- Registrado
- 20 de Dic, 2019
Scrivener's errors are disregarded, if you request leave to amend on those grounds you're going to get some funny looks.
4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC and LOLCOW, LLC, d/b/a KIWI FARMS, Plaintiffs, v. THE UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, a/k/a OFCOM
- Iniciador del tema WelperHelper99
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC v. UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS 1:25-cv-02880 — District Court, District of Columbia
-
- Docket No.
- 1:25-cv-02880
-
- Court
- District Court, District of Columbia
-
- Filed
- 26 de Ago, 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
-
- Cause
- 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- 15 de Ene, 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, LOLCOW, LLC, 4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 31)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 15 de Ene, 2026 | REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 01/16/2026) | 1 2 |
| — | 1 de Ene, 2026 | ||
| — | 1 de Ene, 2026 | Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 1/19/2026. (tj) | |
| — | 31 de Dic, 2025 | ||
| — | 31 de Dic, 2025 | MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 19, 2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/1/2026. (lcrc2) |
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2022
why doesn't ofcom tell it's domestic isps to block 4chan and kiwifarms like it does with pirate iptv sites? is the OSA on a different statutory level compared to copyright/piracy laws?
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Because they don't give a shit about their citizens being exposed to it, they want to control the entire Internet, despite being weak cucks who can't do shit about anything.
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
OFCOM uses the fact that Elon Musk happily allows Grok to create nonconsensual child pornography involving real children as an excuse as to why all American communications should be regulated by the British Parliament. Musk has repeatedly praised Grok's nonconsensual undressing capabilities.
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2022
can grok even make porn?
- Registrado
- 16 de Mar, 2022
Since the current controversy I'm aware of is that grok is used to put girls into bikinis, so they hid the Reply tab of Grok, I sincerely doubt so.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Thanks
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2024
Get Elon in on the lawsuit. Make him pay all the bills.
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
Grok can take images of real girls (minor ones too) and put them in hair thin bikinis. I don't want to know if it can go a step further still.
Unknown God
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 19 de Abr, 2025
They could easily do that but they specifically do not want to. They want to intimidate people all over the world to comply with their orders voluntarily, so they don't take on any of the cost or blame. They are faggots and treating them with utmost disrespect is the only correct course of action.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Someone posted some examples. One of them (an adult) was basically in a completely transparent "dress" and was basically porn.
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
I really think things like that should not be allowed to be done to real people.
- Registrado
- 12 de Nov, 2019
Yes , only thing it can't do yet is make a videos like SORA.
It's all Archived by gork.
Musk reallllly should just said end year the new tos starts not 13th of Jan.
Tldr: this is not including the goon cash of female images that happened around new years with gork.
...
For proof
Última edición:
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
Allegedly people already saw CSAM being made by Grok.
Notably the person is complaining that Grok unclothed her and the person (feminist tranny?) is not a minor. Take this specific tweet with a grain of salt
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
Crosspost:
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
UK gov also officially commented.
(https://archive.is/QOj4Q)
It seems UK is going full in to exploit the opening Musk gave them. And to think, all of this could be avoided if Musk didn't want to jerk off to nude 14 year olds.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 12 de Dic, 2022
I'm so glad Elon isn't in this lawsuit. Holy shit
Useful_Mistake
Fire Nation sympathizer
Miembro del personal
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mayo, 2020
KF lawyer to OFCOM
This appears to be regarding Sanctioned Suicide which was one of the parties that decided to not join the litigation.
Additional Emails
This appears to be regarding Sanctioned Suicide which was one of the parties that decided to not join the litigation.
Additional Emails
- Registrado
- 12 de Dic, 2022
Read this on Xitter. Apparently IP blocking isn't enough anymore and they want SaSu dead. Disturbing