Susie Green & Mermaids UK - "Trans Kid Support Charity", Susie had her underage kid get GRS

Destacado
Otterly dijo:
I think there’s a link as well with some of the endocrinology teams at the London hospitals UCLH in particular and Leeds, I’ll try and find something.
Presiona para expandir...
Patients under the Tavistock in Leeds were definitely also getting puberty blockers, UCLH were the ones dealing with it in London, In Hannah Barnes' Time to Think mentions Leeds General Infirmary's endocrinology clinic being responsible for puberty blockers for the Leeds service users.

1746134945817.webp
1746135457227.webp
1746135631014.webp
1746135800667.webp
1746135933786.webp
1746135965670.webp
1746136014838.webp
1746136167208.webp

She mentions that the Mermaids influence on the Leeds service was much stronger than in London, what I'm wondering is if it was pressure from Mermaids that led to them choosing Leeds to be their northern site in the first place.

1746137073843.webp

I was at school with one of those Leeds patients, can't remember the dates exactly for when everything happened with her, I think she was 15 when put on puberty blockers and then either 17 or 18 for testosterone. At the time she expressed to us that she was upset about losing her fertility and how her family couldn't afford to freeze her eggs and she couldn't get it done on the NHS. I don't know what she told the service as they continued to prescribe to her.
 
pangolins dijo:
I was at school with one of those Leeds patients, can't remember the dates exactly for when everything happened with her, I think she was 15 when put on puberty blockers and then either 17 or 18 for testosterone. At the time she expressed to us that she was upset about losing her fertility and how her family couldn't afford to freeze her eggs and she couldn't get it done on the NHS. I don't know what she told the service as they continued to prescribe to her.
Presiona para expandir...
Did you tell her that taking Lupron and wrong sex hormones was probably a bad idea, or at the very least mock her and call her a retard?
 
Well, this is tasteful. Anne "healthcare", Susie's current shower of child-drugging bastards, selling merch of "dead names" that looks like a trooner/pooner shooter hit list.

1757695489270.webp
A TERF posted it but didn't archive it (sloppy!) https://x.com/Jeeeez17/status/1966441560863547449
Wayback Machine doesn't seem to have crawled it either, annoyingly. Here's the link with mostly merch on the theme of seething about TERFs and "haters", but the Dead Names shirt is gone already. Probably since the Charlie Kirk killing, even the Munchausens mums felt it was a bit non-U. https://merchify.me/product-category/anne/
 
Trans support charity Mermaids announces appointment of new CEO

Trans support charity Mermaids has appointed Johanna Hardy (she/her) as new Chief Executive Officer.

Jo will be taking up the role in November, bringing more than 20 years of leadership experience in the charity sector. Her career includes senior roles at Young Minds, Gingerbread, Contact and Mencap, with a strong focus on children, families, mental health and marginalised communities.

Over the course of her career, Jo has led national helplines, face-to-face family support services, expert online information hubs and inclusive family events. She has extensive expertise in service development, safeguarding, quality assurance, evaluation, fundraising and organisational strategy. She also served as Vice-Chair of the BBC Children in Need grant-making committee for London and the South East.

Jo’s personal experience campaigning for trans rights alongside her son – who has lived in his authentic gender identity for the past decade – has shaped her commitment to supporting trans, non-binary and gender-diverse young people. A passionate advocate for equity, inclusion and positive mental health, Jo is also an active member of All About Trans and the NEON Spokesperson Network.

Speaking on her appointment, Jo said: “I am hugely excited and inspired at the prospect of joining and leading Mermaids as your next CEO. This role brings together my extensive charity sector expertise with my personal passion and lived experience in campaigning for trans rights as a parent ally.

“Mermaids is a remarkable charity whose work is needed now more than ever, and I am deeply humbled by the resilience and dedication of everyone involved. I can’t wait to play my part in moving this vital work forward.”

Chair of Trustees, Hardeep Aiden said “We are thrilled to welcome Jo to Mermaids. Her breadth of leadership experience, combined with her personal commitment to championing trans rights, makes her the ideal person to lead the charity into its next chapter. We look forward to working with Jo to continue delivering vital support for trans, non-binary and gender-diverse children and young people, and their families.”
Presiona para expandir...

She pooned out her daughter so like Helen Joyce says, she'll be one of the last few to double down on this shit.

SEEN In Journalism on X says that Johanna Hardy was the vice-chair of BBC's Children In Need when it gave a ton of money to LGBT Youth Scotland which got busted for being a nonce ring, and funded a bunch of other schemes for trooning kids.

In other news, Gender Receipts also on X pointed out that Mermaids has changed their address with the Charity Commission from:
Regus
Princes Exchange 2
Princes Square
Leeds
West Yorkshire
LS1 4HY
to
Mermaids
167-169 Great Portland Street
LONDON
W1W 5PF
 
Webberley has done a bunch of interviews/debates recently.
Vs Julie Bindel.
Vs Helen Joyce.
Vs Robby Starbuck.
 
She's honestly quite deranged. She loses the plot when people say benign shit like 'identifies as trans' or 'a man who wishes to be a woman'. All while she says crazy shit like 'her penis'.

I wonder at the reason for the whirlwind tour lately? She was on Heretics as well. I wonder if the Triggernometry boys will have had her on?
 
Chester Copperpot dijo:
I wonder at the reason for the whirlwind tour lately? She was on Heretics as well. I wonder if the Triggernometry boys will have had her on?
Presiona para expandir...
I think the simple answer is that Webberly is a True Believer™. I assume she's realized that keeping quiet isn't an option anymore and believes that if everyone could just see it from the point of view she does, they'd change their minds. Never mind that her point of view is insane.
 
Stupid Sexy Flanders dijo:
I think the simple answer is that Webberly is a True Believer™. I assume she's realized that keeping quiet isn't an option anymore and believes that if everyone could just see it from the point of view she does, they'd change their minds. Never mind that her point of view is insane.
Presiona para expandir...
It's probably that she's facing competition for the titty skittles and bottled hairs from Susie Green, so has had to go on a marketing drive. She can't directly say "Buy your dope from me" so she's going for the true believer look, to pretend that she's not driven by the money. How will Susie respond? Will Jack make an appearance?.
 
I really can't see why people like Green and Webberly are allowed to walk the streets, let alone claim to be healthcare professionals.

It's about time the grownups told them to pack it in or face the consequences.
 
Not directly linked to Mermaids, but similar in concept, a new paper in The International Journal of Transgender Health:
“The worst thing I’ve ever experienced” – comparing experiences of affirmative and non-affirmative healthcare provision for trans adolescents in the UK
The results section contains a lot of direct quotes from interviewees. For example:

One parent, whose young person had been denied approval for endocrine care by the decision of a complex case panel in the months before GIDS closed-down, had finally been able to access their case notes after the service shut.

I’m not kidding—I read them and I could barely speak… it was traumatizing. I was so severely gaslit by what I read about myself and my husband.

The parent was shocked to read case notes written by a clinician that bore no resemblance to the experiences that their family had shared with the clinician.

We read it, and I was just beside myself. They used terms… ‘we’re a family of rescuers’ ‘we’re a family of activists’…. It was like a witch hunt on me… He just was basically saying that I’ve forced being trans on my daughter, I’ve made her trans and that we’re too influenced by the LGBT community. They were…really preoccupied with the fact that we’ve got an adult trans friend and that [adolescent] confides in her and talks to her. That was really problematic, and they asked me so many questions about this trans person which I also found really offensive. It’s okay (if) she’s talking to a cisgender person. If she’s talking to a trans person, they’re clearly trying to influence her. So, it was all very pathologising really.

The parent found the clinician notes biased, misrepresentative of their experience, unevidenced and judgemental. She saw misogyny in the way clinician notes critiqued the parenting of a mother and grandmother, while a father was barely mentioned despite his active co-parenting role. The parent was concerned at the inclusion of unevidenced speculation of alternative theories for why a child is trans, including their connections to LGBT communities or trans friends. These notes had directly contributed to their child being denied access to endocrine care, without the adolescent or family knowing what was in their notes or having any opportunity to challenge them.

There's another couple of examples that seem familiar-

One parent referenced having not even been able to access the reports that were being submitted to panel about their young adolescent:

It felt very secretive. I did ask at the time to see reports that were being sent… but I was not granted access to any of those, even though they’re about my child… Seemingly these MDTs are secret, and they don’t seem to put that on your file as something that you can then access.

In their case, the panel denied approval for their young person to access endocrine care. When the panel’s decision was reported back to them and their young person, they were shocked at the information conveyed:

When they came and met with us, he pretty much said that we had always been committed to a medical pathway and that we had put [adolescent] under pressure. I was really, really alarmed and really upset and angry in that moment in that meeting. I felt there was a huge power imbalance… I said to him you’ve known us for a few months and clearly you have not understood the case notes from two, three years because all you will see is us being on the fence for years (about medical transition)… This guy took our case to complex case panel… we can see in the notes there was a narrative that he sold to them and on the basis of that they said no.

The experience of having decisions about their healthcare made without any voice, influence, or power was very negative for the parent and their young person.

It was a really, really traumatic experience and it’s not too far stretched to say that it was traumatic…that was probably the worst my daughter has ever been.

[...]

Parent/carers felt that being put into any situation where a child’s gender was being questioned was harmful, something that “introduces shame”. One parent felt that excessive questioning about identity was worsening mental health:

I think it’s dangerous for trans people’s mental health to have to explain and justify to the extent that they’re expecting of who they are. Can you imagine asking the same amount of questions that gender clinics ask to a cisgender person to get them to justify and explain why they are cisgender?
 
"When I kept hammering nails into my hands, doctors asked all sorts of questions that they would never ask of people that don't hammer nails into their hands. This is discrimination against us Nailers".

EDIT: no, I don't know either how you could hammer nails into your hands. I have to admit I didn't think through this metaphor very hard.
 
Última edición:
AssignedEva dijo:
Not directly linked to Mermaids, but similar in concept, a new paper in The International Journal of Transgender Health:
“The worst thing I’ve ever experienced” – comparing experiences of affirmative and non-affirmative healthcare provision for trans adolescents in the UK
The results section contains a lot of direct quotes from interviewees.
Presiona para expandir...
I've read through the article, there's something that I don't understand about the clinic. Here's a quote from a patient that kinda explains my problem here.
"Two years into my experience there they were like okay we think you are transgender. I was like, no darlings, I’ve come here because I am transgender….(the clinicians declared) ‘we deem you a woman’. And I was like, what?… Every session they were like, "How do you feel in terms of gender?… It was so difficult cos they just asked the same question over and over again."

I don't understand why a non affirming clinic would approach patients in this way. As far as I see it, the actual problem these kids have is body dysmorphia. And the clinic should try to find the best outcome for handling that dysmorphia and give them the best quality of life, whether that be therapy, hormone blockers, whatever. This article gives the impression that the doctors at this clinic were interrogating these patients to see if they were "really trans", and like, what does that even mean? If someone transitioned and then detransition, were they really trans? I don't understand why that comes into the equation at all, why is a non affirming clinic trying to figure out if patients are "really trans"?
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo