💼 Careercow Will Stancil / whstancil / stancilculture - "Vibecession" proponent and Biden booster neolib, the "chihuahua of twitter", Important Master's Degree (in Black People), chooses endurance mode "lolcowing through it" as an argument strategy, "Proud member of Do-Something Twitter", raped by Grok

In no discussion with a libtard has one ever brought up an actual fact I didn't know or proven that something I knew was fiction. They all, without exception, live in an unreality constantly mediated by fiction. Captain America is as real to them as Donald Trump.
In the future (or at least in the perspective of countries outside of the West watching this), it will be noted how propagandistic techniques done by the media on top of a pozzed education system has managed to create the modern and rabid leftist - a cultist mindfucked by the system. Or as Terry A Davis has aptly called them, 'niggercattle'.

On that note, they will totally believe that Sam Hyde is a time-traveling demon who gets away with everything and will one day kill Hassan Piker.
 
In the future (or at least in the perspective of countries outside of the West watching this), it will be noted how propagandistic techniques done by the media on top of a pozzed education system has managed to create the modern and rabid leftist - a cultist mindfucked by the system. Or as Terry A Davis has aptly called them, 'niggercattle'.

On that note, they will totally believe that Sam Hyde is a time-traveling demon who gets away with everything and will one day kill Hassan Piker.
Okay, but that's actually true. Probably. I hope. ;)

I misread a quote above, but it started me on a thought:

Ever noticed how libtards seem almost unable to debate anything political without resorting to clumsy and cringey invocations of Star Wars, Star Trek, Disney-this, Pixar-that, Cal-Arts-the-other, etc.?

What, exactly, it means, I do not know.

Yes, I can make the usual (and probably at least partially-correct) observations about their arrested development, their simplistic Good-VS-Evil dichotomies , or TMIJS (Too Much Indiana Jones) Syndrome. But I suspect there is more, and that is worthy of study by the few non-pozzed sociologists.

I take especial pains to avoid pop-culture references, no matter how apt, mostly for this reason, but also to force myself to explain why I believe what I believe; why I hold the values which I do. Analogies and references can be helpful at times, but when they become habitual, devolve into habits and eventually, crutches.

To @The Ugly One , may I suggest that the next time you find yourself hating yourself so much that you waste your time arguing with a shitlib, try this:

Ask them to state their beliefs and positions clearly, without making recourse to pop-culture, or analogies more generally. I'd wager that they will be unable to do so, and get Big Mad, and that it will be extremely funny.
 
Saw this tweet a while ago but it's worth mentioning. I feel that if Will Stancil were to meet his demise at the hands of crazy leftists/ANTIFA, I think the right would genuinely be upset. Not to mention he is one of the few genuine ones at least so that's gotta be crossing the rubicon if even those guys killed him.
theres going to be people with usernames like "ShoveATelephonePoleUpWillStancilsAssGroyper" genuinely mourning the loss while all of leftist twitter (along with bluesky) celebrate like they took down Adolf 2.0
 
Ever noticed how libtards seem almost unable to debate anything political without resorting to clumsy and cringey invocations of Star Wars, Star Trek, Disney-this, Pixar-that, Cal-Arts-the-other, etc.?

What, exactly, it means, I do not know.

Yes, I can make the usual (and probably at least partially-correct) observations about their arrested development, their simplistic Good-VS-Evil dichotomies , or TMIJS (Too Much Indiana Jones) Syndrome. But I suspect there is more, and that is worthy of study by the few non-pozzed sociologists.

I take especial pains to avoid pop-culture references, no matter how apt, mostly for this reason, but also to force myself to explain why I believe what I believe; why I hold the values which I do. Analogies and references can be helpful at times, but when they become habitual, devolve into habits and eventually, crutches.
Why is it that libtards always debate with pop culture garbage? Easy.

They're people who have given up all forms of thinking for the realm of pure pleasure. These types of people are the ones who don't actively learn history, would rather have an algorithm serve it for them. As such, any 'history' or 'fact' they learn is straight from entertainment media. Or to be specific, current year Hollywood slop which includes Netflix, alot of movies produced by the current year West. These types of people are the types who rely on Reddit for information (because they're too lazy to even use different search engines) as well and wind up becoming Redditors on top of it. So you basically have a lazy bastard that has Reddit brain on top of it.

Now, there are varying degrees of this laziness. You got those who do want to self improve and stand a chance to escape this mindset and wind up on the other side. You got those who are still submerged for one reason or another. Usually because their peers are also Redditors.

And then there's the typical libtard who just consumes, doesn't research and have a ton of other retards who do the same shit and bond over the same retarded thing.

In short, the current year libtard are lazy hedonists.
 
Why is it that libtards always debate with pop culture garbage? Easy.
Because they're mentally children who don't understand Batman isn't real.

Who would win in a fight, Batman or Iron Man? The answer is whoever the writer decides should win the fight. Most libtards do not understand fiction on this level. They think Batman and Iron Man are real and that this question has a correct answer.
 
Because they're mentally children who don't understand Batman isn't real.

Who would win in a fight, Batman or Iron Man? The answer is whoever the writer decides should win the fight. Most libtards do not understand fiction on this level. They think Batman and Iron Man are real and that this question has a correct answer.
I was going to write something like "but I don't get it, though...", but it instantly comes back to the same thing:

Immaturity. Pathological immaturity. Good-Guys-VS-Bad-Guys, whom always wear badges on their sleeves marking them as such, just in case the kids might be confused. And the bad-guy badges always have "X"es, or skulls, or frowny-faces, just to make it perfectly clear whom the Bad Guy is.

I may have become excited and emotionally-invested your proposed Batman-VS-Ironman dispute...

...had I been presented with it when I was six years old.

If you want vision of the ShitLiberal Future, Winston, imagine a twelve-year-old boy whose adult teeth haven't finished coming in, screaming "NAZI" in your face, forever.
 
Am I the only leftist here?

The Extremely Online younger leftists might be so shallow that everything is the Rebel Alliance, but I think it's Current Year brain rot more than it is anything specific to leftism. And to dig a little bit on that, I think part of it is that shit like Star Wars or Harry Potter is something that communicates an idea between people living in different areas of the country who may not have that much in common otherwise.

As far as Trump goes, one of the things that I keep coming back to is how for 40+ years he's been wealthy, famous, married to beautiful women (and Melanoma), and he's been a president who will absolutely be known in a thousand years, if only by scholars, but he's a miserable, petty, angry, vindictive man. I can't make any of you see what I'm talking about, and I know I'm about to float a pop culture reference, but he's the Walder Frey of presidents. He's got it all, but instead of being a happy warrior, he's willing to burn his own reputation down to take a cheap shot at a perceived enemy.

Leftism in general and the democrats in particular are in the wilderness right now. A lot of the circular dick-kicking we're seeing from the left comes from having no leadership, or weak leadership. And a chunk of that is the stench of Boomerist underdog identity lingering like a fart in an elevator coupled with "Fuck Trump" as almost the only ideological commonality.

Leftists on the street: See themselves as the French Resistance putting up barricades in the streets of Paris to stop the Nazi tanks.

Last Democratic nominee: Really fucking happy to have the endorsement of DICK FUCKING CHENEY.

The center is not holding and I expect the party to split at some point.
 
Am I the only leftist here?

No but you are probably one of the few left in the site.

The issue you bring up is true, Trump isn't some amazing president. He isn't really that good a person or has that amazing a ideological plataform. The reason Trump won and why he is winning is because the left has gotten a hold of the idiot ball and refuses to let go.

I won't go deep into it here since it has been argued about on the actual Politics section of the site, but western liberals have pretty much spent the last almost 30 years (Jesus has it really been this long) slowly sinking into the weight of their own compromises and accursed pacts with leftists and refusing to move on.
 
The issue you bring up is true, Trump isn't some amazing president. He isn't really that good a person or has that amazing a ideological plataform. The reason Trump won and why he is winning is because the left has gotten a hold of the idiot ball and refuses to let go.
plus he was the first candidate to present a different right wing option to the voters than the rest of the GOP establishment conservaboomers.
people had been bitching and complaining about 'rino' people for a while, trump was the first candidate to actually present himself as the anti-RINO, someone who won't play the uniparty game like the rest of the party was content to do. that's a big part of how he managed to create so much support for himself in a relatively short amount of time.

if trump had lost the nomination and the repubicans had run someone like mitt romney or ted cruz instead, then i am pretty certain that the result would have been president hillary.
 
Am I the only leftist here?

The Extremely Online younger leftists might be so shallow that everything is the Rebel Alliance, but I think it's Current Year brain rot more than it is anything specific to leftism. And to dig a little bit on that, I think part of it is that shit like Star Wars or Harry Potter is something that communicates an idea between people living in different areas of the country who may not have that much in common otherwise.

As far as Trump goes, one of the things that I keep coming back to is how for 40+ years he's been wealthy, famous, married to beautiful women (and Melanoma), and he's been a president who will absolutely be known in a thousand years, if only by scholars, but he's a miserable, petty, angry, vindictive man. I can't make any of you see what I'm talking about, and I know I'm about to float a pop culture reference, but he's the Walder Frey of presidents. He's got it all, but instead of being a happy warrior, he's willing to burn his own reputation down to take a cheap shot at a perceived enemy.

Leftism in general and the democrats in particular are in the wilderness right now. A lot of the circular dick-kicking we're seeing from the left comes from having no leadership, or weak leadership. And a chunk of that is the stench of Boomerist underdog identity lingering like a fart in an elevator coupled with "Fuck Trump" as almost the only ideological commonality.

Leftists on the street: See themselves as the French Resistance putting up barricades in the streets of Paris to stop the Nazi tanks.

Last Democratic nominee: Really fucking happy to have the endorsement of DICK FUCKING CHENEY.

The center is not holding and I expect the party to split at some point.
No, not exactly.

I would still reluctantly call myself "Left", but only in my head (and here, obviously), as the ones who say it aloud and advertise it are... unpleasant.

The major problem, I think, is that Leftists define themselves simply as NOT-(Right-wing politician, view, party, etc.) and also focus far more on people than their qualifications for the job in question.

Trump is crude and boorish, but I like much of what he's done. This breaks the Lefty Brain.

If Bernie Sanders, or AOC, or — Allah forbid — that Ill-Matic Omar cunt do something good, I'll be happy about it.

Try it this way: do you really care if the guy whom builds the bridge across which you're driving is... black?

Trans?
Gay?
Immigrant?
Muslim?
Female? (for different values of "female", of course)

Or would you prefer an Asian or white man whom you know got into architecture/engineering school because he was good, not just (see above list).

You can do the job well? Welcome!
You can't? Fuck off.

And that makes me right-wing, now, huh...
 
You just don’t want to accept the fact that you’re dealing with an expert in Guerrilla Warfare.
He has a degree in Niggerology, wouldn't that be "Gorilla" warfare?

he could easily befriend a pack of three-four melanated gentlemen (five is too high)
Because with five niggers we'd get Will Stancil Surrounded On The Couch memes. "It do BBC like that, Mr. Stancil."

The projection is off the charts with these tweets. This was about Trump's response to Rob Reiner's murder, but it could just as easily be criticizing the left. The first one applies to Will himself and all the NPC's parroting the party line in their echo chambers. The second one is how the left reacted to Charlie Kirk's murder. And the third one perfectly describes Antifa's Burn/Loot/Murder tactics since 2020 and currently in Minnesota.
 
No but you are probably one of the few left in the site.

The issue you bring up is true, Trump isn't some amazing president. He isn't really that good a person or has that amazing a ideological plataform. The reason Trump won and why he is winning is because the left has gotten a hold of the idiot ball and refuses to let go.

I won't go deep into it here since it has been argued about on the actual Politics section of the site, but western liberals have pretty much spent the last almost 30 years (Jesus has it really been this long) slowly sinking into the weight of their own compromises and accursed pacts with leftists and refusing to move on.
I'm a younger millenial and it's sad to say but out of the many Presidents who've been in office since I've been alive Trump is easily the best.

Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama, Biden and Trump. Out of them all Trump is hands down the best President around in my lifetime
 
but he's a miserable, petty, angry, vindictive man. I can't make any of you see what I'm talking about,
I actually understand that he's petty & vindictive, and for once we have somebody in the White House who will kick people in the balls instead of saying, "Aw, gee whillikers, did they politicize the IRS again? Were they letting violent rapists out of jail again? Were they subverting government institutions to funnel money to their party again? Well, gawrsh, doing anything would be so ungentlemanly! I know you want to stop being raped into unconsciousness, but the best I can do is a tax cut!"

I don't want a man like Donald Trump every administration. But the reason we have to have this guy is nobody, and I really do mean nobody, had the ego to think he could take on two parties and win, or the sheer cussedness to hit his enemies so hard that they think twice about hitting him again. A man who had an ounce of honor would have simply not survived what Trump has survived.

He's an absolute cunt. But the reason we have this cunt in office is all the "decent" people agreed that we had no choice but to sell the crown jewels of our national secrets and industries to China, let bloodthirsty rape-demons traffic drugs and children across our border, let bulb-headed savages rob us blind, and let jibbering jeets exclude us from the industries our fathers and grandfathers built.

My party has to figure out that its voters expect more than just nigger-rigging the tax code every decade or so to find another way to not actually pay for the government. But your party needs to figure out that the American government should govern on behalf of Americans, not Somalis, not Indians, and not the Chinese. Americans. Until it figures out that basing an entire political party on enabling crimes committed by dark-skinned people is not a winning play, we're not going to get back to anything resembling normal.

As much of a dumbass self-serving cunt as he was, even FDR understood that. And Trump does too.
 
I'm a younger millennial and it's sad to say but out of the many Presidents who've been in office since I've been alive Trump is easily the best.

Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama, Biden and Trump. Out of them all Trump is hands down the best President around in my lifetime
As an older Gen-X, I can clearly remember three more before that: Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr. Only Reagan was good, and (at least for me) it's pretty close between him and Trump who's better.
 
I actually understand that he's petty & vindictive, and for once we have somebody in the White House who will kick people in the balls instead of saying, "Aw, gee whillikers, did they politicize the IRS again? Were they letting violent rapists out of jail again? Were they subverting government institutions to funnel money to their party again? Well, gawrsh, doing anything would be so ungentlemanly! I know you want to stop being raped into unconsciousness, but the best I can do is a tax cut!"
Supposedly, somebody once wrote to Lincoln complaining about General Grant being a boorish, drunken lout and wanting him to be replaced by a "proper officer." Lincoln's response was "I cannot spare this man, he fights."

Now, I don't know if this story is true or not, but it sums up my feelings on President Trump pretty well. The man ain't perfect, but by God is he a fighter.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo