US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
In terms of regime change, worked well.
See, this is why I just choose to not discuss these topics with you, the mealy mouthed wording and classic tactics that would naturally fit the definition of stereotypical so well I am half-convinced you do it because you know that.
 
See, this is why I just choose to not discuss these topics with you, the mealy mouthed wording and classic tactics that would naturally fit the definition of stereotypical so well I am half-convinced you do it because you know that.
arguing like a lawyer in a courthouse where he makes up the rules, which are always changing as the conversation goes on
 
One thing that keeps coming up in my mind watching these congressional hearings, is why do we allow non-citizens to run for Congress or Senate? Shouldn't we have the same rule for this higher office that we do for President? You literally need to be born here before running?
 
I ask you hearnestly my war chickens? what does the US military have to rest its laurels on in regards to our "successful" foreign policy?
Idk, man, how are Germany and Japan doing? How’s the Soviet Union?

Most of the little ones that seem like fuckups exist in a broader context, where they’re proxies for a larger, generational conflict

As far as quick in-and-out success story, it’s called Grenada
 
Playing semantic games to pretend that his central point didn't get disproven
...cries out as he strikes you?

Also notice how the "people" whining about me never contribute.
I described you perfectly with the Jamal analogy.


Read the articles I linked or at your level, maybe get Chatgpt to break it down for you into small words.


No one is arguing for an invasion of Iran


Why would I be mad for describing a cuckold correctly?
#Contributing
 
Idk, man, how are Germany and Japan doing? How’s the Soviet Union?

Most of the little ones that seem like fuckups exist in a broader context, where they’re proxies for a larger, generational conflict

As far as quick in-and-out success story, it’s called Grenada
The Soviet Union is smashed, and while Japan is still doing well, Germany had been doing wonderfully too until some stupid cunt named Merkel thought it a good idea to give away the entire country to 60-IQ niggers and Mohammedans. Now they're pretty much as cooked as a well-done bratwurst.

It's funny tragic to note that Germany and the UK were enemies in their last war, then made peace, and now both are committing slow, cultural suicide via the same methods.
 
he has brought up Libya before as an example of "successful" us foreign policy of regime change

its hard to argue with people like that cause if you look at the facts and come away with 2+2=5 im not sure I can help you, its like the disagreement is just that fundamental.
The difference is that you look at regime change as regime change + setting up a new government while I look at regime change as removing the regime. Remove the threat first, deal with the rest later.

CTR and many others on here they think we will just dog walk Iran and the area will become a bastion of peace and democracy.
The area will not be a bastion of peace and democracy but the major threat to US hegemony and a supply line to China will be cut.


Case in point.

...cries out as he strikes you?
How are you addressing the point of the Iraq war here?

Sartre should have been shot, especially for ghostwriting Simone de Beauvoir.

Most of de Beauvoir's books were actually written by Sartre.
Unfortunately everyone in the French philosophy scene at that time was pro pedophile because it was in fashion. Antisemite and Jew is still accurate though.
 
The phrase 'resting on one's laurels' comes to mind when reading this post.

Far too many people are too self-assured and passive. Proactivity is what dictates the course of history, not passive observation.
I dunno man. I just don't see Cuba, Venezuela, or Iran as a threat to the US. Cuba cannot keep their power grid online and their airlines running. The US just black bagged Maduro. Iran is on the other side of the world, we bombed their nuclear program, and they were powerless to retaliate. Going to full on war against them just seems like a waste.

I would also say the Maduro thing and Iran nuclear program thing are fairly proactive either way.
 
I dunno man. I just don't see Cuba, Venezuela, or Iran as a threat to the US. Cuba cannot keep their power grid online and their airlines running. The US just black bagged Maduro. Iran is on the other side of the world, we bombed their nuclear program, and they were powerless to retaliate. Going to full on war against them just seems like a waste.

I would also say the Maduro thing and Iran nuclear program thing are fairly proactive either way.
Think of it this way: a homeless guy who hangs around your neighborhood all the time probably isn't a direct threat to you, but he's unsightly, annoying, and has the potential to do sketchy shit.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo