhuman vermin" counts as support now.

Anonymous asked:
Troll anons are now having meltdowns because you aren’t being as problematic as the fictionalized version they have of you in their deluded heads. As such, they YET AGAIN have to make things up like suggesting you support ICE, which you never have done.
I’ve seen known compulsive liars lie less often than these trolls do. Just a bunch of losers who can’t handle that you always try to be better, and they would rather throw an unending tantrum because they refuse to get their shit together.


Yup.
I mean, nothing killed the imposter syndrome or the self-doubt faster than seeing how much all the people who left my life have rotted.
Brittany has devolved and decayed so severely she now believes Pizzagate. She would sooner fall down the QAnon rabbit hole than accept that her constant aggressive behavior with everyone who even slightly rubs her the wrong way is a problem. That she is an abusive person whose entire identity is wrapped in qualities she does not have. That she is an obsessive little loser who is now targeting other trans women because a trans woman stopped wanting to talk to her abusive ass. It's exactly what I said she would do: Target another trans woman. And then another. And then another.
Courtney has been mooching off a succession of people, getting 8 hours of drugs, and using teenagers for emotional support, and she wants people to believe that I'm the fucking problem here? She would rather set herself on fire than admit she fucked up when she ran away. And while she'll freely shit-talk our parents, she still lives her life completely to their standards. She still prides herself on being the pathetic, unlikable little loser that Mom taught her to be, and like Mom she is completely delusional about what that kind of person is.
These are the people who have dedicated their lives to tearing me down for the crime of denying them.

Spoiler: OC lore

Anonymous asked:
You described Assana as a "service bottom" but how does that even work?


I'm one of those infuriating fucks who uses Top and Bottom as synonyms for "Dom" and "Sub."

Anonymous asked:
Why is Saige a femboy instead of a trans woman?


I had a story in mind for him this way.

Anonymous asked:
What exactly is Assana and Saige's deal? What's their relationship?


You know, I could never decide that. Sometimes I write them as a couple, sometimes Saige has a boyfriend and they're friends instead, sometimes it's a weird Friends with Benefits thing.
The consensus I came to before I stopped working on it to pursue other ideas is that Assana and Saige are friends with an extreme amount of comfort around each other. They co-sleep (natch), they've slept together before but not regularly, Assana utterly adores him, and Saige is eternally confused about what he did to warrant that level of adoration but appreciates it nonetheless.

Anonymous asked:
Since you have already answered you don't have any intention on making a trans character, whom among your characters are LBGT?


Amorosa, Anevay, Larissa, and Kalaa are all gay.
Astri, Assana, Saige, Kiera, and Leah are all bisexual.
Iris is an Aromantic Bisexual
Lavi is an Aromantic Lesbian
Lev Martin is Aromantic.
G is an Asexual Lesbian
Avatar Niva is undefined.

Anonymous asked:
Regarding all of your characters, do any of them shave their pubic hair?


All my characters are completely without body hair.

Anonymous asked:
Why are all of your characters completely without body hair?


Why wouldn't they be?

Spoiler: Lily hates her fans/personal stuff

Anonymous asked:
are there any past takes you regret/have changed your mind on (that you dont wanna do a whole youtube video on because that takes a whole lotta time)

casethejoint asked:
how would you rank everything you've given a star rating?


???

Anonymous asked:
So do the trans women period pains from estrogen ever stop or is this a permament thing every month-


They stop if you stop taking estrogen.

My wife's beautiful curls

Anonymous asked:
In your opinion, what counts as an emotional affair? I get confused because, anecdotally, I do not see this label used consistently.
For example, I’ve never seen people use this label to describe two cishet men who share a very close, deep, and platonic friendship such that they are emotionally intimate with each other to an extent that, for whatever reason, they are not with their wives.
Sadly, homophobic assholes would likely make offensive jokes about this kind of friendship if I phrase it like this (since these bigots would mock any expression of masculinity that isn’t explicitly patriarchal/aggressive/toxic). Still, I never see anyone sincerely accuse these platonic, cishet guys of being unfaithful/having an emotional affair just for being more emotionally vulnerable with each other than with their romantic partners. However, I have seen that label used to describe two friends of different genders doing more or less the same platonic thing under the same circumstances. Am I missing something?

In your opinion, what counts as an emotional affair?

An emotional affair is what having friends looks like to a possessive bitch.

For example, I’ve never seen people use this label to describe two cishet men who share a very close, deep, and platonic friendship such that they are emotionally intimate with each other to an extent that, for whatever reason, they are not with their wives.

That's because "emotional affair" is a uniquely "Straights are not okay" thing.

However, I have seen that label used to describe two friends of different genders doing more or less the same platonic thing under the same circumstances. Am I missing something?

No, you're not missing something. If your partner accuses you of having an "emotional affair" you should leave them immediately. You do not want to be in a relationship with someone who invents problems from whole cloth.

 

[A Watchful Ghost]

Has Lily posted their ratings for the whole Ghibli catalogue yet? Would be interesting to see if any patterns show up (i.e. films without female protagonists are rated lower).

No, but most likely they don't want to because talking about Spirited Away is going to cause some shit. And they are trying to delay it as best as they can.

are there any past takes you regret/have changed your mind on (that you dont wanna do a whole youtube video on because that takes a whole lotta time)

Lorch "Asshole to the end." Peet. Never once see what the fuck is wrong with them.

Talking from experience, asshole? Because a lot of this sounds awfully familiar to what you have done to every single friend that has cut ties with you.

 

[AMHOLIO]

I couldn't help but think while I was doing this about that time Lily sent herself a string of insults obviously generated by ChatGPT to pretend her critics were so unoriginal they were using AI to call her a man.

Aww man, I don't need AI to do that!

Spoiler: For Lily's Eyes Only

You are a fat man who is stuck in a relationship with someone you don't find sexually attractive. Your debt cards and legal papers likely still say "Jerry" because you're too fucking lazy to change them and it's easier to not have to correct everyone you meet. Most people who walk by you in town guess that you're a male metalhead, only a few clock you as a man trying to be a woman. Every female you tried to have a relationship has run away and only your wife is left, a trans woman who doesn't have the same creep radar built in like other people. There have been no offers from females (born women) to have sex with you outside of other trans women, who you refuse to write because you do not want to see dick or a male body. You sit there and seethe, waiting for people to misgender you online so you can call it out and harass them for being transphobes... because no one has ever tried to misgender you IRL because you don't go outside. You dream of being swept off your feet by multiple black lesbians, but you are stuck with someone who loves you dearly who was not a woman at birth....yet you have no respect for Mikay either for her love and dedication, like a selfish gamer dudebro who wants a bangmaid to make him tendies and let him play video games all day while she works. Every single trans misgendering insult and dead naming you've done has been to female-at-birth trans people who you hate for having a vagina and daring to mock you. You dream of murdering your haters, but thanks to horseshoe theory, you look as pathetic as all the right wing incel NEETs you hate with your violence fantasies.

Jerry "Lily Orchard" "CD-Call" "Casey-Doppler Skinwalker because mom didn't love me enough" Peet is a man with billions of Y chromosomes in his body. You would never, ever give up your male strength or your penis since you want to use them to abuse the weaker sex. You curse the day that you were born male since lesbians are so hot, and curse that you can't be the only male in the world lesbians are attracted to and defend with their lives. You are a man. A male. An XY haver. A heterosexual who can't even play the "I AM TRANS AND OPPRESSED" card properly anymore since even other trans women hate you. Even they want you to be a man so you stop bringing your awful luggage to the group and associate it with them. Male. Man. Guy. Dude. Señior. Moid. Weeb NEET shut in male of the left who forces his wife to be a bangmaid.

What exactly is Assana and Saige's deal? What's their relationship?

Who the fuck are these retards? I know Lily is probably talking about the Valkyrie thing, but thanks to Lily deleting fucking everything, I have no context. These names could be replaced by different ones and make just as much sense.

Lev Martin is Aromantic

Aromantic shouldn't be included in LGBT. Aromantic means you only feel the urge to have sex, not romance. That's just admitting your brain works wrong or you're a selfish person who loves sleeping around with others and never giving them anything. Which is a very odd contrast to Lev showing his godqueen Kestri constant affection. You'd think it would transfer over to romantic encounters, but I guess he is just the type to jerk off in a cup and never talk to the mother because he desperately needs to wait on Kestri's whims, and being not into relationships helps that.

 

[Cyber Bowling]

One annoying thing about indie games is the tendency to try and be every genre under the sun.
"Shadows in Venus is an FPS 4X Strategy game with RPG and Roguelike elements!"
My dude, you need ADHD medicine.
"Something's in the Closet is a roguelike deckbuilding survival horror with RTS elements"
Bro games are supposed to be ON a system, not BE a system.

I can actually agree with Lily to some extent, but it'd require discussing specific games, not his broad black and white statements which...sound pretty reasonable? Especially because they said it includes element. Like, the first one is basically a description of the Age of Wonders game. You manage your empire, but when you send invading armies and stuff, it's played out in turn-based combat, with hero units and items and levels, aka, the RPG elements. And while there are some campaign maps, it's largely playing in randomly generated maps each time, and whether you win or lose, you unlock points that are used to buy new faction traits, starting items etc. in a rogue like fashion.

The last one clashes a little more because deckbuilding and RTS specifically tend not to go well together, but if it's just RTS elements...I could see it working. Especially if it plays into the survival horror element by having a ticking clock going on in the background. Like, the deck building elements could still be turn-based, but maybe instead of getting straight up card rewards, you're generating card creation via an RTS system, almost like the equivalent of building combat units in Starcraft or your RTS of choice. Actually, that limited resource aspect would also fit in well with the survival horror aspects.

Also, Lily, weren't you complaining two days ago about films being too simple/samey? Aren't you basically advocating for that right now with video games? It's almost like you only enjoy five things and are trying to make it so all games are either like WoW, Kingdom Hearts, that Incest Game you claim to hate or that cutesy game.

Why are so many writers so enamored with making slavery grey?


Some people believe everything is morally grey, that nothing is black and white. So when they're told they can't portray something uniquely evil as grey, they view it as a challenge.

...do they? I don't know if I've ever read or even heard about a story where slavery is morally grey. Running off of what Lily usually complains about, I think what they're actually discussing is stories that feature slavery, but don't include stopping it as a forefront, which is not at all the same as being a morally grey story. I'll use the Star Wars example again. Slavery is very real in that universe, it's portrayed as being wrong, evil and outdated, but the series doesn't revolve around stopping slavery. Despite what Lily says, this doesn't equal taking a neutral stance.

Why the heck are people so against the premise of Toy Story 5? Considering they agree with those moral panic videos, wouldn't this be something they would highly anticipate?


For the same reason everyone is obsessed with protecting minors, but freaks out when ID policies start coming in: They don't want anyone with power to talk about these problems because then they might solve them. They like complaining and using it as a cudgel way more.

As someone with no context for what toy story 5, am I missing something? I even googled Toy Story 5 controversy to see if there was some wild announcement about the plot and...all I saw is people are upset it exists at all because they felt the franchise concluded in the earlier movies and doing a 5th one will undo the emotional weight of those endings.

The notion that not watching something in order will leave you utterly confused is ridiculously overblown by fandom. The reality is most shows and films are not that complicated and are not written in such a way that very important plot details are revealed in Act 2 of Episode A113 - The Clip Show of Destiny. If a show was written like that, people would complain because even if you did watch every episode doesn't mean you'll remember every episode.
Fandom says this stuff because it makes their favorite show sound smarter than it actually is.
You could start Lord of the Rings at The Two Towers Extended Edition and get the gist of most of it.

If ever there was a post that showed Lily's "TV Tropes List" style of watching media, this is it. It's not about "getting the gist" of what's going on, but the weight behind things. This is a more extreme example, but take Lily's favorite Star Trek series, Voyager. I could probably watch the last 4 or 5 episodes of the series, understand "the basic gist" and then just shrug my shoulders and say "That was it?" at the end and not have a particularly strong response to them getting home because I haven't grown attached to these characters, despite understanding the "gist" of them. Using Lily's example, sure, you see Gandalf fighting the Balrog right in the beginning, you can easily piece together what happened, but if you hadn't seen him actually interacting with the Fellowship in the first movie, his return would elicit a similar lackluster feeling. Same with meeting Faramir, you can easily piece together he's the brother of a previous traveling companion, but because you didn't see the first movie, it doesn't mean a lot.

Plots aren't mysteries to be solved, like...the creators want the audience to be able to understand the plot, because it lets you understand the stakes of the story. Again, using Lord of the Rings as an example...you know within the first few minutes the Ring is a device of evil that needs to be destroyed, that it corrupts people, that Sauron is the main villain, that the ring can only be destroyed in Mt. Doom etc. Those are the stakes, you're supposed to be aware of what the characters are trying to do/stop and why they're doing it. But the parts you're watching for are how the characters interact with the world. It's not just about knowing "Oh, some guy named Boromir died" in the first movie...it's about seeing him struggle with his desire for the ring, having his last stand, and then admitting in his final moments to Aragorn that he made a mistake and making Aragorn promise to save their people. *That's* what you're missing out on by starting with Two Towers, even if you can understand that there was a "heroic sacrifice" trope or "death equals redemption" trope in the first movie, as Lily would smuggly view it.

Fuck it, this is already a wall of text, I'll go one further. You know that game you claim to insist is your favorite, BG2. If you skip the first game, you can easily figure out Imoen is your childhood best friend, there's even dialogue to basically say "the torture messed me up, who are you again" in the tutorial so she can tell you. But if you didn't actually play the first game and have her as a party member throughout, her being arrested and kidnapped at the end of the tutorial isn't going to hit with the same weight, even if you know the "childhood best friend" trope applies, and then when you do finally rescue her much later in the game...you might not even care to take her in your party because she's basically a nobody to you, and you're more interested in all the NPCs you've bonded with up until that point. I genuinely don't think I've ever seen a worse take from someone who claims to be a media reviewer.

Your "I got the gist of it" stance on fiction is correct, and more people need to come to terms with it.

There's a JRPG series called Trails, and hardcore fans will shit themselves if you admit to starting with one of the latter arcs, or even just skipping a game.

...okay, pretend I put the BG2 example here. I mostly just want to add that, in my limited expereince with the franchise, I never experienced this. One of the most common questions is "is this a good starting point" and a lot of hardcore fans who have played every game in the series will say some variation of "you might miss some references, but yes." I've also seen many recommend "this might be a better starting point, but avoid this other series because it sucks."

I do not need to sit through almost 150 hours of him doing Anime Warrior School Bullshit while surrounded by fawning girls to grok that.

Well...you probably shouldn't be playing an extremely long RPG series that takes place in an anime warrior school. I know this is the OP and not Lily so I don't want to harp on it too much, but I have no idea what they were expecting.

Some people are just miserable assholes.

Hows your brother doing


Awful, as always

Just thought it was funny these two were back to back questions. Yeah, some people are just miserable assholes Lily...

Anonymous asked:
Why are all of your characters completely without body hair?


Why wouldn't they be?

Well...if you specified that they are/aren't something, that suggests there's a reason for it. I don't think it's absurd to ask for that. If I said something like "I never leave the house on Tuesday." and then responded with "why would I?" when asked that's...not an explanation. I think the first person who asked it was weird for posing the question in the first place, but Lily had an answer, so asking for clarificaiton isn't unreasonable, even if the answer is just as simple as "I like the look." Again, it's not lost on me that just a few posts ago, Lily was complaining about other people being miserable assholes when that's his default state.

An emotional affair is what having friends looks like to a possessive bitch.

While I don't like the term because it sounds kind of childish, I don't necessarily disagree with the principle. I think a big red flag in a relationship is when you don't feel comfortable enough to tell your partner something that you'd more comfortably tell someone else, whether it's a friend or a family member. Especially if you have an established pattern of talking to someone else about those things instead of your partner. So it might not be a case of you "emotionally cheating" but there's definitely some kind of trust issues going on. What I found most interesting is Lily's stance on this because he very much writes his characters in a way where them having a friend they spoke to would be portrayed as an emotional betrayal. Her avatar sister having a girlfriend was shown as bad because it took away from the sister, and Kestri outright says in Lev's rape chapter that she doesn't like the idea of other people getting to spend time with him because it means he'd spend less time with her.

Still, I never see anyone sincerely accuse these platonic, cishet guys of being unfaithful/having an emotional affair just for being more emotionally vulnerable with each other than with their romantic partners

Okay, I know this is OP again and not Lily, but I think this is probably a case of semantics. They probably wouldn't say "emotional affair" in this instance, but the above mentioned stuff about trust still stands. I mostly wanted to highlight this bit because it is absolutely a thing. And not just with guys either, I should add. At the risk of moving to another stereotype, sometimes when a girl is telling another female friend something and not their boyfriend, it's a red flag that the boyfriend is abusive (or at least she's afraid of he will be) and that's why she's telling her female friend and not him. Obivously, it's not always the case, sometimes Lily is correct and it is people creating drama for the sake of drama, but it's just interesting (aka, funny) to me that Lily "I love to talk about psychology" basically shuts down any possible conversation, refuses to see nuance, and just makes a sweeping black and white statement that shuts down any possible conversation.

 

[TheAmbiguousLurker]

"Figures. They're unoriginal and intellectually devoid tech bros who can't think without using a clanker. As I've said the whole time."

Cue tumblr freak out because clanker is a 'chud word' trying to sneakily imply Nigger.

Regarding all of your characters, do any of them shave their pubic hair?

These are the important question I hope people ask me about my characters because I've written basically nothing else about them to talk about.