US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Every time I hear people talk about the Somali government fraud thing, they always preface everything by saying "I'm sure there are some fine people from the Somali community". Nope, they're shitbag people from a shithole country that's literally torn itself apart through inbreeding and infighting. They contribute nothing and do nothing for society as a whole but live off the rest of us. Trump is 100% right, and I want ALL of them the fuck gone. If that makes me a racist, then so be it. I no longer fucking care.
You’re a racist no matter what you do.
 
I am here to take advantage of the trump's golden ticket idea and erode the value of American citizenship, identity, heritage and history.

How may I help.
Look at the retarded Canadian talking about shit he doesn't understand. i already sperged about it in the other A&N thread, but long story short:
>1 mil + fees upfront to get a green card
>EB5 has done the same thing for ages except you just need to present an investment plan, not even needing to pay upfront, which is obviously much more vulnerable to exploitation.
>Corporate version is 2mil + 15k per employee, with an annual 1% fee. Getting the i-485 after that takes some months and is tied to your employment so it can't be a turnstile of rotating hires to save those 2mil. To save in comparison to an h1b you would need to wait until your employee can get the paperwork done and then use those 2mil + transfer fee+ new background check for a new employee. Which would not be very efficient time wise or money wise.
 
The Indiana Senate (full of faggots) are voting tomorrow for R+9 map.
Happen to be knowledgeable of one of the districts affected by this. Just a bit of info for those not familiar with state voting habits. Indiana is a solid red state. For Presidential elections, Indiana has gone blue twice in the past 80 years. (LBJ and Obama 1) State elections are no different. Easy double digit margins. If there is one thing you can be sure of, Indiana is gonna go red.

For reference here's the map:

1765424762184.png

Currently District 1 and District 7 go Blue. Lets focus on 7 for now. New proposal is completely butchering District 7 (the capital, Indianapolis). splits it into four sections, with District 4, 7, 6, 9. In case anyone isn't aware, the only thing in Indiana outside of the capital is Corn, God, and Meth. So every district is basically a huge ass chuck of nothing with a small corner of the capital. Gives the Republicans an easy win. They also do some manuvering around Bloomington because Indiana University and its horrifying institute dedicated to the pedophile Alfred Kinsey is located there.

Now to district 1, way up north. District 1 is completely opposite of the rest of the state. Very consistently blue. So why is District 1 the only other blue portion of the state? Part of it is the steel mills in the area and their unions. The other is Chicago.

The majority of Lake County (district 1) is an hour drive from Downtown Chicago. Its very common for people to commute to Chicago up north, and come back to Indiana for the cheaper living. The area use to be nice towns with a strong catholic community. But over time, the area built up. Businesses popped up, subdivisions got built and now theres no room for anything. Worse yet, the "city" came.

Anyone in Lake county learns as a child to not go to the southside of Chicago. Its a bad area with a bunch of niggers shooting each other. Unfortunetally the niggers in the southside of Chicago breed like animals, and spread further south. And they slowly consumed everything in their wake. It took some time, but they broke through into Indiana.

Now town that use to be fine, have become dumps. Hammond, Whiting, Merrillville all have become garbage ridden shitholes with shootings. Here is the demographics for Hammond, a large city just by the border of Illinois

1765427488720.png

District 1 is experiencing a massive white flight. These Mexicans and niggers come into these town playing their loud music, throwing trash everywhere, and having as many kids as possible to spread their "culture". It a disease. The women get knocked up 4 or 5 times, lies about not knowing who the father is, and lives off of food stamps. The kids are always loud and misbehaved since there is no father figure in the family. Literal monkeys. And this is all acceptable to them because its in their culture.

So district 1 is taking a huge chunk of rural Indiana and combining it with this invading force. And I say GOOD. These Niggers do not represent the hardworking white people of Indiana. They do not deserve their own district. They need to go back to their shithole southside of Chicago. Back to the community they created. Fix your own problems and stay out of Indiana.
 
I think you nailed it. Charlie was just a normie. That's what freaked everyone out and united the right for a brief moment. Unfortunately it's been spent on bickering and useless squabbles. It is not good Nick or Candace are gaining clout. They have always been grifters on the fringe. They aren't supposed to be mainstream, but here we are and it's bad
I've mentioned this before, but it remains prescient. When GamerGate was really going and their standard tactics (e.g., ban us, call us nazis, tell everyone we were just the fringe and real people actually supported them not us, etc) were failing, one thing they tried to get us to do as a very blatant op was "declare a leader."

Ethan Ralph. They wanted us to pick fucking Ethan Ralph as the "leader of GamerGate."

The idea was blatantly obvious. We'd pick a "leader," they'd make him an inflection point, and shatter the movement over his gunt, based on if you hated/loved/couldn't care less about the gunt. A bit of trolls to get the two sides in fighting, and GamerGate would be no more.

They tried the same thing with EVS and ComicsGate. They successfully split SadPuppies into two groups to dilute their influence to nothing. I'd argue Ann Coulter's entire career was being an artificial wedge personality so they could break what passed for the far right over her jaw a few decades ago. I've heard people say they did the same thing with the Tea Party and the Libertarian party, and the UK does it with say, Tommy Robinson.

That's why Fuentes and Owens are being pushed out on stage by people suddenly platforming them when a year ago if you said anything to the right of Stalin you were blacklisted from all media outlets. Put the movement on Fuentes or Owens' backs, then break it in half based on if you support or don't support them, and then you can ignore the now balkanized movement.
 
Trying to not be racist makes you pedantic and condescending
It's not you, sweetie--it's your systemic biases that prevent you from ever truly understanding the plight of the oppressed class unless you're literally beaten into a state of submission (psychologically) and made to accept that everything you knew and lived by was actually evil counter-revolutionary. Now come and help us push the world towards the painted backdrop that our ideological betters have said is the ideal state of humanity and isn't just concealing a bottomless pit.
 
Última edición:
Racism is back on the menu, boys (not applicable at Cinnabon).

CNN: Trump is upping the xenophobia (archive) (lite)
Analysis by Aaron Blake, CNN
Wed December 10, 2025

President Donald Trump finally admitted Tuesday night that he referred to some countries, including heavily Black ones, as “shithole countries” back in 2018.

The first striking thing about that is that he’s effectively admitting that he and some prominent Republicans were extremely dishonest about the episode.

Trump claimed at the time that “this was not the language used.” A pair of GOP senators who were present at the closed-door meeting where he reportedly made the comment said they didn’t recall him using such language. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas said Trump offered no such sentiment. Then-Sen. David Perdue of Georgia said Trump did not use that word and called it a “gross misrepresentation.”

It’s not exactly news that Trump lies, but it is something to see him basically admit to a lie and to throw some allies who had vouched for him (and volunteered their own credibility) under the bus. And that should not get lost here.

(Neither the offices of Cotton nor Perdue, who now serves as Trump’s ambassador to China, responded to a request for comment.)

But perhaps the more significant point in all of this is what it says about Trump’s second term.

When he was reported to have said this during his first term, it was an international incident and even drew some harsh responses from Republicans.

But this week, during remarks in Pennsylvania when he confirmed he said it – and layered it with even more xenophobia – it was just a Tuesday.

Indeed, Republicans and others seem to have largely given up on policing Trump’s xenophobic rhetoric, and he is now, perhaps not coincidentally, dispatching it much more liberally.

As with much of the president’s agenda, things that were shocking in the first term are commonplace and seemingly unremarkable today. He has pushed the envelope just that far. The frog has been boiled.

Trump didn’t just confirm the “shithole countries” remark Tuesday night. (The context was about taking fewer immigrants from countries like Somalia and Haiti and more from countries like Norway, Sweden and Demark, which happen to be among the Whitest countries in the world.) He also unleashed a torrent of even uglier remarks.

He called Somalia “filthy, dirty, disgusting, ridden with crime.” He referred to Rep. Ilhan Omar’s headscarf as a “little turban” and encouraged the crowd to chant “send her back” to Somalia.

And all of this came just a week after Trump called Somalis “garbage” and said he didn’t want them in the United States.

These episodes both carry echoes of his first term, but they were treated much differently back then, including by Trump.

For instance, when Trump in 2019 suggested that members of the so-called Democratic “Squad” like Omar should “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came,” it was widely condemned by Republicans. Some even called it racist.

Just days later, when Trump’s supporters did the “send her back” chant about Omar, Trump claimed he disagreed with it. He tried to suggest he wasn’t actually advocating for sending these members back, just making a friendly suggestion.

But this week, he egged on those chants, punctuating his Omar diatribe by saying, “She should get the hell out. Throw her the hell out.”

A big difference is the way the GOP has responded. Back in Trump’s first term, while Cotton and Perdue did the president a solid on “shithole countries,” other Republicans didn’t toe the line.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, for example, obliquely confirmed the remark at the time and signaled that he had reprimanded Trump for it in real time. Sen. Tim Scott, South Carolina’s other senator and the only Black Republican in the Senate, said that if accurate, “the comment is incredibly disappointing.” More than 20 Republican senators expressed disappointment, to one extent or another.

When a CNN reporter back then pressed Trump on the remarks at a later event, Trump declared, “I want [immigrants] to come in from everywhere.”

Now, he’s not even pretending that’s true anymore. Trump’s not just referring to “shithole” countries; he’s proposing a ban on immigration from all “Third World countries” in the wake of a shooting in Washington, DC, that killed one National Guard member and critically wounded another.

It’s a shift even from the 2024 campaign. When comedian Tony Hinchcliffe called Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage” at a Trump rally late in the race, the Trump campaign distanced itself. Now the president is openly calling countries he doesn’t like “garbage.”

And perhaps the most telling aspect of the GOP’s evolution on this involves Vice President JD Vance.

Long before he was Trump’s vice presidential pick, Vance was a Trump-skeptical Republican. And one of his biggest issues with Trump was – or at least seemed to be – how he talked about immigrants.

“Trump makes people I care about afraid. Immigrants, Muslims, etc.,” Vance posted on Twitter in 2016. “Because of this I find him reprehensible. God wants better of us.”

By late in the 2024 campaign, though, Vance played a leading role in spreading baseless claims about Haitian migrants eating pets, even while freely admitting the stories might not be true. Some local Republicans objected, but the party was largely silent in the heat of the campaign.

And last week, as Trump engaged in arguably his ugliest comments yet – at least before Tuesday night – about sending “garbage” immigrants back to their countries, Vance banged on the table in apparent approval.
 
That's why Fuentes and Owens are being pushed out on stage by people suddenly platforming them when a year ago if you said anything to the right of Stalin you were blacklisted from all media outlets. Put the movement on Fuentes or Owens' backs, then break it in half based on if you support or don't support them, and then you can ignore the now balkanized movement.

I like this point.

Nick got a boost from kanye, and it was a clear set up to get him next to trump.

But the peir morgan thing is just weird because nick made the right call and stood by his slurs. His "its all true" to peirs totally put him a loop

"What do you mean its all true?"....."well your old!" ...."your a virgin" I m still in shock that we basically got a rubber glue grade school shit.

My other thought is that the deep state doesnt have the media cordination they had before so its just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

Going on a tangent here but I wonder if the left/deep state doesnt realize that the human trafficing to loot the treasury and bring in votes, has a destabilizing effect which is how trump gets maga support.

If they stopped importing the unwashed masses, didnt shit on white people, then they would be better set to run the deep state.
 
My other thought is that the deep state doesnt have the media cordination they had before so it’s just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.
They don’t have nearly as much elite human capital as they did at their peak. Competent, vaguely sane Anglo-Saxon/Jewish men have either aged out or been purged from the deep state/ZOG/TPTB’s power structures. What’s left? A bunch of brown, shrieking harpies? Do you think they can run a global empire?
 
I like this point.

Nick got a boost from kanye, and it was a clear set up to get him next to trump.

But the peir morgan thing is just weird because nick made the right call and stood by his slurs. His "its all true" to peirs totally put him a loop

"What do you mean its all true?"....."well your old!" ...."your a virgin" I m still in shock that we basically got a rubber glue grade school shit.

My other thought is that the deep state doesnt have the media cordination they had before so its just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

Going on a tangent here but I wonder if the left/deep state doesnt realize that the human trafficing to loot the treasury and bring in votes, has a destabilizing effect which is how trump gets maga support.

If they stopped importing the unwashed masses, didnt shit on white people, then they would be better set to run the deep state.
Their tactics have always been to call the opposition racist/sexist/islamophobic/homophobic or something like that. But a good chunk of millennials, and even greater parts of younger generations don't really care anymore. They'll either not care about whatever ism or just double down, leaving more media pundits and leftards (in media) without any comeback and looking worse off.

They don’t have nearly as much elite human capital as they did at their peak. Competent, vaguely sane Anglo-Saxon/Jewish men have either aged out or been purged from the deep state/ZOG/TPTB’s power structures. What’s left? A bunch of brown, shrieking harpies? Do you think they can run a global empire?

This too, even if they can get fresh "competent" minds they have been so throroghly indoctrinated by academia that they can't form any articulate and convincing works/propagando or relate to the average person.
 
I've mentioned this before, but it remains prescient. When GamerGate was really going and their standard tactics (e.g., ban us, call us nazis, tell everyone we were just the fringe and real people actually supported them not us, etc) were failing, one thing they tried to get us to do as a very blatant op was "declare a leader."

Ethan Ralph. They wanted us to pick fucking Ethan Ralph as the "leader of GamerGate."

The idea was blatantly obvious. We'd pick a "leader," they'd make him an inflection point, and shatter the movement over his gunt, based on if you hated/loved/couldn't care less about the gunt. A bit of trolls to get the two sides in fighting, and GamerGate would be no more.

They tried the same thing with EVS and ComicsGate. They successfully split SadPuppies into two groups to dilute their influence to nothing. I'd argue Ann Coulter's entire career was being an artificial wedge personality so they could break what passed for the far right over her jaw a few decades ago. I've heard people say they did the same thing with the Tea Party and the Libertarian party, and the UK does it with say, Tommy Robinson.

That's why Fuentes and Owens are being pushed out on stage by people suddenly platforming them when a year ago if you said anything to the right of Stalin you were blacklisted from all media outlets. Put the movement on Fuentes or Owens' backs, then break it in half based on if you support or don't support them, and then you can ignore the now balkanized movement.
None of this would have happened if people was more racist. Taking a nigger seriously, really? and not just a nigger but a WOMAN!? insanity! the homosexual rapist is one thing but this is getting ridiculous.
 
Hahaha. This motherfucker really is going to serve up an ol' "US backed regime change in South America" like it's the 1900's, isn't he. Fuck man. It doesn't repeat, but history sure does fuckin rhyme.
Yeah, there's gonna be boot on the ground by the weekend, just like Iran. Fucktard
 
Nick got a boost from kanye, and it was a clear set up to get him next to trump.

But the peir morgan thing is just weird because nick made the right call and stood by his slurs. His "its all true" to peirs totally put him a loop

"What do you mean its all true?"....."well your old!" ...."your a virgin" I m still in shock that we basically got a rubber glue grade school shit.
Nick handled Piers way too easily, i hate nick and his band of weird groupies, but he put on a master class of how to deal with people like him. Own it, double down, and refuse to concede an inch. His rise over the past 3-4 months has been something crazy to see.
 
Nick handled Piers way too easily, i hate nick and his band of weird groupies, but he put on a master class of how to deal with people like him. Own it, double down, and refuse to concede an inch. His rise over the past 3-4 months has been something crazy to see.
The left can't meme because memes require a kernel of truth and allowing the viewer to come to an obvious conclusion that you may lead them towards, but don't actually state outright. Leftist communication works the other way around -- here is the conclusion, and here is the paragraph of presuppositions you are required to hold presented as paragraphs of text, lets talk about the whys and never question the hows.

When you reject the conclusion outright, the presuppositions don't have anything to make purchase on, and you get, well, how Piers reacted. There was a similar video a while back of a woman going "well I guess I'm racist then" and the leftist host had no idea how to proceed. You could argue this is also what Kirk was doing on campuses.

Piers's clear conclusion he was expecting Nick to accept was something like "Racism is bad" or "Any negative opinion on a nonwhite is racism is bad" and Nick defied that conclusion, so Piers had nothing to work with.

Usually online the reaction is something akin to "here's a bunch of appeals to authority articles defining the presuppositions come back when you understand basic facts it's not my job to educate you [read: make you accept the conclusion], blocked/banned"

The fun thing is the left does this all on an instinctive level. This is because they're demoralized, trained to use critical marxist thought as early as when they're "taught" to "read." They literally can't think outside of this box -- conclusion first, presuppositions leading you to the conclusion, then you can have a discussion about the ramifications of the conclusion or presuppositions. You are never, EVER, allowed to question the conclusion, because they have defined the conclusion as an absolute moral good.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo