US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
You can have a gun at a protest, but you can’t fight cops and feds while armed. Ugghhh - I hate defending a jeet, but really, if this is some arcane strange logic, have you considered perhaps moving to India?
 
Maybe this is stubborn but stop trying to convince these people. Just call them retarded when they are being retarded. That's it. Idc if this man didn't pull out his gun or not. He set up a blockade for a lawful execution of orders that 77 million AMERICANS voted for. He then went with the two lezzies to physically accost federal agents. Maybe you are dumb and dont remember the golden rule of police interraction "Comply or Die". He reached for a gun if not grabbed one and died for being stupid. If someone looks at what's going on in Minnesota and is on the side of fighting against federal law enforcement then they are already too far gone. Just make fun of them. You will change more minds making fun of people's idiocy than talking rationally to them.
 
Gov. Walz: "We grew up reading the story of Anne Frank. Somebody is gonna write one regarding Minnesota."

1.mp4
Yeah, how white women are being violently defiant against federal government to keep raping Somalians in their country. What would you call that? We Voted for This?
 
I already know what the replies will be. "He just shouldn't have been there." "He just shouldn't have possessed a gun." "He just should have kept his firearm in a safe at all times." "He just shouldn't question the state or participate in legal protests."

Odd you didn't include "don't interfere with law enforcement" and "don't resist arrest," which would have also kept him alive while also doing all the things you list above.

If the suspect was being aggressive and was actively trying to use the gun to impede law enforcement? Of course. Take the gun away to de-escalate the situation. Return it later if there's no problem or keep it if there's a conviction.
Oh. I didn't realize I was talking to a retard.
 
Worse, it's a shitty cartoon made by a fat white fujoshi for mentally ill women and fags. It's basically Disney musical slop for Redditors set in Hell when the creator of the series has little to no knowledge of theology.
I'm shocked, shocked to find there are people posting with cartoon avatars expecting to be taken seriously in here.
 
It's actually not a legal protest to interfere with law enforcement.
This is a point that is not being made often enough. None of these "protests" meet the definition of a legal protest. You do not have the right to interfere with police. You do not have the right to block traffic. You most definitely do not have the right to assault people for disagreeing with you. These faggots are not protesting. They are rioting.
 
Is Iran running a dating app for 13/14 year olds for them to get married not systematic rape?
Facilitating hormonal teens to make a lifelong commitment to support and build a family with each other is worlds different from a late thirties paedophile trolling for kids.
Come on man, sometimes I think you care about point scoring more than persuasion.
 
I'm not, i'm pointing out that he's fine with kids getting raped, but he seems to have a huge deep moral issue with Tucker!
>I point out that Tucker openly supports regimes that practice systematic child rape
>Give evidence showing that
>You point out individual cases of such things happening in Israel
>I show how they got punished and how Israeli law was reformed to stop such things from happening again

classic DARVO. You still haven't answered if you think child marriage is child rape or how it would be acceptable for Tucker to shill for regimes that do that.

Facilitating hormonal teens to make a lifelong commitment to support and build a family with each other is worlds different from a late thirties paedophile trolling for kids.
Come on man, sometimes I think you care about point scoring more than persuasion.
Why are you assuming this is between hormonal teens? This is a dating app that's open to adults that accepts children. There's nothing prohibiting a young girl from marrying an older man.

Societies that permit underage marriage like this usually have it be between a young girl and a far older man.

This isn't even considering that Iran practices Mutah which are temporary marriages in Shia Islam meant for sex:


“A House on the Water,” which looks at temporary marriage in Iran, is the latest study by Kameel Ahmadi, an Iranian-British sociologist who lives in Iran [Persian PDF]. Kameel has published extensive research on sexual inequality and marriage in Iran, including a study of early child marriage entitled “An Echo of Silence” [PDF]. His latest research also pays special attention to the pathology of temporary marriage between legally underage children — a subject that has become more controversial in recent years.

In 2014, Iranian parliament’s Research Center published its own report about temporary marriage, describing it as a cure for “reducing illicit sexual relations” in Iran [Persian link]. The report warned about the “spread of homosexuality” among high school students because, it said, their chances of a permanent marriage are very low. “Now that permanent marriage has become difficult,” the report said, “if we cannot find a proper solution, then sexual needs will force individuals to find other ways —including self-gratification, homosexuality, illicit sexual relations, adultery or sexual aggression. And it is not often that individuals choose to control their sexual impulses by fasting, exercise, taking medication or surgery. Temporary marriage is the way out of all these negative consequences.”
“According to the Civil Code,” he writes, “the minimum age of girls for temporary marriage is the same as the age for permanent marriage. In a permanent marriage for a girl under-13, the permission of both the guardian and the court is needed. But temporary marriages are done by the families in an unofficial way and without being legally registered.” He points out that this is a failure of the law.

Also, if a temporary marriage between a girl and a boy results in the girl losing her virginity but does not lead to a permanent marriage, then the girl will have difficulty in finding another husband in a society that puts a high value on virginity.

In the end, it's clear that pedophilia is enshrined in Iranian law.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo