US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Of all the retarded arguments appeals to emotion these idiots make, this one pisses me off most.

Self-defence. That's what it's called, you mongs. Not "execution". Words mean things.

A law-enforcement officer has no greater obligation to allow himself to be shot or run over than does anyone else. On the contrary, the job regularly exposes them to much greater chances of encountering people would are both able and willing to murder them.
 
despite his fanbase mostly consisting of obnoxious leftoids, i don't really hate luigi
reminding the upper echelons of the executive class of their mortality is kinda based

and yes he has a host of other charges
Ver archivo adjunto 8494541
I feel the same.

Luigi is like the Rick And Morty of assassins, in that he's likeable, even as most of his fan-base is obnoxious and cringe-inducing.
 
So what’s good for the Klansman is good for the niggerfaggot.
Yet it's incendiary. Needlessly. And your Justice Department know this.

I know it goes out the window in this thread, but basic PR will afford you miles. What's 'good for the niggerfaggot' is this guy should never even have gotten a headline. Lemon did this because he knew it was publicity. He knew he'd suffer likely tokenistic consequences. Want to really punish an obnoxious journalist? Ignore their existence.
 
I don’t know about him winning the general election. He is a massively unlikable cunt and all his opponents have to do to attack him is quote him.

Plus there was that Christmas tweet where he shit on all the 90s kids. He’s just an awful candidate.
Ohio going blue is 10,000x preferable to the jeet getting elected for two main reasons:

1. The Ohio house and senate will prevent anything major Acton would do, but if Vivek gets elected he's going to flood the state with jeets with the full support of the omega-cucked Ohio GOP.

2. We need to make the message clear: WE. FUCKING. HATE. JEETS. We want America to be for Americans, not shitskin nepobabies from halfway across the world. Barring some catastrophe or mass undetected election fraud, the democrat party isn't going to be an issue a decade from now, but these civnat small c "conservatives" are going to remain an issue much longer than that. I see this race as a battleground between true America first right wingers and spineless Republicans who's only loyalties are to Israel and their stock portfolio. If throwing one election in one state to some impotent Democrat is what it takes to keep the latter from maintaining control of the Republican party, so be it.
 
It’s not private until it pays taxes like a private property. Pay taxes.


Be kinda hard to blow crackheads being dead and all. 🧐
Anyways, dude. The constitutional right to worship belongs to individual people, he attendees. They’re the people you can’t demand payment from for the right to worship.

But for what it’s worth, I sympathize with your perspective to the extent that Joel Osteen should be in jail, and I’d support a proposal that could target him without normal churches getting dragged into it
 
Anyways, dude. The constitutional right to worship belongs to individual people, he attendees. They’re the people you can’t demand payment from for the right to worship.

But for what it’s worth, I sympathize with your perspective to the extent that Joel Osteen should be in jail, and I’d support a proposal that could target him without normal churches getting dragged into it
You reminded me of this gem:
 
The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly mention "churches"
Far as I understand it the constitution doesn't mention churches specifically because they're rolled into the "establishment of religion and free exercise thereof" part of 1A. It's the tax code that specifically says houses of worship are exempt because of the above.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo