Young women are radicalising - Britain’s young women are sad, alienated and increasingly left-wing - The bush of Feminism bears bitter poisonous fruit.

gettyimages-2155594942.jpg
Article Archive
By Scarlett Maguire

Over the past decade we have had countless opinion pieces, documentaries and dramas about dangerously disenfranchised young men, with much discussion about why they’re moving to the populist right. Frustrated and overly online young men are widely seen to be the drivers of a quiet revolution that has been taking place in youth politics: the widening gender gap. Yet not enough thought has been given to young women’s much greater movement in the opposite direction. It might not be too surprising that women’s political preferences get less attention than men’s, but that does not mean they are any less significant.

Many have noted that at the last general election young (18- to 24-year-old) men were twice as likely as young women to vote Reform, while young women were twice as likely to vote Green as young men. There was also extensive coverage given to the signs of Gen Z men backing Nigel Farage. What these observations fail to take into account is that, in fact, a smaller percentage of young men voted for Reform (12 per cent) than the general population (14.3 per cent). Actually, 18- to 24-year-old men were far less likely to have voted for Farage than every other age cohort of men, and young men were still overwhelmingly more likely to vote for left-wing or liberal parties (68 per cent voted Labour, Lib Dem or Green) than they were for a right-wing party (22 per cent voted Conservative or Reform). If voting for a populist right party is indicative of a more radical mindset, then by this metric young men were some of the least radical demographic groups of the whole country.

The 2024 voting patterns of young women tell a very different story. Nearly one in four (23 per cent) of 18- to 24-year-old women voted for the Green Party at the last general election,
compared to just 6.7 per cent of the general population (12 per cent of young men voted for the Greens). Greens performed far better with young women than with any other key demographic (just 10 per cent of 25- to 49-year-old women voted Green, and only 4 per cent of 50- to 64-year-olds). In last year’s general election, young women moved to the populist left considerably more than young men moved to the populist right.

Current voting intention polls show these trends not only persisting but becoming more pronounced. Recent data from More In Common shows that one in three (33 per cent) of young women now say they will vote for the Green Party. Meanwhile, young men, far from being more right wing than the population as a whole, are as likely to vote Green as they are Reform (20 per cent) with Reform still significantly underperforming with under 25 males relative to other age groups.

In fact, the UK is not alone in seeing young women move increasingly to the left. Recent elections in the US, Germany and Portugal all show similar movements between the sexes.

In previous decades young women were actually more likely to vote Conservative than men. However, this trend started reversing in 2015, primarily driven by the younger end of the electorate. In 2019, 18- to 25-year-old women voted for Jeremy Corbyn at more than double the rate of the general population (65 per cent to 32.1 per cent), dwarfing the still considerable 46 per cent of young men who did the same. What over the past decade has caused young women to lurch so dramatically to the left?

I recently recorded a documentary for Radio 4 with Gaby Hinsliffe exploring some potential explanations as to why women are moving dramatically to the left. We discussed the idea that there might be more to the change than conventional party politics. Strikingly, the majority of young people do not identify as either right- or left-wing. Instead, young women see their politics as flowing from their deeply held progressive personal values, which they increasingly think are at odds with the country they see around them.

Britain’s young women seem to feel more alienated from their country than their male peers, and are more likely to think that the country is treating them unfairly compared to older generations (men marginally disagree with the statement, women agree 55 per cent to 37 per cent). Young women feel less connected to their country than young men and are 21 points more likely to think that the country is racist than young men (58 per cent to 37 per cent). Only a minority (31 per cent) say they take pride in being British (compared to 51 per cent of men the same age) and only 38 per cent believe Britain is a tolerant nation (56 per cent of young men think the same).

In fact, young women are not just pessimistic about the country’s culture, but the country’s economy too. It makes sense, with sky-high rental prices, a hardening graduates job market, and years of stagnated living standards, that Gen Z would feel worse about the economy than average. What is less clear is why young women are the most pessimistic group when it comes to the UK economy, with an astonishingly low net economic optimism score of -57 (18 points worse than men of that age group). Perhaps this is why younger women are much more likely to place prices for food and energy bills and housing affordability in their top issues than young men, although it does not fully explain their political priorities. One in three (31 cent) of 16- to 25-year-old women say the conflict in Gaza is in their top three issues, placing it above things like taxes and immigration (just 22 per cent of young men say the same).

Again, it is not immediately obvious why young women would report feeling more isolated than their male peers, but there does seem to be a loneliness epidemic among young women. A majority (53 per cent) saying they feel lonely, substantially more than the proportion of young men saying the same.

The amount of time spent online is also surprisingly skewed across the gender divide. It is well known that the “Covid generation” were kept off school and forced to live out their social lives on the internet, and that algorithms mean young men and women live increasingly parallel lives online. What is less well known is that Covid generation women self-report as being more online, or at least more worried about it, than their male peers. Eighty-four per cent of women this age say they use TikTok regularly compared to 67 per cent men. Young men are more likely than women to use X, but in much smaller numbers than women use TikTok (46 per cent to 26 per cent). Online media consumption seems to be worrying young women more than men, with far more likely to say they spend “far too much time on social media” (49 per cent of 18- to 24-year-old women compared to 36 per cent of men the same age).

Behavioural differences, as well as personal values, could be significantly shaping the gender divide. Online media consumption, higher education (the gender divide is starkest between women with university degrees and men without them, with 56 per cent of university students now women) and even relationship status all seem to drive the increasingly different political outlooks from young men and young women. The political gap between those that are single is even more pronounced than between those who are married.


But whatever the reasons, the extent to which young women feel alienated from the rest of the country matters. There is still a prevailing sense that whatever young women are thinking or feeling, it doesn’t matter very much. Political trends among this cohort are generally seen more like a questionable fashion choice that they’ll probably soon grow out of, rather than anything meaningful or significant. But the extent to which young women are moving to the populist left is dramatic and doesn’t show signs of changing anytime soon. This crucial gender divide will not only continue to shape our politics but could also alter our social fabric as women increasingly feel they have less in common with older generations and men their own age. The consequences of an increasingly radical generation of young women could be dramatic and long-lasting.
 
this random turkroach on /pol/ explained it somewhat decently a decade ago
Ver archivo adjunto 8386111
I would counter this with centuries of autists getting literally zero pussy (or having to hide any they did get) being responsible for the vast majority of records keeping, knowledge preservation, and philosophizing, but yeah, the general gist is accurate.
 
I would counter this with centuries of autists getting literally zero pussy (or having to hide any they did get) being responsible for the vast majority of records keeping, knowledge preservation, and philosophizing, but yeah, the general gist is accurate.
they simply found their studies and records more stimulating than women or at least worth having over the endless nagging a woman would cost
 
I would counter this with centuries of autists getting literally zero pussy (or having to hide any they did get) being responsible for the vast majority of records keeping, knowledge preservation, and philosophizing, but yeah, the general gist is accurate.
Not everyone wins but at least society was stable and rewarding enough that even they wanted to participate. There are plenty of innovators and creatives that never had children but put their endeavors towards contributing to society out of sheer love or at least respect for it.
 
Funny you mention that. I'm certain societies of old were patriarchal in order to keep women from rending civilization apart. The whole deal about loyalty, romance, marriage and being a proper lady were made by men to ensure women were pleasant and amicable at least. Compare and contrast to the Modern Woman. All those traits have been replaced with the drive for relevance, their need to make things follow society and as established, our society is a total clownworld, its like watching a leaky gas tank catch on fire.

I'm reminded of Assembly Women which was a play the ancient Greeks wrote and our reality is resembling that right now. But with the addition of Western culture being dominated by corpos and other exploiters as they keep churning out propaganda after propaganda, they're only making things worse.

The older I get the more I believe that one of the fundamental conceits of OG feminist theory is correct, that is fundamental traits typically assigned to womanhood are largely enforced by the often invisible hand of a patriarchy.

And the more I believe our current strife results from how much of an aberration the last century or so has been from all of prior human history in that regard.
 
The older I get the more I believe that one of the fundamental conceits of OG feminist theory is correct, that is fundamental traits typically assigned to womanhood are largely enforced by the often invisible hand of a patriarchy.

And the more I believe our current strife results from how much of an aberration the last century or so has been from all of prior human history in that regard.
In a sense, society itself undertakes a major gaslighting operation just to keep women in line in order for civilization to continue. Its just not noticed because we assume its simply part of society and as such, people do it because that is part of the culture. Which in turn, is taken for granted. People had to keep the tradition going else they risk calamity as we see today.

Religion is also a huge component in keeping women in line too. I remember a tradition back the Viking times that when a woman is married, the celebrations tend to be huge. But when she is found unfaithful/adulterous, the punishment is just as huge. As that involves getting paraded around and cut up by the village. In Christianity, adulterers are punished and shamed by the community. In Islam, you better be in line lest you get beaten, killed or raped by outsiders.

I'm certain that a woman's need to fit in stems from the harsh punishment their ancestors received if they walked out of line. And ironically, that need to fit in is now what is destroying civilization now that their values have been swapped from 'family-centered' to 'girlboss'. And now that girlboss is bringing on the collapse unwittingly.

This time period provided all records are intact will serve as a great example of what happens when you let feminism take root and allow women to break away from a patriarchal standards leads to tragedy and disaster. The Pooners, the troons and the clownworld we are forced to endure is because we broke away from this thanks to men who have forgotten how to say no to women.
 
We need to have some sort of conversation about how people arrive at their opinions They have been given a set of opinions wholesale and they are now viciously enforcing those opinions on their peers.
Good luck with that, they won't listen to any criticism coming from men so unfortunately thats going to be up to you; have fun being called a "pick me"!

Ironically this would likely go for either gender voting for this lunacy.
 
Yeah, the wholesale imposed opinions is by no means female specific.
Its also not political orientation specific, most people are proles mentally.

I don't think it boils down to sheer iq either; I think you need a combination of an at least above average intellect and an inate intellectual curiosity to really work your way out of group think to any meaningful degree.

Of course I'm not saying I have ever had an original thought, very few people do; however, once you wander outside the group think propaganda kiddie pool you realize the shocking degree to which you simply believed narratives.
 
The older I get the more I believe that one of the fundamental conceits of OG feminist theory is correct, that is fundamental traits typically assigned to womanhood are largely enforced by the often invisible hand of a patriarchy.
The most strident feminists of the Anglosphere essentially define patriarchy as caring about men. I think that's the right way to think about it.

As Republicans have pointed out for a long time, there's no "gender gap" in voting. There's a "marriage gap." A married woman considers her husband's (and male children's) interests her own, so she votes like a man. This is why Democrats get pissy at "white women." It's a permissible euphemism (or metonymy, I guess).

Single women vote to "shit-test" their suitors, i.e., ruin non-elite white men's lives. (Or Korean men in Korea, or Japanese men in Japan, etc.) They may not know what they're doing—many explicitly do—but it adds up to a coherent program, from the first white feather on.
 
Its also not political orientation specific, most people are proles mentally.

I don't think it boils down to sheer iq either; I think you need a combination of an at least above average intellect and an inate intellectual curiosity to really work your way out of group think to any meaningful degree.

Of course I'm not saying I have ever had an original thought, very few people do; however, once you wander outside the group think propaganda kiddie pool you realize the shocking degree to which you simply believed narratives.
I have a lot of hope for the left hand side of the bell curve too, we saw that during covid, most of those who resisted were on either end, it was the midwits that had the highest percentage of insanity enforcers.
 
it will never stop being hilarious to me that the only way the mainstream right thinks it will get women to vote for them is if they get dicked
a lot of guys seem to fall for this kind of gorilla chauvinism delusion, where the guy unironically believes that if he gets with some commie antifa art ho he can use his magic dick to turn her into a based christian tradwife. it's ludicrous, but fantasizing about it strokes their egos so the meme refuses to ever go away.
 
a lot of guys seem to fall for this kind of gorilla chauvinism delusion, where the guy unironically believes that if he gets with some commie antifa art ho he can use his magic dick to turn her into a based christian tradwife. it's ludicrous, but fantasizing about it strokes their egos so the meme refuses to ever go away.
the pro and anti womyn arguments both come to the conclusion they're retarded and need to be guided by men even as one insists they are their own valid independent people
i have lost my ability to even
 
Emotional incontinence. That is what you are seeing here.

They base their entire lives on emotion without any sort of intellectual basis. It is all based on feels, not reals. And this sort of behavior has been encourage by the rest of society non-stop for decades at this point, so of course they are going down that route.
I remember my grandma told me women were too emotional to vote. To think I doubted her.
 
they simply found their studies and records more stimulating than women or at least worth having over the endless nagging a woman would cost
Does anyone doubt that if Stephen Miller had been unable to find a woman to have sex with him that he would be any less dedicated to his cause? hahaha no in fact fewer distractions would allow him to deepen his commitment, if such a thing is possible.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo