US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
We should equip ICE with bulldozers and tow trucks. When encountering road blocks, tow the ones you can (impound with fees) and bulldoze/crushinate whatever's left until your vehicles can get through.
I want ICE to go weapons free when they get boxed in like that. Just hop out of their car and light up the assholes blocking them in. The first time will be the last time.
 
See, I disagree. roof koreans are proof that everyone will just be racist against everyone else, then as the world goes into darkness legends will spread of mysterious pale skinned men living in cabins in the woods who remember all the secrets of the universe....

Small whitepill frequently forgot. As whites become a minority in governance; the government will become equally inefficient and corrupt.
I mean I love the memes and all but could we just focus on like getting the illegals out then go on an empire building spree?

With how large our goverment is, why not do both if able?
If the Danish weren't total cucks they be getting down for negations now.

The most interesting thing to me is AFAIK the danish were not only refusing negotiations with American requests but also was not allowing representatives of Greenland are not being allowed to meet with Trump privately. Truthfully I am less then knowledgeable about the true position of Greenland and its populace but it is interesting nonetheless.
 
Tl; dr: Constitutional voting amendments did not grant shit; they confirmed, clarified, and ensured that states could not restrict voting to certain populations based on not being a white land-owning male, and made that the law of the land. Women were no more "donated" that right than poor, property-less white men.
A distinction without a difference. The country used to be ran in accordance with the votes of men, and the votes of those men led to women being able to vote. If you don't think women should be allowed to vote, the blame for this falls on the shoulders of men. If a healthy majority of men said "fuck no", to suffragettes, women would not have been enfranchised.
 
Maddow is as professionally fucked as Kimmel and Colbert. MSNBC is going down in flames, and their parent company have separated them and other failing media channels from the more profitable portions of the company. That's why I imagine she feels emboldened to spout revolutionary rhetoric. Her career as a media personality is in jeopardy, so she's got almost nothing to lose. If she can spout off enough crazy revolutionary rhetoric, maybe she can continue to be a celebrated voice of Marxism if and when her show gets cancelled.
She's among the "useful idiots" class that would be immediately and mercilessly put down the moment her communist dreams came true. Of course, she knows that's never coming, so yeah, nothing to lose indeed.
 
There's a reason they shit on "trad wives" so fucking hard, it's jealousy. Plain and simple, there is no other excuse to be ragging on another woman for being happily married and raising their children.
Most of these feminists would call it "empowering" for a woman to be consensually bound, whipped, and shat on. But if a woman chooses to cook and clean for her family? That's just sick! And demeaning to women everywhere!
 
I think we all know they'll just close every account they're currently charging >10% interest on. They'll just say the new risk isn't worth the reduced squeeze. Good news either way though. It eliminates a lot of usury even if it hurts up front.
Normally I would say 'yes' but this is Trump who has proven to be vindictive and unpredictable. They may just let it pass due to staying in the presidents good graces.
 
Another group of faggots who think they should be able to stop a vehicle by jumping in front of it.
See, this is the kind of shit that the Left will show you and say "See, there's no way that ICE agent could get hurt!" because Faggy McRedshirt there was hoping to get martyred.
Every single one of them should've been summarily executed on the spot
 
Hope this is the beginning of Total Payment Processor Death.
The best thing about Trump is that he reacts to internet bullying instead of running away like Vivek. He did his Maduro snatch and run and thought everyone'd call him a hero but people said they cared 10,000x more about affording a house and not getting fucked over by banks. This and telling Blackrock to fuck off are the things he ran and got elected on.
 
There's something particularly vexing about people acting as though a BPD affected woman saying "I'm not mad" is evidence of her being levelheaded, as if every single man hasn't had an experience with someone like her
That's the kind of shit that only a lesbian would think makes her look level headed.

Your woman says "I'm not mad" means she's going to kill you in your sleep that night.

Plus, the way she was saying it, you just can choke on the smarm.
 
I agree with everything he said earlier but why does he have contouring makeup on his nose

Ver archivo adjunto 8397862Ver archivo adjunto 8397859
Normal VS today.

Ver archivo adjunto 8397871

I hope I'm wong and it's just the lighting but it really looks like it to me.
The baseline probability of autism in the adult population is around 2%.


The commenter's intense fixation on a subtle facial feature (nose contouring via makeup), including creating or sharing a zoomed-in visual comparison of "normal" vs. "today," along with expressing hope that it's just lighting while bluntly pointing it out despite agreeing with the person's statements, suggests a pattern of hyper-focused attention to detail and possibly reduced filtering of social commentary on appearance. This aligns with traits more commonly observed in autistic individuals, such as enhanced pattern recognition in visuals and directness in observations that others might overlook or deem irrelevant.


This evidence raises the probability modestly, to approximately 5-7%.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo